Skip to main content

Big Data in Application and Cloud Performance - Why and How

Vikas Aggarwal

Always regarded as a non-critical part of day-to-day operations in the past, Big Data and its delayed analysis was relegated to batch processing tools and monthly meetings. Today, as the IT industry has snowballed into a fast moving avalanche of Cloud, virtualization, outsourcing and distributed computing, the science of extracting meaningful intelligent metrics from Big Data has become an important and real-time component of IT Operations.

Why Big Data in Cloud Performance Tools?

No longer do IT management systems work in vertical or horizontal isolation as just a few years ago. The inter-dependence between IT Services, applications, servers, cloud services and network infrastructure has a direct and measurable impact on Business Services.

The amount of data generated by these components is huge and the rate at which this data is generated is so fast that traditional tools cannot keep up with any kind of real time correlation. The combined volume of data generated by this hybrid infrastructure can be huge, but if it is correlated properly, it can give misson critical insight into:

- the response times and behavior of an IT service or application

- the cause of performance degradation of an IT service

- trend analysis and proactive capacity planning

- see if SLAs are being met for business services

This data has to be analyzed and processed in real-time in order to provide proactive responses and alerting for service degradation. The data that is being collected can be structured or unstructured, coming from a variety of systems which depend on each other to offer optimal performance, and has little to no obvious linkage or keys to one another (i.e. the data coming from an application is completely independent of the data coming from the network that it is running on).

Some examples of data sources that need to be correlated are application logs, netflow, JMX, XML, SNMP, WMI, security logs, packet analysis, business service response times, weather, news, etc.

Enterprises are moving to hybrid cloud environments at an alarming rate and all customer surveys indicate that the complexity of these platforms are their biggest concern. Enterprises must adopt monitoring systems that are flexible and can handle Big Data efficiently so that they can offer real-time responses to alarms and get meaningful business impact analysis from all of the different data sources.

Contextual analytics and presentation of data from multiple sources is invaluable to IT Operations in troubleshooting poor application performance and user satisfaction.

As a simple example, a user response time application could send an alert that the response time of an application is too high. Application Performance Monitoring (APM) data could indicate that a database is responding slowly to queries because the buffers are starved and the number of transactions is abnormally high. Integrating with network netflow or packet data would allow immediate drill down to isolate which client IP address is the source of the high number of queries.

How to Handle Big Data for Cloud Performance

Traditional monitoring or BI platforms are not designed to handle the volume and variety of data from this hybrid IT infrastructure. The management platforms need to be designed to correlate Big Data from the IT components in real-time and provide feedback to the operations team for proactive responses. As these monitoring systems evolve, their Big Data correlation components will become richer and more analytical and will position these enterprises for the IT environments of the future.

New generation enterprise monitoring solutions that are scalable, have predictive analytics, multi-tenant and a granular security model are now available from a small number of vendors. Single use systems that are designed for just network data or just application data are trapped within the same boundaries that makes Big Data meaningless - by its very nature, Big Data systems need to be able to handle a very wide variety of data sources to provide greater uptime from faster troubleshooting and lower OpEx from correlated analysis.

Vikas Aggarwal is CEO of Zyrion.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

Big Data in Application and Cloud Performance - Why and How

Vikas Aggarwal

Always regarded as a non-critical part of day-to-day operations in the past, Big Data and its delayed analysis was relegated to batch processing tools and monthly meetings. Today, as the IT industry has snowballed into a fast moving avalanche of Cloud, virtualization, outsourcing and distributed computing, the science of extracting meaningful intelligent metrics from Big Data has become an important and real-time component of IT Operations.

Why Big Data in Cloud Performance Tools?

No longer do IT management systems work in vertical or horizontal isolation as just a few years ago. The inter-dependence between IT Services, applications, servers, cloud services and network infrastructure has a direct and measurable impact on Business Services.

The amount of data generated by these components is huge and the rate at which this data is generated is so fast that traditional tools cannot keep up with any kind of real time correlation. The combined volume of data generated by this hybrid infrastructure can be huge, but if it is correlated properly, it can give misson critical insight into:

- the response times and behavior of an IT service or application

- the cause of performance degradation of an IT service

- trend analysis and proactive capacity planning

- see if SLAs are being met for business services

This data has to be analyzed and processed in real-time in order to provide proactive responses and alerting for service degradation. The data that is being collected can be structured or unstructured, coming from a variety of systems which depend on each other to offer optimal performance, and has little to no obvious linkage or keys to one another (i.e. the data coming from an application is completely independent of the data coming from the network that it is running on).

Some examples of data sources that need to be correlated are application logs, netflow, JMX, XML, SNMP, WMI, security logs, packet analysis, business service response times, weather, news, etc.

Enterprises are moving to hybrid cloud environments at an alarming rate and all customer surveys indicate that the complexity of these platforms are their biggest concern. Enterprises must adopt monitoring systems that are flexible and can handle Big Data efficiently so that they can offer real-time responses to alarms and get meaningful business impact analysis from all of the different data sources.

Contextual analytics and presentation of data from multiple sources is invaluable to IT Operations in troubleshooting poor application performance and user satisfaction.

As a simple example, a user response time application could send an alert that the response time of an application is too high. Application Performance Monitoring (APM) data could indicate that a database is responding slowly to queries because the buffers are starved and the number of transactions is abnormally high. Integrating with network netflow or packet data would allow immediate drill down to isolate which client IP address is the source of the high number of queries.

How to Handle Big Data for Cloud Performance

Traditional monitoring or BI platforms are not designed to handle the volume and variety of data from this hybrid IT infrastructure. The management platforms need to be designed to correlate Big Data from the IT components in real-time and provide feedback to the operations team for proactive responses. As these monitoring systems evolve, their Big Data correlation components will become richer and more analytical and will position these enterprises for the IT environments of the future.

New generation enterprise monitoring solutions that are scalable, have predictive analytics, multi-tenant and a granular security model are now available from a small number of vendors. Single use systems that are designed for just network data or just application data are trapped within the same boundaries that makes Big Data meaningless - by its very nature, Big Data systems need to be able to handle a very wide variety of data sources to provide greater uptime from faster troubleshooting and lower OpEx from correlated analysis.

Vikas Aggarwal is CEO of Zyrion.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...