Skip to main content

Why the End-User Experience is Key to APM

The value that end-user activity monitoring (EUAM) provides has become clear. By monitoring users in real time, you can help ensure application performance and identify errors before they affect anyone. However, many IT organizations continue to wrestle with how to use the data gathered from monitoring activities to increase business understanding and to enhance the quality of the user's experience.

EUAM provides a wealth of information that may be easier to leverage when it is incorporated into existing IT operations management technology, but there are some challenges to making this happen.

Historically, the end user has not been a primary focus for IT operations. While this focus is starting to change, the user continues to be supported through the service desk and enabled through the management of the devices used. This level of support alone does not give the user the ability to solve IT problems independently or provide visibility into how these people use IT.

This situation is changing now because end users are beginning to play a major role in influencing IT decisions, especially regarding how IT applications are chosen, supplied, consumed and evaluated to support the business. Forward-thinking IT operations organizations are now using or investigating the use of management products that can provide greater visibility into how users consume IT.

Integrating End-User Activity Monitoring and Application Performance Monitoring

Monitoring end-user activity provides applications performance monitoring with visibility at the endpoint. Application performance monitoring has two areas of focus: the back-end data center communication layers and the front-end transactional communication (to the end user). Current application performance monitoring tools focus on a specific application or communication method. This means that they fail to provide a holistic understanding on how multiple applications impact each other or support the overall service at the end-point — the end user.

Adding EUAM to the application performance monitoring solution enables IT operations to understand how the end user is experiencing IT services, irrespective of how many applications are being used or where they are sourced. However, gaining visibility into end-user activity is valuable only if IT operations measure it against end-user satisfaction metrics.

Together these two capabilities provide valuable visibility into:

- Application performance beyond the data center

- Applications performance and usage irrespective of each application’s source

- End-user activity and applications experience

End-User Activity Monitoring + IT Service Management = An Excellent User Experience

For decades, IT has struggled to understand how end users consume IT, which at the service desk has resulted in a set of carefully articulated questions to help identify and route issues. Service desk managers continually wrestle with how to effectively solve end-user issues through accurate analysis and associating incidents with the appropriate support team and expertise level.

As the end-user environment becomes more complex, it will become more challenging for service managers to support the business. The ability to leverage internal data center metrics is less relevant in a world where the IT user is using Cloud-delivered applications, and consuming applications on many different devices. Service managers must be able to understand both what the end user is doing and how the end user consumes IT to enable the business.

The ability to understand end-user behavior, through the integration of EUAM and ITSM, moves the service desk from a passive incident-reporting system to a solution that provides the IT support organization visibility into how the business uses IT.

At the most basic level, this visibility enables service managers to manage incidents more effectively. At a more advanced level, the information enables them to identify and management business trends and provide services in line with business usage.

Combine End-User and Activity Monitoring with Mobility

The management of mobile devices continues to challenge IT organizations. Mobile device usage, changes and configurations can be managed more effectively when end-user activity is factored into the equation.

Understanding how and when people use their mobile devices allows the management of the devices to be aligned with business priorities and not just device activity.

In addition, understanding the end-user experience with devices can contribute to understanding what devices are more effective in supporting the business.

Closing Thoughts

By focusing on the end user, IT operations organizations can factor the business impact into IT service decisions and ensure that users are supported more effectively through visibility into their activity. Application performance monitoring solutions should ensure that there are no blind spots in how the business uses IT, and this visibility is leveraged to augment and enhance other key solutions.

IT organizations should embark on a strategy that includes the end user as a core focus. Begin now to investigate the use of tools that can monitor end-user activity and provide the necessary detail to enable better IT services.

ABOUT David Williams

David Williams is Vice President of Strategy in the Office of the CTO at BMC, with particular focus on availability and performance monitoring, applications performance monitoring, IT operations automation, and management tools architectures. He has 29 years of experience in IT operations management. Williams joined BMC from Gartner, where he was Research VP, leading the research for IT process automation (runbook automation); event, correlation, and analysis; performance monitoring; and IT operations management architectures and frameworks. His past experience also includes executive-level positions at Alterpoint (acquired by Versata), IT Masters (acquired by BMC), and as VP of Product Management and Strategy at IBM Tivoli. He also worked as a senior technologist at CA for Unicenter TNG and spent his early years in IT working in computer operations for several companies, including Bankers Trust.

Related Links:

BMC End User Experience Management

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

Many organizations assumed their infrastructure strategy was settled. It had been implemented, optimized and built into long-term plans. Recent changes in technology and vendor consolidation are forcing a second look. Cloud outages and licensing changes have exposed how much dependency exists on a small number of platforms. As a result, organizations are reevaluating whether those decisions still hold up under current conditions ...

Edge AI is strategically embedded in core IT and infrastructure spending across industries, according to the 2026 Edge AI Survey from ZEDEDA. The research shows that 83% of C-suite and IT executive respondents say edge AI is important to their core business strategy ...

As AI adoption accelerates, operational complexity — not model intelligence — is becoming the primary barrier to reliable AI at scale, according to the State of AI Engineering 2026 from Datadog ... The report highlights a compounding complexity challenge as AI systems scale ... Around 5% of AI model requests fail in production, with nearly 60% of those failures caused by capacity limits ...

