Skip to main content

As Digital Transformation Prevails, Automation Remains a Top Priority for DevOps, ITOps and SRE Teams

Jessica Abelson
Transposit

Hybrid work adoption and the accelerated pace of digital transformation are driving an increasing need for automation and site reliability engineering (SRE) practices, according to new research.

In a new survey collected from 1,046 engineering, IT Operations, DevOps and site reliability engineering professionals in the United States with the role of VP, Director, Manager or individual contributor at organizations with over 300 employees, almost half of respondents (48.2%) said automation is a way to decrease Mean Time to Resolution/Repair (MTTR) and improve service management.

The second annual State of DevOps Automation Report, commissioned by Transposit also revealed close to sixty percent of organizations are losing up to half a million dollars per hour to downtime, a critical issue that can be mitigated with better automation and collaboration.

Organizations Still Lack Full Integration of Incident Response Tools

With 90.2% of organizations reporting an increased focus on digital transformation over the past year, paired with the persistence of hybrid and remote work, almost three-quarters (73.4%) of operations teams have expanded their tech stack. However, when asked how well integrated the various tools used during incident response are, only one quarter (24.7%) said all of their tools are integrated through one tool or platform. This means the vast majority (75.3%) don’t have full integration, leaving teams at risk of slow issue detection and analysis and a decrease in overall quality of service reliability and customer experience.

Broader deployment of automation has led developers to recognize that it’s key to reducing downtime and increasing resolution. This was seen by 3 in 4 organizations that implemented a continuous workflow to incident response for service management after adopting a hybrid workforce model.

Manual Processes Are Outdated and Lead to Higher Cost of Downtime and Service Incident Volume

The survey also found that more than a third (39.7%) of organizations had an increased cost of downtime during the last year (March 2021 to now). In fact, 58.2% reported that downtime (i.e., application outages, service degradation) cost their organization up to $499,999 per hour on average. Of those who reported an increase in the amount of time it takes to resolve incidents, 45.2% said it was due to a lack of unified communication with teammates (people are collaborating using disparate tools).


"Organizations need to deliver innovation faster and more efficiently than ever before. However, too many SRE, ITOps and DevOps teams are wasting time on disconnected, manual processes and playing a reactive game of whack-a-mole as they try to keep applications running," said Divanny Lamas, CEO of Transposit.

Operations teams are experiencing challenges while trying to solve incidents, including difficulties reaching people with specialized knowledge, inadequate support from collaboration methods and tools and lack of automation. When asked if they have observed any change in the frequency of service incidents that have affected their customers over the course of the last year (March 2021 to now), 62.9% of respondents reported an increase. Of those who said there was an increase in service incidents, respondents said the top reasons why this happened are digital transformation (60.7%), rolling out of new products or product updates (55.1%), methods and tools for collaboration did not adequately support their remote team (49.3%) and organizational change including team member churn, influx of new team members, and M&A activity (45.4%).

The Key to Faster Resolution of Incidents and Less Downtime: SRE Practices Combined with Automation

The rising demand for site reliability engineering is clear, as 75.6% of respondents said there has been an increased focus on SRE practices in their organization in the past 12 months, and of those, 35.1% plan to expand SRE efforts in 2022. Additionally, 65.1% of respondents plan to hire site reliability engineers in the next 12 months.

The need for automation tools is evident in the SRE roles to complement organizations’ increased focus on site reliability practices; 42.3% of SREs said the current level of automation is not meeting their organization’s needs and they are actively pursuing a new solution to solve for this shortage.

SREs are still dealing with cumbersome and tedious processes, despite the increased demand for SRE practices. Over half of SREs (56.5%) reported they still manually enter data into an ITSM system or other system or record to keep track of actions that were taken by humans during the resolution of an incident.

To scale, organizations need to implement automation technology to rid teams of these time-consuming manual processes. This is underlined by the fact that a full 100% of the respondents with a VP/Director/Manager SRE title who cited a decrease or no change in service incidents said it was because their organization implemented automation technology to help reduce the number of service incidents. Respondents also said better documentation, process and availability of data during incidents would have the most impact on MTTR, downtime and quality of service reliability.

As seen in the survey, organizations' approaches to automation differ. A majority (63%) responded that their approach to automation was incremental automation, in which they begin by codifying processes and work up to more advanced, fully automated scenarios. When asked whether automation should let humans use their judgment at critical decision points to be more reliable and effective, 80.4% of respondents said yes. Automation that keeps humans in the loop at key decision points increases flexibility and stability while automating repetitive tasks.

The top three tasks respondents would like automated are: service requests (52.6%), change requests (42.9%) and user provisioning (39.8%). Organizations are seeing the need to double-down on automation — the top three ways organizations plan to improve their incident management process are to implement new automation tools or applications (48.2%), implement new communications/collaboration tools or applications (41.5%) and implement new integration tools or applications (40.6%).

The survey makes it clear that ITOps, DevOps and SRE professionals should consider enhancing service reliability through human-in-the-loop automation, SRE practices and better collaboration methods. Teams enabled with these tools and process advancements are better empowered to spend their time and efforts on delivering innovation and competitive advantages, and ultimately creating more business value.

