Even Artificial Intelligence Is Only as Good as Its Users

Khadim Batti
Whatfix

Artificial intelligence (AI) has saturated the conversation around technology as compelling new tools like ChatGPT produce headlines every day. Enterprise leaders have correctly identified the potential of AI — and its many tributary technologies — to generate new efficiencies at scale, particularly in the cloud era. But as we now know, these technologies are rarely plug-and-play, for reasons both technical and human. As they introduce AI into the workplace, IT leaders, CIOs and other executives will need to address both of these dynamics to derive the full value from their technology investments across all different departments from sales and marketing to R&D.

Focus on User Digital Experience

The value of modern technology is realized at scale. As new advanced technologies move more into everyday operations, an emerging barrier (and consequently, also a differentiator) is how easily and efficiently users are able to interact with the tools they're given. A powerful tool which lags in adoption among half the workforce cannot achieve its full potential value. Of course, this means training is essential. But the modern technology environment moves quickly, outpacing traditional training methods. Therefore, methods of training need to evolve as well, leveraging the technologies to which they correspond. 

Organizations that are able to achieve high rates of technology adoption, usage, and efficiency among their workforce at scale will be in a far better position to generate the full returns on their technology investments. This means focusing on users just as much as the technology itself. Organizations must take advantage of all the training resources at their disposal — including product demos, walkthroughs, and other materials — to adapt to new technology. However, the core issue is the rapid rate of technology change. The pace of change makes it challenging for users to adjust to the cadence of updates and new tools. This holds companies back from realizing the full value of their technology investments through lack of user adoption. 

Crucially, traditional training methods are inadequate in the face of today's fast-moving technology landscape. This is where AI can enable the introduction of further tools: by automating user guidance through a software layer that can act across business apps, for example, an organization can reduce the friction associated with learning a new tool and therefore increase adoption. AI on the back end can automate tasks or introduce real-time guidance to produce a smoother, more efficient user experience. By making business apps easier to use and adopt, organizations can derive greater value from their existing technology suite as well as reduce the friction associated with introducing a new tool. Used in this way, and combined with more traditional elements, like workshops and on-demand informational content and mechanisms to deliver feedback, AI creates a virtuous cycle. 

The other side of this is monitoring software efficiency. In modern organizations, data fuels decision making — this should be no different when it comes to AI. Leaders can't expect to introduce solutions — even automated solutions — and automatically receive maximum return on their investment. Especially at scale, digital tools are still only as good as how well they're being used. Leaders must be able to identify bottlenecks and quickly adapt to increase efficiency over time. This means developing KPIs that correspond to business goals and tracking with the purpose of making informed adjustments to strategy both on the business side and the internal technology side.

Build the Infrastructure to Support AI

Digital transformation in general, and especially where AI is concerned, is at its core a technical and organizational infrastructure to support continuous change over time. In the cloud era, change management strategies must be a permanent feature of the company's strategic outlook rather than a transition plan with an end-date. Technology, as the primary differentiator in all industries, must be a central part of any change management strategy. For AI, this means building teams that have the skills and expertise to manage its deployment across business units. Software engineers are an essential part of any AI team — they have the technical capabilities to enable deployments and to integrate them into operations. They should also contribute to making the operations of any particular AI program visible and intelligible to all relevant stakeholders, and especially the C-suite. 

It's important to note that AI is not best used as a catch-all solution to apply broadly and blindly everywhere it might fit. In the avalanche of AI headlines concerning every industry under the sun, it can be easy to forget this. AI is best used to achieve specific tasks. Organizations must clearly identify the purpose of each AI deployment and have a reliable means to track its progress in relation to those goals. The team should include representatives from product management and design to ensure that any AI project aligns with overall business objectives. 

Additionally, organizations must ensure that stakeholders clearly understand the inputs and outputs of any program, as well as how they relate to one another so that teams can make informed decisions about strategic adjustments. AI outputs depend on the specificity of their inputs, so teams must be trained on how to formulate these inputs in an efficient way, a process called "prompt engineering." Some AI solutions can also learn these inputs as employees deploy them and autofill them in context moving forward, creating a positive feedback loop to remove friction from the process over time. 

Artificial intelligence represents a structural shift in how we use technology — organizations must reflect that by establishing dedicated systems and structures to integrate the technology and manage its evolution over time. At the same time, the organizations that are able to achieve the best return on AI investments will clearly understand its capabilities and limitations and establish mechanisms to ensure AI projects are contributing positively to overall business goals.

Unlocking the Potential of Your Existing Workforce

AI is here to stay, and it represents a massive change in terms of how people and businesses relate to technology. As tools like generative AI grow more sophisticated, they will emerge in additional areas of our everyday lives — chatbots, customer service, IT service management, and more, for example. In sales, for example, AI helps employees conduct prospect research and develop personalized email scripts on the front end, while economizing the CRM user experience on the back end. In R&D it helps researchers filter monumental datalakes of information to produce actionable knowledge. The true benefits of AI tools are in the efficiencies they can unlock among the existing workforce. Employees within a structure that focuses on continuous transformation will develop competencies and skills through their natural workflows that will enable them to supervise AI as an everyday function. By focusing on user digital experience as much as the technologies themselves, organizations will be able to generate the maximum return on their investments while simultaneously developing the capacity to evolve in tandem with innovations they used to chase.

