Skip to main content

Facebook Instant Articles: A Solution to Publishers' Perennial Web Performance Challenge

Drit Suljoti

Of all the industries that have moved to a more web-centric approach over the past decade and a half, you'd be hard-pressed to find one that has struggled more with the transition than the news media. Due to a revenue model that has traditionally relied heavily on subscriptions and in-person purchases of print publications in conjunction with ad sales, this industry was slower than most to figure out a business model that works online.

While different subscription and paywall strategies have had varying levels of success, news publishers have also had to rely heavily on online advertisements and other third party tags (e.g. profile-building pixels) – and that, of course, can create a problem when it comes to delivering a great web experience to their end users.

This is because an abundance of third party tags can drag down the performance of a website. All other things being equal, the heavier a page is (aka the more bytes that an end user's browser must download to display it) will always load slower than one with fewer bytes.

The same logic applies to a site that has to make many different connections to third party providers in order to access that data.

And on top of that, every single third party element and its connection represents a potential pitfall that, should an error occur while accessing the data, could impact the performance of the entire site.

In a Catchpoint study from March, news sites were found to have a significantly higher percentage of their site content – as well as their speed bottlenecks – coming from third parties than sites from the eCommerce, banking, and travel industries. And in a more recent survey of the top 50 news sites across both desktop and mobile, it's easy to see why:


The numbers in the table above represent the averages of the different data sets across all the sites that were tested, and they show the problem that IT Ops teams at these publications have struggled to deal with for years. An average webpage load time (i.e. the time it takes until the user can interact with the page) of over 3.5 seconds is very high compared to other industries, and it's caused by the excessive amount of data that must be downloaded, as well as all of the different third party connections.

Those numbers would be bad enough if they were just desktop sites, but the mobile category is where things really get scary. While the mobile site averages are slightly better across the board than their desktop counterparts, they're not nearly good enough.

Due to bandwidth issues on mobile networks and additional fees that are built into many data plans, content providers should be striving to trim down their mobile sites and reduce the number of third-party elements on their pages as much as possible. Yet as you can clearly see, that's not happening in the news industry due to their goal of maximizing their revenue streams through those same third-party vendors.

With this challenge in mind, several major news organizations recently decided to partner with Facebook for the new Instant Articles feature, on the Facebook mobile app. By hosting their content on the social media giant's platform, those news sites' articles can be pre-loaded for users, slashing the webpage load time on mobile devices down to practically zero. This is because the way a browser renders a page is very different from Facebook's app, which is specifically designed to deliver the fastest possible experience to the end user (pre-loading, loading in parallel/lowering dependencies, etc.).

Modern browsers currently have the capability to pre-load content, but not to the level that Facebook can. So if the Instant Articles feature becomes more prevalent, the question then becomes how the browser vendors will be able to respond.

While these news sites may be sacrificing their own mobile site traffic by not funneling users to their actual sites, the ads that can be featured on Instant Articles mean that news outlets are still able to bring in advertising revenue while maximizing their users' online experience.

For now, it remains to be seen how prevalent the Instant Articles feature will be (it's still only available on iOS; Android users still have to access the actual publishers' mobile sites to read articles), but it's a creative solution to a difficult problem. By sacrificing some of their autonomy, news organizations may finally be able to deliver their content in a manner that doesn't end up costing them readers who don't have the patience to wait for a slow mobile page to load.

Drit Suljoti is CPO and Co-Founder of Catchpoint Systems.

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

Facebook Instant Articles: A Solution to Publishers' Perennial Web Performance Challenge

Drit Suljoti

Of all the industries that have moved to a more web-centric approach over the past decade and a half, you'd be hard-pressed to find one that has struggled more with the transition than the news media. Due to a revenue model that has traditionally relied heavily on subscriptions and in-person purchases of print publications in conjunction with ad sales, this industry was slower than most to figure out a business model that works online.

While different subscription and paywall strategies have had varying levels of success, news publishers have also had to rely heavily on online advertisements and other third party tags (e.g. profile-building pixels) – and that, of course, can create a problem when it comes to delivering a great web experience to their end users.

This is because an abundance of third party tags can drag down the performance of a website. All other things being equal, the heavier a page is (aka the more bytes that an end user's browser must download to display it) will always load slower than one with fewer bytes.

The same logic applies to a site that has to make many different connections to third party providers in order to access that data.

And on top of that, every single third party element and its connection represents a potential pitfall that, should an error occur while accessing the data, could impact the performance of the entire site.

In a Catchpoint study from March, news sites were found to have a significantly higher percentage of their site content – as well as their speed bottlenecks – coming from third parties than sites from the eCommerce, banking, and travel industries. And in a more recent survey of the top 50 news sites across both desktop and mobile, it's easy to see why:


The numbers in the table above represent the averages of the different data sets across all the sites that were tested, and they show the problem that IT Ops teams at these publications have struggled to deal with for years. An average webpage load time (i.e. the time it takes until the user can interact with the page) of over 3.5 seconds is very high compared to other industries, and it's caused by the excessive amount of data that must be downloaded, as well as all of the different third party connections.

Those numbers would be bad enough if they were just desktop sites, but the mobile category is where things really get scary. While the mobile site averages are slightly better across the board than their desktop counterparts, they're not nearly good enough.

Due to bandwidth issues on mobile networks and additional fees that are built into many data plans, content providers should be striving to trim down their mobile sites and reduce the number of third-party elements on their pages as much as possible. Yet as you can clearly see, that's not happening in the news industry due to their goal of maximizing their revenue streams through those same third-party vendors.

With this challenge in mind, several major news organizations recently decided to partner with Facebook for the new Instant Articles feature, on the Facebook mobile app. By hosting their content on the social media giant's platform, those news sites' articles can be pre-loaded for users, slashing the webpage load time on mobile devices down to practically zero. This is because the way a browser renders a page is very different from Facebook's app, which is specifically designed to deliver the fastest possible experience to the end user (pre-loading, loading in parallel/lowering dependencies, etc.).

Modern browsers currently have the capability to pre-load content, but not to the level that Facebook can. So if the Instant Articles feature becomes more prevalent, the question then becomes how the browser vendors will be able to respond.

While these news sites may be sacrificing their own mobile site traffic by not funneling users to their actual sites, the ads that can be featured on Instant Articles mean that news outlets are still able to bring in advertising revenue while maximizing their users' online experience.

For now, it remains to be seen how prevalent the Instant Articles feature will be (it's still only available on iOS; Android users still have to access the actual publishers' mobile sites to read articles), but it's a creative solution to a difficult problem. By sacrificing some of their autonomy, news organizations may finally be able to deliver their content in a manner that doesn't end up costing them readers who don't have the patience to wait for a slow mobile page to load.

Drit Suljoti is CPO and Co-Founder of Catchpoint Systems.

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...