Jessica Abelson is Director of Product Marketing at Transposit

The Latest

AI is the catalyst for significant investment in data teams as enterprises require higher-quality data to power their AI applications, according to the State of Analytics Engineering Report from dbt Labs ...

Misaligned architecture can lead to business consequences, with 93% of respondents reporting negative outcomes such as service disruptions, high operational costs and security challenges ...

A Gartner analyst recently suggested that GenAI tools could create 25% time savings for network operational teams. Where might these time savings come from? How are GenAI tools helping NetOps teams today, and what other tasks might they take on in the future as models continue improving? In general, these savings come from automating or streamlining manual NetOps tasks ...

IT and line-of-business teams are increasingly aligned in their efforts to close the data gap and drive greater collaboration to alleviate IT bottlenecks and offload growing demands on IT teams, according to The 2025 Automation Benchmark Report: Insights from IT Leaders on Enterprise Automation & the Future of AI-Driven Businesses from Jitterbit ...

A large majority (86%) of data management and AI decision makers cite protecting data privacy as a top concern, with 76% of respondents citing ROI on data privacy and AI initiatives across their organization, according to a new Harris Poll from Collibra ...

According to Gartner, Inc. the following six trends will shape the future of cloud over the next four years, ultimately resulting in new ways of working that are digital in nature and transformative in impact ...

2020 was the equivalent of a wedding with a top-shelf open bar. As businesses scrambled to adjust to remote work, digital transformation accelerated at breakneck speed. New software categories emerged overnight. Tech stacks ballooned with all sorts of SaaS apps solving ALL the problems — often with little oversight or long-term integration planning, and yes frequently a lot of duplicated functionality ... But now the music's faded. The lights are on. Everyone from the CIO to the CFO is checking the bill. Welcome to the Great SaaS Hangover ...

Regardless of OpenShift being a scalable and flexible software, it can be a pain to monitor since complete visibility into the underlying operations is not guaranteed ... To effectively monitor an OpenShift environment, IT administrators should focus on these five key elements and their associated metrics ...

An overwhelming majority of IT leaders (95%) believe the upcoming wave of AI-powered digital transformation is set to be the most impactful and intensive seen thus far, according to The Science of Productivity: AI, Adoption, And Employee Experience, a new report from Nexthink ...

Overall outage frequency and the general level of reported severity continue to decline, according to the Outage Analysis 2025 from Uptime Institute. However, cyber security incidents are on the rise and often have severe, lasting impacts ...

As Digital Transformation Prevails, Automation Remains a Top Priority for DevOps, ITOps and SRE Teams

Jessica Abelson
Transposit

Hybrid work adoption and the accelerated pace of digital transformation are driving an increasing need for automation and site reliability engineering (SRE) practices, according to new research.

In a new survey collected from 1,046 engineering, IT Operations, DevOps and site reliability engineering professionals in the United States with the role of VP, Director, Manager or individual contributor at organizations with over 300 employees, almost half of respondents (48.2%) said automation is a way to decrease Mean Time to Resolution/Repair (MTTR) and improve service management.

The second annual State of DevOps Automation Report, commissioned by Transposit also revealed close to sixty percent of organizations are losing up to half a million dollars per hour to downtime, a critical issue that can be mitigated with better automation and collaboration.

Organizations Still Lack Full Integration of Incident Response Tools

With 90.2% of organizations reporting an increased focus on digital transformation over the past year, paired with the persistence of hybrid and remote work, almost three-quarters (73.4%) of operations teams have expanded their tech stack. However, when asked how well integrated the various tools used during incident response are, only one quarter (24.7%) said all of their tools are integrated through one tool or platform. This means the vast majority (75.3%) don’t have full integration, leaving teams at risk of slow issue detection and analysis and a decrease in overall quality of service reliability and customer experience.

Broader deployment of automation has led developers to recognize that it’s key to reducing downtime and increasing resolution. This was seen by 3 in 4 organizations that implemented a continuous workflow to incident response for service management after adopting a hybrid workforce model.

Manual Processes Are Outdated and Lead to Higher Cost of Downtime and Service Incident Volume

The survey also found that more than a third (39.7%) of organizations had an increased cost of downtime during the last year (March 2021 to now). In fact, 58.2% reported that downtime (i.e., application outages, service degradation) cost their organization up to $499,999 per hour on average. Of those who reported an increase in the amount of time it takes to resolve incidents, 45.2% said it was due to a lack of unified communication with teammates (people are collaborating using disparate tools).


"Organizations need to deliver innovation faster and more efficiently than ever before. However, too many SRE, ITOps and DevOps teams are wasting time on disconnected, manual processes and playing a reactive game of whack-a-mole as they try to keep applications running," said Divanny Lamas, CEO of Transposit.

