Skip to main content

APM Tools and High-Availability Clusters: A Powerful Combination for Network Resiliency

Cassius Rhue
SIOS Technology

Network resilience, defined as the ability of a network to maintain connectivity and functional continuity in the event of disruption, is an operational imperative for technology dependent enterprises. Recent analysis by Siemens found that an hour of downtime can run into the millions, disrupting production, violating service level agreements (SLAs), preventing transactions, and running up large bills for staff overtime and outside consultants to restore service, run post-mortem analyses, and pay steep fines.

For some industries, like financial services, the effects of poor network resilience can be contagious. Global economies depend on financial services organizations with reliable, efficient IT infrastructure to facilitate trillions of dollars of commercial transactions each year, so the perception of network fragility can upset entire markets. That's why banking regulators like the Basel Committee and the US Federal Reserve require high standards for achieving network resilience. Likewise, because of their critical role in public safety, organizations operating in industries like healthcare, critical infrastructure, and telecommunications all have mandates to adopt practices designed to achieve high levels of network resilience.

Resilient Organizations Are Smart Organizations

IT infrastructure (on-premises, cloud, or hybrid) is becoming larger and more complex. IT management tools need data to drive better decision making and more process automation to complement manual intervention by IT staff. That is why smart organizations invest in the systems and strategies needed to make their IT infrastructure more resilient in the event of disruption, and why many are turning to application performance monitoring (APM) in conjunction with high availability (HA) clusters.

APM tools are well-positioned as a means of feeding better data into the platforms enterprises use to monitor and manage IT infrastructure. Data provided by APM provides a more precise understanding of system health, enabling IT management to establish more precise parameters for making decisions with the confidence of good, timely data. High availability clusters are either hardware (SAN-based clusters) or software (SANless clusters) that support seamless failover of services to backup resources in the event of an incident.

A Powerful Combination

The combination of APM and HA makes it easier for enterprises to improve network resiliency by supporting and injecting better decision making and the use of automation to enable seamless failover, predictive analytics, self-healing, and other capabilities consistent with maximizing network performance, uptime, and operational resilience. When used in a multi-cloud environment, services can failover to the organization's secondary cloud provider, which is a major advantage when an outage affects a cloud services provider. And in a multi-cloud environment resilience is further boosted by distributing workloads between clouds and eliminating a single source of failure.

As some enterprises evolve toward autonomous IT, data provided by APM provides a more precise understanding of system health, enabling IT management to establish more precise parameters for making decisions with confidence. This can help avoid an unnecessary dilemma in cases when the consequences of intervening to shut down one system, even if it is to switch to a backup system, could cost thousands of dollars.

Data-Based Decision Making

Consider a situation where the person responsible for a critical decision to failover to avoid a possible incident calculates that it may cost the organization more than $50,000 to manually intervene, even if the cost of waiting for an actual, catastrophic crash might be considerably higher. In that case, the decision maker may feel it would be better to blame something else rather than be questioned for making a gut decision or a good-faith judgment call. Better data means those involved have a clearer understanding of the situation and if they have to manually intervene, they can do so with hard evidence to justify their decision.

Here's where the one-two punch of APM tools and HA clusters helps by making it easier to maintain service continuity even when poor system performance, an incident, or a disaster threatens to disrupt operations. By giving IT managers a clear understanding of the health of the network and its components, operators can see exactly what's happening and take measures in advance of an incident or crisis to avert downtime. When failover is required, the reasoning is supported by data within the context of parameters established dictated by the organization's risk tolerance. Gray areas are eliminated.

Consider the Advantages

When integrated with an enterprise's APM tools, HA clusters provide network resilience by ensuring failover of mission-critical services and application is automatic and seamless, minimizing delays and errors that can occur during manual intervention and ensuring operations continue until the incident is resolved. Today, more organizations are opting for SANless clusters because they function the same as traditional SAN clusters but at a lower cost and without taxing network resources like SAN-based hardware. SANless clusters have the flexibility to work in on-premises, cloud, or hybrid infrastructure, and enable node configurations that support geographically distributed data centers, which is important for disaster planning.

Whether your organization operates in an industry where network resilience is mandated, or if you are looking for a way to differentiate by improving reliability, consider the advantages of teaming your APM solution with high availability clusters. Together they offer a smart, simple, and cost-effective way to keep pace with expectations for network resiliency.

Cassius Rhue is VP of Customer Experience at SIOS Technology

Hot Topics

The Latest

Application performance monitoring (APM) is a game of catching up — building dashboards, setting thresholds, tuning alerts, and manually correlating metrics to root causes. In the early days, this straightforward model worked as applications were simpler, stacks more predictable, and telemetry was manageable. Today, the landscape has shifted, and more assertive tools are needed ...

