AppDynamics announced major enhancements to its End-User Monitoring capabilities as part of its new Winter ’16 Release.
The release introduces user sessions support for both Mobile and Browser Real-User Monitoring, providing a unified, seamless view of a user’s start-to-finish sequence of interactions, enabling enterprises to trace the digital user journey and correlate user actions — such as Web page views and mobile screen views — to application performance, conversion success, and other business metrics. Also part of the release is new Browser Synthetic Monitoring, now generally available, which enables proactive website monitoring to help ensure baseline performance and availability, establish competitive benchmarks, and monitor third-party content performance.
With these enhancements, enterprises now have a comprehensive, real-time view of end-user experience — fully integrated with the performance of the applications, databases and supporting services, all in a single pane of glass — as well as consistent benchmarking of performance independent of real-user load.
User sessions tracks and captures a user’s entire journey on a website or mobile app from the start until a configurable period of inactivity, or start-to-finish of a transaction sequence. Sessions can be viewed for individual users or a class of users. Sessions data is invaluable for understanding funnel dynamics, tracking conversion and bounce rates, and seeing where in the sequence users had issues or disengaged. Performance issues, health violations, and their causes are captured throughout a session, and the correlation with business impact can be captured especially in conjunction with AppDynamics Application Analytics.
“As companies embark on their digital transformation, it is absolutely critical to have an accurate, real-time view of every customer and their interactions with the applications,” said Kalyan Ramanathan, VP of Product Marketing for AppDynamics. “With user sessions, enterprises see in real time how their customers are proceeding through an entire transaction — whether it’s making a purchase, conducting a financial transaction, or navigating content — and the impacts of application performance on the success of that interaction become abundantly clear.”
The new AppDynamics user sessions capability provides the needed visibility with:
- End-to-end visualization of customer journey for both native mobile apps and websites, showing the sequence of user steps and the conversion funnel
- A single, integrated view of all the steps in a user session
- Identification of performance impact on funnel and conversion
- Issue identification and context to help streamline customer support
Also with the Winter ’16 Release, Browser Synthetic Monitoring moves out of beta and becomes generally available. It is a distributed, cloud-based, intelligent monitoring solution for programmatically monitoring website availability, functionality, and performance. It enables enterprises to proactively monitor and optimize their websites and Web applications from dozens of locations around the globe, using real web browsers, to proactively detect availability and performance issues so they can be solved before they impact actual users.
Built with the highly regarded, open-source WebPageTest technology, Browser Synthetic Monitoring eliminates the variability inherent in real-user monitoring, and provides accurate measurements for baselining performance, competitive benchmarking, and management of third-party content performance. In addition to reporting on availability, Browser Synthetic Monitoring can be scripted to measure a sequence of transactions simulating an actual user’s workflow, including entering forms data, log-in credentials, and actions to test and ensure application logic.
“Browser Synthetic Monitoring reports on browser performance in a consistent, rigorous fashion — without the variability inherent in real-user measurements, where you have different equipment, networks, etc.,” Ramanathan said. “And it’s the ideal way to benchmark competitors’ sites, to know whether you’re delivering the best experience for your customers, or if you have catching up to do.”
Because it is a cloud-based solution, enterprises can scale their synthetic monitoring up or down as needed, schedule measurement jobs flexibly anytime 24/7, and choose which of more than two dozen points of presence around the globe they want to measure and with which browsers. Measurements can also be set up to automatically re-test immediately on error, failure, or timeout to reduce or eliminate false positives for more intelligent alerting. There’s no need to wait for the next available window, by which time conditions may have changed. Browser Synthetic data can be viewed side-by-side with Browser and Mobile Real-User data in a single dashboard; Browser Synthetic Monitoring snapshots are also correlated with AppDynamics server-side APM for end-to-end traceability of issues.
“Browser Synthetic Monitoring is an indispensable tool for anyone running a website,” said Ian Withrow, Group Product Manager for AppDynamics End-User Monitoring. ”It’s the only real way to benchmark your competitors’ site performance. And it’s an accurate, consistent way to measure and manage third-party content performance to understand the impact third parties are having on your site, and to measure and manage performance for compliance with service-level agreements. Combined with our real-user monitoring solutions, it’s the most comprehensive picture you can get of performance at the point of interaction.”
The Latest
In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...
Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...
In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ...
Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...
Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...
Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...
The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...
The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...
In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...
AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.