Skip to main content

Enhancing the Availability of Important but Non-Critical Applications

Cassius Rhue
SIOS Technology

For mission-critical applications, it's often easy to justify an investment in a solution designed to ensure that the application is available no less than 99.99% of the time — easy because the cost to the organization of that app being offline would quickly surpass the cost of a high availability (HA) solution. In a 2022 survey from ITIC, 44% of respondents from mid-sized and large enterprises said that a single hour of unexpected downtime could cost more than $1 million.

But not every application warrants the investment in an HA solution with redundant infrastructure spanning multiple data centers or cloud availability zones. Many of the applications in an organization fall into a category perhaps best described as important-but-non-critical applications. If these applications go offline, even for an extended period of time, they're not likely to impact your business to the tune of $1M per hour. But downtime may be costly in other ways. You may need to redirect IT resources from other projects to bring them back online. Your employee productivity and satisfaction may take a hit, leading to lower customer satisfaction. Your reputation may suffer.

So how can you reduce the risk of unexpected downtime without investing in an HA solution?

The answer actually has two parts. One is simple: constant vigilance, enabled through the use of application monitoring tools that monitor all aspects of the application execution environment — from the underlying characteristics of the hardware to the allocation of resources and the management of process threads. Because these tools are designed with application awareness, they can both identify conditions that are out of bounds for the application and ignore conditions that are, in fact, normal for the application, even though a monitoring solution that lacks application awareness might flag that condition as problematic.

The second part of the answer, though, is just as important: incorporate application-aware automation. There are any number of monitoring tools that can keep your IT personnel apprised of the performance of distinct aspects of the application stack. When these tools detect an issue, though, they typically send an alert to the IT team, which then needs to review the alert, determine what to do, and then perform some action to resolve the problem (if, in fact, the alert really does indicate a problem). If the application-aware monitoring tools were also able to respond — appropriately and automatically — to detected problems, then you could enhance the performance and reliability of these important-but-non-critical applications without placing any additional burdens on your IT team.

Such application-aware solutions for automated monitoring and maintenance of your important-but-non-critical systems are available. By monitoring for problems that might be minor in the near term but more problematic in the long term, they can proactively help you avoid application downtime. For example, they might detect and automatically restart an application service that is not performing as expected. If that doesn't improve the situation, the solution might restart the entire application (or reboot the entire server) — all without operator intervention. These tools can bring a problem to the attention of an operator — if it's a problem that the tool cannot resolve on its own — but because these tools are designed to be application aware and have been designed to execute an appropriate response automatically, they can proactively do the right thing without having to request an intervention from your IT personnel.

By remaining vigilant and monitoring all aspects of the application environment, these solutions can ensure that your important-but-non-critical applications remain accessible and operational at a much higher level of availability than you would otherwise achieve through a combination of hope and benign neglect. You won't have a guarantee of 99.99% availability as you would if you were running your applications on an HA infrastructure spanning multiple data centers or cloud availability zones, but for a fraction of the cost of an HA infrastructure you can enhance the availability of these applications in a way that is commensurate with their importance to your employees, customers, and reputation.

Cassius Rhue is VP of Customer Experience at SIOS Technology

Hot Topics

The Latest

While 87% of manufacturing leaders and technical specialists report that ROI from their AIOps initiatives has met or exceeded expectations, only 37% say they are fully prepared to operationalize AI at scale, according to The Future of IT Operations in the AI Era, a report from Riverbed ...

Many organizations rely on cloud-first architectures to aggregate, analyze, and act on their operational data ... However, not all environments are conducive to cloud-first architectures ... There are limitations to cloud-first architectures that render them ineffective in mission-critical situations where responsiveness, cost control, and data sovereignty are non-negotiable; these limitations include ...

For years, cybersecurity was built around a simple assumption: protect the physical network and trust everything inside it. That model made sense when employees worked in offices, applications lived in data centers, and devices rarely left the building. Today's reality is fluid: people work from everywhere, applications run across multiple clouds, and AI-driven agents are beginning to act on behalf of users. But while the old perimeter dissolved, a new one quietly emerged ...

For years, infrastructure teams have treated compute as a relatively stable input. Capacity was provisioned, costs were forecasted, and performance expectations were set based on the assumption that identical resources behaved identically. That mental model is starting to break down. AI infrastructure is no longer behaving like static cloud capacity. It is increasingly behaving like a market ...

Resilience can no longer be defined by how quickly an organization recovers from an incident or disruption. The effectiveness of any resilience strategy is dependent on its ability to anticipate change, operate under continuous stress, and adapt confidently amid uncertainty ...

Mobile users are less tolerant of app instability than ever before. According to a new report from Luciq, No Margin for Error: What Mobile Users Expect and What Mobile Leaders Must Deliver in 2026, even minor performance issues now result in immediate abandonment, lost purchases, and long-term brand impact ...

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become the dominant force shaping enterprise data strategies. Boards expect progress. Executives expect returns. And data leaders are under pressure to prove that their organizations are "AI-ready" ...

Agentic AI is a major buzzword for 2026. Many tech companies are making bold promises about this technology, but many aren't grounded in reality, at least not yet. This coming year will likely be shaped by reality checks for IT teams, and progress will only come from a focus on strong foundations and disciplined execution ...

AI systems are still prone to hallucinations and misjudgments ... To build the trust needed for adoption, AI must be paired with human-in-the-loop (HITL) oversight, or checkpoints where humans verify, guide, and decide what actions are taken. The balance between autonomy and accountability is what will allow AI to deliver on its promise without sacrificing human trust ...

More data center leaders are reducing their reliance on utility grids by investing in onsite power for rapidly scaling data centers, according to the Data Center Power Report from Bloom Energy ...

