Gartner Q&A: Jonah Kowall Talks About APM - Part 1

Pete Goldin
APMdigest

In Part 1 of APMdigest's exclusive interview, Jonah Kowall, Research Vice President, IT Operations Management at Gartner, discusses Gartner's 2013 Magic Quadrant for Application Performance Monitoring (APM), and APM hot topics including SaaS and Mobile.

APM: What do you see as the most significant changes in the market between the release of Gartner's 2012 and 2013 Magic Quadrants for APM?

JK: We have seen increased acceleration and investment by some of the smaller players in the space. In addition, the use of analytics technology has further differentiated offerings in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) market.

And, of course, we have seen a greater importance on Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) delivery. We definitely see more end-user organizations implementing SaaS. I think that trend will continue, hence the relative weighting of SaaS and analytics will be increasing year over year for the APM Magic Quadrant.

APM: Is the growth of SaaS APM living up to the expectations many of us set for it a year or two ago?

JK: SaaS is not for everyone. It is definitely a subset of the market today. Solutions which offer differentiation because of the delivery model, or solutions which give you a choice of the same product in both delivery models, appeal more to buyers.

Additionally, SaaS helps shorten the buying cycle, meaning POCs can be executed much more efficiently, and customers can see value quickly, even if they decide longer-term that they may want to move on-premise.

APM: The requirements for Gartner's Magic Quadrant for APM continue to say "some features of the APM offering must be available via a SaaS delivery model" rather than requiring full feature SaaS. At some point, do you foresee the APM Magic Quadrant requiring every vendor to offer the full product as a service?

JK: We require that vendors have a least some functionality in SaaS. In 2012, we allowed a third party to provide the SaaS, and in 2013 we required that the vendors themselves provide SaaS.

Looking forward, we definitely do see most of the players in the APM Magic Quadrant offering more of their full solution as a service, so I wouldn't be surprised to see that requirement continue to expand.

APM: Do you have any stats on how much productivity can be increased by using APM SaaS?

JK: There have not been any studies conducted and I think that it would be hard to determine what that number is. It also depends on the complexity of the product.

Some solutions are very straightforward to implement, in terms of infrastructure requirements, meaning the server that collects the data from the agents. Other solutions can be more complex and require many components, especially at scale. It really varies on the vendor solution in terms of the complexity of the infrastructure requirements.

APM: But you do see an advantage to APM as a service?

Yes. There is no question upgrades may be painful. One area of complication is when customizations or integrations have been made with other products. By offering APM as a service, the customer is automatically upgraded without having to deal with the upgrade process. The agents are normally backwards compatible, but at least the user interface and functionality will remain current without putting in the extra work.

The other piece is that SaaS products integrate with well-formed APIs because they have been designed that way, since they are remotely delivered. When you have on-premise software, customization and integration often takes the form of either custom code or integrations that are not as well formed in terms of the APIs that are available.

SaaS providers have to keep some level of API compatibility in order for integration. That is definitely not the case with on-premise, and we have seen that be an issue with keeping customers on current revisions of software. If the software is not kept up to date, the customer eventually gets disgruntled with the fact that it doesn't support the new technologies or there are bugs that do not get fixed. It ultimately ends up reflecting poorly on the vendor, even if the solution, in its current version, fixes a lot of the issues that the users dislike. SaaS solves these issues.

APM: It seems like a lot of these productivity issues are maintenance oriented?

JK: Yes, it is the work that the ops guys need to do to keep current on the versions of the software. Enterprises often skip a major version of software and go to the next one. That is something we see a lot. For example, with Windows, many enterprises deployed Windows XP and then Windows 7, and skipped Windows Vista. We are seeing a lot of the same type of approach to APM. But the vendors don't expect enterprises to skip major versions. If you try to upgrade from version 5 to version 7, for example, it can cause problems because there is a pretty significant gap between those major versions.

APM: Your 2013 APM Magic Quadrant says "Mobile APM is the next wave of innovation" but it seems to be taking longer than we all expected.

