Skip to main content

Hybrid Work Is Here to Stay, Bringing Its Own Mix of Complexities for IT

Alastair Pooley
Snow Software

2020 heralded the era of remote working, with companies empowering their employees to work in their homes. Cloud usage skyrocketed, and as Microsoft's CEO said, "We've seen two years' worth of digital transformation in two months."

The world's appetite for cloud services has increased but now, more than 18 months since the beginning of the pandemic, organizations are assessing their cloud spend and trying to better understand the IT investments that were made under pressure. This is a huge challenge in and of itself, with the added complexity of embracing hybrid work.


A recent survey from Snow Software polled 400 IT leaders to determine the current state of hybrid work and technologies and found that more than 92% were moving or had already moved to a hybrid work mode. This statistic isn't surprising as many companies — most recently LinkedIn and Amazon — have pushed back their return to office dates due to the Delta variant or adopted a permanent hybrid work approach rather than a full return to office.

While most IT leaders have moved or are already moving to hybrid work, only 34% indicated that the shift to hybrid work is the IT team's primary focus for the next 12 months. Most leaders noted that reducing/optimizing IT costs (55%) and enabling competitive differentiation through IT initiatives (57%) are their main priorities.

This begs the question — if hybrid work is top of mind for organizations, why is it not a top focus for IT leaders?


Hybrid vs Remote Work: the Difference is Complexity

Firstly, it is important to recognize that remote and hybrid work bring their own set of complexities. While they have similarities — both bringing the challenges of managing application sprawl, shadow IT and managing costs — they are not the same.

Hybrid work involves managing requirements for both a remote and a physical environment. A hybrid work model must adjust to the ebb and flow of employees who may pivot back and forth, creating a similar technology experience regardless of location. Troubleshooting network constraints at company headquarters while also solving connectivity issues for an employee at home are the reality of hybrid work. For remote-only work, the variables stay largely the same.

Every organization has its own unique needs, and as we saw in the survey, many IT leaders are still dealing with some lingering effects of 2020 decisions. But hybrid is an increasing priority, and the majority of IT leaders are optimistic about the future of hybrid work, with 57% saying they were excited and 44% indicating it was a move in the right direction.


SaaS Sprawl is (and Will Likely Remain) Concerning

According to the survey undertaken by Snow, IT leaders believe the most challenging aspects of supporting or transitioning to hybrid work are controlling costs (18%) and reining in unseen application use (16%). Most organizations surveyed are running hundreds or thousands of SaaS applications across their network, and 73% of IT leaders indicated that this is an increase over the last 12 months. With SaaS continuing to gain importance, it's no wonder that one of the biggest challenges for SaaS is controlling sprawl. Discovering unmanaged SaaS applications remains a priority and will likely be a priority for many years to come.


When asked, IT leaders named Microsoft 365, Google Workspace and Zoom as the core applications used by their organizations. Video conferencing was ranked as the top type of tool organizations relied on the most in the last year (32%), confirming Zoom's place among the core applications. Other tools organizations relied on included:

■ Cloud infrastructure (i.e. Microsoft Azure, AWS, Google Cloud, etc.) (23%)

■ Office suites (i.e. Office365, Gsuite, Dropbox Paper, etc.) (11%)

■ Specialty software (i.e. Salesforce, Adobe, etc.) (11%)

Surprisingly, collaboration applications (i.e. Slack, Teams, Dropbox, etc.) were on the lower end of tools heavily relied on in the past year (9%). Considering the top three most-used applications include many of the features of collaboration applications (such as chat, file sharing, etc.), collaboration-focused applications may have ranked lower because their function was already covered by the leading tools.

2021 IT Spending Will Increase

With increased complexity comes increased costs. More than 83% of IT leaders expect additional funds to support and implement new ways of working, while 13% said they expected their budget to stay flat and just 2% said they would face budget cuts. If given an additional budget today to support new ways of working, the majority of IT leaders (37%) believe it should be invested in IT staff while other leaders believed that budget should be spent on:

■ SaaS applications (18%)

■ Cloud infrastructure (i.e. public, private, virtual machines, etc.) (17%)

■ Cybersecurity tools and training (10%)


Hybrid work models will put more pressure on IT, with IT leaders (34%) expecting that hybrid work will increase employee access and consumption of IT resources — and only 10% think hybrid work will decrease the employee use of IT resources. Additionally, 18% of IT leaders believe that hybrid work will increase department-led technology purchases, which can contribute to shadow IT if the right policies, processes and staff are not in place.

While SaaS spending increased in 2020, according to IT leaders surveyed, this is only the beginning of more significant spending increases we will see as hybrid work becomes the norm. As we continue to navigate the pandemic and embrace the hybrid work model, organizations will need to think more critically about how they can support this new reality. For example, in this new era of hybrid work, vendors like Microsoft are developing solutions for organizations to offer greater flexibility to the hybrid workforce. It is now essential that organizations take the time to review and assess their IT spending and resources to ensure their companies and employees are well equipped to adopt a hybrid work environment.