Operations teams are experiencing challenges while trying to solve incidents, including difficulties reaching people with specialized knowledge, inadequate support from collaboration methods and tools and lack of automation. When asked if they have observed any change in the frequency of service incidents that have affected their customers over the course of the last year (March 2021 to now), 62.9% of respondents reported an increase. Of those who said there was an increase in service incidents, respondents said the top reasons why this happened are digital transformation (60.7%), rolling out of new products or product updates (55.1%), methods and tools for collaboration did not adequately support their remote team (49.3%) and organizational change including team member churn, influx of new team members, and M&A activity (45.4%).

The Key to Faster Resolution of Incidents and Less Downtime: SRE Practices Combined with Automation

The rising demand for site reliability engineering is clear, as 75.6% of respondents said there has been an increased focus on SRE practices in their organization in the past 12 months, and of those, 35.1% plan to expand SRE efforts in 2022. Additionally, 65.1% of respondents plan to hire site reliability engineers in the next 12 months.

The need for automation tools is evident in the SRE roles to complement organizations’ increased focus on site reliability practices; 42.3% of SREs said the current level of automation is not meeting their organization’s needs and they are actively pursuing a new solution to solve for this shortage.

SREs are still dealing with cumbersome and tedious processes, despite the increased demand for SRE practices. Over half of SREs (56.5%) reported they still manually enter data into an ITSM system or other system or record to keep track of actions that were taken by humans during the resolution of an incident.

To scale, organizations need to implement automation technology to rid teams of these time-consuming manual processes. This is underlined by the fact that a full 100% of the respondents with a VP/Director/Manager SRE title who cited a decrease or no change in service incidents said it was because their organization implemented automation technology to help reduce the number of service incidents. Respondents also said better documentation, process and availability of data during incidents would have the most impact on MTTR, downtime and quality of service reliability.

As seen in the survey, organizations' approaches to automation differ. A majority (63%) responded that their approach to automation was incremental automation, in which they begin by codifying processes and work up to more advanced, fully automated scenarios. When asked whether automation should let humans use their judgment at critical decision points to be more reliable and effective, 80.4% of respondents said yes. Automation that keeps humans in the loop at key decision points increases flexibility and stability while automating repetitive tasks.

The top three tasks respondents would like automated are: service requests (52.6%), change requests (42.9%) and user provisioning (39.8%). Organizations are seeing the need to double-down on automation — the top three ways organizations plan to improve their incident management process are to implement new automation tools or applications (48.2%), implement new communications/collaboration tools or applications (41.5%) and implement new integration tools or applications (40.6%).

The survey makes it clear that ITOps, DevOps and SRE professionals should consider enhancing service reliability through human-in-the-loop automation, SRE practices and better collaboration methods. Teams enabled with these tools and process advancements are better empowered to spend their time and efforts on delivering innovation and competitive advantages, and ultimately creating more business value.

Jessica Abelson is Director of Product Marketing at Transposit

The Latest

AI is the catalyst for significant investment in data teams as enterprises require higher-quality data to power their AI applications, according to the State of Analytics Engineering Report from dbt Labs ...

Misaligned architecture can lead to business consequences, with 93% of respondents reporting negative outcomes such as service disruptions, high operational costs and security challenges ...

A Gartner analyst recently suggested that GenAI tools could create 25% time savings for network operational teams. Where might these time savings come from? How are GenAI tools helping NetOps teams today, and what other tasks might they take on in the future as models continue improving? In general, these savings come from automating or streamlining manual NetOps tasks ...

IT and line-of-business teams are increasingly aligned in their efforts to close the data gap and drive greater collaboration to alleviate IT bottlenecks and offload growing demands on IT teams, according to The 2025 Automation Benchmark Report: Insights from IT Leaders on Enterprise Automation & the Future of AI-Driven Businesses from Jitterbit ...

A large majority (86%) of data management and AI decision makers cite protecting data privacy as a top concern, with 76% of respondents citing ROI on data privacy and AI initiatives across their organization, according to a new Harris Poll from Collibra ...

According to Gartner, Inc. the following six trends will shape the future of cloud over the next four years, ultimately resulting in new ways of working that are digital in nature and transformative in impact ...

2020 was the equivalent of a wedding with a top-shelf open bar. As businesses scrambled to adjust to remote work, digital transformation accelerated at breakneck speed. New software categories emerged overnight. Tech stacks ballooned with all sorts of SaaS apps solving ALL the problems — often with little oversight or long-term integration planning, and yes frequently a lot of duplicated functionality ... But now the music's faded. The lights are on. Everyone from the CIO to the CFO is checking the bill. Welcome to the Great SaaS Hangover ...

Regardless of OpenShift being a scalable and flexible software, it can be a pain to monitor since complete visibility into the underlying operations is not guaranteed ... To effectively monitor an OpenShift environment, IT administrators should focus on these five key elements and their associated metrics ...

An overwhelming majority of IT leaders (95%) believe the upcoming wave of AI-powered digital transformation is set to be the most impactful and intensive seen thus far, according to The Science of Productivity: AI, Adoption, And Employee Experience, a new report from Nexthink ...

Overall outage frequency and the general level of reported severity continue to decline, according to the Outage Analysis 2025 from Uptime Institute. However, cyber security incidents are on the rise and often have severe, lasting impacts ...