Enhancing the Availability of Important but Non-Critical Applications

Cassius Rhue
SIOS Technology

For mission-critical applications, it's often easy to justify an investment in a solution designed to ensure that the application is available no less than 99.99% of the time — easy because the cost to the organization of that app being offline would quickly surpass the cost of a high availability (HA) solution. In a 2022 survey from ITIC, 44% of respondents from mid-sized and large enterprises said that a single hour of unexpected downtime could cost more than $1 million.

But not every application warrants the investment in an HA solution with redundant infrastructure spanning multiple data centers or cloud availability zones. Many of the applications in an organization fall into a category perhaps best described as important-but-non-critical applications. If these applications go offline, even for an extended period of time, they're not likely to impact your business to the tune of $1M per hour. But downtime may be costly in other ways. You may need to redirect IT resources from other projects to bring them back online. Your employee productivity and satisfaction may take a hit, leading to lower customer satisfaction. Your reputation may suffer.

So how can you reduce the risk of unexpected downtime without investing in an HA solution?

The answer actually has two parts. One is simple: constant vigilance, enabled through the use of application monitoring tools that monitor all aspects of the application execution environment — from the underlying characteristics of the hardware to the allocation of resources and the management of process threads. Because these tools are designed with application awareness, they can both identify conditions that are out of bounds for the application and ignore conditions that are, in fact, normal for the application, even though a monitoring solution that lacks application awareness might flag that condition as problematic.

The second part of the answer, though, is just as important: incorporate application-aware automation. There are any number of monitoring tools that can keep your IT personnel apprised of the performance of distinct aspects of the application stack. When these tools detect an issue, though, they typically send an alert to the IT team, which then needs to review the alert, determine what to do, and then perform some action to resolve the problem (if, in fact, the alert really does indicate a problem). If the application-aware monitoring tools were also able to respond — appropriately and automatically — to detected problems, then you could enhance the performance and reliability of these important-but-non-critical applications without placing any additional burdens on your IT team.

Such application-aware solutions for automated monitoring and maintenance of your important-but-non-critical systems are available. By monitoring for problems that might be minor in the near term but more problematic in the long term, they can proactively help you avoid application downtime. For example, they might detect and automatically restart an application service that is not performing as expected. If that doesn't improve the situation, the solution might restart the entire application (or reboot the entire server) — all without operator intervention. These tools can bring a problem to the attention of an operator — if it's a problem that the tool cannot resolve on its own — but because these tools are designed to be application aware and have been designed to execute an appropriate response automatically, they can proactively do the right thing without having to request an intervention from your IT personnel.

By remaining vigilant and monitoring all aspects of the application environment, these solutions can ensure that your important-but-non-critical applications remain accessible and operational at a much higher level of availability than you would otherwise achieve through a combination of hope and benign neglect. You won't have a guarantee of 99.99% availability as you would if you were running your applications on an HA infrastructure spanning multiple data centers or cloud availability zones, but for a fraction of the cost of an HA infrastructure you can enhance the availability of these applications in a way that is commensurate with their importance to your employees, customers, and reputation.

Cassius Rhue is VP of Customer Experience at SIOS Technology

Hot Topics

The Latest

While 87% of manufacturing leaders and technical specialists report that ROI from their AIOps initiatives has met or exceeded expectations, only 37% say they are fully prepared to operationalize AI at scale, according to The Future of IT Operations in the AI Era, a report from Riverbed ...

Many organizations rely on cloud-first architectures to aggregate, analyze, and act on their operational data ... However, not all environments are conducive to cloud-first architectures ... There are limitations to cloud-first architectures that render them ineffective in mission-critical situations where responsiveness, cost control, and data sovereignty are non-negotiable; these limitations include ...

For years, cybersecurity was built around a simple assumption: protect the physical network and trust everything inside it. That model made sense when employees worked in offices, applications lived in data centers, and devices rarely left the building. Today's reality is fluid: people work from everywhere, applications run across multiple clouds, and AI-driven agents are beginning to act on behalf of users. But while the old perimeter dissolved, a new one quietly emerged ...

For years, infrastructure teams have treated compute as a relatively stable input. Capacity was provisioned, costs were forecasted, and performance expectations were set based on the assumption that identical resources behaved identically. That mental model is starting to break down. AI infrastructure is no longer behaving like static cloud capacity. It is increasingly behaving like a market ...

Resilience can no longer be defined by how quickly an organization recovers from an incident or disruption. The effectiveness of any resilience strategy is dependent on its ability to anticipate change, operate under continuous stress, and adapt confidently amid uncertainty ...

Mobile users are less tolerant of app instability than ever before. According to a new report from Luciq, No Margin for Error: What Mobile Users Expect and What Mobile Leaders Must Deliver in 2026, even minor performance issues now result in immediate abandonment, lost purchases, and long-term brand impact ...

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become the dominant force shaping enterprise data strategies. Boards expect progress. Executives expect returns. And data leaders are under pressure to prove that their organizations are "AI-ready" ...

Agentic AI is a major buzzword for 2026. Many tech companies are making bold promises about this technology, but many aren't grounded in reality, at least not yet. This coming year will likely be shaped by reality checks for IT teams, and progress will only come from a focus on strong foundations and disciplined execution ...

AI systems are still prone to hallucinations and misjudgments ... To build the trust needed for adoption, AI must be paired with human-in-the-loop (HITL) oversight, or checkpoints where humans verify, guide, and decide what actions are taken. The balance between autonomy and accountability is what will allow AI to deliver on its promise without sacrificing human trust ...

More data center leaders are reducing their reliance on utility grids by investing in onsite power for rapidly scaling data centers, according to the Data Center Power Report from Bloom Energy ...