Skip to main content

Chasing a Moving Target: APM in the Cloud - Part 2

Detection, Analysis and Action
Albert Mavashev

In my last blog, I discussed strategies for dealing with the complexities of monitoring performance in the various stacks that make up a cloud implementation. Here, we will look at ways to detect trends, analyze your data, and act on it.

The first requirement for detecting trends in application performance in the cloud is to have good information delivered in a timely manner about each stack as well as the application.
  
We acquire this information via data collectors that harvest all relevant indicators within the same clock tick. For example: response time, GC activity, memory usage, CPU Usage. Doing this within the same clock tick is called serialization. It is of little use to know I have a failed transaction at time X, but only have CPU and memory data from X minus 10 minutes.

Next, we require a history for each metric. This can be maintained in memory for near real-time analysis, but we also need to use slower storage for longer-term views.

Finally, we apply pattern matching to the data. We might scan and match metrics such as “find all applications whose GC is above High Bollinger Band for 2+ samples.” Doing this in memory can enable very fast detection across a large number of indicators.

Here are three steps you can use to detect performance trends

1. Measure the relevant application performance indicators on the business side such as orders filled, failed or missed. And then, measure the ones on the IT side such as  JVM GC activity, memory, I/O rates.

2. Create a base line for each relevant indicator. This could a 1- to60-second sampling for near real-time monitoring. In addition set up a 1-, 10- and 15-minute sample or even daily, weekly or monthly for those longer in duration. You need both.

3. Apply analytics to determine trends and behavior

Keeping it Simple

Applying analytics can be easier than you expect. In fact, the more simple you keep it, the better.

The following three simple analytical techniques can be used in order to detect anomalies:

1. Bollinger Bands – 2 standard deviations off the mean – low and high. The normal is 2 standard deviations from the mean.

2. Percent of Change – This means comparing sample to sample, day to day or week to week, and calculating the percentage of change.

3. Velocity – Essentially this measures how fast indicators are changing. For example, you might be measuring response time and it drops from 10 to 20 seconds over a five-second interval or (20-10)/5 = 2 units/sec. With this technique, we are expecting a certain amount of change; however, when the amount of change is changing at an abnormal rate, we have most likely detected an anomaly.

Now That You Know ... Act On It

After the analysis, the next activity is to take action. This could be alerts, notification or system actions such as restarting processes or even resubmitting orders. Here, we are connecting the dots between IT and the business and alerting the appropriate owners. 

And In Conclusion

Elastic cloud-based applications can’t be monitored effectively using static models, as these models assume constancy. And the one thing constant about these applications is their volatility. In these environments, what was abnormal yesterday might likely be normal today. As a result, what static models indicate may be wrong. 

However, using a methodology comprised of gathering both business and IT metrics, creating automated base lines and applying analytics to them in real time can produce effective results and predict behavior. 

Albert Mavashev is Chief Technology Officer at Nastel Technologies.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become the dominant force shaping enterprise data strategies. Boards expect progress. Executives expect returns. And data leaders are under pressure to prove that their organizations are "AI-ready" ...

Agentic AI is a major buzzword for 2026. Many tech companies are making bold promises about this technology, but many aren't grounded in reality, at least not yet. This coming year will likely be shaped by reality checks for IT teams, and progress will only come from a focus on strong foundations and disciplined execution ...

AI systems are still prone to hallucinations and misjudgments ... To build the trust needed for adoption, AI must be paired with human-in-the-loop (HITL) oversight, or checkpoints where humans verify, guide, and decide what actions are taken. The balance between autonomy and accountability is what will allow AI to deliver on its promise without sacrificing human trust ...

More data center leaders are reducing their reliance on utility grids by investing in onsite power for rapidly scaling data centers, according to the Data Center Power Report from Bloom Energy ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 21, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses AI-driven NetOps ... 

Enterprise IT has become increasingly complex and fragmented. Organizations are juggling dozens — sometimes hundreds — of different tools for endpoint management, security, app delivery, and employee experience. Each one needs its own license, its own maintenance, and its own integration. The result is a patchwork of overlapping tools, data stuck in silos, security vulnerabilities, and IT teams are spending more time managing software than actually getting work done ...

2025 was the year everybody finally saw the cracks in the foundation. If you were running production workloads, you probably lived through at least one outage you could not explain to your executives without pulling up a diagram and a whiteboard ...

Data has never been more central to a greater portion of enterprise operations than it is today. From software development to marketing strategy, data has become an essential component for success. But as data use cases multiply, so too does the diversity of the data itself. This shift is pushing organizations toward increasingly complex data infrastructure ...

Enterprises are not stalling because they doubt AI, but because they cannot yet govern, validate, or safely scale autonomous systems, according to The Pulse of Agentic AI 2026, a new report from Dynatrace ...

For most of the cloud era, site reliability engineers (SREs) were measured by their ability to protect availability, maintain performance, and reduce the operational risk of change. Cost management was someone else's responsibility, typically finance, procurement, or a dedicated FinOps team. That separation of duties made sense when infrastructure was relatively static and cloud bills grew in predictable ways. But modern cloud-native systems don't behave that way ...

