Skip to main content

How IT Teams Can Unleash the True Potential of AIOps Through 5 Levels of Maturity

Sean McDermott
Windward Consulting Group

Over the last few years, the need and market for artificial intelligence for IT operations (AIOps) has grown significantly as enterprises look for solutions to scale operations while improving customer experience and overall satisfaction. As the need grows, it's predicted that 40% of organizations will implement an AIOps solution by 2022, and 55% of organizations leverage modern IT operations tools like AIOps to improve overall customer satisfaction.

While many of today's enterprises view AIOps as just another tool in the stack hoping to solve age-old problems, AIOps should be viewed as a holistic, long-term strategy. But before IT teams can envision long-term success, they must develop a foundation that both deploys modern machine learning and automation and allows them to track progress. In turn, this creates transparency throughout the organization and gives IT teams an opportunity to show their value.

I've had the opportunity to work with a number of organizations embarking on their AIOps journey. I always advise them to start by evaluating their needs and the possibilities AIOps can bring to them through five different levels of AIOps maturity. This is a strategic approach that allows enterprises to achieve complete automation for long-term success.

Here's what enterprises should know about the five levels of AIOps maturity:

Level 1: Reactive

When teams are in the first stage of AIOps maturity, siloed operations hinder communication with the rest of the business, leaving IT teams in constant reactive mode as they collect events and logs. IT teams become firefighters attempting to balance putting out internal fires while ensuring customers are satisfied. Additionally, because their time is spent solving major issues in reactive mode, they miss the opportunity to showcase their value to the rest of the business and help produce proactive strategies.

Level 2: Integrated

In the second level of AIOps maturity, operational silos become less of a barrier, and communication between IT teams and other departments becomes easier and more frequent. Additionally, data sources start to weave into a unified architecture and IT service management (ITSM) processes are improved significantly. Teams also begin to layer artificial intelligence and machine learning into the process.

Level 3: Analytical

Teams begin to reap the benefits of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the analytical level of AIOps maturity. They can define more baseline metrics to share with the rest of the organization. In turn, this gives them the opportunity to leverage data to show the overall value of IT and AIOps as it relates to overarching business goals and objectives.

Level 4: Prescriptive

By the fourth level, IT teams have nearly mastered the use of ML and automation to continue improving processes and showing value to stakeholders. In addition, the prescriptive stage optimizes the approach to ITSM processes.

Level 5: Automated

In the fifth level of AIOps maturity, full automation is implemented with little to no human interaction. Teams see complete transparency throughout the organization as they leverage ML through prescriptive models. Finally, teams are able to sit at the executive table and play a more strategic role in improving the business operations, while automation works in the background to keep the lights on.

As teams look to implement AIOps and navigate through each level of maturity, they achieve the true potential AIOps provides them, ultimately preparing them for long-term success.

Sean McDermott is the Founder of Windward Consulting Group and RedMonocle

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

How IT Teams Can Unleash the True Potential of AIOps Through 5 Levels of Maturity

Sean McDermott
Windward Consulting Group

Over the last few years, the need and market for artificial intelligence for IT operations (AIOps) has grown significantly as enterprises look for solutions to scale operations while improving customer experience and overall satisfaction. As the need grows, it's predicted that 40% of organizations will implement an AIOps solution by 2022, and 55% of organizations leverage modern IT operations tools like AIOps to improve overall customer satisfaction.

While many of today's enterprises view AIOps as just another tool in the stack hoping to solve age-old problems, AIOps should be viewed as a holistic, long-term strategy. But before IT teams can envision long-term success, they must develop a foundation that both deploys modern machine learning and automation and allows them to track progress. In turn, this creates transparency throughout the organization and gives IT teams an opportunity to show their value.

I've had the opportunity to work with a number of organizations embarking on their AIOps journey. I always advise them to start by evaluating their needs and the possibilities AIOps can bring to them through five different levels of AIOps maturity. This is a strategic approach that allows enterprises to achieve complete automation for long-term success.

Here's what enterprises should know about the five levels of AIOps maturity:

Level 1: Reactive

When teams are in the first stage of AIOps maturity, siloed operations hinder communication with the rest of the business, leaving IT teams in constant reactive mode as they collect events and logs. IT teams become firefighters attempting to balance putting out internal fires while ensuring customers are satisfied. Additionally, because their time is spent solving major issues in reactive mode, they miss the opportunity to showcase their value to the rest of the business and help produce proactive strategies.

Level 2: Integrated

In the second level of AIOps maturity, operational silos become less of a barrier, and communication between IT teams and other departments becomes easier and more frequent. Additionally, data sources start to weave into a unified architecture and IT service management (ITSM) processes are improved significantly. Teams also begin to layer artificial intelligence and machine learning into the process.

Level 3: Analytical

Teams begin to reap the benefits of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the analytical level of AIOps maturity. They can define more baseline metrics to share with the rest of the organization. In turn, this gives them the opportunity to leverage data to show the overall value of IT and AIOps as it relates to overarching business goals and objectives.

Level 4: Prescriptive

By the fourth level, IT teams have nearly mastered the use of ML and automation to continue improving processes and showing value to stakeholders. In addition, the prescriptive stage optimizes the approach to ITSM processes.

Level 5: Automated

In the fifth level of AIOps maturity, full automation is implemented with little to no human interaction. Teams see complete transparency throughout the organization as they leverage ML through prescriptive models. Finally, teams are able to sit at the executive table and play a more strategic role in improving the business operations, while automation works in the background to keep the lights on.

As teams look to implement AIOps and navigate through each level of maturity, they achieve the true potential AIOps provides them, ultimately preparing them for long-term success.

Sean McDermott is the Founder of Windward Consulting Group and RedMonocle

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...