Building Trust in AIOps

Richard Whitehead
Moogsoft

In the old days of monolithic architectures, IT operations teams could manage service-disrupting incidents themselves. But these architectures have evolved, and the systems our digital economy relies on today are too complex and produce too much data for human operators to monitor, let alone fix. Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) solutions automate system monitoring and remediation strategies to help DevOps and SRE teams ensure that services and apps are continuously available.

If legacy tools are insufficient and AIOps streamlines DevOps and SRE teams’ tasks, shouldn’t adopting AIOps tools be a no-brainer?

The missing link is typically trust. Can highly trained IT pros trust AIOps to monitor their dynamic, interconnected systems?

And can this technology offer accurate and effective mitigation solutions?

The reason for worry is understandable — if automated systems falter, human operators bear the burden.

But the reality is: the disparate data sources, vast amounts of information and incidents that arise from such large datasets are beyond what a human mind can reasonably handle. Modern systems require modern automated solutions.

Let’s explore how IT leaders can build trust in AIOps tools and eliminate toil from their teams in the meantime.

Get to Know Your AIOps Tool

Effective, properly integrated AIOps tools can proactively look for problems, determine the root cause of the incident and fix the potentially service-impacting issue. The result is a reduction of manual toil for DevOps and SRE teams. But these teams shouldn’t worry about job security: humanless automation is far from a reality. After all, the remediation strategy can be worse than the incident, and untangling that issue requires human rationalization. The overall goal should be rapid root cause analysis and accurate remediation strategies with human authorization (and automation when and if it makes sense). As the “paradox of automation” says, "the more efficient the automated system, the more crucial the human contribution of the operators."

As evidenced by GigaOm’s Radar for AIOps Solutionsreport, AIOps tools vary in their approaches to observability, integrations and self-healing functions. Even vendors’ use of the term “AI” differs. While some AI-driven solutions provide automated neural capabilities, other allegedly AI-based systems merely operate on rules-based heuristics and rely heavily on human IT teams.

If teams don’t know what they’re getting with an AIOps tool, they likely question if they can trust the technology at all. The short answer is: not necessarily.

AIOps tools based on rules and models can only handle a pre-established set of rules programmed into the IT infrastructure. This rigidity leads to an obvious problem. Our modern systems constantly change, and when those changes occur, teams need to alter the programmed rules too. Root cause analysis also becomes harder to identify and rectify automatically, putting the onus back on the human operators and garnering little value from the automation.

Unlike rule- and model-driven AIOps solutions, evidence-driven tools are better suited to keep pace with ephemeral modern systems. Instead of relying on fixed rules and models, evidence-based solutions respond to what the system is actually experiencing. This approach is far more beneficial to DevOps and SRE teams in finding the root causes and deploying self-healing. For example, empirical tests have shown that advanced natural language processing can provide more accurate and scalable results than rules, with substantially less maintenance overhead.

Build Trust in Your AIOps Tool

Just as humans need to build trust with each other, IT teams need to build trust with their AIOps tool. Trust-building in AIOps should be the same as it is in humans — with an incremental “truth and proof” approach that allows people to evaluate data and experience results before moving on.

IT teams should start by deploying an AIOps tool and connecting it to application and service data sources. With native or third-party tool integration capabilities, the AIOps tool should connect to the DevOps toolchain or CI/CD pipeline to automate workflows and the bidirectional transfer of data and notifications. Once the tool is implemented, teams should observe the initial root cause analysis and outputs to determine the solution’s success or failure.

Did the tool surface useful information and provide context to the data?

Will this solution move teams closer to improved service assurance?

While AIOps tools can streamline the tasks facing DevOps and SRE teams, it doesn’t completely replace human operators. Human reasoning is still at the core of sound operations. But AIOps tools can eliminate human toil, giving IT teams time to do what they do best: innovate new technologies.

As the AIOps tool racks up more wins, teams will realize the tool’s value and trust will naturally follow. Then, DevOps teams can take the solution beyond incident remediation and into Value Stream Management (VSM) that governs businesses’ value streams from the inception of an idea to the ultimate outcome — the customer experience. AIOps enables proactive solutions that reduce mundane, time-consuming work for internal teams and provide next-level customer experiences.

DevOps and SRE teams can start their AIOps journey with trust-building, getting hands-on experience with the tool and judging how much value it generates for internal and external audiences. With an incremental approach to deployment and testing, a trusted AIOps tool can eliminate significant human toil and unlock time to keep up with unceasing digital transformation.

Richard Whitehead is Chief Evangelist at Moogsoft

Related Links

Hot Topics

Related Vendors

The Latest

How AI Agents Are Reshaping DataOps for the Always-On Enterprise

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

AI Deepfakes: Rethinking Trust in the Workplace

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Nine in Ten Enterprises Plan Cloud Data Repatriation amid Rising Cloud Costs and Data Sovereignty Mandates

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Why ITOps Need Right-Sized AI, Not Bigger Models

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

The End of Reactive DevOps: AI-Driven Observability for Zero-Defect Digital Systems

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

5 Takeaways from the Observability Forecast for Media and Entertainment

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Why Moving Off the Cloud Is the Easy Part and What Comes Next Is Where Things Get Hard

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Podcast - Episode 24: Network Observability Tool Sprawl

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

Capacity Isn't a Guess: Observability-Driven Sizing for On-Prem Databases

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

5 Security Principles Every Entrepreneur Should Apply to Leadership

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

Building Trust in AIOps

Richard Whitehead
Moogsoft

In the old days of monolithic architectures, IT operations teams could manage service-disrupting incidents themselves. But these architectures have evolved, and the systems our digital economy relies on today are too complex and produce too much data for human operators to monitor, let alone fix. Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) solutions automate system monitoring and remediation strategies to help DevOps and SRE teams ensure that services and apps are continuously available.