Cloud adoption has accelerated, but backup strategies haven't always kept pace. Many organizations continue to rely on backup strategies that were either lifted directly from on-prem environments or use cloud-native tools in limited, DR-focused ways ... Eon uncovered a handful of critical gaps regarding how organizations approach cloud backup. To capture these prevailing winds, we gathered insights from 150+ IT and cloud leaders at the recent Google Cloud Next conference, which we've compiled into the 2025 State of Cloud Data Backup ...

Private clouds are no longer playing catch-up, and public clouds are no longer the default as organizations recalibrate their cloud strategies, according to the Private Cloud Outlook 2025 report from Broadcom. More than half (53%) of survey respondents say private cloud is their top priority for deploying new workloads over the next three years, while 69% are considering workload repatriation from public to private cloud, with one-third having already done so ...

As organizations chase productivity gains from generative AI, teams are overwhelmingly focused on improving delivery speed (45%) over enhancing software quality (13%), according to the Quality Transformation Report from Tricentis ...

Back in March of this year ... MongoDB's stock price took a serious tumble ... In my opinion, it reflects a deeper structural issue in enterprise software economics altogether — vendor lock-in ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 15, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses Do-It-Yourself Network Automation ... 

Zero-day vulnerabilities — security flaws that are exploited before developers even know they exist — pose one of the greatest risks to modern organizations. Recently, such vulnerabilities have been discovered in well-known VPN systems like Ivanti and Fortinet, highlighting just how outdated these legacy technologies have become in defending against fast-evolving cyber threats ... To protect digital assets and remote workers in today's environment, companies need more than patchwork solutions. They need architecture that is secure by design ...

Traditional observability requires users to leap across different platforms or tools for metrics, logs, or traces and related issues manually, which is very time-consuming, so as to reasonably ascertain the root cause. Observability 2.0 fixes this by unifying all telemetry data, logs, metrics, and traces into a single, context-rich pipeline that flows into one smart platform. But this is far from just having a bunch of additional data; this data is actionable, predictive, and tied to revenue realization ...

64% of enterprise networking teams use internally developed software or scripts for network automation, but 61% of those teams spend six or more hours per week debugging and maintaining them, according to From Scripts to Platforms: Why Homegrown Tools Dominate Network Automation and How Vendors Can Help, my latest EMA report ...

Cloud computing has transformed how we build and scale software, but it has also quietly introduced one of the most persistent challenges in modern IT: cost visibility and control ... So why, after more than a decade of cloud adoption, are cloud costs still spiraling out of control? The answer lies not in tooling but in culture ...

APM Tools and High-Availability Clusters: A Powerful Combination for Network Resiliency

Cassius Rhue
SIOS Technology

Network resilience, defined as the ability of a network to maintain connectivity and functional continuity in the event of disruption, is an operational imperative for technology dependent enterprises. Recent analysis by Siemens found that an hour of downtime can run into the millions, disrupting production, violating service level agreements (SLAs), preventing transactions, and running up large bills for staff overtime and outside consultants to restore service, run post-mortem analyses, and pay steep fines.

For some industries, like financial services, the effects of poor network resilience can be contagious. Global economies depend on financial services organizations with reliable, efficient IT infrastructure to facilitate trillions of dollars of commercial transactions each year, so the perception of network fragility can upset entire markets. That's why banking regulators like the Basel Committee and the US Federal Reserve require high standards for achieving network resilience. Likewise, because of their critical role in public safety, organizations operating in industries like healthcare, critical infrastructure, and telecommunications all have mandates to adopt practices designed to achieve high levels of network resilience.

Resilient Organizations Are Smart Organizations

IT infrastructure (on-premises, cloud, or hybrid) is becoming larger and more complex. IT management tools need data to drive better decision making and more process automation to complement manual intervention by IT staff. That is why smart organizations invest in the systems and strategies needed to make their IT infrastructure more resilient in the event of disruption, and why many are turning to application performance monitoring (APM) in conjunction with high availability (HA) clusters.

APM tools are well-positioned as a means of feeding better data into the platforms enterprises use to monitor and manage IT infrastructure. Data provided by APM provides a more precise understanding of system health, enabling IT management to establish more precise parameters for making decisions with the confidence of good, timely data. High availability clusters are either hardware (SAN-based clusters) or software (SANless clusters) that support seamless failover of services to backup resources in the event of an incident.

A Powerful Combination

The combination of APM and HA makes it easier for enterprises to improve network resiliency by supporting and injecting better decision making and the use of automation to enable seamless failover, predictive analytics, self-healing, and other capabilities consistent with maximizing network performance, uptime, and operational resilience. When used in a multi-cloud environment, services can failover to the organization's secondary cloud provider, which is a major advantage when an outage affects a cloud services provider. And in a multi-cloud environment resilience is further boosted by distributing workloads between clouds and eliminating a single source of failure.

