Skip to main content

Building on BSM with an IT Performance System

Michael Procopio

For a VP of operations, the cloud, virtualization and mobile communications are making BSM harder than ever. Unfortunately your business customers don’t care. They just want your services to work when, where and how they want them. And they don’t want them to cost too much either.

But here’s the issue: while effective, the tried and true approach to BSM—focusing on monitoring and measuring end-user experience—doesn’t provide the type of insight that a VP of operations needs. Today’s IT environment is just too complex. You need higher-level insights that are possible with an IT performance system.

The Solution: Make BSM the Foundation of an IT Performance System

IT performance systems help tame IT complexity and allow you to stay true to your BSM objectives. They can offer comprehensive, real-time visibility into everything underpinning your business services. You can monitor not only the end-user experience (BSM), but the entire IT environment impacting and surrounding that service. That includes your network, infrastructure, applications and all network-edge devices—computers, smart phones, tablets, etc.

Building on your BSM capabilities with an IT performance system allows you to gain broader and deeper insights into your organization’s performance. For example, do you know which service has the most emergency RFCs? Or, which service costs you the most in the number of IT staff to support? These insights can help you work on IT as opposed to just in IT, proving your value to the business. An IT performance system gives IT leaders a method for systematically managing IT, while also providing the means to demonstrate IT’s value and contribution to the business. To be more specific, imagine an automated, dashboard-driven system that monitors your entire IT environment and provides real-time performance reports in the form of key performance indicators (KPIs).

You Can’t Manage What You Can’t Measure

Accurate, timely and meaningful KPIs are critical to making a performance system work. Without them there’s no way to measure how your organization is performing. From an IT leader’s perspective, this means understanding the overall health of an IT organization, revealed through KPIs like:

- cost reduction
- operations versus innovation investment
- business strategy alignment
- customer satisfaction
- percent of SLAs not met
- percent of “healthy” versus “unhealthy” projects
- average cost of IT service per customer

Key Capabilities in an IT Performance System

In order for an IT performance system to complement your current BSM efforts, it’s important that it have the right mix of core capabilities.

Comprehensive—an IT performance system needs to monitor and measure your entire IT environment, from the data center and network to your applications and mobile devices. And that includes all service-delivery models—on-premise, cloud and hybrid.

Digital and automated—to use performance information (KPIs) effectively, you need the ability to access and understand that information quickly. You can’t do that with manually-created reports in spreadsheets. Your system needs to be automated and digital.

Real time— to maintain business service quality and reliability, you must be able to prevent problems before they occur. So Like BSM, an IT performance system needs to be real-time. You need to know how your systems are performing at any given moment.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

Many organizations assumed their infrastructure strategy was settled. It had been implemented, optimized and built into long-term plans. Recent changes in technology and vendor consolidation are forcing a second look. Cloud outages and licensing changes have exposed how much dependency exists on a small number of platforms. As a result, organizations are reevaluating whether those decisions still hold up under current conditions ...

Edge AI is strategically embedded in core IT and infrastructure spending across industries, according to the 2026 Edge AI Survey from ZEDEDA. The research shows that 83% of C-suite and IT executive respondents say edge AI is important to their core business strategy ...

As AI adoption accelerates, operational complexity — not model intelligence — is becoming the primary barrier to reliable AI at scale, according to the State of AI Engineering 2026 from Datadog ... The report highlights a compounding complexity challenge as AI systems scale ... Around 5% of AI model requests fail in production, with nearly 60% of those failures caused by capacity limits ...

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

Building on BSM with an IT Performance System

Michael Procopio

For a VP of operations, the cloud, virtualization and mobile communications are making BSM harder than ever. Unfortunately your business customers don’t care. They just want your services to work when, where and how they want them. And they don’t want them to cost too much either.

But here’s the issue: while effective, the tried and true approach to BSM—focusing on monitoring and measuring end-user experience—doesn’t provide the type of insight that a VP of operations needs. Today’s IT environment is just too complex. You need higher-level insights that are possible with an IT performance system.

The Solution: Make BSM the Foundation of an IT Performance System

IT performance systems help tame IT complexity and allow you to stay true to your BSM objectives. They can offer comprehensive, real-time visibility into everything underpinning your business services. You can monitor not only the end-user experience (BSM), but the entire IT environment impacting and surrounding that service. That includes your network, infrastructure, applications and all network-edge devices—computers, smart phones, tablets, etc.

Building on your BSM capabilities with an IT performance system allows you to gain broader and deeper insights into your organization’s performance. For example, do you know which service has the most emergency RFCs? Or, which service costs you the most in the number of IT staff to support? These insights can help you work on IT as opposed to just in IT, proving your value to the business. An IT performance system gives IT leaders a method for systematically managing IT, while also providing the means to demonstrate IT’s value and contribution to the business. To be more specific, imagine an automated, dashboard-driven system that monitors your entire IT environment and provides real-time performance reports in the form of key performance indicators (KPIs).

You Can’t Manage What You Can’t Measure

Accurate, timely and meaningful KPIs are critical to making a performance system work. Without them there’s no way to measure how your organization is performing. From an IT leader’s perspective, this means understanding the overall health of an IT organization, revealed through KPIs like:

- cost reduction
- operations versus innovation investment
- business strategy alignment
- customer satisfaction
- percent of SLAs not met
- percent of “healthy” versus “unhealthy” projects
- average cost of IT service per customer

Key Capabilities in an IT Performance System

In order for an IT performance system to complement your current BSM efforts, it’s important that it have the right mix of core capabilities.

Comprehensive—an IT performance system needs to monitor and measure your entire IT environment, from the data center and network to your applications and mobile devices. And that includes all service-delivery models—on-premise, cloud and hybrid.

Digital and automated—to use performance information (KPIs) effectively, you need the ability to access and understand that information quickly. You can’t do that with manually-created reports in spreadsheets. Your system needs to be automated and digital.

Real time— to maintain business service quality and reliability, you must be able to prevent problems before they occur. So Like BSM, an IT performance system needs to be real-time. You need to know how your systems are performing at any given moment.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

Many organizations assumed their infrastructure strategy was settled. It had been implemented, optimized and built into long-term plans. Recent changes in technology and vendor consolidation are forcing a second look. Cloud outages and licensing changes have exposed how much dependency exists on a small number of platforms. As a result, organizations are reevaluating whether those decisions still hold up under current conditions ...

Edge AI is strategically embedded in core IT and infrastructure spending across industries, according to the 2026 Edge AI Survey from ZEDEDA. The research shows that 83% of C-suite and IT executive respondents say edge AI is important to their core business strategy ...

As AI adoption accelerates, operational complexity — not model intelligence — is becoming the primary barrier to reliable AI at scale, according to the State of AI Engineering 2026 from Datadog ... The report highlights a compounding complexity challenge as AI systems scale ... Around 5% of AI model requests fail in production, with nearly 60% of those failures caused by capacity limits ...

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...