APIs and CD: Rekindling Interest in APM - Part 1
April 26, 2016

Julie Craig
EMA

Share this

I last researched the topic of Application Performance Management (APM) back in 2013 with a report entitled Application Performance Management (APM) in the Age of Hybrid Cloud. Hybrid cloud was then, and still is, an important topic. One key finding garnered from that research, however, was the fact that the term "hybrid cloud" is defined differently by virtually every vendor and IT organization.

For vendors, "hybrid cloud" solutions seem to be most frequently defined as "whatever cloud-related products we're trying to sell." On the IT side, the term "hybrid cloud" is most often defined as "whatever types of cloud services we're trying to integrate." Regardless, while hybrid cloud is still a topic of lively discussion on multiple fronts, I decided to let the dust settle for a bit and turn my attention to other important topic areas in 2014 and 2015.

For 2014, the focus areas were management of public cloud and DevOps/Continuous Delivery. In 2015, the topics included API management and DevOps/Continuous Delivery (again — a lot of interest and business value here). However, another very interesting outcome came out of the process of doing deep dives into a variety of seemingly unrelated topic areas: As is often the case, findings in one topic area always seem to contain breadcrumbs that generate questions relating to adjacent spaces.

The API research, for example, uncovered the fact that transactions leveraging APIs are more often managed from the perspective of the API Gateway (45% of respondents) than with APM solutions (32%). In essence, the Gateway has become another monitoring silo, which IT organizations are utilizing in standalone mode to track transaction performance and availability.

So at a time when software is becoming increasingly business relevant, IT teams are, in too many cases, retreating to the silo monitoring techniques of the past to track and troubleshoot application performance. This may well be due to the fact that they lack access to APM solutions. Nevertheless, as is always the case with silo-based monitoring, the problem is that monitoring the gateway alone results in too many gaps in visibility to efficiently automate end-to-end troubleshooting and root cause analysis.

The DevOps and Continuous Delivery studies uncovered APM-related breadcrumbs as well. The 2015 research, for example, found that while Continuous Delivery has a proven upside to the business, it is also siphoning both Dev and Ops resources away from the development and delivery processes and into production support.

Specifically, companies in which "Continuous Delivery" frequency increased by 10% or more during the prior year were 2.5 times more likely to experience double-digit revenue growth than their less nimble competitors. In other good news for the business, almost 50% of survey respondents reported that the increase in delivery frequency resulted in "higher levels of customer satisfaction."

At the same time and on the opposite end of the spectrum, the impact on IT is not as rosy. Approximately 50% of respondents reported that development is being drawn into the troubleshooting process more often; a similar percentage reported that operations is spending more time on production support as well. The culprit seems to be the increased production change volumes introduced by accelerated Agile and Continuous Delivery practices.

Survey respondents also point to "manual troubleshooting processes arising from production changes" as the #1 bottleneck slowing down the Continuous Delivery pipeline. So while acceleration of the Continuous Delivery process has a strong impact on the business bottom line, increased time spent on production support is reducing the time Dev and Ops teams can actually spend rolling out new services.

These findings point to a need for "smart" APM solutions. For more, Read APIs and CD: Rekindling Interest in APM - Part 2.

Julie Craig is Research Director for Application Management at Enterprise Management Associates (EMA)
Share this

The Latest

June 23, 2022

Digital businesses don't invest in monitoring for monitoring's sake. They do it to make the business run better. Every dollar spent on observability — every hour your team spends using monitoring tools or responding to what they reveal — should tie back directly to business outcomes: conversions, revenues, brand equity. If they don't? You might be missing the forest for the trees ...

June 22, 2022

Every day, companies are missing customer experience (CX) "red flags" because they don't have the tools to observe CX processes or metrics. Even basic errors or defects in automated customer interactions are left undetected for days, weeks or months, leading to widespread customer dissatisfaction. In fact, poor CX and digital technology investments are costing enterprises billions of dollars in lost potential revenue ...

June 21, 2022

Organizations are moving to microservices and cloud native architectures at an increasing pace. The primary incentive for these transformation projects is typically to increase the agility and velocity of software release and product innovation. These dynamic systems, however, are far more complex to manage and monitor, and they generate far higher data volumes ...

June 16, 2022

Global IT teams adapted to remote work in 2021, resolving employee tickets 23% faster than the year before as overall resolution time for IT tickets went down by 7 hours, according to the Freshservice Service Management Benchmark Report from Freshworks ...

June 15, 2022

Once upon a time data lived in the data center. Now data lives everywhere. All this signals the need for a new approach to data management, a next-gen solution ...

June 14, 2022

Findings from the 2022 State of Edge Messaging Report from Ably and Coleman Parkes Research show that most organizations (65%) that have built edge messaging capabilities in house have experienced an outage or significant downtime in the last 12-18 months. Most of the current in-house real-time messaging services aren't cutting it ...

June 13, 2022
Today's users want a complete digital experience when dealing with a software product or system. They are not content with the page load speeds or features alone but want the software to perform optimally in an omnichannel environment comprising multiple platforms, browsers, devices, and networks. This calls into question the role of load testing services to check whether the given software under testing can perform optimally when subjected to peak load ...
June 09, 2022

Networks need to be up and running for businesses to continue operating and sustaining customer-facing services. Streamlining and automating network administration tasks enable routine business processes to continue without disruption, eliminating any network downtime caused by human error or other system flaws ...

June 08, 2022

Enterprises have had access to various Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) tools for quite a few years, to guide in their project selection and execution lifecycle. Yet, in spite of the digital evolution of management software, many organizations still fail to construct an effective PPM plan or utilize cutting-edge management tools ...

June 07, 2022

It has become increasingly difficult for DevOps and SRE teams to minimize the impact of issues and ensure high-quality end-user experiences. In this blog, I'm going to propose a new approach to support real-time use cases — edge observability — that enables you to detect issues as they occur and resolve them in minutes ...