JK: In 2013, we didn't really see mobile APM products that were actually giving “true APM”. We have had synthetic testing products that do mobile for quite a while, but that is a completely different value proposition from APM, which lives inside the application. So when I say "mobile APM", I am really talking about the same type of APM that looks inside applications, not the type of synthetic end user experience that just tries to emulate a user.

So even a year ago from today we just started to see early versions of true APM products for mobile coming out. This market has not been around very long. Solution providers typically have a revenue goal in mind when they release these products, and most of the mobile APM solutions out there exceeded any of the goals that were set.

APM: When do you feel Mobile APM will become truly mainstream, to the point where it drives the APM market?

JK: The demand is there because of the growth and diversity of mobile applications themselves. There are a lot of mobile apps out there, so it is going to take a while to actually proliferate through enough of the development organizations to be what I would call "mainstream". I would say that true Mobile APM is probably a couple of years off from being mainstream by any stretch of the imagination, but it is definitely growing in adoption and we are seeing new and interesting solutions coming to market.

Gartner Q&A: Jonah Kowall Talks About APM - Part 2

In Part 2, Jonah Kowall discusses Gartner's 2013 Magic Quadrant for Application Performance Monitoring (APM), complexity in today's product offerings, and the market's move to simplify APM.

Hot Topic
The Latest
The Latest 10

The Latest

Escaping Pilot Purgatory: How AI Becomes an Operational Advantage

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Closing the Gap in Modern Tech and the Tools Meant to Monitor Them

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Podcast - Episode 23: NetOps Labor Shortage

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Why FinOps Rewrote Its Mission and What It Signals for Technology Management

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Clearing the Path to AI: Why Vendor Consolidation Matters Now

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Cold Data, Hot Problem: Why AI Is Rewriting Enterprise Storage Strategy

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

Observability at a Crossroads: AI, Economics, Complexity and the Enduring Power of Open Source

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

Explainability Is the New Battleground in AI-Powered Observability

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

Empowering the Human Side of the Autonomous IT Age

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI Scale Is Outpacing Infrastructure - and IT Leaders Are Running Out of Time

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

Gartner Q&A: Jonah Kowall Talks About APM - Part 1

Pete Goldin
APMdigest

In Part 1 of APMdigest's exclusive interview, Jonah Kowall, Research Vice President, IT Operations Management at Gartner, discusses Gartner's 2013 Magic Quadrant for Application Performance Monitoring (APM), and APM hot topics including SaaS and Mobile.

APM: What do you see as the most significant changes in the market between the release of Gartner's 2012 and 2013 Magic Quadrants for APM?

JK: We have seen increased acceleration and investment by some of the smaller players in the space. In addition, the use of analytics technology has further differentiated offerings in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) market.

And, of course, we have seen a greater importance on Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) delivery. We definitely see more end-user organizations implementing SaaS. I think that trend will continue, hence the relative weighting of SaaS and analytics will be increasing year over year for the APM Magic Quadrant.

APM: Is the growth of SaaS APM living up to the expectations many of us set for it a year or two ago?

JK: SaaS is not for everyone. It is definitely a subset of the market today. Solutions which offer differentiation because of the delivery model, or solutions which give you a choice of the same product in both delivery models, appeal more to buyers.

Additionally, SaaS helps shorten the buying cycle, meaning POCs can be executed much more efficiently, and customers can see value quickly, even if they decide longer-term that they may want to move on-premise.

APM: The requirements for Gartner's Magic Quadrant for APM continue to say "some features of the APM offering must be available via a SaaS delivery model" rather than requiring full feature SaaS. At some point, do you foresee the APM Magic Quadrant requiring every vendor to offer the full product as a service?

JK: We require that vendors have a least some functionality in SaaS. In 2012, we allowed a third party to provide the SaaS, and in 2013 we required that the vendors themselves provide SaaS.

Looking forward, we definitely do see most of the players in the APM Magic Quadrant offering more of their full solution as a service, so I wouldn't be surprised to see that requirement continue to expand.

APM: Do you have any stats on how much productivity can be increased by using APM SaaS?