Alastair Pooley is CIO of Snow Software

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

Hybrid Work Is Here to Stay, Bringing Its Own Mix of Complexities for IT

Alastair Pooley
Snow Software

2020 heralded the era of remote working, with companies empowering their employees to work in their homes. Cloud usage skyrocketed, and as Microsoft's CEO said, "We've seen two years' worth of digital transformation in two months."

The world's appetite for cloud services has increased but now, more than 18 months since the beginning of the pandemic, organizations are assessing their cloud spend and trying to better understand the IT investments that were made under pressure. This is a huge challenge in and of itself, with the added complexity of embracing hybrid work.


A recent survey from Snow Software polled 400 IT leaders to determine the current state of hybrid work and technologies and found that more than 92% were moving or had already moved to a hybrid work mode. This statistic isn't surprising as many companies — most recently LinkedIn and Amazon — have pushed back their return to office dates due to the Delta variant or adopted a permanent hybrid work approach rather than a full return to office.

While most IT leaders have moved or are already moving to hybrid work, only 34% indicated that the shift to hybrid work is the IT team's primary focus for the next 12 months. Most leaders noted that reducing/optimizing IT costs (55%) and enabling competitive differentiation through IT initiatives (57%) are their main priorities.

This begs the question — if hybrid work is top of mind for organizations, why is it not a top focus for IT leaders?


Hybrid vs Remote Work: the Difference is Complexity

Firstly, it is important to recognize that remote and hybrid work bring their own set of complexities. While they have similarities — both bringing the challenges of managing application sprawl, shadow IT and managing costs — they are not the same.

Hybrid work involves managing requirements for both a remote and a physical environment. A hybrid work model must adjust to the ebb and flow of employees who may pivot back and forth, creating a similar technology experience regardless of location. Troubleshooting network constraints at company headquarters while also solving connectivity issues for an employee at home are the reality of hybrid work. For remote-only work, the variables stay largely the same.

Every organization has its own unique needs, and as we saw in the survey, many IT leaders are still dealing with some lingering effects of 2020 decisions. But hybrid is an increasing priority, and the majority of IT leaders are optimistic about the future of hybrid work, with 57% saying they were excited and 44% indicating it was a move in the right direction.


SaaS Sprawl is (and Will Likely Remain) Concerning

According to the survey undertaken by Snow, IT leaders believe the most challenging aspects of supporting or transitioning to hybrid work are controlling costs (18%) and reining in unseen application use (16%). Most organizations surveyed are running hundreds or thousands of SaaS applications across their network, and 73% of IT leaders indicated that this is an increase over the last 12 months. With SaaS continuing to gain importance, it's no wonder that one of the biggest challenges for SaaS is controlling sprawl. Discovering unmanaged SaaS applications remains a priority and will likely be a priority for many years to come.


When asked, IT leaders named Microsoft 365, Google Workspace and Zoom as the core applications used by their organizations. Video conferencing was ranked as the top type of tool organizations relied on the most in the last year (32%), confirming Zoom's place among the core applications. Other tools organizations relied on included:

■ Cloud infrastructure (i.e. Microsoft Azure, AWS, Google Cloud, etc.) (23%)

■ Office suites (i.e. Office365, Gsuite, Dropbox Paper, etc.) (11%)

■ Specialty software (i.e. Salesforce, Adobe, etc.) (11%)

Surprisingly, collaboration applications (i.e. Slack, Teams, Dropbox, etc.) were on the lower end of tools heavily relied on in the past year (9%). Considering the top three most-used applications include many of the features of collaboration applications (such as chat, file sharing, etc.), collaboration-focused applications may have ranked lower because their function was already covered by the leading tools.

2021 IT Spending Will Increase

With increased complexity comes increased costs. More than 83% of IT leaders expect additional funds to support and implement new ways of working, while 13% said they expected their budget to stay flat and just 2% said they would face budget cuts. If given an additional budget today to support new ways of working, the majority of IT leaders (37%) believe it should be invested in IT staff while other leaders believed that budget should be spent on:

■ SaaS applications (18%)

■ Cloud infrastructure (i.e. public, private, virtual machines, etc.) (17%)

■ Cybersecurity tools and training (10%)


Hybrid work models will put more pressure on IT, with IT leaders (34%) expecting that hybrid work will increase employee access and consumption of IT resources — and only 10% think hybrid work will decrease the employee use of IT resources. Additionally, 18% of IT leaders believe that hybrid work will increase department-led technology purchases, which can contribute to shadow IT if the right policies, processes and staff are not in place.

While SaaS spending increased in 2020, according to IT leaders surveyed, this is only the beginning of more significant spending increases we will see as hybrid work becomes the norm. As we continue to navigate the pandemic and embrace the hybrid work model, organizations will need to think more critically about how they can support this new reality. For example, in this new era of hybrid work, vendors like Microsoft are developing solutions for organizations to offer greater flexibility to the hybrid workforce. It is now essential that organizations take the time to review and assess their IT spending and resources to ensure their companies and employees are well equipped to adopt a hybrid work environment.

Alastair Pooley is CIO of Snow Software

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...