Skip to main content

As Digital Transformation Prevails, Automation Remains a Top Priority for DevOps, ITOps and SRE Teams

Jessica Abelson
Transposit

Hybrid work adoption and the accelerated pace of digital transformation are driving an increasing need for automation and site reliability engineering (SRE) practices, according to new research.

In a new survey collected from 1,046 engineering, IT Operations, DevOps and site reliability engineering professionals in the United States with the role of VP, Director, Manager or individual contributor at organizations with over 300 employees, almost half of respondents (48.2%) said automation is a way to decrease Mean Time to Resolution/Repair (MTTR) and improve service management.

The second annual State of DevOps Automation Report, commissioned by Transposit also revealed close to sixty percent of organizations are losing up to half a million dollars per hour to downtime, a critical issue that can be mitigated with better automation and collaboration.

Organizations Still Lack Full Integration of Incident Response Tools

With 90.2% of organizations reporting an increased focus on digital transformation over the past year, paired with the persistence of hybrid and remote work, almost three-quarters (73.4%) of operations teams have expanded their tech stack. However, when asked how well integrated the various tools used during incident response are, only one quarter (24.7%) said all of their tools are integrated through one tool or platform. This means the vast majority (75.3%) don’t have full integration, leaving teams at risk of slow issue detection and analysis and a decrease in overall quality of service reliability and customer experience.

Broader deployment of automation has led developers to recognize that it’s key to reducing downtime and increasing resolution. This was seen by 3 in 4 organizations that implemented a continuous workflow to incident response for service management after adopting a hybrid workforce model.

Manual Processes Are Outdated and Lead to Higher Cost of Downtime and Service Incident Volume

The survey also found that more than a third (39.7%) of organizations had an increased cost of downtime during the last year (March 2021 to now). In fact, 58.2% reported that downtime (i.e., application outages, service degradation) cost their organization up to $499,999 per hour on average. Of those who reported an increase in the amount of time it takes to resolve incidents, 45.2% said it was due to a lack of unified communication with teammates (people are collaborating using disparate tools).


"Organizations need to deliver innovation faster and more efficiently than ever before. However, too many SRE, ITOps and DevOps teams are wasting time on disconnected, manual processes and playing a reactive game of whack-a-mole as they try to keep applications running," said Divanny Lamas, CEO of Transposit.

Operations teams are experiencing challenges while trying to solve incidents, including difficulties reaching people with specialized knowledge, inadequate support from collaboration methods and tools and lack of automation. When asked if they have observed any change in the frequency of service incidents that have affected their customers over the course of the last year (March 2021 to now), 62.9% of respondents reported an increase. Of those who said there was an increase in service incidents, respondents said the top reasons why this happened are digital transformation (60.7%), rolling out of new products or product updates (55.1%), methods and tools for collaboration did not adequately support their remote team (49.3%) and organizational change including team member churn, influx of new team members, and M&A activity (45.4%).

The Key to Faster Resolution of Incidents and Less Downtime: SRE Practices Combined with Automation

The rising demand for site reliability engineering is clear, as 75.6% of respondents said there has been an increased focus on SRE practices in their organization in the past 12 months, and of those, 35.1% plan to expand SRE efforts in 2022. Additionally, 65.1% of respondents plan to hire site reliability engineers in the next 12 months.

The need for automation tools is evident in the SRE roles to complement organizations’ increased focus on site reliability practices; 42.3% of SREs said the current level of automation is not meeting their organization’s needs and they are actively pursuing a new solution to solve for this shortage.

SREs are still dealing with cumbersome and tedious processes, despite the increased demand for SRE practices. Over half of SREs (56.5%) reported they still manually enter data into an ITSM system or other system or record to keep track of actions that were taken by humans during the resolution of an incident.

To scale, organizations need to implement automation technology to rid teams of these time-consuming manual processes. This is underlined by the fact that a full 100% of the respondents with a VP/Director/Manager SRE title who cited a decrease or no change in service incidents said it was because their organization implemented automation technology to help reduce the number of service incidents. Respondents also said better documentation, process and availability of data during incidents would have the most impact on MTTR, downtime and quality of service reliability.

