Skip to main content

CloudFabrix Rebrands as Fabrix.ai

CloudFabrix announced its corporate rebranding to Fabrix.ai.

The rebranding to Fabrix.ai represents a natural evolution of the company's mission to provide a Modern Operational Intelligence platform for businesses to build, deploy, and manage AI Agents that streamline complex tasks, accelerate digital transformation, and foster intelligent workflows. This transformation embodies Fabrix.ai's vision to empower enterprises with AI capabilities that are not just accessible but also seamlessly integrated into daily operations.

Under the new name, Fabrix.ai announced the evolution of its Robotic Data Automation Fabric (RDAF) into a Modern Operational Intelligence platform for the Agentic AI era. The Robotic Data Automation Fabric (Data Fabric) is now extended with an AI Fabric and an Automation Fabric to build, deploy, and manage autonomous AI agents for ITOps Agentic Workflows using simple conversational phrases.

The platform employs three building blocks, working in tandem to accomplish outcomes-

  • AI Fabric - is an AI agent-driven distributed orchestrator that enables customers to securely build, deploy, and manage Agents' lifecycles, ensuring guardrails and quality controls. It integrates with disparate large and small models, curated datasets, and automation to drive Agentic Workflows.
  • Automation Fabric - is an outcome-driven Agentic Workflow framework that integrates Agents, Automation, and Data to build Agentic Workflows. It is dynamic and extensible and can also integrate with other third-party engines like Cisco BPA, NSO, Redhat Ansible, or Terraform.
  • Data fabric - Robotic Data Automation Fabric (RDAF) is a semantic-based data fabric that provides data integration with 1000+ data bots, data ingestion, data transformation, enrichment, and data routing, using Telemetry pipelines to your choice of source and destination.

Key tenets of Fabrix.ai Agentic AI Framework include:

   Agent Orchestration and Lifecycle Management
   AI Guardrails
   Managing Data and Action Privileges for Agents
   Visibility and Observability of Agents
   Agent Quality Control and Assurance
   Reasoning LLMs

Some examples of AI agents driving Agentic workflows are as follows -

  • SLO / KPI Management agent / Anomaly detection - Example: An agent that monitors network traffic and alerts on unusual spikes or drops in activity, potentially indicating a security breach, network outage, or performance issue
  • Network Digital Twin for Service Assurance - Example: An agent that creates a Digital Twin of the Network and creates baseline and what-if scenarios, predictive scenarios for service assurance and predictive maintenance, and change management scenarios for ACL (Access Control List) changes
  • Closed Loop Remediation agent - Example: An agent that automatically detects failed applications or infrastructure, performance issues or resource constraints and provisions or scales up network capacity or cloud resources to meet increased demand or does change management.

In addition to the out-of-box agents, businesses and partners can create their own agents with simple conversational prompts, thus democratizing Agentic workflows for enhanced productivity, reduced risk, and improved ROI.

"Our transition to Fabrix.ai marks an exciting new chapter in our company's journey," said Raju Datla, CEO of Fabrix.ai. "Our rebranding to Fabrix.ai is not just a change of name but a testament to our commitment to leading the AI revolution in the ITOps space. We're excited to introduce a platform where AI agents become the backbone of productivity, driving efficiency and intelligent decision-making across organizations."

The Latest

While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Most production autonomous agents do not run in a vacuum. They run inside cloud infrastructure: virtual machines, containers, pods, managed clusters or private servers. That is where most operations teams start monitoring. Is the VM alive? Is the container running? Did the pod restart? Is memory stable? Is CPU too high? Did the health check pass? Those signals are useful. They tell you whether the shell around the agent is alive. They do not tell you whether the agent inside is actually operational ...

CloudFabrix Rebrands as Fabrix.ai

CloudFabrix announced its corporate rebranding to Fabrix.ai.

The rebranding to Fabrix.ai represents a natural evolution of the company's mission to provide a Modern Operational Intelligence platform for businesses to build, deploy, and manage AI Agents that streamline complex tasks, accelerate digital transformation, and foster intelligent workflows. This transformation embodies Fabrix.ai's vision to empower enterprises with AI capabilities that are not just accessible but also seamlessly integrated into daily operations.

Under the new name, Fabrix.ai announced the evolution of its Robotic Data Automation Fabric (RDAF) into a Modern Operational Intelligence platform for the Agentic AI era. The Robotic Data Automation Fabric (Data Fabric) is now extended with an AI Fabric and an Automation Fabric to build, deploy, and manage autonomous AI agents for ITOps Agentic Workflows using simple conversational phrases.

The platform employs three building blocks, working in tandem to accomplish outcomes-

  • AI Fabric - is an AI agent-driven distributed orchestrator that enables customers to securely build, deploy, and manage Agents' lifecycles, ensuring guardrails and quality controls. It integrates with disparate large and small models, curated datasets, and automation to drive Agentic Workflows.
  • Automation Fabric - is an outcome-driven Agentic Workflow framework that integrates Agents, Automation, and Data to build Agentic Workflows. It is dynamic and extensible and can also integrate with other third-party engines like Cisco BPA, NSO, Redhat Ansible, or Terraform.
  • Data fabric - Robotic Data Automation Fabric (RDAF) is a semantic-based data fabric that provides data integration with 1000+ data bots, data ingestion, data transformation, enrichment, and data routing, using Telemetry pipelines to your choice of source and destination.

Key tenets of Fabrix.ai Agentic AI Framework include:

   Agent Orchestration and Lifecycle Management
   AI Guardrails
   Managing Data and Action Privileges for Agents
   Visibility and Observability of Agents
   Agent Quality Control and Assurance
   Reasoning LLMs

Some examples of AI agents driving Agentic workflows are as follows -

  • SLO / KPI Management agent / Anomaly detection - Example: An agent that monitors network traffic and alerts on unusual spikes or drops in activity, potentially indicating a security breach, network outage, or performance issue
  • Network Digital Twin for Service Assurance - Example: An agent that creates a Digital Twin of the Network and creates baseline and what-if scenarios, predictive scenarios for service assurance and predictive maintenance, and change management scenarios for ACL (Access Control List) changes
  • Closed Loop Remediation agent - Example: An agent that automatically detects failed applications or infrastructure, performance issues or resource constraints and provisions or scales up network capacity or cloud resources to meet increased demand or does change management.

In addition to the out-of-box agents, businesses and partners can create their own agents with simple conversational prompts, thus democratizing Agentic workflows for enhanced productivity, reduced risk, and improved ROI.

"Our transition to Fabrix.ai marks an exciting new chapter in our company's journey," said Raju Datla, CEO of Fabrix.ai. "Our rebranding to Fabrix.ai is not just a change of name but a testament to our commitment to leading the AI revolution in the ITOps space. We're excited to introduce a platform where AI agents become the backbone of productivity, driving efficiency and intelligent decision-making across organizations."

The Latest

While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ... 

Most production autonomous agents do not run in a vacuum. They run inside cloud infrastructure: virtual machines, containers, pods, managed clusters or private servers. That is where most operations teams start monitoring. Is the VM alive? Is the container running? Did the pod restart? Is memory stable? Is CPU too high? Did the health check pass? Those signals are useful. They tell you whether the shell around the agent is alive. They do not tell you whether the agent inside is actually operational ...