Skip to main content

APM – The Unknown Quantity

What does Application Performance Management really offer the business?

Do you know how much your slow computer applications are affecting productivity and costing you?

Knowing the answer to this question is vital to the business in our current financial turmoil where everybody is asking to save costs and justify their existence. Its importance runs through the organization; for C-level executives, better productivity means more profits, for department managers that rely on IT to deliver their function it means better staff morale, and for CIO's it shows how they add value.

To run a department you need vital information such as costs and sick days as they affect productivity. Surely it is worth knowing how the computer application is affecting productivity, staff and departmental targets?

This is the true value of Application Performance Monitoring (APM). The trouble is the market rarely communicates the business value of APM. Typically, the focus is on the nuts and bolts, pitching at the technician. APM is much more than that. Managers who sit outside of IT need to know how it can reduce costs, drive productivity and motivate staff. Only then can informed decisions about the adoption of APM be made.

The Typical Message

The latest trend among Managed Service Providers is to monitor applications, networks and servers. There are reams of information on APM and a host of providers who provide 3D graphs, rev counters and Batcave style lights designed to alert and confuse. Among this information, it is very hard to find how the business benefits from APM.

A quick web browse gives a handful of benefits. None of them really help the business; these Googled benefits merely make life a bit easier for the IT department.

- Deliver business services

- Capture transaction performance data from problem sources

- Accelerate troubleshooting and remediation

This is fine for technicians; but what about the Finance Director who needs to authorize the purchase? How does the service delivery manager benefit from APM? What about the Chief Executive?

APM – What it Really Does

APM is about understanding production, knowing your limits and thresholds and maximizing output. Productivity increases and processes improve with the added boon of making staff feel better as you address the daily niggles that wear them down. It answers two important questions:

1. How much is this application costing me?

2. How much money can I save making the application work better

Application performance Management can save you money eliminating waste and making your staff more productive. Cheaper, more productive staff increase production. One of the side effects of APM is the boost to morale – not only is there an active interest in the day-to-day problems of the users but user experience also improves. So, application performance management saves you money, makes you more productive and keeps the workers happy.

How Does it Save You Money?

A London council saved £300k by increasing service output and delivering a better service to residents. Money was being spent on temporary staff to help cope with the backlog and workflow. We identified through APM how to avoid this cost and deliver a better service. Here is what happened:

Due to government cuts, The Head of a government department was under increased pressure to find cost savings. The IT system was the best place to start as it was under-performing and regularly crashing, affecting staff morale and creating a backlog. Starting quickly was important: this is one of the biggest parking departments in London.

Quadnet demonstrated that a £200K (US$315K) saving could be made by reduced staffing levels if the system problems could be fixed. Quadnet then pinpointed the problem, drove the changes and held the right team accountable for fixing it.

The actual result was far better than expected. So far, this customer has saved £300,000 (almost US$500,000).

The right amount of temporary staff were cut without harming production or the delivery of front line services. In fact, service delivery continued to improve, even without the temporary staff.

This scenario is far more common than may be expected. A survey of government departments showed that most users are unhappy with their problem applications:

- 70% of users find their applications slow and unresponsive

- 80% experienced problems with their application

- 40% are frustrated and do not bother with repeat helpdesk calls to fix the situation.

How Much Will You Save?

If you know there is a regular application problem, then it is quite easy to calculate how much it is costing you.

(Downtime/day x Average hourly rate) X (No. of staff) X (250 work days) = Saving

APM will provide an accurate figure for your savings, probably highlighting problems you were unaware of. APM will also show you how the application can improve and then prove the saving has been delivered after the event. It is a valuable tool for maximizing production and helping you determine and demonstrate future IT investments.

Is Application Performance Management something you can afford to ignore?

About Edward Chaput de Saintonge

Edward Chaput de Saintonge is the marketer at Quadnet Services, London. He has spent the last two years developing and implementing managed services marketing campaigns that offer a fresh perspective in to the monitoring industry. Prior to joining Quadnet Services, Edward was at Computacenter focusing on public sector new business. He is a graduate of the University of Leeds, spending a year studying at Capital Normal University, Beijing. Edward speaks Chinese and Italian and is an aspiring chef.