Khadim Batti is Co-founder and CEO of Whatfix

Related Links

Hot Topics

The Latest

Three Strikes and They're Gone: Why Proactive Operations is Now a Customer Retention Strategy

IT organizations have historically measured success by how quickly they can respond when something goes wrong. The entire discipline of Incident Management has been optimized around mean time to resolution, first-response SLAs and ticket closure rates. But new research suggests that even though this is a well-executed playbook, it's no longer enough to retain customers ...

When the Database Is the Problem, Is APM Enough?

Production incidents rarely announce themselves as database problems. They appear as slow transactions, timeouts, rising response times, or an application struggling under a workload it previously handled. APM provides an essential starting point. It can identify a slow transaction path, highlight an affected service, and show that a database dependency is consuming more time than expected. But identifying the database as part of the problem is not the same as explaining what is happening inside it ...

From Cleanup to Prevention: The Future of Cloud-Native Cost Optimization

Cloud teams are under constant pressure to reduce spend without slowing development or increasing operational risk. They are deploying autoscalers, rightsizing workloads, enforcing resource requests, reviewing utilization dashboards, and building FinOps processes around cloud-native environments. Yet the results often disappoint ...

The Real Enterprise AI Risk Isn't Hallucinations

Ask most IT leaders about their biggest concern with AI and you'll hear the same answer: hallucinations ... Today, however, the conversation has shifted ... As organizations move beyond chatbots and experiments, they are increasingly deploying AI agents that perform multi-step tasks. These systems retrieve documents, query databases, call APIs, generate reports, write code, and make recommendations. The issue is not whether the model can reason. The issue is whether the organization can see, verify, and govern the decisions being made along the way ...

Beyond Buy vs. Build: The New Playbook for Data Pipelines

While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...

The Corporate Network Is Fading - Here's What Replaces It

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

IT Leaders Must Establish a Network Data Architecture Practice

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

Data Center Outages Are Decreasing but More Costly

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

Observability Has a Physical Layer Now: What AI Infrastructure Teaches IT Operations

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

TLS Certificate Expiration Is Becoming an Observability Problem

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Even Artificial Intelligence Is Only as Good as Its Users

Khadim Batti
Whatfix

Artificial intelligence (AI) has saturated the conversation around technology as compelling new tools like ChatGPT produce headlines every day. Enterprise leaders have correctly identified the potential of AI — and its many tributary technologies — to generate new efficiencies at scale, particularly in the cloud era. But as we now know, these technologies are rarely plug-and-play, for reasons both technical and human. As they introduce AI into the workplace, IT leaders, CIOs and other executives will need to address both of these dynamics to derive the full value from their technology investments across all different departments from sales and marketing to R&D.

Focus on User Digital Experience

The value of modern technology is realized at scale. As new advanced technologies move more into everyday operations, an emerging barrier (and consequently, also a differentiator) is how easily and efficiently users are able to interact with the tools they're given. A powerful tool which lags in adoption among half the workforce cannot achieve its full potential value. Of course, this means training is essential. But the modern technology environment moves quickly, outpacing traditional training methods. Therefore, methods of training need to evolve as well, leveraging the technologies to which they correspond. 

Organizations that are able to achieve high rates of technology adoption, usage, and efficiency among their workforce at scale will be in a far better position to generate the full returns on their technology investments. This means focusing on users just as much as the technology itself. Organizations must take advantage of all the training resources at their disposal — including product demos, walkthroughs, and other materials — to adapt to new technology. However, the core issue is the rapid rate of technology change. The pace of change makes it challenging for users to adjust to the cadence of updates and new tools. This holds companies back from realizing the full value of their technology investments through lack of user adoption. 

Crucially, traditional training methods are inadequate in the face of today's fast-moving technology landscape. This is where AI can enable the introduction of further tools: by automating user guidance through a software layer that can act across business apps, for example, an organization can reduce the friction associated with learning a new tool and therefore increase adoption. AI on the back end can automate tasks or introduce real-time guidance to produce a smoother, more efficient user experience. By making business apps easier to use and adopt, organizations can derive greater value from their existing technology suite as well as reduce the friction associated with introducing a new tool. Used in this way, and combined with more traditional elements, like workshops and on-demand informational content and mechanisms to deliver feedback, AI creates a virtuous cycle. 

The other side of this is monitoring software efficiency. In modern organizations, data fuels decision making — this should be no different when it comes to AI. Leaders can't expect to introduce solutions — even automated solutions — and automatically receive maximum return on their investment. Especially at scale, digital tools are still only as good as how well they're being used. Leaders must be able to identify bottlenecks and quickly adapt to increase efficiency over time. This means developing KPIs that correspond to business goals and tracking with the purpose of making informed adjustments to strategy both on the business side and the internal technology side.