As seen in the survey, organizations' approaches to automation differ. A majority (63%) responded that their approach to automation was incremental automation, in which they begin by codifying processes and work up to more advanced, fully automated scenarios. When asked whether automation should let humans use their judgment at critical decision points to be more reliable and effective, 80.4% of respondents said yes. Automation that keeps humans in the loop at key decision points increases flexibility and stability while automating repetitive tasks.

The top three tasks respondents would like automated are: service requests (52.6%), change requests (42.9%) and user provisioning (39.8%). Organizations are seeing the need to double-down on automation — the top three ways organizations plan to improve their incident management process are to implement new automation tools or applications (48.2%), implement new communications/collaboration tools or applications (41.5%) and implement new integration tools or applications (40.6%).

The survey makes it clear that ITOps, DevOps and SRE professionals should consider enhancing service reliability through human-in-the-loop automation, SRE practices and better collaboration methods. Teams enabled with these tools and process advancements are better empowered to spend their time and efforts on delivering innovation and competitive advantages, and ultimately creating more business value.

Jessica Abelson is Director of Product Marketing at Transposit
APM

The Latest

A major architectural shift is underway across enterprise networks, according to a new global study from Cisco. As AI assistants, agents, and data-driven workloads reshape how work gets done, they're creating faster, more dynamic, more latency-sensitive, and more complex network traffic. Combined with the ubiquity of connected devices, 24/7 uptime demands, and intensifying security threats, these shifts are driving infrastructure to adapt and evolve ...

Image
Cisco

The development of banking apps was supposed to provide users with convenience, control and piece of mind. However, for thousands of Halifax customers recently, a major mobile outage caused the exact opposite, leaving customers unable to check balances, or pay bills, sparking widespread frustration. This wasn't an isolated incident ... So why are these failures still happening? ...

Cyber threats are growing more sophisticated every day, and at their forefront are zero-day vulnerabilities. These elusive security gaps are exploited before a fix becomes available, making them among the most dangerous threats in today's digital landscape ... This guide will explore what these vulnerabilities are, how they work, why they pose such a significant threat, and how modern organizations can stay protected ...

The prevention of data center outages continues to be a strategic priority for data center owners and operators. Infrastructure equipment has improved, but the complexity of modern architectures and evolving external threats presents new risks that operators must actively manage, according to the Data Center Outage Analysis 2025 from Uptime Institute ...

As observability engineers, we navigate a sea of telemetry daily. We instrument our applications, configure collectors, and build dashboards, all in pursuit of understanding our complex distributed systems. Yet, amidst this flood of data, a critical question often remains unspoken, or at best, answered by gut feeling: "Is our telemetry actually good?" ... We're inviting you to participate in shaping a foundational element for better observability: the Instrumentation Score ...

We're inching ever closer toward a long-held goal: technology infrastructure that is so automated that it can protect itself. But as IT leaders aggressively employ automation across our enterprises, we need to continuously reassess what AI is ready to manage autonomously and what can not yet be trusted to algorithms ...

Much like a traditional factory turns raw materials into finished products, the AI factory turns vast datasets into actionable business outcomes through advanced models, inferences, and automation. From the earliest data inputs to the final token output, this process must be reliable, repeatable, and scalable. That requires industrializing the way AI is developed, deployed, and managed ...

Almost half (48%) of employees admit they resent their jobs but stay anyway, according to research from Ivanti ... This has obvious consequences across the business, but we're overlooking the massive impact of resenteeism and presenteeism on IT. For IT professionals tasked with managing the backbone of modern business operations, these numbers spell big trouble ...

For many B2B and B2C enterprise brands, technology isn't a core strength. Relying on overly complex architectures (like those that follow a pure MACH doctrine) has been flagged by industry leaders as a source of operational slowdown, creating bottlenecks that limit agility in volatile market conditions ...

FinOps champions crucial cross-departmental collaboration, uniting business, finance, technology and engineering leaders to demystify cloud expenses. Yet, too often, critical cost issues are softened into mere "recommendations" or "insights" — easy to ignore. But what if we adopted security's battle-tested strategy and reframed these as the urgent risks they truly are, demanding immediate action? ...