JK: There have not been any studies conducted and I think that it would be hard to determine what that number is. It also depends on the complexity of the product.

Some solutions are very straightforward to implement, in terms of infrastructure requirements, meaning the server that collects the data from the agents. Other solutions can be more complex and require many components, especially at scale. It really varies on the vendor solution in terms of the complexity of the infrastructure requirements.

APM: But you do see an advantage to APM as a service?

Yes. There is no question upgrades may be painful. One area of complication is when customizations or integrations have been made with other products. By offering APM as a service, the customer is automatically upgraded without having to deal with the upgrade process. The agents are normally backwards compatible, but at least the user interface and functionality will remain current without putting in the extra work.

The other piece is that SaaS products integrate with well-formed APIs because they have been designed that way, since they are remotely delivered. When you have on-premise software, customization and integration often takes the form of either custom code or integrations that are not as well formed in terms of the APIs that are available.

SaaS providers have to keep some level of API compatibility in order for integration. That is definitely not the case with on-premise, and we have seen that be an issue with keeping customers on current revisions of software. If the software is not kept up to date, the customer eventually gets disgruntled with the fact that it doesn't support the new technologies or there are bugs that do not get fixed. It ultimately ends up reflecting poorly on the vendor, even if the solution, in its current version, fixes a lot of the issues that the users dislike. SaaS solves these issues.

APM: It seems like a lot of these productivity issues are maintenance oriented?

JK: Yes, it is the work that the ops guys need to do to keep current on the versions of the software. Enterprises often skip a major version of software and go to the next one. That is something we see a lot. For example, with Windows, many enterprises deployed Windows XP and then Windows 7, and skipped Windows Vista. We are seeing a lot of the same type of approach to APM. But the vendors don't expect enterprises to skip major versions. If you try to upgrade from version 5 to version 7, for example, it can cause problems because there is a pretty significant gap between those major versions.

APM: Your 2013 APM Magic Quadrant says "Mobile APM is the next wave of innovation" but it seems to be taking longer than we all expected.

JK: In 2013, we didn't really see mobile APM products that were actually giving “true APM”. We have had synthetic testing products that do mobile for quite a while, but that is a completely different value proposition from APM, which lives inside the application. So when I say "mobile APM", I am really talking about the same type of APM that looks inside applications, not the type of synthetic end user experience that just tries to emulate a user.

So even a year ago from today we just started to see early versions of true APM products for mobile coming out. This market has not been around very long. Solution providers typically have a revenue goal in mind when they release these products, and most of the mobile APM solutions out there exceeded any of the goals that were set.

APM: When do you feel Mobile APM will become truly mainstream, to the point where it drives the APM market?

JK: The demand is there because of the growth and diversity of mobile applications themselves. There are a lot of mobile apps out there, so it is going to take a while to actually proliferate through enough of the development organizations to be what I would call "mainstream". I would say that true Mobile APM is probably a couple of years off from being mainstream by any stretch of the imagination, but it is definitely growing in adoption and we are seeing new and interesting solutions coming to market.

Gartner Q&A: Jonah Kowall Talks About APM - Part 2

In Part 2, Jonah Kowall discusses Gartner's 2013 Magic Quadrant for Application Performance Monitoring (APM), complexity in today's product offerings, and the market's move to simplify APM.

Hot Topic
The Latest
The Latest 10

The Latest

Escaping Pilot Purgatory: How AI Becomes an Operational Advantage

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Closing the Gap in Modern Tech and the Tools Meant to Monitor Them

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Podcast - Episode 23: NetOps Labor Shortage

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Why FinOps Rewrote Its Mission and What It Signals for Technology Management

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Clearing the Path to AI: Why Vendor Consolidation Matters Now

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Cold Data, Hot Problem: Why AI Is Rewriting Enterprise Storage Strategy

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

Observability at a Crossroads: AI, Economics, Complexity and the Enduring Power of Open Source

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

Explainability Is the New Battleground in AI-Powered Observability

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

Empowering the Human Side of the Autonomous IT Age

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI Scale Is Outpacing Infrastructure - and IT Leaders Are Running Out of Time

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.