As some enterprises evolve toward autonomous IT, data provided by APM provides a more precise understanding of system health, enabling IT management to establish more precise parameters for making decisions with confidence. This can help avoid an unnecessary dilemma in cases when the consequences of intervening to shut down one system, even if it is to switch to a backup system, could cost thousands of dollars.

Data-Based Decision Making

Consider a situation where the person responsible for a critical decision to failover to avoid a possible incident calculates that it may cost the organization more than $50,000 to manually intervene, even if the cost of waiting for an actual, catastrophic crash might be considerably higher. In that case, the decision maker may feel it would be better to blame something else rather than be questioned for making a gut decision or a good-faith judgment call. Better data means those involved have a clearer understanding of the situation and if they have to manually intervene, they can do so with hard evidence to justify their decision.

Here's where the one-two punch of APM tools and HA clusters helps by making it easier to maintain service continuity even when poor system performance, an incident, or a disaster threatens to disrupt operations. By giving IT managers a clear understanding of the health of the network and its components, operators can see exactly what's happening and take measures in advance of an incident or crisis to avert downtime. When failover is required, the reasoning is supported by data within the context of parameters established dictated by the organization's risk tolerance. Gray areas are eliminated.

Consider the Advantages

When integrated with an enterprise's APM tools, HA clusters provide network resilience by ensuring failover of mission-critical services and application is automatic and seamless, minimizing delays and errors that can occur during manual intervention and ensuring operations continue until the incident is resolved. Today, more organizations are opting for SANless clusters because they function the same as traditional SAN clusters but at a lower cost and without taxing network resources like SAN-based hardware. SANless clusters have the flexibility to work in on-premises, cloud, or hybrid infrastructure, and enable node configurations that support geographically distributed data centers, which is important for disaster planning.

Whether your organization operates in an industry where network resilience is mandated, or if you are looking for a way to differentiate by improving reliability, consider the advantages of teaming your APM solution with high availability clusters. Together they offer a smart, simple, and cost-effective way to keep pace with expectations for network resiliency.

Cassius Rhue is VP of Customer Experience at SIOS Technology

Hot Topics

The Latest

Application performance monitoring (APM) is a game of catching up — building dashboards, setting thresholds, tuning alerts, and manually correlating metrics to root causes. In the early days, this straightforward model worked as applications were simpler, stacks more predictable, and telemetry was manageable. Today, the landscape has shifted, and more assertive tools are needed ...

Cloud adoption has accelerated, but backup strategies haven't always kept pace. Many organizations continue to rely on backup strategies that were either lifted directly from on-prem environments or use cloud-native tools in limited, DR-focused ways ... Eon uncovered a handful of critical gaps regarding how organizations approach cloud backup. To capture these prevailing winds, we gathered insights from 150+ IT and cloud leaders at the recent Google Cloud Next conference, which we've compiled into the 2025 State of Cloud Data Backup ...

Private clouds are no longer playing catch-up, and public clouds are no longer the default as organizations recalibrate their cloud strategies, according to the Private Cloud Outlook 2025 report from Broadcom. More than half (53%) of survey respondents say private cloud is their top priority for deploying new workloads over the next three years, while 69% are considering workload repatriation from public to private cloud, with one-third having already done so ...

As organizations chase productivity gains from generative AI, teams are overwhelmingly focused on improving delivery speed (45%) over enhancing software quality (13%), according to the Quality Transformation Report from Tricentis ...

Back in March of this year ... MongoDB's stock price took a serious tumble ... In my opinion, it reflects a deeper structural issue in enterprise software economics altogether — vendor lock-in ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 15, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses Do-It-Yourself Network Automation ... 

Zero-day vulnerabilities — security flaws that are exploited before developers even know they exist — pose one of the greatest risks to modern organizations. Recently, such vulnerabilities have been discovered in well-known VPN systems like Ivanti and Fortinet, highlighting just how outdated these legacy technologies have become in defending against fast-evolving cyber threats ... To protect digital assets and remote workers in today's environment, companies need more than patchwork solutions. They need architecture that is secure by design ...

Traditional observability requires users to leap across different platforms or tools for metrics, logs, or traces and related issues manually, which is very time-consuming, so as to reasonably ascertain the root cause. Observability 2.0 fixes this by unifying all telemetry data, logs, metrics, and traces into a single, context-rich pipeline that flows into one smart platform. But this is far from just having a bunch of additional data; this data is actionable, predictive, and tied to revenue realization ...

64% of enterprise networking teams use internally developed software or scripts for network automation, but 61% of those teams spend six or more hours per week debugging and maintaining them, according to From Scripts to Platforms: Why Homegrown Tools Dominate Network Automation and How Vendors Can Help, my latest EMA report ...

Cloud computing has transformed how we build and scale software, but it has also quietly introduced one of the most persistent challenges in modern IT: cost visibility and control ... So why, after more than a decade of cloud adoption, are cloud costs still spiraling out of control? The answer lies not in tooling but in culture ...