As Digital Transformation Prevails, Automation Remains a Top Priority for DevOps, ITOps and SRE Teams

Jessica Abelson
Transposit

Hybrid work adoption and the accelerated pace of digital transformation are driving an increasing need for automation and site reliability engineering (SRE) practices, according to new research.

In a new survey collected from 1,046 engineering, IT Operations, DevOps and site reliability engineering professionals in the United States with the role of VP, Director, Manager or individual contributor at organizations with over 300 employees, almost half of respondents (48.2%) said automation is a way to decrease Mean Time to Resolution/Repair (MTTR) and improve service management.

The second annual State of DevOps Automation Report, commissioned by Transposit also revealed close to sixty percent of organizations are losing up to half a million dollars per hour to downtime, a critical issue that can be mitigated with better automation and collaboration.

Organizations Still Lack Full Integration of Incident Response Tools

With 90.2% of organizations reporting an increased focus on digital transformation over the past year, paired with the persistence of hybrid and remote work, almost three-quarters (73.4%) of operations teams have expanded their tech stack. However, when asked how well integrated the various tools used during incident response are, only one quarter (24.7%) said all of their tools are integrated through one tool or platform. This means the vast majority (75.3%) don’t have full integration, leaving teams at risk of slow issue detection and analysis and a decrease in overall quality of service reliability and customer experience.

Broader deployment of automation has led developers to recognize that it’s key to reducing downtime and increasing resolution. This was seen by 3 in 4 organizations that implemented a continuous workflow to incident response for service management after adopting a hybrid workforce model.

Manual Processes Are Outdated and Lead to Higher Cost of Downtime and Service Incident Volume

The survey also found that more than a third (39.7%) of organizations had an increased cost of downtime during the last year (March 2021 to now). In fact, 58.2% reported that downtime (i.e., application outages, service degradation) cost their organization up to $499,999 per hour on average. Of those who reported an increase in the amount of time it takes to resolve incidents, 45.2% said it was due to a lack of unified communication with teammates (people are collaborating using disparate tools).


"Organizations need to deliver innovation faster and more efficiently than ever before. However, too many SRE, ITOps and DevOps teams are wasting time on disconnected, manual processes and playing a reactive game of whack-a-mole as they try to keep applications running," said Divanny Lamas, CEO of Transposit.

Operations teams are experiencing challenges while trying to solve incidents, including difficulties reaching people with specialized knowledge, inadequate support from collaboration methods and tools and lack of automation. When asked if they have observed any change in the frequency of service incidents that have affected their customers over the course of the last year (March 2021 to now), 62.9% of respondents reported an increase. Of those who said there was an increase in service incidents, respondents said the top reasons why this happened are digital transformation (60.7%), rolling out of new products or product updates (55.1%), methods and tools for collaboration did not adequately support their remote team (49.3%) and organizational change including team member churn, influx of new team members, and M&A activity (45.4%).

The Key to Faster Resolution of Incidents and Less Downtime: SRE Practices Combined with Automation

The rising demand for site reliability engineering is clear, as 75.6% of respondents said there has been an increased focus on SRE practices in their organization in the past 12 months, and of those, 35.1% plan to expand SRE efforts in 2022. Additionally, 65.1% of respondents plan to hire site reliability engineers in the next 12 months.

The need for automation tools is evident in the SRE roles to complement organizations’ increased focus on site reliability practices; 42.3% of SREs said the current level of automation is not meeting their organization’s needs and they are actively pursuing a new solution to solve for this shortage.

SREs are still dealing with cumbersome and tedious processes, despite the increased demand for SRE practices. Over half of SREs (56.5%) reported they still manually enter data into an ITSM system or other system or record to keep track of actions that were taken by humans during the resolution of an incident.

To scale, organizations need to implement automation technology to rid teams of these time-consuming manual processes. This is underlined by the fact that a full 100% of the respondents with a VP/Director/Manager SRE title who cited a decrease or no change in service incidents said it was because their organization implemented automation technology to help reduce the number of service incidents. Respondents also said better documentation, process and availability of data during incidents would have the most impact on MTTR, downtime and quality of service reliability.

