Skip to main content

GenAI in the Enterprise: Why Data Security Is at Risk

Todd Thorsen
CrashPlan

Enterprise data sprawl — vast amounts of critical information scattered across endpoints and siloed within SaaS applications — already challenges companies' ability to protect and back up their data. Much of this information is never fully secured, leaving organizations vulnerable. Now, as generative AI (GenAI) platforms emerge as yet another environment where enterprise data is consumed, transformed, and created, this fragmentation is set to intensify. Without effective data governance, large swaths of corporate information may not be backed up at all. Instead, that data could be uploaded to external GenAI systems, putting sensitive information and intellectual property at risk and amplifying the already formidable complexities of data protection.

 

Image
Crashplan

 

Use of Unregulated GenAI Spikes

GenAI platforms have increased in popularity, and enterprises need help to control how their employees interact with them. New data shows that 72% of workers who uploaded data to GenAI platforms did so without employers providing licenses. The same study found that 65% of organizations lack clear policies on using data with or from AI platforms. Experimenting with GenAI raises security concerns at the employee and employer levels.

For example, the US Patent and Trademark Office banned the use of GenAI tools last year due to security concerns with the technology and some of these tools exhibiting unpredictable behaviors. While there is a ban on using platforms like ChatGPT for work purposes, USPTO employees can use "state-of-the-art generative AI models" only inside the agency's internal test environment.

While this might be considered a cautious approach, it indicates how workplaces will likely evaluate how they implement and interact with GenAI platforms.

Unregulated GenAI Use Comes with Security Risks

The rapid adoption of GenAI tools has raised concerns about data privacy and security within organizations. But what exactly are these risks, and what implications can companies face?

  • Data breaches: AI tools may not have sufficient security controls in place which can lead to exposure of sensitive or proprietary data to malicious actors.
  • Intellectual property theft: Any data uploaded to GenAI platforms is stored and can be used to train the models, leaving IP and trade secrets in the public domain.
  • Regulatory violations: Depending on the data involved, geography and industry regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA can come into play, meaning there are strict data governance regulations. Non-compliance of these can result in fines or legal action.

Using unregulated GenAI can have severe consequences, which re-emphasizes the need for clear guidelines, ethical safeguards, and responsible deployment to ensure companies and employees benefit from these technologies while managing the associated risks.

Addressing the Risks of GenAI

Responsible governance requires a combination of technology, policy, education, and collaboration to foster a culture of responsible innovation and allow enterprises to minimize risks. So, what can companies do to ensure their data is protected? Develop actionable plans that include:

  • Clear GenAI policies: Establish guidelines for how GenAI platforms can be used, including approved cases. Prohibit sensitive or proprietary data from being uploaded and implement an approval process for using GenAI tools. Enterprises must define how they expect employees to use these platforms.
  • Licensed access: Ensure employees can access and use licensed GenAI tools vetted for security and compliance purposes. This provides greater control over the types of platforms being used by employees.
  • Data security training: Whether it's periodic training or in-the-moment reminders, employees need to be educated about the implications of leveraging an unregulated GenAI platform and using company data. Since these platforms use data to train their models, safeguarding IP and sensitive data is crucial.
  • Track GenAI activity: Organizations can monitor and manage how employees interact with GenAI platforms and look for red flags like high-volume uploads or using unapproved tools.

Uploading sensitive company data to unapproved third-party GenAI platforms can leave companies vulnerable to many consequences and potential regulatory violations. Organizations must establish policies and appropriately vet tools to help minimize risk and ensure responsible use.

As GenAI accelerates the creation and dispersion of enterprise data, the risks of data sprawl and insufficient backups increase dramatically. If left unmanaged, GenAI usage could lead to critical corporate information living outside secure ecosystems — never fully backed up, difficult to govern, and vulnerable to theft or misuse. By implementing robust policies, ensuring licensed and controlled platform access, providing ongoing employee education, and maintaining visibility into GenAI interactions, enterprises can still harness the innovative power of these tools. In doing so, they not only mitigate data security and compliance risks but also ensure that data, no matter where it resides, remains protected, integral, and usable for driving sustainable business value.