Build the Infrastructure to Support AI

Digital transformation in general, and especially where AI is concerned, is at its core a technical and organizational infrastructure to support continuous change over time. In the cloud era, change management strategies must be a permanent feature of the company's strategic outlook rather than a transition plan with an end-date. Technology, as the primary differentiator in all industries, must be a central part of any change management strategy. For AI, this means building teams that have the skills and expertise to manage its deployment across business units. Software engineers are an essential part of any AI team — they have the technical capabilities to enable deployments and to integrate them into operations. They should also contribute to making the operations of any particular AI program visible and intelligible to all relevant stakeholders, and especially the C-suite. 

It's important to note that AI is not best used as a catch-all solution to apply broadly and blindly everywhere it might fit. In the avalanche of AI headlines concerning every industry under the sun, it can be easy to forget this. AI is best used to achieve specific tasks. Organizations must clearly identify the purpose of each AI deployment and have a reliable means to track its progress in relation to those goals. The team should include representatives from product management and design to ensure that any AI project aligns with overall business objectives. 

Additionally, organizations must ensure that stakeholders clearly understand the inputs and outputs of any program, as well as how they relate to one another so that teams can make informed decisions about strategic adjustments. AI outputs depend on the specificity of their inputs, so teams must be trained on how to formulate these inputs in an efficient way, a process called "prompt engineering." Some AI solutions can also learn these inputs as employees deploy them and autofill them in context moving forward, creating a positive feedback loop to remove friction from the process over time. 

Artificial intelligence represents a structural shift in how we use technology — organizations must reflect that by establishing dedicated systems and structures to integrate the technology and manage its evolution over time. At the same time, the organizations that are able to achieve the best return on AI investments will clearly understand its capabilities and limitations and establish mechanisms to ensure AI projects are contributing positively to overall business goals.

Unlocking the Potential of Your Existing Workforce

AI is here to stay, and it represents a massive change in terms of how people and businesses relate to technology. As tools like generative AI grow more sophisticated, they will emerge in additional areas of our everyday lives — chatbots, customer service, IT service management, and more, for example. In sales, for example, AI helps employees conduct prospect research and develop personalized email scripts on the front end, while economizing the CRM user experience on the back end. In R&D it helps researchers filter monumental datalakes of information to produce actionable knowledge. The true benefits of AI tools are in the efficiencies they can unlock among the existing workforce. Employees within a structure that focuses on continuous transformation will develop competencies and skills through their natural workflows that will enable them to supervise AI as an everyday function. By focusing on user digital experience as much as the technologies themselves, organizations will be able to generate the maximum return on their investments while simultaneously developing the capacity to evolve in tandem with innovations they used to chase.

Khadim Batti is Co-founder and CEO of Whatfix

Related Links

Hot Topics

The Latest

Three Strikes and They're Gone: Why Proactive Operations is Now a Customer Retention Strategy

IT organizations have historically measured success by how quickly they can respond when something goes wrong. The entire discipline of Incident Management has been optimized around mean time to resolution, first-response SLAs and ticket closure rates. But new research suggests that even though this is a well-executed playbook, it's no longer enough to retain customers ...

When the Database Is the Problem, Is APM Enough?

Production incidents rarely announce themselves as database problems. They appear as slow transactions, timeouts, rising response times, or an application struggling under a workload it previously handled. APM provides an essential starting point. It can identify a slow transaction path, highlight an affected service, and show that a database dependency is consuming more time than expected. But identifying the database as part of the problem is not the same as explaining what is happening inside it ...

From Cleanup to Prevention: The Future of Cloud-Native Cost Optimization

Cloud teams are under constant pressure to reduce spend without slowing development or increasing operational risk. They are deploying autoscalers, rightsizing workloads, enforcing resource requests, reviewing utilization dashboards, and building FinOps processes around cloud-native environments. Yet the results often disappoint ...

The Real Enterprise AI Risk Isn't Hallucinations

Ask most IT leaders about their biggest concern with AI and you'll hear the same answer: hallucinations ... Today, however, the conversation has shifted ... As organizations move beyond chatbots and experiments, they are increasingly deploying AI agents that perform multi-step tasks. These systems retrieve documents, query databases, call APIs, generate reports, write code, and make recommendations. The issue is not whether the model can reason. The issue is whether the organization can see, verify, and govern the decisions being made along the way ...

Beyond Buy vs. Build: The New Playbook for Data Pipelines

While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...

The Corporate Network Is Fading - Here's What Replaces It

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

IT Leaders Must Establish a Network Data Architecture Practice

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

Data Center Outages Are Decreasing but More Costly

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

Observability Has a Physical Layer Now: What AI Infrastructure Teaches IT Operations

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

TLS Certificate Expiration Is Becoming an Observability Problem

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...