As seen in the survey, organizations' approaches to automation differ. A majority (63%) responded that their approach to automation was incremental automation, in which they begin by codifying processes and work up to more advanced, fully automated scenarios. When asked whether automation should let humans use their judgment at critical decision points to be more reliable and effective, 80.4% of respondents said yes. Automation that keeps humans in the loop at key decision points increases flexibility and stability while automating repetitive tasks.

The top three tasks respondents would like automated are: service requests (52.6%), change requests (42.9%) and user provisioning (39.8%). Organizations are seeing the need to double-down on automation — the top three ways organizations plan to improve their incident management process are to implement new automation tools or applications (48.2%), implement new communications/collaboration tools or applications (41.5%) and implement new integration tools or applications (40.6%).

The survey makes it clear that ITOps, DevOps and SRE professionals should consider enhancing service reliability through human-in-the-loop automation, SRE practices and better collaboration methods. Teams enabled with these tools and process advancements are better empowered to spend their time and efforts on delivering innovation and competitive advantages, and ultimately creating more business value.

Jessica Abelson is Director of Product Marketing at Transposit
APM

The Latest

A major architectural shift is underway across enterprise networks, according to a new global study from Cisco. As AI assistants, agents, and data-driven workloads reshape how work gets done, they're creating faster, more dynamic, more latency-sensitive, and more complex network traffic. Combined with the ubiquity of connected devices, 24/7 uptime demands, and intensifying security threats, these shifts are driving infrastructure to adapt and evolve ...

Image
Cisco

The development of banking apps was supposed to provide users with convenience, control and piece of mind. However, for thousands of Halifax customers recently, a major mobile outage caused the exact opposite, leaving customers unable to check balances, or pay bills, sparking widespread frustration. This wasn't an isolated incident ... So why are these failures still happening? ...

Cyber threats are growing more sophisticated every day, and at their forefront are zero-day vulnerabilities. These elusive security gaps are exploited before a fix becomes available, making them among the most dangerous threats in today's digital landscape ... This guide will explore what these vulnerabilities are, how they work, why they pose such a significant threat, and how modern organizations can stay protected ...

The prevention of data center outages continues to be a strategic priority for data center owners and operators. Infrastructure equipment has improved, but the complexity of modern architectures and evolving external threats presents new risks that operators must actively manage, according to the Data Center Outage Analysis 2025 from Uptime Institute ...

As observability engineers, we navigate a sea of telemetry daily. We instrument our applications, configure collectors, and build dashboards, all in pursuit of understanding our complex distributed systems. Yet, amidst this flood of data, a critical question often remains unspoken, or at best, answered by gut feeling: "Is our telemetry actually good?" ... We're inviting you to participate in shaping a foundational element for better observability: the Instrumentation Score ...

We're inching ever closer toward a long-held goal: technology infrastructure that is so automated that it can protect itself. But as IT leaders aggressively employ automation across our enterprises, we need to continuously reassess what AI is ready to manage autonomously and what can not yet be trusted to algorithms ...

Much like a traditional factory turns raw materials into finished products, the AI factory turns vast datasets into actionable business outcomes through advanced models, inferences, and automation. From the earliest data inputs to the final token output, this process must be reliable, repeatable, and scalable. That requires industrializing the way AI is developed, deployed, and managed ...

Almost half (48%) of employees admit they resent their jobs but stay anyway, according to research from Ivanti ... This has obvious consequences across the business, but we're overlooking the massive impact of resenteeism and presenteeism on IT. For IT professionals tasked with managing the backbone of modern business operations, these numbers spell big trouble ...

For many B2B and B2C enterprise brands, technology isn't a core strength. Relying on overly complex architectures (like those that follow a pure MACH doctrine) has been flagged by industry leaders as a source of operational slowdown, creating bottlenecks that limit agility in volatile market conditions ...

FinOps champions crucial cross-departmental collaboration, uniting business, finance, technology and engineering leaders to demystify cloud expenses. Yet, too often, critical cost issues are softened into mere "recommendations" or "insights" — easy to ignore. But what if we adopted security's battle-tested strategy and reframed these as the urgent risks they truly are, demanding immediate action? ...