Todd Thorsen is Chief Information Security Officer at CrashPlan

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

GenAI in the Enterprise: Why Data Security Is at Risk

Todd Thorsen
CrashPlan

Enterprise data sprawl — vast amounts of critical information scattered across endpoints and siloed within SaaS applications — already challenges companies' ability to protect and back up their data. Much of this information is never fully secured, leaving organizations vulnerable. Now, as generative AI (GenAI) platforms emerge as yet another environment where enterprise data is consumed, transformed, and created, this fragmentation is set to intensify. Without effective data governance, large swaths of corporate information may not be backed up at all. Instead, that data could be uploaded to external GenAI systems, putting sensitive information and intellectual property at risk and amplifying the already formidable complexities of data protection.

 

Image
Crashplan

 

Use of Unregulated GenAI Spikes

GenAI platforms have increased in popularity, and enterprises need help to control how their employees interact with them. New data shows that 72% of workers who uploaded data to GenAI platforms did so without employers providing licenses. The same study found that 65% of organizations lack clear policies on using data with or from AI platforms. Experimenting with GenAI raises security concerns at the employee and employer levels.

For example, the US Patent and Trademark Office banned the use of GenAI tools last year due to security concerns with the technology and some of these tools exhibiting unpredictable behaviors. While there is a ban on using platforms like ChatGPT for work purposes, USPTO employees can use "state-of-the-art generative AI models" only inside the agency's internal test environment.

While this might be considered a cautious approach, it indicates how workplaces will likely evaluate how they implement and interact with GenAI platforms.

Unregulated GenAI Use Comes with Security Risks

The rapid adoption of GenAI tools has raised concerns about data privacy and security within organizations. But what exactly are these risks, and what implications can companies face?

  • Data breaches: AI tools may not have sufficient security controls in place which can lead to exposure of sensitive or proprietary data to malicious actors.
  • Intellectual property theft: Any data uploaded to GenAI platforms is stored and can be used to train the models, leaving IP and trade secrets in the public domain.
  • Regulatory violations: Depending on the data involved, geography and industry regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA can come into play, meaning there are strict data governance regulations. Non-compliance of these can result in fines or legal action.

Using unregulated GenAI can have severe consequences, which re-emphasizes the need for clear guidelines, ethical safeguards, and responsible deployment to ensure companies and employees benefit from these technologies while managing the associated risks.

Addressing the Risks of GenAI

Responsible governance requires a combination of technology, policy, education, and collaboration to foster a culture of responsible innovation and allow enterprises to minimize risks. So, what can companies do to ensure their data is protected? Develop actionable plans that include:

  • Clear GenAI policies: Establish guidelines for how GenAI platforms can be used, including approved cases. Prohibit sensitive or proprietary data from being uploaded and implement an approval process for using GenAI tools. Enterprises must define how they expect employees to use these platforms.
  • Licensed access: Ensure employees can access and use licensed GenAI tools vetted for security and compliance purposes. This provides greater control over the types of platforms being used by employees.
  • Data security training: Whether it's periodic training or in-the-moment reminders, employees need to be educated about the implications of leveraging an unregulated GenAI platform and using company data. Since these platforms use data to train their models, safeguarding IP and sensitive data is crucial.
  • Track GenAI activity: Organizations can monitor and manage how employees interact with GenAI platforms and look for red flags like high-volume uploads or using unapproved tools.

Uploading sensitive company data to unapproved third-party GenAI platforms can leave companies vulnerable to many consequences and potential regulatory violations. Organizations must establish policies and appropriately vet tools to help minimize risk and ensure responsible use.

As GenAI accelerates the creation and dispersion of enterprise data, the risks of data sprawl and insufficient backups increase dramatically. If left unmanaged, GenAI usage could lead to critical corporate information living outside secure ecosystems — never fully backed up, difficult to govern, and vulnerable to theft or misuse. By implementing robust policies, ensuring licensed and controlled platform access, providing ongoing employee education, and maintaining visibility into GenAI interactions, enterprises can still harness the innovative power of these tools. In doing so, they not only mitigate data security and compliance risks but also ensure that data, no matter where it resides, remains protected, integral, and usable for driving sustainable business value.

Todd Thorsen is Chief Information Security Officer at CrashPlan

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...