Skip to main content

Q&A: Gabriel Lowy Talks About Investing in APM

Pete Goldin
APMdigest

In APMdigest's exclusive interview, Gabriel Lowy, Founder of Tech-Tonics, looks at Application Performance Management (APM) from the investor's perspective.

APM: We regularly hear about new investments in vendors of APM and related technologies. Is this trend gaining momentum?

GL: It is a trend that has had momentum for a few years. New investments have gone to both established companies that have been part of industry consolidation as well as to start-ups.

Larger vendors have been snapping up start-ups in recently years to get newer technologies that were lacking in their portfolios. Private equity has also been quite active in the space. They have taken out public companies such as BMC, Compuware and Riverbed that they believed were underperforming relative to market trends and their intrinsic value. Meanwhile, start-ups with innovative solutions and go-to-market strategies continue to get VC funding. Eventually, they will IPO like New Relic did, or sell out to a larger buyer. And so the cycle goes.

APM: Is APM a good industry for investment opportunities?

GL: APM is a good industry for investment opportunities, but only the right ones. As enterprises become increasingly software-defined and seek to get better returns on their data assets with advanced analytics, more are recognizing that these are not attainable without exceptional user experience. The better the employee user experience is, the more engaged they are with customers, lifting their productivity. In turn, the better the customer user experience is, the more engaged they are with the company. Both are critical to satisfaction and loyalty and to achieving corporate ROI and risk management objectives.

But investments in point solutions have diminished value because the trend in the space is toward consolidating the number of point solutions into a higher-level, more strategic and holistic approach. We've proposed this in our PADS Framework for performance management and user experience.

APM: What should an investor look for in an APM vendor?

GL: Well-managed companies with a strategy and product portfolio that aligns with industry trends that has a paper trail of solid execution. It's that simple. But it's not easy to do it consistently. Features and benefits only have value in the eyes of the customer. Those vendors that can demonstrate success at application performance and user experience from DevOps to production will drive growth by helping the customer achieve their business and financial objectives. Vendors must give customers flexibility in how they consume the solution and ease of use and deployment to reduce TCO and show a rapid payback on investment. That's the so-called value proposition. That's what attracts investment.

APM: What is the long-term financial outlook for APM as an industry?

GL: I believe APM has a favorable long-term outlook for the fundamental reasons I referred to earlier. User experience drives financial performance and higher market valuations. A study we did of S&P 500 companies last year validated this. Those with a strategic approach outperformed their peer groups. And they have fewer tools deployed than the double-digits that exist in many companies. That sprawls makes companies skeptical and often causes more headaches that resolves them. As yet, not enough companies have taken a strategic approach. I expect that will change as companies realize that APM, next to database, is the most strategic software they can invest in.

APM: Do you have any other tips for investors looking at APM vendors?

GL: Do your due diligence. Recognize what the key drivers are for the APM space. Talk to customers and understand use cases. What are the most important applications issues that customers face? Separate the sizzle from the steak in terms of claims versus deliverables. How satisfied are the vendor's customers? What are their complaints? Supplement this with independent industry research. APM is a space with a bright future. But as with any investment, you've got to stick to facts and fundamentals.

ABOUT Gabriel Lowy

Gabriel Lowy is the founder of TechTonics. During the past 17 years, he has been consistently recognized as a leading technology analyst, including Forbes.com Best Analysts in America and The Wall Street Journal Best of the Street. He has published over 1,000 reports and articles on different sectors of the technology industry, including market studies, forecasts and competitor analyses. Lowy is a trusted adviser to senior managements, including CEOs, CMOs, CFOs and CIOs. He is an active blogger on subjects intersecting strategy, technology and finance, and is a featured contributor to APMdigest.

Lowy has held senior technology research analyst positions with several Wall Street firms, including Mizuho Securities USA, Noble Financial Group, Inc., Collins Stewart LLC, Credit Lyonnais Securities USA and Oppenheimer & Co. He began his career at Andersen Consulting. Lowy holds an MBA in Strategy and a BS in Marketing from New York University's Stern School of Business.

