Q&A: IDC Talks About APM

Pete Goldin
APMdigest

In APMdigest's exclusive interview, Mary Johnston Turner, Research Vice President in IDC's Enterprise System Management Software practice, discusses Application Performance Management and related topics covered in recent IDC reports including IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Production APM Software as a Service 2013 Vendor Analysis.

APM: How do emerging technologies – particularly mobile and social business – drive an increased need for APM?

MJT: Over the last several years, application environments have become much more dynamic due to the adoption of virtualization, cloud, mobility, social business and big data.

Mobility and social business provide end users a new level of personalization and real-time applications but end user experiences can be unpredictable given the myriad of mobile devices, browsers and apps that are available. Mobile and social apps tend to be released quickly and updated continually so developers and service providers need to know immediately if there are problems with the code or if users are experiencing unexpected problems.

With all the complexity and interdependencies in today's environments it can be difficult to rapidly isolate the source of problems and to provide developers and IT operations team with enough of the right kind of information so that they can remediate those problems quickly.

In contrast to older APM solutions that were often difficult to configure and maintain, a new generation of APM solutions is emerging that is more suited to the needs of modern mobile and social applications environments. They are designed to be used by a wide range of IT operations, development and line of business professionals and are easier to deploy and manage while still providing sophisticated information about the status of the code, the browser, the mobile app and the end user experience.

APM: Do you feel the acceptance of SaaS will impact the growth in adoption of APM in general?

MJT: In the early days, SaaS was often seen as a lightweight alternative to more sophisticated enterprise scale on premise APM software options. However, as the use of SaaS delivery platforms has matured, robust APM SaaS offerings are coming to market. Customers that want to get started with APM for little or no up-front cost can take advantage of free services and get value quickly using self-service activation tools. User interfaces, navigation and analytics are becoming much more intuitive. Many of the SaaS APM solutions come with significant pre-built reports and models, allowing organizations to quickly get that time to value.

Beyond that, APM SaaS options allow organizations to ramp up use of APM as needed overtime and match spending to business need. Overall, the barriers to implementing APM are much lower than they used to be at a time when the need for APM is greater than ever. I expect that SaaS delivered APM will definitely help to expand the overall APM market.

APM: What should a potential APM buyer be looking for in an APM SaaS solution?

MJT: Traditionally many APM products focused on Java, or .Net, however, many of today's applications are being written in PHP, Ruby, Python and other languages. Support for mobile as well as traditional desktop applications is also critical. It is critical to make sure that the solution supports your top priority application environments.

Similarly, the APM solutions needs insight into the infrastructure supporting the application so the ability to monitor across public clouds, virtualized environment or even on physical infrastructures is important – particularly for multi-tier applications where different tiers live in different infrastructure environments.

Beyond that, buyers should focus on ease of use and time to value. For example, look for services that can be activated easily.

A SaaS APM solution should have good graphics and visualization and the ability to integrate data from a wide range of sources to help IT and developer teams monitor performance efficiently and troubleshoot problems quickly.

The ability to customize different views of the APM data for different roles and the capability to develop custom reports are important, as are advanced analytics and root cause diagnostics that can help correlate data and get down to root cause quickly.

Finally, the ability to scale up in terms of numbers of users, devices, and transactions is vital as is the ability to scale down in situations where the use of the application varies over time.

APM: In terms of app development, do you feel quality – and therefore APM – will become a priority over fast innovation and time to market?

MJT: I think successful companies and the applications they rely on to do business will have to meet the speed and quality test simultaneously. We are way past the days were customers will applaud innovators if the application crashes or performance is unpredictable. Most business is done online today and customers can quickly move their business elsewhere if the application doesn't perform. The need for consistent user experiences and application quality will only increase over time but it cannot be overlooked today.

ABOUT Mary Johnston Turner

Mary Johnston Turner, IDC Research Vice President, Enterprise Systems Management Software, drives IDC's forecasts and analysis of many IT management software markets including public and private cloud operations, data center automation, virtualization management and performance and availability management. She is a major contributor to IDC's annual IT industry predictions process.

Each year, Turner surveys and interviews hundreds of IT decision makers on priorities for IT spending and strategic IT initiatives. She has conducted extensive research on cloud management strategies and changes in the performance management software market. Turner also examines the priorities around mobile interfaces and control points for enterprise scale system management solutions. Her systems management software coverage is published in IDC's Enterprise Systems Management Software service while her analysis of cloud management software is published in IDC's IT Cloud Decision Economics service.

Turner is a 25 year veteran of the IT research and advisory services business. She is widely published and quoted in many major business and trade publications, and is a frequent speaker at industry events. Turner has been with IDC since 2008. Prior to joining IDC she held senior analyst and consulting positions at Ovum, Summit Strategies, Northeast Consulting Resources and Yankee Group. She holds a Masters of Public Policy (M.P.P.) degree from Harvard's Kennedy School of Government.

