The world saw an epic number of data breaches in 2015. Reports of large-scale hacking attacks stealing everything from government secrets to children's birthdays and toy profiles were splashed across the headlines. IT executives and their teams were left to ponder – would we be next? As leaders, we need to leverage the strengths of our security and operations teams to fight back.
BMC and Forbes Insights recently surveyed executives in North America and Europe to get their perspective on their organization's overall security health and to find out what issues are critical to address. The results revealed the need for a framework organizations can use to get a solid strategy in place for improved security and compliance.
The survey showed that 97% of executives expect an increase in breach attempts in the next 12 months and 44% of executives say breaches occur even when vulnerabilities and remediation techniques are already identified. These two statistics paint a sobering image – almost half of data breaches could have been prevented.
With the threat of attacks on the rise, what causes unimplemented remediation plans to sit on the shelf? Lack of visibility between groups, lack of automation and competing priorities between groups all contribute to the issue. These three factors combine to create the "SecOps Gap."
Inconsistent approaches, manual processes and no ability to identify a threat and track its status across the lifecycle are challenges commonly faced by most organizations, and they all contribute to the gap. To address this, companies must focus on three critical elements to ensure that their security and operations teams are aligned on objectives and share accountability for the security and compliance of the organization. The three elements are People, Process and Technology.
People
A strong people strategy is the heart of an effective change management initiative. Start with setting a consistent vision for the security and operations teams. They need to see that they are interdependent and have shared goals in regard to the overall security of the organization. They need to balance these goals together with the needs of the business to be agile and reliable.
Process
The processes need to be reviewed in light of the shared goals and objectives. Repetitive, manual workflows should be evaluated to see if they are candidates for automation. Handoffs between the organizations need to be tight and provide opportunities for feedback and learning.
Technology
Technology should be deployed to facilitate the coordination and collaboration between these organizations. It is vital to be deliberate and to make sure that the technology you choose is built to solve the complete problem and not just portions of it. Many organizations implement point solutions to address the problem which fall short of addressing the complete problem.
Solutions must also be able to scale to handle the demands and complexity of your enterprise. Of the survey respondents, 60% want tools for automating corrective actions and 59% want a centralized view into vulnerabilities and remediation actions.
With 60% of survey respondents stating IT operations and security teams have only a general understanding of each other's requirements, it's clear that the SecOps Gap needs to be quickly acknowledged and addressed.
Bill Berutti is President of the Cloud, Data Center and Performance Businesses at BMC.
The Latest
The 2024 State of the Data Center Report from CoreSite shows that although C-suite confidence in the economy remains high, a VUCA (volatile, uncertain, complex, ambiguous) environment has many business leaders proceeding with caution when it comes to their IT and data ecosystems, with an emphasis on cost control and predictability, flexibility and risk management ...
In June, New Relic published the State of Observability for Energy and Utilities Report to share insights, analysis, and data on the impact of full-stack observability software in energy and utilities organizations' service capabilities. Here are eight key takeaways from the report ...
The rapid rise of generative AI (GenAI) has caught everyone's attention, leaving many to wonder if the technology's impact will live up to the immense hype. A recent survey by Alteryx provides valuable insights into the current state of GenAI adoption, revealing a shift from inflated expectations to tangible value realization across enterprises ... Here are five key takeaways that underscore GenAI's progression from hype to real-world impact ...
As software development grows more intricate, the challenge for observability engineers tasked with ensuring optimal system performance becomes more daunting. Current methodologies are struggling to keep pace, with the annual Observability Pulse surveys indicating a rise in Mean Time to Remediation (MTTR). According to this survey, only a small fraction of organizations, around 10%, achieve full observability today. Generative AI, however, promises to significantly move the needle ...
While nearly all data leaders surveyed are building generative AI applications, most don't believe their data estate is actually prepared to support them, according to the State of Reliable AI report from Monte Carlo Data ...
Enterprises are putting a lot of effort into improving the digital employee experience (DEX), which has become essential to both improving organizational performance and attracting and retaining talented workers. But to date, most efforts to deliver outstanding DEX have focused on people working with laptops, PCs, or thin clients. Employees on the frontlines, using mobile devices to handle logistics ... have been largely overlooked ...
The average customer-facing incident takes nearly three hours to resolve (175 minutes) while the estimated cost of downtime is $4,537 per minute, meaning each incident can cost nearly $794,000, according to new research from PagerDuty ...
In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 8, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses AutoCon with the conference founders Scott Robohn and Chris Grundemann ...
Numerous vendors and service providers have recently embraced the NaaS concept, yet there is still no industry consensus on its definition or the types of networks it involves. Furthermore, providers have varied in how they define the NaaS service delivery model. I conducted research for a new report, Network as a Service: Understanding the Cloud Consumption Model in Networking, to refine the concept of NaaS and reduce buyer confusion over what it is and how it can offer value ...