If legacy tools are insufficient and AIOps streamlines DevOps and SRE teams’ tasks, shouldn’t adopting AIOps tools be a no-brainer?

The missing link is typically trust. Can highly trained IT pros trust AIOps to monitor their dynamic, interconnected systems?

And can this technology offer accurate and effective mitigation solutions?

The reason for worry is understandable — if automated systems falter, human operators bear the burden.

But the reality is: the disparate data sources, vast amounts of information and incidents that arise from such large datasets are beyond what a human mind can reasonably handle. Modern systems require modern automated solutions.

Let’s explore how IT leaders can build trust in AIOps tools and eliminate toil from their teams in the meantime.

Get to Know Your AIOps Tool

Effective, properly integrated AIOps tools can proactively look for problems, determine the root cause of the incident and fix the potentially service-impacting issue. The result is a reduction of manual toil for DevOps and SRE teams. But these teams shouldn’t worry about job security: humanless automation is far from a reality. After all, the remediation strategy can be worse than the incident, and untangling that issue requires human rationalization. The overall goal should be rapid root cause analysis and accurate remediation strategies with human authorization (and automation when and if it makes sense). As the “paradox of automation” says, "the more efficient the automated system, the more crucial the human contribution of the operators."

As evidenced by GigaOm’s Radar for AIOps Solutionsreport, AIOps tools vary in their approaches to observability, integrations and self-healing functions. Even vendors’ use of the term “AI” differs. While some AI-driven solutions provide automated neural capabilities, other allegedly AI-based systems merely operate on rules-based heuristics and rely heavily on human IT teams.

If teams don’t know what they’re getting with an AIOps tool, they likely question if they can trust the technology at all. The short answer is: not necessarily.

AIOps tools based on rules and models can only handle a pre-established set of rules programmed into the IT infrastructure. This rigidity leads to an obvious problem. Our modern systems constantly change, and when those changes occur, teams need to alter the programmed rules too. Root cause analysis also becomes harder to identify and rectify automatically, putting the onus back on the human operators and garnering little value from the automation.

Unlike rule- and model-driven AIOps solutions, evidence-driven tools are better suited to keep pace with ephemeral modern systems. Instead of relying on fixed rules and models, evidence-based solutions respond to what the system is actually experiencing. This approach is far more beneficial to DevOps and SRE teams in finding the root causes and deploying self-healing. For example, empirical tests have shown that advanced natural language processing can provide more accurate and scalable results than rules, with substantially less maintenance overhead.

Build Trust in Your AIOps Tool

Just as humans need to build trust with each other, IT teams need to build trust with their AIOps tool. Trust-building in AIOps should be the same as it is in humans — with an incremental “truth and proof” approach that allows people to evaluate data and experience results before moving on.

IT teams should start by deploying an AIOps tool and connecting it to application and service data sources. With native or third-party tool integration capabilities, the AIOps tool should connect to the DevOps toolchain or CI/CD pipeline to automate workflows and the bidirectional transfer of data and notifications. Once the tool is implemented, teams should observe the initial root cause analysis and outputs to determine the solution’s success or failure.

Did the tool surface useful information and provide context to the data?

Will this solution move teams closer to improved service assurance?

While AIOps tools can streamline the tasks facing DevOps and SRE teams, it doesn’t completely replace human operators. Human reasoning is still at the core of sound operations. But AIOps tools can eliminate human toil, giving IT teams time to do what they do best: innovate new technologies.

As the AIOps tool racks up more wins, teams will realize the tool’s value and trust will naturally follow. Then, DevOps teams can take the solution beyond incident remediation and into Value Stream Management (VSM) that governs businesses’ value streams from the inception of an idea to the ultimate outcome — the customer experience. AIOps enables proactive solutions that reduce mundane, time-consuming work for internal teams and provide next-level customer experiences.

DevOps and SRE teams can start their AIOps journey with trust-building, getting hands-on experience with the tool and judging how much value it generates for internal and external audiences. With an incremental approach to deployment and testing, a trusted AIOps tool can eliminate significant human toil and unlock time to keep up with unceasing digital transformation.

Richard Whitehead is Chief Evangelist at Moogsoft

Related Links

Hot Topics

Related Vendors

The Latest

How AI Agents Are Reshaping DataOps for the Always-On Enterprise

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

AI Deepfakes: Rethinking Trust in the Workplace

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Nine in Ten Enterprises Plan Cloud Data Repatriation amid Rising Cloud Costs and Data Sovereignty Mandates

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Why ITOps Need Right-Sized AI, Not Bigger Models

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

The End of Reactive DevOps: AI-Driven Observability for Zero-Defect Digital Systems

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

5 Takeaways from the Observability Forecast for Media and Entertainment

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Why Moving Off the Cloud Is the Easy Part and What Comes Next Is Where Things Get Hard

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Podcast - Episode 24: Network Observability Tool Sprawl

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

Capacity Isn't a Guess: Observability-Driven Sizing for On-Prem Databases

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

5 Security Principles Every Entrepreneur Should Apply to Leadership

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...