Skip to main content

Enabling the Future of Remote Work

Tony Zhao
Agora

What may have appeared to be a stopgap solution in the spring of 2020 is now clearly our new workplace reality: It's impossible to walk back so many of the developments in workflow we've seen since then. The question is no longer when we'll all get back to the office, but how the companies that are lagging in their technological ability to facilitate remote work can catch up. 
 
The "late bloomer" companies here can learn a lot about fostering employees' productivity and happiness from the earlier adapters — and from people who have been building remote work solutions with agility and efficiency in mind.  

At Agora's recent conference, we brought together some of those solution-builders: Charley Ho, co-founder and CTO of virtual office provider Remotion, Joe da Silva, co-founder and CEO of collaborative platform Camvas, and Matthew Lloyd, CXO of digital workplace provider Wurkr. Agora Startup Advocate, Blaise Thomas, moderated the discussion.  

Our panel agreed remote work is here to stay, and a poll of session attendees made it clearer that the hybrid model is what workers want: 17% said they would prefer to work entirely remotely, about the same share said they preferred being required to come to the office a certain number of days per week, and the majority preferred coming to the office whenever they choose.  

So we asked the panel what companies, teams and employees can do next.  

Remote work needs to mirror face-to-face interactions, and businesses can do better than the clunky tools so many of them are using today.

Part of the promise of remote work is that it provides flexibility — which is what the modern workforce demands. Charley Ho of Remotion points out that so much of in-person office life is spontaneous, and workplace tools need to build in spontaneity. Remote work platforms need to do better than "in-person." Ho says the "giant face" video call phenomenon is unnatural and can feel exhausting — and you start solving that by assessing how participants are shown on the screen, asking whether "the full-screen video experience"  is really necessary for everyone, especially when you are trying to emulate an "always on" presence like in the physical office. We can't underestimate how flexible in-person interactions truly are. 

"When one person works remote, everyone works remote." 

That, said Joe da Silva, is Camvas's "core philosophy," and it's a smart guideline. "Unless we work in such a way that we give everyone the context to be productive, you really need to create communication capabilities that allow for that to happen," he elaborated. Lloyd added that if you want everyone on a team to be in "the same situation," you need to lead with remote. Eschewing the office meeting room and having everyone dial into a meeting from their desk gives everyone on the team an equal say, and removes the fear that anyone out of the office is being left behind. 

"Always on" doesn't mean "panopticon."  

The problem with leaving your webcam on all the time, pointed out Matthew Lloyd, is that people feel like it violates their privacy. And the in-person office, he added, can really be a "distraction farm." Wurkr aimed to improve on that, by allowing workers to move between virtual offices and to "replicate the knock on the door" anywhere around the world, but also offering do-not-disturb options. Some clients, he said, don't even want to "switch on" — but they enjoy, psychologically, just feeling "proximity" to their colleagues.  

Remote work can be more distracting than the office, and companies need to solve that. 

Ho said Remotion learned some things about what distraction means while considering what "always-on" meant. "A video call feels so much more intense of an interaction," he said. "But what happens when you tab into Slack, someone asks a question to you 20 seconds later, just as you've tabbed back to your work? If I could just be tapped on the shoulder, that would save time." Ho added that his team found it's helpful to workers to see who's having those conversations and where, and to allow them to join those conversations and collaborate meaningfully.  

A synchronous workflow for remote work and tools that enable it are good for productivity — and inclusion.  

All panelists agreed that remote work can have a democratizing effect. It allows companies to hire wherever in the world they find the right talent, which provides opportunities for people who don't have similar local opportunities. Lloyd pointed out it's extremely helpful for people with mobility issues — even people who don't cope well in large groups. Opening up the team this way brings diversity of thought, experience, perspective — which is good for the business's overall vision and competitiveness. 

These takeaways carry a lot of meaning and value for industry stakeholders as they consider how they operate in the remote work ecosystem. It'll be intriguing to see how the conversation progresses in person and on every remote platform.

