Skip to main content

Business Service Reliability: Correlating the Customer Experience and Business Outcomes

A recent poll on Business Service Reliability (BSR) found that IT needs to put an increased focus on managing and measuring the customer experience to improve business outcomes.

The poll — conducted by IDG Research Services on behalf of CA Technologies — sought to determine how organizations measure both BSR and the customer experience that IT provides. Business Service Reliability is a new approach to helping IT transform by providing a clearly-defined framework for managing and measuring customer interactions.

The majority of respondents (58 percent) are using a combination of surveys and other metrics (e.g. application downtime and call-center volume) to measure the customer experience.

Just over one quarter (26 percent) reported that IT delivers an exceptional experience. The majority of respondents (61 percent) classified the customer experience as adequate.

The remainder described it as inconsistent – the customer experience meets the expectations of the business some, but not all, of the time.

Lack of a single unified view of application health and customer experience (45 percent) was cited as the top obstacle to providing an exceptional customer experience, followed by inability to link end-user transaction issues to infrastructure, application and network components (35 percent), and difficulty prioritizing application issues and problems based on business impact (35 percent).

Improved customer satisfaction, loyalty and acquisition (65 percent) were chosen as the top benefits of Business Service Reliability, followed by faster delivery of new services (45 percent) and increased productivity (45 percent).

Increased communication with the lines of business to determine where the problems lie was the number one action item for improving Business Service Reliability, followed by investments in Infrastructure Management and Application Performance Management.

IT organizations need to better understand and optimize the customer's end-user experience with business services, rather than merely tracking metrics and thresholds for the various servers, storage, network and software components that support end-to-end service delivery. While components can be up 99.99 percent of the time, a customer may still have a bad experience with a service.

In today’s competitive market, customer experience has become one of the most critical ways to differentiate a business. By focusing on the 5 nines of customer experience rather than the 5 nines of availability, IT can help ensure every link in the service delivery chain is not only available, but is performing as intended and interacting appropriately to consistently deliver successful customer interactions.

By taking a formulaic approach to quantifying key success metrics, Business Service Reliability enables IT to concentrate on making sure every customer interaction is successful. IT organizations that succeed at managing the holistic service, rather than just the availability of supporting components, can deliver greater value to the business and spend less of their time clearing irrelevant alerts from their monitoring consoles.

ABOUT Tony Davis

Tony Davis is a 23 year veteran of the IT industry with a specialty in IT service reliability and strategy, currently serving as a Vice President of Solution Strategy & Sr. Consulting Fellow for CA Technologies North American Service Assurance business. Davis is the author of If My Availability is So Good, Why Do My Customers Feel So Bad?, a pragmatic guide to the 5 nines of customer experience.

The Latest

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

The gap is widening between what teams spend on observability tools and the value they receive amid surging data volumes and budget pressures, according to The Breaking Point for Observability Leaders, a report from Imply ...

Seamless shopping is a basic demand of today's boundaryless consumer — one with little patience for friction, limited tolerance for disconnected experiences and minimal hesitation in switching brands. Customers expect intuitive, highly personalized experiences and the ability to move effortlessly across physical and digital channels within the same journey. Failure to deliver can cost dearly ...

If your best engineers spend their days sorting tickets and resetting access, you are wasting talent. New global data shows that employees in the IT sector rank among the least motivated across industries. They're under a lot of pressure from many angles. Pressure to upskill and uncertainty around what agentic AI means for job security is creating anxiety. Meanwhile, these roles often function like an on-call job and require many repetitive tasks ...

Business Service Reliability: Correlating the Customer Experience and Business Outcomes

A recent poll on Business Service Reliability (BSR) found that IT needs to put an increased focus on managing and measuring the customer experience to improve business outcomes.

The poll — conducted by IDG Research Services on behalf of CA Technologies — sought to determine how organizations measure both BSR and the customer experience that IT provides. Business Service Reliability is a new approach to helping IT transform by providing a clearly-defined framework for managing and measuring customer interactions.

The majority of respondents (58 percent) are using a combination of surveys and other metrics (e.g. application downtime and call-center volume) to measure the customer experience.

Just over one quarter (26 percent) reported that IT delivers an exceptional experience. The majority of respondents (61 percent) classified the customer experience as adequate.

The remainder described it as inconsistent – the customer experience meets the expectations of the business some, but not all, of the time.

Lack of a single unified view of application health and customer experience (45 percent) was cited as the top obstacle to providing an exceptional customer experience, followed by inability to link end-user transaction issues to infrastructure, application and network components (35 percent), and difficulty prioritizing application issues and problems based on business impact (35 percent).

Improved customer satisfaction, loyalty and acquisition (65 percent) were chosen as the top benefits of Business Service Reliability, followed by faster delivery of new services (45 percent) and increased productivity (45 percent).

Increased communication with the lines of business to determine where the problems lie was the number one action item for improving Business Service Reliability, followed by investments in Infrastructure Management and Application Performance Management.

IT organizations need to better understand and optimize the customer's end-user experience with business services, rather than merely tracking metrics and thresholds for the various servers, storage, network and software components that support end-to-end service delivery. While components can be up 99.99 percent of the time, a customer may still have a bad experience with a service.

In today’s competitive market, customer experience has become one of the most critical ways to differentiate a business. By focusing on the 5 nines of customer experience rather than the 5 nines of availability, IT can help ensure every link in the service delivery chain is not only available, but is performing as intended and interacting appropriately to consistently deliver successful customer interactions.

By taking a formulaic approach to quantifying key success metrics, Business Service Reliability enables IT to concentrate on making sure every customer interaction is successful. IT organizations that succeed at managing the holistic service, rather than just the availability of supporting components, can deliver greater value to the business and spend less of their time clearing irrelevant alerts from their monitoring consoles.

ABOUT Tony Davis

Tony Davis is a 23 year veteran of the IT industry with a specialty in IT service reliability and strategy, currently serving as a Vice President of Solution Strategy & Sr. Consulting Fellow for CA Technologies North American Service Assurance business. Davis is the author of If My Availability is So Good, Why Do My Customers Feel So Bad?, a pragmatic guide to the 5 nines of customer experience.

The Latest

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

The gap is widening between what teams spend on observability tools and the value they receive amid surging data volumes and budget pressures, according to The Breaking Point for Observability Leaders, a report from Imply ...

Seamless shopping is a basic demand of today's boundaryless consumer — one with little patience for friction, limited tolerance for disconnected experiences and minimal hesitation in switching brands. Customers expect intuitive, highly personalized experiences and the ability to move effortlessly across physical and digital channels within the same journey. Failure to deliver can cost dearly ...

If your best engineers spend their days sorting tickets and resetting access, you are wasting talent. New global data shows that employees in the IT sector rank among the least motivated across industries. They're under a lot of pressure from many angles. Pressure to upskill and uncertainty around what agentic AI means for job security is creating anxiety. Meanwhile, these roles often function like an on-call job and require many repetitive tasks ...