Skip to main content

Fixing and Preventing Application Outages: 5 Questions That Just Might Save Your Network

Akhil Sahai

Why do outages of mission-critical applications still happen? Aren't there multiple solutions that can alert IT teams to problems? Yes – and that can be part of the problem. One alarm goes off, and then another and another until the team is quickly overwhelmed. By the time an incident like this is brought under control, the company may have lost on average as much as $750,000 for a 90-minute outage, according to the Ponemon report, Cost of Data Center Outages, in addition to loss of face and damage to brand value.

What typically happens next is that forensic experts go through multiple product consoles and logs to identify the cause of an incident, and the blame gets passed around as time ticks away. But deep machine learning-based, root-cause analytics and predictive analytics technologies are helping organizations dramatically prevent such incidents and reduce mean time to repair.

In a digital-first world, teams must manage unparalleled amounts of data while predicting and preventing outages, in real time, while maintaining and delivering agile, reliable applications. The problem is that most organizations must tap several different siloed vendor tools to assist in the monitoring, identifying, mitigation and remediation of incidents and hope that they speak to each other, which traditionally hasn't happened.

IT infrastructure keeps changing from physical to hybrid and multi-cloud environments, and new architectures keep arising. Consequently, it is becoming impossible for IT administrators to keep up with the multitude of objects, with thousands of metrics generating data in near-real time.

Applications in today's environments need to be reliable and secure within these high performance environments, so new approaches must be employed to provide intelligence. Automated, self-learning solutions that analyze and provide insight into applications and infrastructure topologies are essential in this transformation.

The New Language of Monitoring Tools

Vendors are throwing around phrases like "big data" and "machine learning" because organizations understand that these features can help them tackle the complex needs of application performance. But what do they really mean?

Machine Learning: Machine learning is self-learning, supervised or unsupervised algorithms that can be based on neural networks, statistics or Digital Signal Processing et al.

Big Data Architecture: A framework for managing masses of structured and unstructured data in an automated, highly scalable way using open source technologies.

Domain Knowledge: Questions about what happened, what caused it, how to remediate it and prevent it from happening again – the domain knowledge in TechOps and DevOps helps answer them.

5 Questions About Your Monitoring Solution

Ask these 5 questions before moving forward with a monitoring solution that can address application outages:

1. Immediate Intelligence: Does the solution identify in real time, those alarms that need immediate attention?

2. Scalability: Does the solution scale and is it able to handle millions of objects?

3. Automation: Does it quickly pinpoint the root cause of the problem and identify how to fix it, rather than relying on expensive domain experts?

4. Communal Wisdom: Do you have access to tribal knowledge such as vendor knowledge bases, discussion forums and the latest state-of-the-art technologies in order to help teams remediate incidents quickly and efficiently?

5. Prevention: Historically, monitoring tools send alerts only after a problem has already occurred or when the rules and set thresholds are violated, but the key to preventing outages is to predict issues in advance. Does the solution provide alerts to anomalous trends or potentially dangerous issues before they impact your application?

Yesterday's siloed IT management tools tend not to communicate with each other, causing confusion and over-alerting. This makes it difficult, if not impossible, for IT teams to determine what's worth investigating and what's not – paving the way for service disruptions and breaches. Fortunately, today's solutions offer real-time insight and recommendations for remediation, as well as analytics that can predict trouble so you can stop problems before they start.

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

Fixing and Preventing Application Outages: 5 Questions That Just Might Save Your Network

Akhil Sahai

Why do outages of mission-critical applications still happen? Aren't there multiple solutions that can alert IT teams to problems? Yes – and that can be part of the problem. One alarm goes off, and then another and another until the team is quickly overwhelmed. By the time an incident like this is brought under control, the company may have lost on average as much as $750,000 for a 90-minute outage, according to the Ponemon report, Cost of Data Center Outages, in addition to loss of face and damage to brand value.

What typically happens next is that forensic experts go through multiple product consoles and logs to identify the cause of an incident, and the blame gets passed around as time ticks away. But deep machine learning-based, root-cause analytics and predictive analytics technologies are helping organizations dramatically prevent such incidents and reduce mean time to repair.

In a digital-first world, teams must manage unparalleled amounts of data while predicting and preventing outages, in real time, while maintaining and delivering agile, reliable applications. The problem is that most organizations must tap several different siloed vendor tools to assist in the monitoring, identifying, mitigation and remediation of incidents and hope that they speak to each other, which traditionally hasn't happened.

IT infrastructure keeps changing from physical to hybrid and multi-cloud environments, and new architectures keep arising. Consequently, it is becoming impossible for IT administrators to keep up with the multitude of objects, with thousands of metrics generating data in near-real time.

Applications in today's environments need to be reliable and secure within these high performance environments, so new approaches must be employed to provide intelligence. Automated, self-learning solutions that analyze and provide insight into applications and infrastructure topologies are essential in this transformation.

The New Language of Monitoring Tools

Vendors are throwing around phrases like "big data" and "machine learning" because organizations understand that these features can help them tackle the complex needs of application performance. But what do they really mean?

Machine Learning: Machine learning is self-learning, supervised or unsupervised algorithms that can be based on neural networks, statistics or Digital Signal Processing et al.

Big Data Architecture: A framework for managing masses of structured and unstructured data in an automated, highly scalable way using open source technologies.

Domain Knowledge: Questions about what happened, what caused it, how to remediate it and prevent it from happening again – the domain knowledge in TechOps and DevOps helps answer them.

5 Questions About Your Monitoring Solution

Ask these 5 questions before moving forward with a monitoring solution that can address application outages:

1. Immediate Intelligence: Does the solution identify in real time, those alarms that need immediate attention?

2. Scalability: Does the solution scale and is it able to handle millions of objects?

3. Automation: Does it quickly pinpoint the root cause of the problem and identify how to fix it, rather than relying on expensive domain experts?

4. Communal Wisdom: Do you have access to tribal knowledge such as vendor knowledge bases, discussion forums and the latest state-of-the-art technologies in order to help teams remediate incidents quickly and efficiently?

5. Prevention: Historically, monitoring tools send alerts only after a problem has already occurred or when the rules and set thresholds are violated, but the key to preventing outages is to predict issues in advance. Does the solution provide alerts to anomalous trends or potentially dangerous issues before they impact your application?

Yesterday's siloed IT management tools tend not to communicate with each other, causing confusion and over-alerting. This makes it difficult, if not impossible, for IT teams to determine what's worth investigating and what's not – paving the way for service disruptions and breaches. Fortunately, today's solutions offer real-time insight and recommendations for remediation, as well as analytics that can predict trouble so you can stop problems before they start.

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.