The Latest
The Latest 10

The Latest

Alert Fatigue Is No Longer a Morale Problem, It's a Reliability Risk and a System Failure

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

Most Enterprises Think They Can Switch AI Vendors in a Month ... Most Who've Tried Couldn't

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Your Observability Stack Has a Telemetry Pipeline Problem

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

Operator to Orchestrator: 80% of IT Pros See Shift in Role as AI Permeates Workflows

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

Gartner: 40% of Organizations Deploying AI Will Use AI Observability to Monitor Model Performance by 2028

40% of organizations deploying AI will implement dedicated AI observability tools by 2028 to monitor model performance, bias and outputs, according to Gartner ...

Almost Half of AI-Generated Code Fails in Production

Until AI-powered engineering tools have live visibility of how code behaves at runtime, they cannot be trusted to autonomously ensure reliable systems, according to the State of AI-Powered Engineering Report 2026 report from Lightrun. The report reveals that a major volume of manual work is required when AI-generated code is deployed: 43% of AI-generated code requires manual debugging in production, even after passing QA or staging tests. Furthermore, an average of three manual redeploy cycles are required to verify a single AI-suggested code fix in production ...

AI Requires Design, Not Edicts

Many organizations describe AI as strategic, but they do not manage it strategically. When AI plans are disconnected from strategy, detached from organizational learning, and protected from serious assumptions testing, the problem is no longer technical immaturity; it is a failure of management discipline ... Executives too often tell organizations to "use AI" before they define what AI is supposed to change. The problem deepens in organizations where strategy isn't well articulated in the first place ...

How Intelligent Orchestration Enables Enterprises to Move from AI POC to AI Production

Across the enterprise technology landscape, a quiet crisis is playing out. Organizations have run hundreds, sometimes thousands, of generative AI pilots. Leadership has celebrated the proof of concept (POCs) ... Industry experience points to a sobering reality: only 5-10% of AI POCs that progress to the pilot stage successfully reach scaled production. The remaining 90% fail because the enterprise environment around them was never ready to absorb them, not the AI models ...

Reliability Is the New Bottleneck of Innovation

Today's modern systems are not what they once were. Organizations now rely on distributed systems, event-driven workflows, hybrid and multi-cloud environments and continuous delivery pipelines. While each adds flexibility, it also introduces new, often invisible failures. Development speed is no longer the primary bottleneck of innovation. Reliability is ...

5 Takeaways from the Observability Forecast for Retail and eCommerce

Seeing is believing, or in this case, seeing is understanding, according to New Relic's 2025 Observability Forecast for Retail and eCommerce report. Retailers who want to provide exceptional customer experiences while improving IT operations efficiency are leaning on observability ... Here are five key takeaways from the report ...

Q&A: IDC Talks About APM

Pete Goldin
APMdigest

In APMdigest's exclusive interview, Mary Johnston Turner, Research Vice President in IDC's Enterprise System Management Software practice, discusses Application Performance Management and related topics covered in recent IDC reports including IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Production APM Software as a Service 2013 Vendor Analysis.

APM: How do emerging technologies – particularly mobile and social business – drive an increased need for APM?

MJT: Over the last several years, application environments have become much more dynamic due to the adoption of virtualization, cloud, mobility, social business and big data.

Mobility and social business provide end users a new level of personalization and real-time applications but end user experiences can be unpredictable given the myriad of mobile devices, browsers and apps that are available. Mobile and social apps tend to be released quickly and updated continually so developers and service providers need to know immediately if there are problems with the code or if users are experiencing unexpected problems.

With all the complexity and interdependencies in today's environments it can be difficult to rapidly isolate the source of problems and to provide developers and IT operations team with enough of the right kind of information so that they can remediate those problems quickly.

In contrast to older APM solutions that were often difficult to configure and maintain, a new generation of APM solutions is emerging that is more suited to the needs of modern mobile and social applications environments. They are designed to be used by a wide range of IT operations, development and line of business professionals and are easier to deploy and manage while still providing sophisticated information about the status of the code, the browser, the mobile app and the end user experience.

APM: Do you feel the acceptance of SaaS will impact the growth in adoption of APM in general?

MJT: In the early days, SaaS was often seen as a lightweight alternative to more sophisticated enterprise scale on premise APM software options. However, as the use of SaaS delivery platforms has matured, robust APM SaaS offerings are coming to market. Customers that want to get started with APM for little or no up-front cost can take advantage of free services and get value quickly using self-service activation tools. User interfaces, navigation and analytics are becoming much more intuitive. Many of the SaaS APM solutions come with significant pre-built reports and models, allowing organizations to quickly get that time to value.

