Skip to main content

GenAI in the Enterprise: Why Data Security Is at Risk

Todd Thorsen
CrashPlan

Enterprise data sprawl — vast amounts of critical information scattered across endpoints and siloed within SaaS applications — already challenges companies' ability to protect and back up their data. Much of this information is never fully secured, leaving organizations vulnerable. Now, as generative AI (GenAI) platforms emerge as yet another environment where enterprise data is consumed, transformed, and created, this fragmentation is set to intensify. Without effective data governance, large swaths of corporate information may not be backed up at all. Instead, that data could be uploaded to external GenAI systems, putting sensitive information and intellectual property at risk and amplifying the already formidable complexities of data protection.

 

Image
Crashplan

 

Use of Unregulated GenAI Spikes

GenAI platforms have increased in popularity, and enterprises need help to control how their employees interact with them. New data shows that 72% of workers who uploaded data to GenAI platforms did so without employers providing licenses. The same study found that 65% of organizations lack clear policies on using data with or from AI platforms. Experimenting with GenAI raises security concerns at the employee and employer levels.

For example, the US Patent and Trademark Office banned the use of GenAI tools last year due to security concerns with the technology and some of these tools exhibiting unpredictable behaviors. While there is a ban on using platforms like ChatGPT for work purposes, USPTO employees can use "state-of-the-art generative AI models" only inside the agency's internal test environment.

While this might be considered a cautious approach, it indicates how workplaces will likely evaluate how they implement and interact with GenAI platforms.

Unregulated GenAI Use Comes with Security Risks

The rapid adoption of GenAI tools has raised concerns about data privacy and security within organizations. But what exactly are these risks, and what implications can companies face?

  • Data breaches: AI tools may not have sufficient security controls in place which can lead to exposure of sensitive or proprietary data to malicious actors.
  • Intellectual property theft: Any data uploaded to GenAI platforms is stored and can be used to train the models, leaving IP and trade secrets in the public domain.
  • Regulatory violations: Depending on the data involved, geography and industry regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA can come into play, meaning there are strict data governance regulations. Non-compliance of these can result in fines or legal action.

Using unregulated GenAI can have severe consequences, which re-emphasizes the need for clear guidelines, ethical safeguards, and responsible deployment to ensure companies and employees benefit from these technologies while managing the associated risks.

Addressing the Risks of GenAI

Responsible governance requires a combination of technology, policy, education, and collaboration to foster a culture of responsible innovation and allow enterprises to minimize risks. So, what can companies do to ensure their data is protected? Develop actionable plans that include:

  • Clear GenAI policies: Establish guidelines for how GenAI platforms can be used, including approved cases. Prohibit sensitive or proprietary data from being uploaded and implement an approval process for using GenAI tools. Enterprises must define how they expect employees to use these platforms.
  • Licensed access: Ensure employees can access and use licensed GenAI tools vetted for security and compliance purposes. This provides greater control over the types of platforms being used by employees.
  • Data security training: Whether it's periodic training or in-the-moment reminders, employees need to be educated about the implications of leveraging an unregulated GenAI platform and using company data. Since these platforms use data to train their models, safeguarding IP and sensitive data is crucial.
  • Track GenAI activity: Organizations can monitor and manage how employees interact with GenAI platforms and look for red flags like high-volume uploads or using unapproved tools.

Uploading sensitive company data to unapproved third-party GenAI platforms can leave companies vulnerable to many consequences and potential regulatory violations. Organizations must establish policies and appropriately vet tools to help minimize risk and ensure responsible use.

As GenAI accelerates the creation and dispersion of enterprise data, the risks of data sprawl and insufficient backups increase dramatically. If left unmanaged, GenAI usage could lead to critical corporate information living outside secure ecosystems — never fully backed up, difficult to govern, and vulnerable to theft or misuse. By implementing robust policies, ensuring licensed and controlled platform access, providing ongoing employee education, and maintaining visibility into GenAI interactions, enterprises can still harness the innovative power of these tools. In doing so, they not only mitigate data security and compliance risks but also ensure that data, no matter where it resides, remains protected, integral, and usable for driving sustainable business value.

