How Do You Quantify the ROI of Network Monitoring?
November 05, 2015

Dirk Paessler
Paessler AG

Share this

Return on Investment is a tricky term. It is quite simple to take the total cost of software and amortize it over a period of time. But in the case of network monitoring, that analysis ignores what the software actually does. Put simply, network monitoring gives IT visibility and insight into their infrastructure, helping spot problems before they start, and ensuring uptime and availability. Calculating ROI for such software without acknowledging its impact would be akin to amortizing the cost of a sales enablement tool without considering if it increases sales. A more forward-looking approach that accounts for the software’s impact is necessary, but the analysis is not without its issues.

When used correctly, network monitoring software can prevent a number of problems – mail server crashes, website failures, and network downtime, among others. The benefit to users and IT is obvious, but the effect on the bottom line is more difficult to quantify. Losing email for a day affects productivity, but losing email at 9 a.m. on a Monday is different than 4 p.m. on a Friday. Similarly, a website crash is a disaster if it happens for a retailer on Cyber Monday, but is less of a problem for most other businesses.

There have been studies aimed at quantifying the costs of IT failures. In 2012, industry analyst Michael Krigsman published an article that put the total cost of IT failures on the world economy at $3 trillion per year. A Gartner study from 2014 put a finer point on the issue, stating that the average cost of network downtime is $5,600 per minute, or $300,000 an hour. While the effects of downtime and outages will be felt differently by individual businesses, these studies highlight both the need for network monitoring, and illustrate the financial case that can be made for it.

IT managers looking to make the case for network monitoring in their budgets do not need to use analyst figures or estimates. Instead, they can look at a number of local factors – including the costs of IT staffing, the average time it takes to restore failures, number of network failures in the previous year, and SLAs with various service providers. By arming themselves with data, IT leaders will have an easier time explaining to the business side about the need for network monitoring.

The budgeting process for IT grows more difficult every year. Nearly every part of the business now spends money on technology, and in some cases a great deal of the budget is shifted towards marketing and sales enablement. As IT managers are constantly asked to do more with less, they need monitoring more than ever – it keeps an eye on infrastructure when they can’t. It is imperative that IT departments do not lose out on a critical tool simply because it does not have the eye-catching appeal of the "Next Big Thing". But with hard numbers and a little common-sense thinking, IT can make the case for network monitoring successfully.

Dirk Paessler is CEO and Founder of Paessler AG.

Share this

The Latest

July 25, 2024

The 2024 State of the Data Center Report from CoreSite shows that although C-suite confidence in the economy remains high, a VUCA (volatile, uncertain, complex, ambiguous) environment has many business leaders proceeding with caution when it comes to their IT and data ecosystems, with an emphasis on cost control and predictability, flexibility and risk management ...

July 24, 2024

In June, New Relic published the State of Observability for Energy and Utilities Report to share insights, analysis, and data on the impact of full-stack observability software in energy and utilities organizations' service capabilities. Here are eight key takeaways from the report ...

July 23, 2024

The rapid rise of generative AI (GenAI) has caught everyone's attention, leaving many to wonder if the technology's impact will live up to the immense hype. A recent survey by Alteryx provides valuable insights into the current state of GenAI adoption, revealing a shift from inflated expectations to tangible value realization across enterprises ... Here are five key takeaways that underscore GenAI's progression from hype to real-world impact ...

July 22, 2024
A defective software update caused what some experts are calling the largest IT outage in history on Friday, July 19. The impact reverberated through multiple industries around the world ...
July 18, 2024

As software development grows more intricate, the challenge for observability engineers tasked with ensuring optimal system performance becomes more daunting. Current methodologies are struggling to keep pace, with the annual Observability Pulse surveys indicating a rise in Mean Time to Remediation (MTTR). According to this survey, only a small fraction of organizations, around 10%, achieve full observability today. Generative AI, however, promises to significantly move the needle ...

July 17, 2024

While nearly all data leaders surveyed are building generative AI applications, most don't believe their data estate is actually prepared to support them, according to the State of Reliable AI report from Monte Carlo Data ...

July 16, 2024

Enterprises are putting a lot of effort into improving the digital employee experience (DEX), which has become essential to both improving organizational performance and attracting and retaining talented workers. But to date, most efforts to deliver outstanding DEX have focused on people working with laptops, PCs, or thin clients. Employees on the frontlines, using mobile devices to handle logistics ... have been largely overlooked ...

July 15, 2024

The average customer-facing incident takes nearly three hours to resolve (175 minutes) while the estimated cost of downtime is $4,537 per minute, meaning each incident can cost nearly $794,000, according to new research from PagerDuty ...

July 12, 2024

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 8, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses AutoCon with the conference founders Scott Robohn and Chris Grundemann ...

July 11, 2024

Numerous vendors and service providers have recently embraced the NaaS concept, yet there is still no industry consensus on its definition or the types of networks it involves. Furthermore, providers have varied in how they define the NaaS service delivery model. I conducted research for a new report, Network as a Service: Understanding the Cloud Consumption Model in Networking, to refine the concept of NaaS and reduce buyer confusion over what it is and how it can offer value ...