Hot Topic
The Latest
The Latest 10

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

Q&A: Gabriel Lowy Talks About Investing in APM

Pete Goldin
APMdigest

In APMdigest's exclusive interview, Gabriel Lowy, Founder of Tech-Tonics, looks at Application Performance Management (APM) from the investor's perspective.

APM: We regularly hear about new investments in vendors of APM and related technologies. Is this trend gaining momentum?

GL: It is a trend that has had momentum for a few years. New investments have gone to both established companies that have been part of industry consolidation as well as to start-ups.

Larger vendors have been snapping up start-ups in recently years to get newer technologies that were lacking in their portfolios. Private equity has also been quite active in the space. They have taken out public companies such as BMC, Compuware and Riverbed that they believed were underperforming relative to market trends and their intrinsic value. Meanwhile, start-ups with innovative solutions and go-to-market strategies continue to get VC funding. Eventually, they will IPO like New Relic did, or sell out to a larger buyer. And so the cycle goes.

APM: Is APM a good industry for investment opportunities?

GL: APM is a good industry for investment opportunities, but only the right ones. As enterprises become increasingly software-defined and seek to get better returns on their data assets with advanced analytics, more are recognizing that these are not attainable without exceptional user experience. The better the employee user experience is, the more engaged they are with customers, lifting their productivity. In turn, the better the customer user experience is, the more engaged they are with the company. Both are critical to satisfaction and loyalty and to achieving corporate ROI and risk management objectives.

But investments in point solutions have diminished value because the trend in the space is toward consolidating the number of point solutions into a higher-level, more strategic and holistic approach. We've proposed this in our PADS Framework for performance management and user experience.

APM: What should an investor look for in an APM vendor?

GL: Well-managed companies with a strategy and product portfolio that aligns with industry trends that has a paper trail of solid execution. It's that simple. But it's not easy to do it consistently. Features and benefits only have value in the eyes of the customer. Those vendors that can demonstrate success at application performance and user experience from DevOps to production will drive growth by helping the customer achieve their business and financial objectives. Vendors must give customers flexibility in how they consume the solution and ease of use and deployment to reduce TCO and show a rapid payback on investment. That's the so-called value proposition. That's what attracts investment.

APM: What is the long-term financial outlook for APM as an industry?

GL: I believe APM has a favorable long-term outlook for the fundamental reasons I referred to earlier. User experience drives financial performance and higher market valuations. A study we did of S&P 500 companies last year validated this. Those with a strategic approach outperformed their peer groups. And they have fewer tools deployed than the double-digits that exist in many companies. That sprawls makes companies skeptical and often causes more headaches that resolves them. As yet, not enough companies have taken a strategic approach. I expect that will change as companies realize that APM, next to database, is the most strategic software they can invest in.

APM: Do you have any other tips for investors looking at APM vendors?

GL: Do your due diligence. Recognize what the key drivers are for the APM space. Talk to customers and understand use cases. What are the most important applications issues that customers face? Separate the sizzle from the steak in terms of claims versus deliverables. How satisfied are the vendor's customers? What are their complaints? Supplement this with independent industry research. APM is a space with a bright future. But as with any investment, you've got to stick to facts and fundamentals.

ABOUT Gabriel Lowy

Gabriel Lowy is the founder of TechTonics. During the past 17 years, he has been consistently recognized as a leading technology analyst, including Forbes.com Best Analysts in America and The Wall Street Journal Best of the Street. He has published over 1,000 reports and articles on different sectors of the technology industry, including market studies, forecasts and competitor analyses. Lowy is a trusted adviser to senior managements, including CEOs, CMOs, CFOs and CIOs. He is an active blogger on subjects intersecting strategy, technology and finance, and is a featured contributor to APMdigest.

Lowy has held senior technology research analyst positions with several Wall Street firms, including Mizuho Securities USA, Noble Financial Group, Inc., Collins Stewart LLC, Credit Lyonnais Securities USA and Oppenheimer & Co. He began his career at Andersen Consulting. Lowy holds an MBA in Strategy and a BS in Marketing from New York University's Stern School of Business.

Hot Topic
The Latest
The Latest 10

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.