Skip to main content

Analytics That Matter - For APM-Generated Big Data

“Big Data” is everywhere. What does it mean? Just as Cloud Computing bursted onto the scene a few years ago, it depends on whom you ask.

Traditionally, in the Business Intelligence (BI) world, Big Data included analyzing historical business data from large data warehouses with the purpose of identifying long-term trends that could be leveraged in consumer business strategies. In recent years, Big Data has been a term talked about in the IT industry as an application of technology to attack extremely large, unstructured data sets that can reside both within and outside of an organization. If you look at a recent definition of Big Data, it is a term applied to data sets whose size has grown beyond the capability of commonly used software tools to capture, manage and analyze within a tolerable period of times for different use cases.

Application Performance Management (APM) is an extremely relevant use case and has a developing “Big Data” problem. Several factors are contributing to the explosive growth and type of data that must be analyzed and/or correlated in application performance monitoring and business service management (BSM).

First, the number of components that make up today’s mission critical applications has exploded. Instead of hundreds of servers for an application, nowadays, because of virtualization, you can easily be talking about thousands of virtual servers and objects for web applications.

Secondly, the diversity of data that people want to analyze to provide a holistic perspective has increased drastically. It is no longer good enough to simply understand traditional IT infrastructure performance based on server operating system, network traffic, and storage capacity. Application Performance analysis is now based on the relationships of IT infrastructure components, application performance metrics from applications and application servers, business activity monitors (BAM) data, customer experience monitors (CEM) and Real-User Monitoring (RUM). In addition to the aggregated transactional data, there are new systems that capture transactions’ actual path encompassing the entire application stack.

Finally, the requirements for analysis speed and data granularity have also increased significantly. Mission critical application performance now requires real-time or near real-time data analysis. When we were doing server availability and performance monitoring 10 years ago, it was the norm to collect and analyze data every 15 minutes.  Today, this has evolved to data analysis every 5 minutes or less with sub-minute data collection where all transaction paths are collected for data analysis. When mapped out, it's easy to see the enormous growth particularly when you look at APM related storage requirements that are quickly growing from gigabytes to terabytes and tomorrow petabytes.

Where APM and Big Data Meet the Cloud

All this data requires extremely complex analysis and correlation in order to truly understand performance of critical applications.

One of Netuitive’s large enterprise customers reported that it monitors and correlates a billion infrastructure and application data points and business metrics daily as part of its global service delivery. This is what I am referring to as APM-generated Big Data.

In addition to the shear number of data points, IT operators are expected to provide real-time analysis to the business and long-term storage for post-mortem analysis, capacity planning and compliance.

So where does this lead us? This is where APM and Big Data meet the Cloud. The cloud can deliver cheaper and more flexible storage and computing power crucial to analytics for Big Data. It also has the capability to be much more elastic for your APM data storage and analytics needs. Organizations can actually think about storing years of collected and aggregated APM data for compliance and analysis purposes without the cost being prohibitive.

But what does this mean to vendors in the APM space? 

First of all, the analytics platform for APM data has to evolve to be able to process the growing number of different data sources across business, customer experience, applications and IT domains. Netuitives’ “Open” analytics platform is engineered to address virtually any data source in real-time.

Secondly, data storage and access time will be critical even as APM data volumes continue to explode, so not only does the technology need to be able to run in the cloud, but the traditional pull-based data collection architecture has to evolve into a push based model with an horizontally scalable computing and storage architecture in order to become virtually limitless in terms of scalability. This is critical for larger organizations as “real” time no longer means analysis every 5 to 15 minutes, but sub-minute analytics.

Lastly, because storage and computing costs should not significantly exceed the cost of analytics software for a solution to be viable, Netuitive is advancing its product architecture to leverage NoSQL columnar data store as a replacement to traditional database.

While our R&D challenges are complex, the goal is simple: provide APM Analytics that matter by enabling our enterprise customers to process billions of infrastructure, application, and business metrics from hundreds of thousands of managed elements at 10x less cost than existing infrastructures.

ABOUT Jean-François Huard

Jean-François Huard is Chief Technical Officer and Vice President of Research and Development at Netuitive, Inc. In this role he is responsible for leading the company’s vision and technology innovation effort.

Previously, Huard was Chief Network Architect and Vice President of Network Engineering at InvisibleHand Networks, a start-up company funded by Polaris Venture Partners. Earlier, he led the technology team at Xbind, Inc. Earlier in his career, Huard worked in network fault management at AT&T Bell Labs, and was a member of the research staff at the Center for Telecommunications Research.

Jean-François contributed to the definition of the international MPEG-4 standard, and was chair and technical editor of the IEEE P1520.2 working group. He has authored or co-authored many scientific papers published in technical journals and conferences, standard contributions, and has filed multiple patents.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

The gap is widening between what teams spend on observability tools and the value they receive amid surging data volumes and budget pressures, according to The Breaking Point for Observability Leaders, a report from Imply ...