Todd Thorsen is Chief Information Security Officer at CrashPlan

The Latest

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

GenAI in the Enterprise: Why Data Security Is at Risk

Todd Thorsen
CrashPlan

Enterprise data sprawl — vast amounts of critical information scattered across endpoints and siloed within SaaS applications — already challenges companies' ability to protect and back up their data. Much of this information is never fully secured, leaving organizations vulnerable. Now, as generative AI (GenAI) platforms emerge as yet another environment where enterprise data is consumed, transformed, and created, this fragmentation is set to intensify. Without effective data governance, large swaths of corporate information may not be backed up at all. Instead, that data could be uploaded to external GenAI systems, putting sensitive information and intellectual property at risk and amplifying the already formidable complexities of data protection.

 

Image
Crashplan

 

Use of Unregulated GenAI Spikes

GenAI platforms have increased in popularity, and enterprises need help to control how their employees interact with them. New data shows that 72% of workers who uploaded data to GenAI platforms did so without employers providing licenses. The same study found that 65% of organizations lack clear policies on using data with or from AI platforms. Experimenting with GenAI raises security concerns at the employee and employer levels.

For example, the US Patent and Trademark Office banned the use of GenAI tools last year due to security concerns with the technology and some of these tools exhibiting unpredictable behaviors. While there is a ban on using platforms like ChatGPT for work purposes, USPTO employees can use "state-of-the-art generative AI models" only inside the agency's internal test environment.

While this might be considered a cautious approach, it indicates how workplaces will likely evaluate how they implement and interact with GenAI platforms.

Unregulated GenAI Use Comes with Security Risks

The rapid adoption of GenAI tools has raised concerns about data privacy and security within organizations. But what exactly are these risks, and what implications can companies face?

  • Data breaches: AI tools may not have sufficient security controls in place which can lead to exposure of sensitive or proprietary data to malicious actors.
  • Intellectual property theft: Any data uploaded to GenAI platforms is stored and can be used to train the models, leaving IP and trade secrets in the public domain.
  • Regulatory violations: Depending on the data involved, geography and industry regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA can come into play, meaning there are strict data governance regulations. Non-compliance of these can result in fines or legal action.

Using unregulated GenAI can have severe consequences, which re-emphasizes the need for clear guidelines, ethical safeguards, and responsible deployment to ensure companies and employees benefit from these technologies while managing the associated risks.

Addressing the Risks of GenAI

Responsible governance requires a combination of technology, policy, education, and collaboration to foster a culture of responsible innovation and allow enterprises to minimize risks. So, what can companies do to ensure their data is protected? Develop actionable plans that include:

  • Clear GenAI policies: Establish guidelines for how GenAI platforms can be used, including approved cases. Prohibit sensitive or proprietary data from being uploaded and implement an approval process for using GenAI tools. Enterprises must define how they expect employees to use these platforms.
  • Licensed access: Ensure employees can access and use licensed GenAI tools vetted for security and compliance purposes. This provides greater control over the types of platforms being used by employees.
  • Data security training: Whether it's periodic training or in-the-moment reminders, employees need to be educated about the implications of leveraging an unregulated GenAI platform and using company data. Since these platforms use data to train their models, safeguarding IP and sensitive data is crucial.
  • Track GenAI activity: Organizations can monitor and manage how employees interact with GenAI platforms and look for red flags like high-volume uploads or using unapproved tools.

Uploading sensitive company data to unapproved third-party GenAI platforms can leave companies vulnerable to many consequences and potential regulatory violations. Organizations must establish policies and appropriately vet tools to help minimize risk and ensure responsible use.

As GenAI accelerates the creation and dispersion of enterprise data, the risks of data sprawl and insufficient backups increase dramatically. If left unmanaged, GenAI usage could lead to critical corporate information living outside secure ecosystems — never fully backed up, difficult to govern, and vulnerable to theft or misuse. By implementing robust policies, ensuring licensed and controlled platform access, providing ongoing employee education, and maintaining visibility into GenAI interactions, enterprises can still harness the innovative power of these tools. In doing so, they not only mitigate data security and compliance risks but also ensure that data, no matter where it resides, remains protected, integral, and usable for driving sustainable business value.

Todd Thorsen is Chief Information Security Officer at CrashPlan

The Latest

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...