Related Links:

www.quadnet.co.uk/

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

APM – The Unknown Quantity

What does Application Performance Management really offer the business?

Do you know how much your slow computer applications are affecting productivity and costing you?

Knowing the answer to this question is vital to the business in our current financial turmoil where everybody is asking to save costs and justify their existence. Its importance runs through the organization; for C-level executives, better productivity means more profits, for department managers that rely on IT to deliver their function it means better staff morale, and for CIO's it shows how they add value.

To run a department you need vital information such as costs and sick days as they affect productivity. Surely it is worth knowing how the computer application is affecting productivity, staff and departmental targets?

This is the true value of Application Performance Monitoring (APM). The trouble is the market rarely communicates the business value of APM. Typically, the focus is on the nuts and bolts, pitching at the technician. APM is much more than that. Managers who sit outside of IT need to know how it can reduce costs, drive productivity and motivate staff. Only then can informed decisions about the adoption of APM be made.

The Typical Message

The latest trend among Managed Service Providers is to monitor applications, networks and servers. There are reams of information on APM and a host of providers who provide 3D graphs, rev counters and Batcave style lights designed to alert and confuse. Among this information, it is very hard to find how the business benefits from APM.

A quick web browse gives a handful of benefits. None of them really help the business; these Googled benefits merely make life a bit easier for the IT department.

- Deliver business services

- Capture transaction performance data from problem sources

- Accelerate troubleshooting and remediation

This is fine for technicians; but what about the Finance Director who needs to authorize the purchase? How does the service delivery manager benefit from APM? What about the Chief Executive?

APM – What it Really Does

APM is about understanding production, knowing your limits and thresholds and maximizing output. Productivity increases and processes improve with the added boon of making staff feel better as you address the daily niggles that wear them down. It answers two important questions:

1. How much is this application costing me?

2. How much money can I save making the application work better

Application performance Management can save you money eliminating waste and making your staff more productive. Cheaper, more productive staff increase production. One of the side effects of APM is the boost to morale – not only is there an active interest in the day-to-day problems of the users but user experience also improves. So, application performance management saves you money, makes you more productive and keeps the workers happy.

How Does it Save You Money?

A London council saved £300k by increasing service output and delivering a better service to residents. Money was being spent on temporary staff to help cope with the backlog and workflow. We identified through APM how to avoid this cost and deliver a better service. Here is what happened:

Due to government cuts, The Head of a government department was under increased pressure to find cost savings. The IT system was the best place to start as it was under-performing and regularly crashing, affecting staff morale and creating a backlog. Starting quickly was important: this is one of the biggest parking departments in London.

Quadnet demonstrated that a £200K (US$315K) saving could be made by reduced staffing levels if the system problems could be fixed. Quadnet then pinpointed the problem, drove the changes and held the right team accountable for fixing it.

The actual result was far better than expected. So far, this customer has saved £300,000 (almost US$500,000).

The right amount of temporary staff were cut without harming production or the delivery of front line services. In fact, service delivery continued to improve, even without the temporary staff.

This scenario is far more common than may be expected. A survey of government departments showed that most users are unhappy with their problem applications:

- 70% of users find their applications slow and unresponsive

- 80% experienced problems with their application

- 40% are frustrated and do not bother with repeat helpdesk calls to fix the situation.

How Much Will You Save?

If you know there is a regular application problem, then it is quite easy to calculate how much it is costing you.

(Downtime/day x Average hourly rate) X (No. of staff) X (250 work days) = Saving

APM will provide an accurate figure for your savings, probably highlighting problems you were unaware of. APM will also show you how the application can improve and then prove the saving has been delivered after the event. It is a valuable tool for maximizing production and helping you determine and demonstrate future IT investments.

Is Application Performance Management something you can afford to ignore?

About Edward Chaput de Saintonge

Edward Chaput de Saintonge is the marketer at Quadnet Services, London. He has spent the last two years developing and implementing managed services marketing campaigns that offer a fresh perspective in to the monitoring industry. Prior to joining Quadnet Services, Edward was at Computacenter focusing on public sector new business. He is a graduate of the University of Leeds, spending a year studying at Capital Normal University, Beijing. Edward speaks Chinese and Italian and is an aspiring chef.

Related Links:

www.quadnet.co.uk/

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.