How Close Are We To Achieving a Monitoring Integration Strategy? A Survey
September 06, 2018

Moria Frederickson
Blue Medora

Share this

In a June 2018 survey of over 400 IT professionals within the VMware User Group community, Blue Medora took a closer look at how various metric collection strategies and access to Dimensional Data impacts IT success. We started with one question: How important is your monitoring integration strategy?

We wanted to test if increased access, data depth and context provided by a Dimensional Data stream positively impacted IT outcomes. Dimensional Data refers to a real-time metric stream provided by a monitoring integration as a service (MIaaS). A Dimensional Data stream will include highly granular behavioral detail — beyond what a single endpoint API connection might include — as well as rich relational context.

75% of Companies Lack Critical Data to Manage IT System Health and Performance

The big takeaway — many organizations are running multiple monitoring tools in an effort to get the appropriate data depth and context they need across their entire IT stack. Sixty percent of respondents are already running three or more monitoring systems and 50% of them plan to consolidate monitoring tools in the next 18 months.

But despite that, two-thirds of IT ops teams still lack visibility into the external resource relationships and three-quarters lack access to component-level data resolution, resulting in more downtime than peers using monitoring integrations that provide this critical capability.

70% of respondents said most of their monitoring integrations were not compatible with more than one monitoring platform — a leading cause of metric silos in many organizations.

Dimensional Data adoption is still in its infancy, but demand is growing. Only 9% of organizations who participated in the survey currently have access to Dimensional Data across the majority of their integrations and are considered fully deployed. On average, 43% of organizations wish to increase Dimensional Data adoption within the next 18 months.


Figure 1: A breakdown of responses to the question "How many unique monitoring platforms do you have in use within your environment?"

Half of respondents indicated that they were trying to consolidate — perhaps in search of that elusive "single source of monitoring truth," but others had no near-term plans to decrease the number of monitoring tools. Some of the reasons they gave for sticking with all the tools they have included:

■ Different technologies monitored (infrastructure, cloud, etc.)

■ Different analytic or visualization capabilities

■ Different use cases (logs, performance, etc.)

■ Individual team preferences

70% of respondents said most of their monitoring integrations were not compatible with more than one monitoring platform, but demand is on the rise. Of that majority, 62% plan to make multi-platform metrics a reality in the near future.


Figure 2: Respondents’ current access to metrics across multiple platforms (without customization) is currently in the minority, but could move to the majority within the next two years.

The multi-platform adoption stats are particularly interesting when taken in context with the monitoring and tool consolidation stats in key finding one. For those not interested or planning to consolidate tools (again about half of the respondents in the survey) another path to eliminating metric silos has emerged--giving all monitoring platforms universal access to the same data set.

But back to that first question — How important is your monitoring integration strategy? We were surprised how much monitoring integrations impact respondents’ business. We’d heard it in conversations over the years but had never crunched the numbers. In four out of the five areas we examined, including productivity, utilization, downtime and cost savings the answer to our question was overwhelmingly yes.

Nearly 40% of the top performers in utilization and productivity gains had fully deployed Dimensional Data.


Figure 3: Of those reporting greater than $100k savings each year due to their monitoring integration strategy, 39% had fully deployed a dimensional data stream.

Of those who fully deployed Dimensional Data, one in five saw more than $1m a year in savings and one in two saw more than $100k in savings. Even we were blown away by the scale of savings.

It seems most monitoring research focuses on the efficacy of monitoring platforms or analytics engines but doesn’t spend a great deal of time looking at the data that goes into them. This research supported the idea that universal access to a Dimensional Data stream or other integration strategy that includes metric breadth, depth and context will likely have a positive context on key business measures like IT productivity, utilization, cost savings and downtime.

About the Survey: Blue Medora partnered with the VMware User Group (VMUG) to survey 410 of the group’s members about the current and near-future state of monitoring integration in their environment. All had IT responsibilities at organizations with over 500 employees. 76% of respondents held an admin or architect role within the IT organization.

Moria Frederickson is Director of Marketing at Blue Medora
Share this

The Latest

January 17, 2019

APMdigest invited industry experts to predict how Cloud will evolve and impact application performance and business in 2019. Part 3, the final installment, covers monitoring and managing application performance in the Cloud ...

January 16, 2019

APMdigest invited industry experts to predict how Cloud will evolve and impact application performance and business in 2019. Part 2 covers multi-cloud, hybrid cloud, serverless and more ...

January 15, 2019

As a continuation of the list of 2019 predictions, APMdigest invited industry experts to predict how Cloud will evolve and impact application performance and business in 2019 ...

January 14, 2019

APMdigest invited industry experts to predict how Network Performance Management (NPM) and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2019 ...

January 11, 2019

I would like to highlight some of the predictions made at the start of 2018, and how those have panned out, or not actually occurred. I will review some of the predictions and trends from APMdigest's 2018 APM Predictions. Here is Part 2 ...

January 10, 2019

I would like to highlight some of the predictions made at the start of 2018, and how those have panned out, or not actually occurred. I will review some of the predictions and trends from APMdigest's 2018 APM Predictions ...

January 09, 2019

I sat down with Stephen Elliot, VP of Management Software and DevOps at IDC, to discuss where the market is headed, how legacy vendors will need to adapt, and how customers can get ahead of these trends to gain a competitive advantage. Part 2 of the interview ...

January 08, 2019

Monitoring and observability requirements are continuing to adapt to the rapid advances in public cloud, containers, serverless, microservices, and DevOps and CI/CD practices. As new technology and development processes become mainstream, enterprise adoption begins to increase, bringing its own set of security, scalability, and manageability needs. I sat down with Stephen Elliot, VP of Management Software and DevOps at IDC, to discuss where the market is headed, how legacy vendors will need to adapt, and how customers can get ahead of these trends to gain a competitive advantage ...

December 20, 2018

APMdigest invited industry experts to predict how APM and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2019. Part 6 covers the Internet of Things (IoT) ...

December 19, 2018

APMdigest invited industry experts to predict how APM and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2019. Part 5 covers the evolution of ITOA and its impact on the IT team ...