Skip to main content

Dataflow Complexity is the New Normal

Pat Patterson

The process of wrangling big data is fraught with pitfalls for enterprises. Data-driven enterprises are buckling under the burden of gathering, analyzing and making actionable an incredible and growing amount of data flowing in from a variety of sources. It's not just the amount of big data that is confounding data-driven companies: The speed at which data must be collected and analyzed, and the variety of data types (think: IoT sensors, log files, web clickstreams) are overwhelming enterprise data architectures, which are increasingly defined by a complex tangle of big data sources and processing systems. Topping all this is the problem of data drift, the unexpected changes that consistently plague big data sources and result in corrupt and unusable data.

In short, the complexity of data in motion is growing and risks undermining the success of the modern data-driven enterprise. A recent survey of data engineers and architects, conducted by StreamSets, sought to bring some perspective to the new reality in the enterprise, leading to some interesting insights about the enterprise data landscape.

As we expected, use of streaming data has become quite common, with a high number of respondents — 72 percent — collecting this data for a variety of uses. Of these, two-thirds (48 percent) collect a combination of batch and streaming data, since real-time data requires context to provide intelligence. In contrast, 28 percent move batch data only, and 24 percent ingest streaming data only.

Survey results also showed that enterprises are gathering data from a range of sources: 61 percent collect from transactional databases, 53 percent from log files, 42 percent from analytics databases, 27 percent from clickstream data and 18 percent from IoT devices.

Moving on from their use of streaming data, the survey reveals that enterprises are also experiencing a sense of data urgency — that is, expeditious analysis of their incoming data sets. In fact, according to the survey, 56 percent of respondents say they require data analysis within minutes of receiving the data, and 16 percent require analysis within seconds. The world has certainly evolved from the daily or weekly business intelligence report to a live dashboard, or even analysis that drives automated actions like website personalization that can have a direct impact on a business' effectiveness in engaging with its customers. These requirements put extreme pressure on enterprise data architectures not necessarily designed to deliver consumption-ready data with this type of speed.

Our survey responses indicate that enterprises funnel their data into a range of destinations, making them much more complicated and expensive to manage than ever before. In addition, respondents keep some of their data on premises (58 percent), some in private clouds (48 percent) and some in public clouds (27 percent). The combination of diverse data stores and multiple deployment models is a new phenomenon we call data sprawl, and it is a key driver of dataflow complexity.

The challenges of increased dataflow complexity are here and now and, given the unprecedented growth of data each day, must be considered the new normal. With this information as a bird's-eye view of the state of data in motion, savvy enterprises will adopt technologies and solutions that will help them evolve with the big data landscape.

Pat Patterson is Community Champion at StreamSets.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

Dataflow Complexity is the New Normal

Pat Patterson

The process of wrangling big data is fraught with pitfalls for enterprises. Data-driven enterprises are buckling under the burden of gathering, analyzing and making actionable an incredible and growing amount of data flowing in from a variety of sources. It's not just the amount of big data that is confounding data-driven companies: The speed at which data must be collected and analyzed, and the variety of data types (think: IoT sensors, log files, web clickstreams) are overwhelming enterprise data architectures, which are increasingly defined by a complex tangle of big data sources and processing systems. Topping all this is the problem of data drift, the unexpected changes that consistently plague big data sources and result in corrupt and unusable data.

In short, the complexity of data in motion is growing and risks undermining the success of the modern data-driven enterprise. A recent survey of data engineers and architects, conducted by StreamSets, sought to bring some perspective to the new reality in the enterprise, leading to some interesting insights about the enterprise data landscape.

As we expected, use of streaming data has become quite common, with a high number of respondents — 72 percent — collecting this data for a variety of uses. Of these, two-thirds (48 percent) collect a combination of batch and streaming data, since real-time data requires context to provide intelligence. In contrast, 28 percent move batch data only, and 24 percent ingest streaming data only.

Survey results also showed that enterprises are gathering data from a range of sources: 61 percent collect from transactional databases, 53 percent from log files, 42 percent from analytics databases, 27 percent from clickstream data and 18 percent from IoT devices.

Moving on from their use of streaming data, the survey reveals that enterprises are also experiencing a sense of data urgency — that is, expeditious analysis of their incoming data sets. In fact, according to the survey, 56 percent of respondents say they require data analysis within minutes of receiving the data, and 16 percent require analysis within seconds. The world has certainly evolved from the daily or weekly business intelligence report to a live dashboard, or even analysis that drives automated actions like website personalization that can have a direct impact on a business' effectiveness in engaging with its customers. These requirements put extreme pressure on enterprise data architectures not necessarily designed to deliver consumption-ready data with this type of speed.

Our survey responses indicate that enterprises funnel their data into a range of destinations, making them much more complicated and expensive to manage than ever before. In addition, respondents keep some of their data on premises (58 percent), some in private clouds (48 percent) and some in public clouds (27 percent). The combination of diverse data stores and multiple deployment models is a new phenomenon we call data sprawl, and it is a key driver of dataflow complexity.

The challenges of increased dataflow complexity are here and now and, given the unprecedented growth of data each day, must be considered the new normal. With this information as a bird's-eye view of the state of data in motion, savvy enterprises will adopt technologies and solutions that will help them evolve with the big data landscape.

Pat Patterson is Community Champion at StreamSets.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.