Do you know how much your slow computer applications are affecting productivity and costing you?
Knowing the answer to this question is vital to the business in our current financial turmoil where everybody is asking to save costs and justify their existence. Its importance runs through the organization; for C-level executives, better productivity means more profits, for department managers that rely on IT to deliver their function it means better staff morale, and for CIO's it shows how they add value.
To run a department you need vital information such as costs and sick days as they affect productivity. Surely it is worth knowing how the computer application is affecting productivity, staff and departmental targets?
This is the true value of Application Performance Monitoring (APM). The trouble is the market rarely communicates the business value of APM. Typically, the focus is on the nuts and bolts, pitching at the technician. APM is much more than that. Managers who sit outside of IT need to know how it can reduce costs, drive productivity and motivate staff. Only then can informed decisions about the adoption of APM be made.
The Typical Message
The latest trend among Managed Service Providers is to monitor applications, networks and servers. There are reams of information on APM and a host of providers who provide 3D graphs, rev counters and Batcave style lights designed to alert and confuse. Among this information, it is very hard to find how the business benefits from APM.
A quick web browse gives a handful of benefits. None of them really help the business; these Googled benefits merely make life a bit easier for the IT department.
- Deliver business services
- Capture transaction performance data from problem sources
- Accelerate troubleshooting and remediation
This is fine for technicians; but what about the Finance Director who needs to authorize the purchase? How does the service delivery manager benefit from APM? What about the Chief Executive?
APM – What it Really Does
APM is about understanding production, knowing your limits and thresholds and maximizing output. Productivity increases and processes improve with the added boon of making staff feel better as you address the daily niggles that wear them down. It answers two important questions:
1. How much is this application costing me?
2. How much money can I save making the application work better
Application performance Management can save you money eliminating waste and making your staff more productive. Cheaper, more productive staff increase production. One of the side effects of APM is the boost to morale – not only is there an active interest in the day-to-day problems of the users but user experience also improves. So, application performance management saves you money, makes you more productive and keeps the workers happy.
How Does it Save You Money?
A London council saved £300k by increasing service output and delivering a better service to residents. Money was being spent on temporary staff to help cope with the backlog and workflow. We identified through APM how to avoid this cost and deliver a better service. Here is what happened:
Due to government cuts, The Head of a government department was under increased pressure to find cost savings. The IT system was the best place to start as it was under-performing and regularly crashing, affecting staff morale and creating a backlog. Starting quickly was important: this is one of the biggest parking departments in London.
Quadnet demonstrated that a £200K (US$315K) saving could be made by reduced staffing levels if the system problems could be fixed. Quadnet then pinpointed the problem, drove the changes and held the right team accountable for fixing it.
The actual result was far better than expected. So far, this customer has saved £300,000 (almost US$500,000).
The right amount of temporary staff were cut without harming production or the delivery of front line services. In fact, service delivery continued to improve, even without the temporary staff.
This scenario is far more common than may be expected. A survey of government departments showed that most users are unhappy with their problem applications:
- 70% of users find their applications slow and unresponsive
- 80% experienced problems with their application
- 40% are frustrated and do not bother with repeat helpdesk calls to fix the situation.
How Much Will You Save?
If you know there is a regular application problem, then it is quite easy to calculate how much it is costing you.
(Downtime/day x Average hourly rate) X (No. of staff) X (250 work days) = Saving
APM will provide an accurate figure for your savings, probably highlighting problems you were unaware of. APM will also show you how the application can improve and then prove the saving has been delivered after the event. It is a valuable tool for maximizing production and helping you determine and demonstrate future IT investments.
Is Application Performance Management something you can afford to ignore?
About Edward Chaput de Saintonge
Edward Chaput de Saintonge is the marketer at Quadnet Services, London. He has spent the last two years developing and implementing managed services marketing campaigns that offer a fresh perspective in to the monitoring industry. Prior to joining Quadnet Services, Edward was at Computacenter focusing on public sector new business. He is a graduate of the University of Leeds, spending a year studying at Capital Normal University, Beijing. Edward speaks Chinese and Italian and is an aspiring chef.
APMdigest and leading IT research firm Enterprise Management Associates (EMA) are partnering to bring you the EMA-APMdigest Podcast, a new podcast focused on the latest technologies impacting IT Operations. In Episode 2 - Part 1 Pete Goldin, Editor and Publisher of APMdigest, discusses Network Observability with Shamus McGillicuddy, Vice President of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA ...
CIOs have stepped into the role of digital leader and strategic advisor, according to the 2023 Global CIO Survey from Logicalis ...
Synthetic monitoring is crucial to deploy code with confidence as catching bugs with E2E tests on staging is becoming increasingly difficult. It isn't trivial to provide realistic staging systems, especially because today's apps are intertwined with many third-party APIs ...
Recent EMA field research found that ServiceOps is either an active effort or a formal initiative in 78% of the organizations represented by a global panel of 400+ IT leaders. It is relatively early but gaining momentum across industries and organizations of all sizes globally ...
Managing availability and performance within SAP environments has long been a challenge for IT teams. But as IT environments grow more complex and dynamic, and the speed of innovation in almost every industry continues to accelerate, this situation is becoming a whole lot worse ...
Harnessing the power of network-derived intelligence and insights is critical in detecting today's increasingly sophisticated security threats across hybrid and multi-cloud infrastructure, according to a new research study from IDC ...
Recent research suggests that many organizations are paying for more software than they need. If organizations are looking to reduce IT spend, leaders should take a closer look at the tools being offered to employees, as not all software is essential ...
Organizations are challenged by tool sprawl and data source overload, according to the Grafana Labs Observability Survey 2023, with 52% of respondents reporting that their companies use 6 or more observability tools, including 11% that use 16 or more.
An array of tools purport to maintain availability — the trick is sorting through the noise to find the right one. Let us discuss why availability is so important and then unpack the ROI of deploying Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) during an economic downturn ...
Development teams so often find themselves rushing to get a release out on time. When it comes time for testing, the software works fine in the lab. But, when it's released, customers report a bunch of bugs. How does this happen? Why weren't the flaws found in QA? ...