Skip to main content

How to Detect (and Resolve) IT Ops/APM Issues Before Your Users Do

Kevin Conklin

Among the most embarrassing situations for application support teams is first hearing about a critical performance issue from their users. With technology getting increasingly complex and IT environments changing almost overnight, the reality is that even the most experienced support teams are bound to miss a major problem with a critical application or service. One of the contributing factors is their continued reliance on traditional monitoring approaches.

Traditional tools limit us to monitoring for a combination of key performance indicator thresholds and failure modes that have already been experienced. So when it comes to finding new problems, the best case is alerts that describe the symptom (slow response time, transaction fails, etc.). A very experienced IT professional will have seen many behaviors, and consequently can employ monitoring based on best practices and past experiences. But even the most experienced IT professional will have a hard time designing rules and thresholds that can monitor for new, unknown problems without generating a number of noisy false alerts. Anomaly detection goes beyond the limits of traditional approaches because it sees and learns everything in the data provided, whether it has happened before or not.

Anomaly detection works by identifying unusual behaviors in data generated by an application or service delivery environment. The technology uses machine learning predictive analytics to establish baselines in the data and automatically learn what normal behavior is. The technology then identifies deviations in behavior that are unusually severe or maybe causal to other anomalies – a clear indication that something is wrong. And the best part? This technology works in real-time as well as in troubleshooting mode, so it's proactively monitoring your IT environment. With this approach, real problems can be identified and acted upon faster than before.

More advanced anomaly detection technologies can run multiple analyses in parallel, and are capable of analyzing multiple data sources simultaneously, identifying related, anomalous relationships within the system. Thus, when a chain of events is causal to a performance issue, the alerts contain all the related anomalies. This helps support teams zero in on the cause of the problem immediately.

Traditional approaches are also known to generate huge volumes of false alerts. Anomaly detection, on the other hand, uses advanced statistical analyses to minimize false alerts. Those few alerts that are generated provide more data, which results in faster troubleshooting.

Anomaly detection looks for significant variations from the norm and ranks severity by probability. Machine learning technology helps the system learn the difference between commonly occurring errors as well as spikes and drops in metrics, and true anomalies that are more accurate indicators of a problem. This can mean the difference between tens of thousands of alerts each day, most of which are false, and a dozen or so a week that should be pursued.

Anomaly detection can identify the early signs of developing problems in massive volumes of data before they turn into real, big problems. Enabling IT teams to slash troubleshooting time and decrease the noise from false alarms empowers them to attack and resolve any issues before they reach critical proportions.

If users do become aware of a problem, the IT team can respond "we're on it" instead of saying "thanks for letting us know."

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

How to Detect (and Resolve) IT Ops/APM Issues Before Your Users Do

Kevin Conklin

Among the most embarrassing situations for application support teams is first hearing about a critical performance issue from their users. With technology getting increasingly complex and IT environments changing almost overnight, the reality is that even the most experienced support teams are bound to miss a major problem with a critical application or service. One of the contributing factors is their continued reliance on traditional monitoring approaches.

Traditional tools limit us to monitoring for a combination of key performance indicator thresholds and failure modes that have already been experienced. So when it comes to finding new problems, the best case is alerts that describe the symptom (slow response time, transaction fails, etc.). A very experienced IT professional will have seen many behaviors, and consequently can employ monitoring based on best practices and past experiences. But even the most experienced IT professional will have a hard time designing rules and thresholds that can monitor for new, unknown problems without generating a number of noisy false alerts. Anomaly detection goes beyond the limits of traditional approaches because it sees and learns everything in the data provided, whether it has happened before or not.

Anomaly detection works by identifying unusual behaviors in data generated by an application or service delivery environment. The technology uses machine learning predictive analytics to establish baselines in the data and automatically learn what normal behavior is. The technology then identifies deviations in behavior that are unusually severe or maybe causal to other anomalies – a clear indication that something is wrong. And the best part? This technology works in real-time as well as in troubleshooting mode, so it's proactively monitoring your IT environment. With this approach, real problems can be identified and acted upon faster than before.

More advanced anomaly detection technologies can run multiple analyses in parallel, and are capable of analyzing multiple data sources simultaneously, identifying related, anomalous relationships within the system. Thus, when a chain of events is causal to a performance issue, the alerts contain all the related anomalies. This helps support teams zero in on the cause of the problem immediately.

Traditional approaches are also known to generate huge volumes of false alerts. Anomaly detection, on the other hand, uses advanced statistical analyses to minimize false alerts. Those few alerts that are generated provide more data, which results in faster troubleshooting.

Anomaly detection looks for significant variations from the norm and ranks severity by probability. Machine learning technology helps the system learn the difference between commonly occurring errors as well as spikes and drops in metrics, and true anomalies that are more accurate indicators of a problem. This can mean the difference between tens of thousands of alerts each day, most of which are false, and a dozen or so a week that should be pursued.

Anomaly detection can identify the early signs of developing problems in massive volumes of data before they turn into real, big problems. Enabling IT teams to slash troubleshooting time and decrease the noise from false alarms empowers them to attack and resolve any issues before they reach critical proportions.

If users do become aware of a problem, the IT team can respond "we're on it" instead of saying "thanks for letting us know."

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.