Chasing a Moving Target: APM in the Cloud - Part 2

Detection, Analysis and Action
Albert Mavashev

In my last blog, I discussed strategies for dealing with the complexities of monitoring performance in the various stacks that make up a cloud implementation. Here, we will look at ways to detect trends, analyze your data, and act on it.

The first requirement for detecting trends in application performance in the cloud is to have good information delivered in a timely manner about each stack as well as the application.
  
We acquire this information via data collectors that harvest all relevant indicators within the same clock tick. For example: response time, GC activity, memory usage, CPU Usage. Doing this within the same clock tick is called serialization. It is of little use to know I have a failed transaction at time X, but only have CPU and memory data from X minus 10 minutes.

Next, we require a history for each metric. This can be maintained in memory for near real-time analysis, but we also need to use slower storage for longer-term views.

Finally, we apply pattern matching to the data. We might scan and match metrics such as “find all applications whose GC is above High Bollinger Band for 2+ samples.” Doing this in memory can enable very fast detection across a large number of indicators.

Here are three steps you can use to detect performance trends

1. Measure the relevant application performance indicators on the business side such as orders filled, failed or missed. And then, measure the ones on the IT side such as  JVM GC activity, memory, I/O rates.

2. Create a base line for each relevant indicator. This could a 1- to60-second sampling for near real-time monitoring. In addition set up a 1-, 10- and 15-minute sample or even daily, weekly or monthly for those longer in duration. You need both.

3. Apply analytics to determine trends and behavior

Keeping it Simple

Applying analytics can be easier than you expect. In fact, the more simple you keep it, the better.

The following three simple analytical techniques can be used in order to detect anomalies:

1. Bollinger Bands – 2 standard deviations off the mean – low and high. The normal is 2 standard deviations from the mean.

2. Percent of Change – This means comparing sample to sample, day to day or week to week, and calculating the percentage of change.

3. Velocity – Essentially this measures how fast indicators are changing. For example, you might be measuring response time and it drops from 10 to 20 seconds over a five-second interval or (20-10)/5 = 2 units/sec. With this technique, we are expecting a certain amount of change; however, when the amount of change is changing at an abnormal rate, we have most likely detected an anomaly.

Now That You Know ... Act On It

After the analysis, the next activity is to take action. This could be alerts, notification or system actions such as restarting processes or even resubmitting orders. Here, we are connecting the dots between IT and the business and alerting the appropriate owners. 

And In Conclusion

Elastic cloud-based applications can’t be monitored effectively using static models, as these models assume constancy. And the one thing constant about these applications is their volatility. In these environments, what was abnormal yesterday might likely be normal today. As a result, what static models indicate may be wrong. 

However, using a methodology comprised of gathering both business and IT metrics, creating automated base lines and applying analytics to them in real time can produce effective results and predict behavior. 

Albert Mavashev is Chief Technology Officer at Nastel Technologies.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become the dominant force shaping enterprise data strategies. Boards expect progress. Executives expect returns. And data leaders are under pressure to prove that their organizations are "AI-ready" ...

Agentic AI is a major buzzword for 2026. Many tech companies are making bold promises about this technology, but many aren't grounded in reality, at least not yet. This coming year will likely be shaped by reality checks for IT teams, and progress will only come from a focus on strong foundations and disciplined execution ...

AI systems are still prone to hallucinations and misjudgments ... To build the trust needed for adoption, AI must be paired with human-in-the-loop (HITL) oversight, or checkpoints where humans verify, guide, and decide what actions are taken. The balance between autonomy and accountability is what will allow AI to deliver on its promise without sacrificing human trust ...

More data center leaders are reducing their reliance on utility grids by investing in onsite power for rapidly scaling data centers, according to the Data Center Power Report from Bloom Energy ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 21, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses AI-driven NetOps ... 

Enterprise IT has become increasingly complex and fragmented. Organizations are juggling dozens — sometimes hundreds — of different tools for endpoint management, security, app delivery, and employee experience. Each one needs its own license, its own maintenance, and its own integration. The result is a patchwork of overlapping tools, data stuck in silos, security vulnerabilities, and IT teams are spending more time managing software than actually getting work done ...

2025 was the year everybody finally saw the cracks in the foundation. If you were running production workloads, you probably lived through at least one outage you could not explain to your executives without pulling up a diagram and a whiteboard ...

Data has never been more central to a greater portion of enterprise operations than it is today. From software development to marketing strategy, data has become an essential component for success. But as data use cases multiply, so too does the diversity of the data itself. This shift is pushing organizations toward increasingly complex data infrastructure ...

Enterprises are not stalling because they doubt AI, but because they cannot yet govern, validate, or safely scale autonomous systems, according to The Pulse of Agentic AI 2026, a new report from Dynatrace ...

For most of the cloud era, site reliability engineers (SREs) were measured by their ability to protect availability, maintain performance, and reduce the operational risk of change. Cost management was someone else's responsibility, typically finance, procurement, or a dedicated FinOps team. That separation of duties made sense when infrastructure was relatively static and cloud bills grew in predictable ways. But modern cloud-native systems don't behave that way ...