Analytics That Matter - For APM-Generated Big Data

“Big Data” is everywhere. What does it mean? Just as Cloud Computing bursted onto the scene a few years ago, it depends on whom you ask.

Traditionally, in the Business Intelligence (BI) world, Big Data included analyzing historical business data from large data warehouses with the purpose of identifying long-term trends that could be leveraged in consumer business strategies. In recent years, Big Data has been a term talked about in the IT industry as an application of technology to attack extremely large, unstructured data sets that can reside both within and outside of an organization. If you look at a recent definition of Big Data, it is a term applied to data sets whose size has grown beyond the capability of commonly used software tools to capture, manage and analyze within a tolerable period of times for different use cases.

Application Performance Management (APM) is an extremely relevant use case and has a developing “Big Data” problem. Several factors are contributing to the explosive growth and type of data that must be analyzed and/or correlated in application performance monitoring and business service management (BSM).

First, the number of components that make up today’s mission critical applications has exploded. Instead of hundreds of servers for an application, nowadays, because of virtualization, you can easily be talking about thousands of virtual servers and objects for web applications.

Secondly, the diversity of data that people want to analyze to provide a holistic perspective has increased drastically. It is no longer good enough to simply understand traditional IT infrastructure performance based on server operating system, network traffic, and storage capacity. Application Performance analysis is now based on the relationships of IT infrastructure components, application performance metrics from applications and application servers, business activity monitors (BAM) data, customer experience monitors (CEM) and Real-User Monitoring (RUM). In addition to the aggregated transactional data, there are new systems that capture transactions’ actual path encompassing the entire application stack.

Finally, the requirements for analysis speed and data granularity have also increased significantly. Mission critical application performance now requires real-time or near real-time data analysis. When we were doing server availability and performance monitoring 10 years ago, it was the norm to collect and analyze data every 15 minutes.  Today, this has evolved to data analysis every 5 minutes or less with sub-minute data collection where all transaction paths are collected for data analysis. When mapped out, it's easy to see the enormous growth particularly when you look at APM related storage requirements that are quickly growing from gigabytes to terabytes and tomorrow petabytes.

Where APM and Big Data Meet the Cloud

All this data requires extremely complex analysis and correlation in order to truly understand performance of critical applications.

One of Netuitive’s large enterprise customers reported that it monitors and correlates a billion infrastructure and application data points and business metrics daily as part of its global service delivery. This is what I am referring to as APM-generated Big Data.

In addition to the shear number of data points, IT operators are expected to provide real-time analysis to the business and long-term storage for post-mortem analysis, capacity planning and compliance.

So where does this lead us? This is where APM and Big Data meet the Cloud. The cloud can deliver cheaper and more flexible storage and computing power crucial to analytics for Big Data. It also has the capability to be much more elastic for your APM data storage and analytics needs. Organizations can actually think about storing years of collected and aggregated APM data for compliance and analysis purposes without the cost being prohibitive.

But what does this mean to vendors in the APM space? 

First of all, the analytics platform for APM data has to evolve to be able to process the growing number of different data sources across business, customer experience, applications and IT domains. Netuitives’ “Open” analytics platform is engineered to address virtually any data source in real-time.

Secondly, data storage and access time will be critical even as APM data volumes continue to explode, so not only does the technology need to be able to run in the cloud, but the traditional pull-based data collection architecture has to evolve into a push based model with an horizontally scalable computing and storage architecture in order to become virtually limitless in terms of scalability. This is critical for larger organizations as “real” time no longer means analysis every 5 to 15 minutes, but sub-minute analytics.

Lastly, because storage and computing costs should not significantly exceed the cost of analytics software for a solution to be viable, Netuitive is advancing its product architecture to leverage NoSQL columnar data store as a replacement to traditional database.

While our R&D challenges are complex, the goal is simple: provide APM Analytics that matter by enabling our enterprise customers to process billions of infrastructure, application, and business metrics from hundreds of thousands of managed elements at 10x less cost than existing infrastructures.

ABOUT Jean-François Huard

Jean-François Huard is Chief Technical Officer and Vice President of Research and Development at Netuitive, Inc. In this role he is responsible for leading the company’s vision and technology innovation effort.

Previously, Huard was Chief Network Architect and Vice President of Network Engineering at InvisibleHand Networks, a start-up company funded by Polaris Venture Partners. Earlier, he led the technology team at Xbind, Inc. Earlier in his career, Huard worked in network fault management at AT&T Bell Labs, and was a member of the research staff at the Center for Telecommunications Research.

Jean-François contributed to the definition of the international MPEG-4 standard, and was chair and technical editor of the IEEE P1520.2 working group. He has authored or co-authored many scientific papers published in technical journals and conferences, standard contributions, and has filed multiple patents.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

The gap is widening between what teams spend on observability tools and the value they receive amid surging data volumes and budget pressures, according to The Breaking Point for Observability Leaders, a report from Imply ...