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

Why the End-User Experience is Key to APM

The value that end-user activity monitoring (EUAM) provides has become clear. By monitoring users in real time, you can help ensure application performance and identify errors before they affect anyone. However, many IT organizations continue to wrestle with how to use the data gathered from monitoring activities to increase business understanding and to enhance the quality of the user's experience.

EUAM provides a wealth of information that may be easier to leverage when it is incorporated into existing IT operations management technology, but there are some challenges to making this happen.

Historically, the end user has not been a primary focus for IT operations. While this focus is starting to change, the user continues to be supported through the service desk and enabled through the management of the devices used. This level of support alone does not give the user the ability to solve IT problems independently or provide visibility into how these people use IT.

This situation is changing now because end users are beginning to play a major role in influencing IT decisions, especially regarding how IT applications are chosen, supplied, consumed and evaluated to support the business. Forward-thinking IT operations organizations are now using or investigating the use of management products that can provide greater visibility into how users consume IT.

Integrating End-User Activity Monitoring and Application Performance Monitoring

Monitoring end-user activity provides applications performance monitoring with visibility at the endpoint. Application performance monitoring has two areas of focus: the back-end data center communication layers and the front-end transactional communication (to the end user). Current application performance monitoring tools focus on a specific application or communication method. This means that they fail to provide a holistic understanding on how multiple applications impact each other or support the overall service at the end-point — the end user.

Adding EUAM to the application performance monitoring solution enables IT operations to understand how the end user is experiencing IT services, irrespective of how many applications are being used or where they are sourced. However, gaining visibility into end-user activity is valuable only if IT operations measure it against end-user satisfaction metrics.

Together these two capabilities provide valuable visibility into:

- Application performance beyond the data center

- Applications performance and usage irrespective of each application’s source

- End-user activity and applications experience

End-User Activity Monitoring + IT Service Management = An Excellent User Experience

For decades, IT has struggled to understand how end users consume IT, which at the service desk has resulted in a set of carefully articulated questions to help identify and route issues. Service desk managers continually wrestle with how to effectively solve end-user issues through accurate analysis and associating incidents with the appropriate support team and expertise level.

As the end-user environment becomes more complex, it will become more challenging for service managers to support the business. The ability to leverage internal data center metrics is less relevant in a world where the IT user is using Cloud-delivered applications, and consuming applications on many different devices. Service managers must be able to understand both what the end user is doing and how the end user consumes IT to enable the business.

The ability to understand end-user behavior, through the integration of EUAM and ITSM, moves the service desk from a passive incident-reporting system to a solution that provides the IT support organization visibility into how the business uses IT.

At the most basic level, this visibility enables service managers to manage incidents more effectively. At a more advanced level, the information enables them to identify and management business trends and provide services in line with business usage.

Combine End-User and Activity Monitoring with Mobility

The management of mobile devices continues to challenge IT organizations. Mobile device usage, changes and configurations can be managed more effectively when end-user activity is factored into the equation.

Understanding how and when people use their mobile devices allows the management of the devices to be aligned with business priorities and not just device activity.

In addition, understanding the end-user experience with devices can contribute to understanding what devices are more effective in supporting the business.

Closing Thoughts

By focusing on the end user, IT operations organizations can factor the business impact into IT service decisions and ensure that users are supported more effectively through visibility into their activity. Application performance monitoring solutions should ensure that there are no blind spots in how the business uses IT, and this visibility is leveraged to augment and enhance other key solutions.

IT organizations should embark on a strategy that includes the end user as a core focus. Begin now to investigate the use of tools that can monitor end-user activity and provide the necessary detail to enable better IT services.

ABOUT David Williams

David Williams is Vice President of Strategy in the Office of the CTO at BMC, with particular focus on availability and performance monitoring, applications performance monitoring, IT operations automation, and management tools architectures. He has 29 years of experience in IT operations management. Williams joined BMC from Gartner, where he was Research VP, leading the research for IT process automation (runbook automation); event, correlation, and analysis; performance monitoring; and IT operations management architectures and frameworks. His past experience also includes executive-level positions at Alterpoint (acquired by Versata), IT Masters (acquired by BMC), and as VP of Product Management and Strategy at IBM Tivoli. He also worked as a senior technologist at CA for Unicenter TNG and spent his early years in IT working in computer operations for several companies, including Bankers Trust.

Related Links:

BMC End User Experience Management

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

Many organizations assumed their infrastructure strategy was settled. It had been implemented, optimized and built into long-term plans. Recent changes in technology and vendor consolidation are forcing a second look. Cloud outages and licensing changes have exposed how much dependency exists on a small number of platforms. As a result, organizations are reevaluating whether those decisions still hold up under current conditions ...

Edge AI is strategically embedded in core IT and infrastructure spending across industries, according to the 2026 Edge AI Survey from ZEDEDA. The research shows that 83% of C-suite and IT executive respondents say edge AI is important to their core business strategy ...

As AI adoption accelerates, operational complexity — not model intelligence — is becoming the primary barrier to reliable AI at scale, according to the State of AI Engineering 2026 from Datadog ... The report highlights a compounding complexity challenge as AI systems scale ... Around 5% of AI model requests fail in production, with nearly 60% of those failures caused by capacity limits ...

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...