With a projected 7 billion mobile users by 2021, mobile is becoming the most dominant digital touchpoint for customer engagement. Annual mobile app downloads are projected to reach 258 billion by 2022 — a 45% increase from 2017. But downloads alone do not indicate mobile success — retention and engagement are key. While there are many factors that influence these metrics, application performance may be one of the most critical.
Application crashes can increase churn and damage brand reputation. In fact, app crashes cause more than 70% of uninstalls. Because Google ranking algorithms now downrank apps with stability problems, uptime and performance can even influence download metrics. It is imperative that organizations are delivering high-performing mobile applications and that the developers supporting those applications have the ability to identify and remediate errors efficiently.
But due to the growing complexity of the application ecosystem, this can be easier said than done. Developers are often limited by a lack of visibility and control over mobile devices. They have no way of knowing every device’s attributes or predicting which other apps and system processes may be competing for compute power. Mobile app developers are no strangers to segmentation faults and bus errors. And programming for such a diverse array of devices creates its own set of challenges. Flaws in native code, third-party dependencies or, in rare cases, even in the system libraries, can bring down the entire application.
Developers today are under pressure to deliver code faster than ever before. Even when rigorous testing processes are in place, the increasing complexity of application development will inevitably cause errors. Monitoring is an important component of application delivery, but the changing ecosystem calls for the reinvention of application performance monitoring that incorporates rich context and actionable insights.
Rethinking Application Performance Monitoring
While companies with faulty code are dealing with the fallout, those that rely on modern application performance monitoring (APM) are shipping better code more quickly and with less risk. Legacy monitoring tools focus more on system behavior, offering performance metrics on availability, throughput, and latency, but miss the mark when it comes to actionable insight that helps mobile developers make sense of complexity and quickly get to the root cause of errors.
On mobile — as with all native applications — it is important to have context beyond a crash. Developers need rich details supporting the error, such as the types of phones impacted, the number of users impacted, the specific actions a user took when the error was thrown, or even the storage capacity and battery life of the user's phone at the time the app crashed. These details are especially important for mobile developers because of the vast array of devices and native libraries used in programming. Having this information enables them to immediately triage and prioritize problems.
When developers can also identify the exact release and commit the error is tied to, they can quickly remediate the issue to minimize the breadth of impact. Developers can also move this feedback into the development cycle. By capturing every single exception and crash users encounter, meaningful trends will surface to help prioritize issues and avoid replication in future software release.
It is also important to consider that modern applications are not self-contained — they have multiple runtimes across the stack, causing added complexity in monitoring. Support for mobile, coupled with similar support for web, gives developers a complete picture, which is key in today’s application-centric landscape.
Innovation in the mobile space shows no signs of slowing, so developers must take proactive steps to address the factors that derail mobile app development and wreak havoc on user experience. By taking a modern approach to APM, incorporating rich context and actionable insights, and syncing this information across all of their applications, developers can code better and faster, ensuring their companies remain successful and competitive in the mobile world.
The Latest
The 2024 State of the Data Center Report from CoreSite shows that although C-suite confidence in the economy remains high, a VUCA (volatile, uncertain, complex, ambiguous) environment has many business leaders proceeding with caution when it comes to their IT and data ecosystems, with an emphasis on cost control and predictability, flexibility and risk management ...
In June, New Relic published the State of Observability for Energy and Utilities Report to share insights, analysis, and data on the impact of full-stack observability software in energy and utilities organizations' service capabilities. Here are eight key takeaways from the report ...
The rapid rise of generative AI (GenAI) has caught everyone's attention, leaving many to wonder if the technology's impact will live up to the immense hype. A recent survey by Alteryx provides valuable insights into the current state of GenAI adoption, revealing a shift from inflated expectations to tangible value realization across enterprises ... Here are five key takeaways that underscore GenAI's progression from hype to real-world impact ...
As software development grows more intricate, the challenge for observability engineers tasked with ensuring optimal system performance becomes more daunting. Current methodologies are struggling to keep pace, with the annual Observability Pulse surveys indicating a rise in Mean Time to Remediation (MTTR). According to this survey, only a small fraction of organizations, around 10%, achieve full observability today. Generative AI, however, promises to significantly move the needle ...
While nearly all data leaders surveyed are building generative AI applications, most don't believe their data estate is actually prepared to support them, according to the State of Reliable AI report from Monte Carlo Data ...
Enterprises are putting a lot of effort into improving the digital employee experience (DEX), which has become essential to both improving organizational performance and attracting and retaining talented workers. But to date, most efforts to deliver outstanding DEX have focused on people working with laptops, PCs, or thin clients. Employees on the frontlines, using mobile devices to handle logistics ... have been largely overlooked ...
The average customer-facing incident takes nearly three hours to resolve (175 minutes) while the estimated cost of downtime is $4,537 per minute, meaning each incident can cost nearly $794,000, according to new research from PagerDuty ...
In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 8, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses AutoCon with the conference founders Scott Robohn and Chris Grundemann ...
Numerous vendors and service providers have recently embraced the NaaS concept, yet there is still no industry consensus on its definition or the types of networks it involves. Furthermore, providers have varied in how they define the NaaS service delivery model. I conducted research for a new report, Network as a Service: Understanding the Cloud Consumption Model in Networking, to refine the concept of NaaS and reduce buyer confusion over what it is and how it can offer value ...
