Skip to main content

Bringing Alert Management into the Present with Advanced Analytics

Kevin Conklin

We have smart cars on the horizon that will navigate themselves. Mobile apps that make communication, navigation and entertainment an integral part of our daily lives. Your insurance pricing may soon be affected by whether or not you wear a personal health monitoring device. Everywhere you turn, the very latest IT technologies are being leveraged to provide advanced services that were unimaginable even ten years ago. So why is it that the IT environments that provide these services are managed using an analytics technology designed for the 1970s?

The IT landscape has evolved significantly over the past few decades. IT management simply has not kept pace. IT operations teams are anxious that too many problems are reported first by end users. Support teams worry that too many people spend too much time troubleshooting. Over 70 percent of troubleshooting time is actually wasted following false hunches because alerts provide no value to the diagnostic process. Enterprises that are still reliant on yesterday’s management strategies will find it increasingly difficult to solve today’s operations and performance management challenges.

This is not just an issue of falling behind a technology curve. There is a real business impact in increasing incident rates, failing to detect potentially disastrous outages and human resources wasting valuable time. An increasing number of IT shops are anxiously searching for alternatives.

This is where advanced machine learning analytics can help.

Too often operations teams can become engulfed by alerts – getting tens of thousands a day and not knowing which to deal with and when, making it quite possible that something important was ignored while time was wasted on something trivial. Through a powerful combination of machine learning and anomaly detection, advanced analytics can reduce the alarms to a prioritized set that have the largest impact on the environment. By learning which alerts are “normal”, these systems define an operable status quo. In essence, machine learning filters out the “background noise” of alerts that, based on their persistence, have no effect on normal operations. From there, statistical algorithms identify and rank “abnormal” outliers on a scale measuring severity (value of a spike or drop occurrence), rarity (number of previous instances) or impact (quantity of related anomalies). The result is a reduction from hundreds of thousands of noisy alerts a week to a few dozen notifications of real problems.

Despite producing huge volumes of alerts, rules and thresholds implementations often miss problems or report them long after the customer has experienced the impact. The fear of generating even more alerts forces monitoring teams to select fewer KPIs, thus decreasing the likelihood of detection. Problems that slowly approach thresholds go unnoticed until user experience is already impacted. Adopting this advanced analytics approach empowers enterprises to not only identify problems that rules and thresholds miss or simply execute against too late, but also provide their troubleshooting teams with pre-correlated causal data.

By replacing legacy rules and thresholds with machine learning anomaly detection, IT teams can monitor larger sets of performance data in real-time. Monitoring more KPIs enable a higher percentage of issues to be detected before the users report them. Through real-time cross correlation, related anomalies are detected and alerts become more actionable. Early adopters report that they are able to reduce troubleshooting time by 75 percent, with commensurate reductions in the number of people involved by as much as 85 percent.

Advanced machine learning systems will fundamentally change the way data is converted into information over the next few years. If your business is leveraging information to provide competitive services, you can’t afford to be the laggard.

Hot Topics

The Latest

AI observability serves several roles across an organization. AI engineers use it to build, evaluate, and improve AI systems. SREs use it to operate those systems reliably and efficiently in production, including managing their cost. Leaders need it to connect AI behavior and operational performance to business outcomes. The common need is a clear understanding of whether AI systems are delivering the intended result ...

Part 4 outlines the challenges enterprise face when adopting AI observability. The main challenge is that AI complexity compounds at every stage of maturity. LLM-based applications introduce new behavior, dependencies, and quality considerations, while Agentic AI adds further failure modes as systems make decisions and take actions ...

Part 3 reports on the current state of AI observability. Most experts agree: enterprises are moving faster with AI than they are with the operational discipline needed to run it safely ...

When discussing AI Observability, one of the first questions that arises: Is this just an extension of traditional observability or is this a whole new type of tool? Part 2 compares traditional observability with AI observability ...

In this extensive 14-part series that will post over the next three weeks, experts across observability and AI will provide insight and opinions on the need for AI Observability, the challenges, the benefits, the current state, and predictions for the future ...

Amid rising complexity, organizations are moving quickly toward agent-driven operations: AgenticOps, according to The Impact of Agentic AI on Network Operations, a new report from Cisco ...

AI, automation, and enterprise software give organizations an extraordinary amount of leverage. Work that once required hours can happen in minutes. Information buried across systems can be analyzed almost instantly. Complex workflows can be coordinated across teams with far less manual intervention. That leverage creates a temptation to start with the technology ...

Everyone wants to talk about models. Compute clusters. Benchmark scores that climb a fraction of a point and make headlines anyway. It's an easy conversation to have because it's measurable. But it's also increasingly beside the point ...

For more than a decade, the default infrastructure play has been simple. Move more workloads to the cloud, retire on-premises gear and treat the data center as a cost to shrink. That logic held while public cloud offered near-limitless capacity at predictable prices, and AI demand is now testing both halves of that assumption ...

Most enterprise IT leaders can tell you exactly how many applications are running across their organization. They can surface a dashboard showing telecom spend by region, pull a report on SaaS license utilization, or call up a real-time view of mobile device inventory. The data is there, and IT leaders have largely delivered on the promise of visibility. Yet, in most organizations, that visibility has not translated into business value ...

