Skip to main content

How to Shift Left with Code Profiling

Madeline Horton
Stackify

What is "Shifting Left?"

Development teams who utilize shift left practices typically employ frequent testing to speed up project deliverability and allow for better adherence to project timelines.

In Agile, development and testing work in tandem, with testing being performed at each stage of the software delivery lifecycle, also known as the SDLC. This combination of development and testing is known as "shifting left." Shift left is a software development testing practice intended to resolve any errors or performance bottlenecks as early in the software development lifecycle (SDLC) as possible.

Before Agile, software testing was performed using the waterfall methodology. When using the waterfall methodology, all testing occurs prior to deployment — from the non-production environments to the production environments. Through waterfall pre-deployment testing, issues are found in the code far too late and the release is inevitably delayed until all bottlenecks are fixed. Then, the code re-enters a testing period, which continues until all bugs are resolved and the code is deployed into the production environment. Waterfall methodology often negatively impacts the project’s deliverability and timeline. Increased time to market directly correlates with business revenue.

How Can I "Shift Left?"

In order to properly shift left, continuous testing must begin as soon as a developer starts to write code. A code profiler is one way of receiving immediate feedback and implementing a continuous testing loop in the preliminary stages of development.

Code profiling is one tool developers use to shift left and utilize frequent testing throughout the SDLC. Why? Fixing code directly while writing it on the developer’s workstation is essentially shifting as far left as possible. By shifting this far left, issues are found even before committing the code to a QA or non-production environment.

Traditionally, developers have used code profilers to identify performance bottlenecks without having to constantly touch their code. Code profilers are useful in answering questions such as "How many times is each method being called in my code" or "How long are these methods taking?" Additionally, code profilers track useful information such as memory allocation, garbage collection, web requests, and key methods in your code.

There are two types of code profilers: server-side profilers and desktop profilers. Server-side profilers track key performance methods in both pre-production and production environments to measure transaction timing and increased visibility into errors and logs. Another term for server-side profiling is Application Performance Management, or APM.

A desktop code profiler tracks the performance of every line of code within an individual method as well as tracking memory allocations and garbage collection to aid with memory leaks. Unfortunately, desktop profiling often causes applications to run slower than usual. In return, most developers utilize desktop profilers as a situational tool and not for daily use. Usually, developers only use code profilers when investigating a CPU or memory problem.

In order to provide both the granularity of a desktop code profiler and the light-weight nature of a server-side profiler, there are hybrid profilers. In a sense, hybrid profilers serve as the best of both worlds — merging key data from the server-side profiler with code-level details from the desktop profiler. Their light-weight nature is perfect for everyday use with server level insights and the ability to track key methods, transactions, dependency calls, errors, and logs.

What Code Profiler Should I Pick?

After evaluating the importance of a code profiler when implementing shift left methodology, it is important to keep in mind a few things. Often, profilers need to be built into the code itself. This is the reason why most desktop code profilers cause applications to run slow and are only utilized in specific circumstances. When looking at application performance management tools, note that most APMs require code or multiple configuration changes.

Whether you implement shift left methodology via a server-side, desktop, or hybrid code profiler, profilers are imperative for finding the hot path in your code. For example, a code profiler can be used to find what is using the 20% of the total CPU usage within your code. Then, your code profiler can help determine what you can do to improve your code.

Additionally, you can utilize a code profiler for proactively finding memory leaks as well as dependency call and transaction performance.

Code profilers are a necessary tool for constantly testing and improving your code throughout the SDLC as profilers can help look for the methods that can lead to the greatest improvement over time.

Madeline Horton is a Campaign Marketing Strategist at Stackify

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

How to Shift Left with Code Profiling

Madeline Horton
Stackify

What is "Shifting Left?"

Development teams who utilize shift left practices typically employ frequent testing to speed up project deliverability and allow for better adherence to project timelines.

In Agile, development and testing work in tandem, with testing being performed at each stage of the software delivery lifecycle, also known as the SDLC. This combination of development and testing is known as "shifting left." Shift left is a software development testing practice intended to resolve any errors or performance bottlenecks as early in the software development lifecycle (SDLC) as possible.

Before Agile, software testing was performed using the waterfall methodology. When using the waterfall methodology, all testing occurs prior to deployment — from the non-production environments to the production environments. Through waterfall pre-deployment testing, issues are found in the code far too late and the release is inevitably delayed until all bottlenecks are fixed. Then, the code re-enters a testing period, which continues until all bugs are resolved and the code is deployed into the production environment. Waterfall methodology often negatively impacts the project’s deliverability and timeline. Increased time to market directly correlates with business revenue.

How Can I "Shift Left?"

In order to properly shift left, continuous testing must begin as soon as a developer starts to write code. A code profiler is one way of receiving immediate feedback and implementing a continuous testing loop in the preliminary stages of development.

Code profiling is one tool developers use to shift left and utilize frequent testing throughout the SDLC. Why? Fixing code directly while writing it on the developer’s workstation is essentially shifting as far left as possible. By shifting this far left, issues are found even before committing the code to a QA or non-production environment.

Traditionally, developers have used code profilers to identify performance bottlenecks without having to constantly touch their code. Code profilers are useful in answering questions such as "How many times is each method being called in my code" or "How long are these methods taking?" Additionally, code profilers track useful information such as memory allocation, garbage collection, web requests, and key methods in your code.

There are two types of code profilers: server-side profilers and desktop profilers. Server-side profilers track key performance methods in both pre-production and production environments to measure transaction timing and increased visibility into errors and logs. Another term for server-side profiling is Application Performance Management, or APM.

A desktop code profiler tracks the performance of every line of code within an individual method as well as tracking memory allocations and garbage collection to aid with memory leaks. Unfortunately, desktop profiling often causes applications to run slower than usual. In return, most developers utilize desktop profilers as a situational tool and not for daily use. Usually, developers only use code profilers when investigating a CPU or memory problem.

In order to provide both the granularity of a desktop code profiler and the light-weight nature of a server-side profiler, there are hybrid profilers. In a sense, hybrid profilers serve as the best of both worlds — merging key data from the server-side profiler with code-level details from the desktop profiler. Their light-weight nature is perfect for everyday use with server level insights and the ability to track key methods, transactions, dependency calls, errors, and logs.

What Code Profiler Should I Pick?

After evaluating the importance of a code profiler when implementing shift left methodology, it is important to keep in mind a few things. Often, profilers need to be built into the code itself. This is the reason why most desktop code profilers cause applications to run slow and are only utilized in specific circumstances. When looking at application performance management tools, note that most APMs require code or multiple configuration changes.

Whether you implement shift left methodology via a server-side, desktop, or hybrid code profiler, profilers are imperative for finding the hot path in your code. For example, a code profiler can be used to find what is using the 20% of the total CPU usage within your code. Then, your code profiler can help determine what you can do to improve your code.

Additionally, you can utilize a code profiler for proactively finding memory leaks as well as dependency call and transaction performance.

Code profilers are a necessary tool for constantly testing and improving your code throughout the SDLC as profilers can help look for the methods that can lead to the greatest improvement over time.

Madeline Horton is a Campaign Marketing Strategist at Stackify

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.