Tony Zhao is Co-Founder and CEO at Agora

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

Enabling the Future of Remote Work

Tony Zhao
Agora

What may have appeared to be a stopgap solution in the spring of 2020 is now clearly our new workplace reality: It's impossible to walk back so many of the developments in workflow we've seen since then. The question is no longer when we'll all get back to the office, but how the companies that are lagging in their technological ability to facilitate remote work can catch up. 
 
The "late bloomer" companies here can learn a lot about fostering employees' productivity and happiness from the earlier adapters — and from people who have been building remote work solutions with agility and efficiency in mind.  

At Agora's recent conference, we brought together some of those solution-builders: Charley Ho, co-founder and CTO of virtual office provider Remotion, Joe da Silva, co-founder and CEO of collaborative platform Camvas, and Matthew Lloyd, CXO of digital workplace provider Wurkr. Agora Startup Advocate, Blaise Thomas, moderated the discussion.  

Our panel agreed remote work is here to stay, and a poll of session attendees made it clearer that the hybrid model is what workers want: 17% said they would prefer to work entirely remotely, about the same share said they preferred being required to come to the office a certain number of days per week, and the majority preferred coming to the office whenever they choose.  

So we asked the panel what companies, teams and employees can do next.  

Remote work needs to mirror face-to-face interactions, and businesses can do better than the clunky tools so many of them are using today.

Part of the promise of remote work is that it provides flexibility — which is what the modern workforce demands. Charley Ho of Remotion points out that so much of in-person office life is spontaneous, and workplace tools need to build in spontaneity. Remote work platforms need to do better than "in-person." Ho says the "giant face" video call phenomenon is unnatural and can feel exhausting — and you start solving that by assessing how participants are shown on the screen, asking whether "the full-screen video experience"  is really necessary for everyone, especially when you are trying to emulate an "always on" presence like in the physical office. We can't underestimate how flexible in-person interactions truly are. 

"When one person works remote, everyone works remote." 

That, said Joe da Silva, is Camvas's "core philosophy," and it's a smart guideline. "Unless we work in such a way that we give everyone the context to be productive, you really need to create communication capabilities that allow for that to happen," he elaborated. Lloyd added that if you want everyone on a team to be in "the same situation," you need to lead with remote. Eschewing the office meeting room and having everyone dial into a meeting from their desk gives everyone on the team an equal say, and removes the fear that anyone out of the office is being left behind. 

"Always on" doesn't mean "panopticon."  

The problem with leaving your webcam on all the time, pointed out Matthew Lloyd, is that people feel like it violates their privacy. And the in-person office, he added, can really be a "distraction farm." Wurkr aimed to improve on that, by allowing workers to move between virtual offices and to "replicate the knock on the door" anywhere around the world, but also offering do-not-disturb options. Some clients, he said, don't even want to "switch on" — but they enjoy, psychologically, just feeling "proximity" to their colleagues.  

Remote work can be more distracting than the office, and companies need to solve that. 

Ho said Remotion learned some things about what distraction means while considering what "always-on" meant. "A video call feels so much more intense of an interaction," he said. "But what happens when you tab into Slack, someone asks a question to you 20 seconds later, just as you've tabbed back to your work? If I could just be tapped on the shoulder, that would save time." Ho added that his team found it's helpful to workers to see who's having those conversations and where, and to allow them to join those conversations and collaborate meaningfully.  

A synchronous workflow for remote work and tools that enable it are good for productivity — and inclusion.  

All panelists agreed that remote work can have a democratizing effect. It allows companies to hire wherever in the world they find the right talent, which provides opportunities for people who don't have similar local opportunities. Lloyd pointed out it's extremely helpful for people with mobility issues — even people who don't cope well in large groups. Opening up the team this way brings diversity of thought, experience, perspective — which is good for the business's overall vision and competitiveness. 

These takeaways carry a lot of meaning and value for industry stakeholders as they consider how they operate in the remote work ecosystem. It'll be intriguing to see how the conversation progresses in person and on every remote platform.

Tony Zhao is Co-Founder and CEO at Agora

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...