Bringing Alert Management into the Present with Advanced Analytics

Kevin Conklin

We have smart cars on the horizon that will navigate themselves. Mobile apps that make communication, navigation and entertainment an integral part of our daily lives. Your insurance pricing may soon be affected by whether or not you wear a personal health monitoring device. Everywhere you turn, the very latest IT technologies are being leveraged to provide advanced services that were unimaginable even ten years ago. So why is it that the IT environments that provide these services are managed using an analytics technology designed for the 1970s?

The IT landscape has evolved significantly over the past few decades. IT management simply has not kept pace. IT operations teams are anxious that too many problems are reported first by end users. Support teams worry that too many people spend too much time troubleshooting. Over 70 percent of troubleshooting time is actually wasted following false hunches because alerts provide no value to the diagnostic process. Enterprises that are still reliant on yesterday’s management strategies will find it increasingly difficult to solve today’s operations and performance management challenges.

This is not just an issue of falling behind a technology curve. There is a real business impact in increasing incident rates, failing to detect potentially disastrous outages and human resources wasting valuable time. An increasing number of IT shops are anxiously searching for alternatives.

This is where advanced machine learning analytics can help.

Too often operations teams can become engulfed by alerts – getting tens of thousands a day and not knowing which to deal with and when, making it quite possible that something important was ignored while time was wasted on something trivial. Through a powerful combination of machine learning and anomaly detection, advanced analytics can reduce the alarms to a prioritized set that have the largest impact on the environment. By learning which alerts are “normal”, these systems define an operable status quo. In essence, machine learning filters out the “background noise” of alerts that, based on their persistence, have no effect on normal operations. From there, statistical algorithms identify and rank “abnormal” outliers on a scale measuring severity (value of a spike or drop occurrence), rarity (number of previous instances) or impact (quantity of related anomalies). The result is a reduction from hundreds of thousands of noisy alerts a week to a few dozen notifications of real problems.

Despite producing huge volumes of alerts, rules and thresholds implementations often miss problems or report them long after the customer has experienced the impact. The fear of generating even more alerts forces monitoring teams to select fewer KPIs, thus decreasing the likelihood of detection. Problems that slowly approach thresholds go unnoticed until user experience is already impacted. Adopting this advanced analytics approach empowers enterprises to not only identify problems that rules and thresholds miss or simply execute against too late, but also provide their troubleshooting teams with pre-correlated causal data.

By replacing legacy rules and thresholds with machine learning anomaly detection, IT teams can monitor larger sets of performance data in real-time. Monitoring more KPIs enable a higher percentage of issues to be detected before the users report them. Through real-time cross correlation, related anomalies are detected and alerts become more actionable. Early adopters report that they are able to reduce troubleshooting time by 75 percent, with commensurate reductions in the number of people involved by as much as 85 percent.

Advanced machine learning systems will fundamentally change the way data is converted into information over the next few years. If your business is leveraging information to provide competitive services, you can’t afford to be the laggard.

Hot Topics

The Latest

AI observability serves several roles across an organization. AI engineers use it to build, evaluate, and improve AI systems. SREs use it to operate those systems reliably and efficiently in production, including managing their cost. Leaders need it to connect AI behavior and operational performance to business outcomes. The common need is a clear understanding of whether AI systems are delivering the intended result ...

Part 4 outlines the challenges enterprise face when adopting AI observability. The main challenge is that AI complexity compounds at every stage of maturity. LLM-based applications introduce new behavior, dependencies, and quality considerations, while Agentic AI adds further failure modes as systems make decisions and take actions ...

Part 3 reports on the current state of AI observability. Most experts agree: enterprises are moving faster with AI than they are with the operational discipline needed to run it safely ...

When discussing AI Observability, one of the first questions that arises: Is this just an extension of traditional observability or is this a whole new type of tool? Part 2 compares traditional observability with AI observability ...

In this extensive 14-part series that will post over the next three weeks, experts across observability and AI will provide insight and opinions on the need for AI Observability, the challenges, the benefits, the current state, and predictions for the future ...

Amid rising complexity, organizations are moving quickly toward agent-driven operations: AgenticOps, according to The Impact of Agentic AI on Network Operations, a new report from Cisco ...

AI, automation, and enterprise software give organizations an extraordinary amount of leverage. Work that once required hours can happen in minutes. Information buried across systems can be analyzed almost instantly. Complex workflows can be coordinated across teams with far less manual intervention. That leverage creates a temptation to start with the technology ...

Everyone wants to talk about models. Compute clusters. Benchmark scores that climb a fraction of a point and make headlines anyway. It's an easy conversation to have because it's measurable. But it's also increasingly beside the point ...

For more than a decade, the default infrastructure play has been simple. Move more workloads to the cloud, retire on-premises gear and treat the data center as a cost to shrink. That logic held while public cloud offered near-limitless capacity at predictable prices, and AI demand is now testing both halves of that assumption ...

Most enterprise IT leaders can tell you exactly how many applications are running across their organization. They can surface a dashboard showing telecom spend by region, pull a report on SaaS license utilization, or call up a real-time view of mobile device inventory. The data is there, and IT leaders have largely delivered on the promise of visibility. Yet, in most organizations, that visibility has not translated into business value ...