Beyond that, APM SaaS options allow organizations to ramp up use of APM as needed overtime and match spending to business need. Overall, the barriers to implementing APM are much lower than they used to be at a time when the need for APM is greater than ever. I expect that SaaS delivered APM will definitely help to expand the overall APM market.

APM: What should a potential APM buyer be looking for in an APM SaaS solution?

MJT: Traditionally many APM products focused on Java, or .Net, however, many of today's applications are being written in PHP, Ruby, Python and other languages. Support for mobile as well as traditional desktop applications is also critical. It is critical to make sure that the solution supports your top priority application environments.

Similarly, the APM solutions needs insight into the infrastructure supporting the application so the ability to monitor across public clouds, virtualized environment or even on physical infrastructures is important – particularly for multi-tier applications where different tiers live in different infrastructure environments.

Beyond that, buyers should focus on ease of use and time to value. For example, look for services that can be activated easily.

A SaaS APM solution should have good graphics and visualization and the ability to integrate data from a wide range of sources to help IT and developer teams monitor performance efficiently and troubleshoot problems quickly.

The ability to customize different views of the APM data for different roles and the capability to develop custom reports are important, as are advanced analytics and root cause diagnostics that can help correlate data and get down to root cause quickly.

Finally, the ability to scale up in terms of numbers of users, devices, and transactions is vital as is the ability to scale down in situations where the use of the application varies over time.

APM: In terms of app development, do you feel quality – and therefore APM – will become a priority over fast innovation and time to market?

MJT: I think successful companies and the applications they rely on to do business will have to meet the speed and quality test simultaneously. We are way past the days were customers will applaud innovators if the application crashes or performance is unpredictable. Most business is done online today and customers can quickly move their business elsewhere if the application doesn't perform. The need for consistent user experiences and application quality will only increase over time but it cannot be overlooked today.

ABOUT Mary Johnston Turner

Mary Johnston Turner, IDC Research Vice President, Enterprise Systems Management Software, drives IDC's forecasts and analysis of many IT management software markets including public and private cloud operations, data center automation, virtualization management and performance and availability management. She is a major contributor to IDC's annual IT industry predictions process.

Each year, Turner surveys and interviews hundreds of IT decision makers on priorities for IT spending and strategic IT initiatives. She has conducted extensive research on cloud management strategies and changes in the performance management software market. Turner also examines the priorities around mobile interfaces and control points for enterprise scale system management solutions. Her systems management software coverage is published in IDC's Enterprise Systems Management Software service while her analysis of cloud management software is published in IDC's IT Cloud Decision Economics service.

Turner is a 25 year veteran of the IT research and advisory services business. She is widely published and quoted in many major business and trade publications, and is a frequent speaker at industry events. Turner has been with IDC since 2008. Prior to joining IDC she held senior analyst and consulting positions at Ovum, Summit Strategies, Northeast Consulting Resources and Yankee Group. She holds a Masters of Public Policy (M.P.P.) degree from Harvard's Kennedy School of Government.

The Latest
The Latest 10

The Latest

Alert Fatigue Is No Longer a Morale Problem, It's a Reliability Risk and a System Failure

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

Most Enterprises Think They Can Switch AI Vendors in a Month ... Most Who've Tried Couldn't

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Your Observability Stack Has a Telemetry Pipeline Problem

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

Operator to Orchestrator: 80% of IT Pros See Shift in Role as AI Permeates Workflows

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

Gartner: 40% of Organizations Deploying AI Will Use AI Observability to Monitor Model Performance by 2028

40% of organizations deploying AI will implement dedicated AI observability tools by 2028 to monitor model performance, bias and outputs, according to Gartner ...

Almost Half of AI-Generated Code Fails in Production

Until AI-powered engineering tools have live visibility of how code behaves at runtime, they cannot be trusted to autonomously ensure reliable systems, according to the State of AI-Powered Engineering Report 2026 report from Lightrun. The report reveals that a major volume of manual work is required when AI-generated code is deployed: 43% of AI-generated code requires manual debugging in production, even after passing QA or staging tests. Furthermore, an average of three manual redeploy cycles are required to verify a single AI-suggested code fix in production ...

AI Requires Design, Not Edicts

Many organizations describe AI as strategic, but they do not manage it strategically. When AI plans are disconnected from strategy, detached from organizational learning, and protected from serious assumptions testing, the problem is no longer technical immaturity; it is a failure of management discipline ... Executives too often tell organizations to "use AI" before they define what AI is supposed to change. The problem deepens in organizations where strategy isn't well articulated in the first place ...

How Intelligent Orchestration Enables Enterprises to Move from AI POC to AI Production

Across the enterprise technology landscape, a quiet crisis is playing out. Organizations have run hundreds, sometimes thousands, of generative AI pilots. Leadership has celebrated the proof of concept (POCs) ... Industry experience points to a sobering reality: only 5-10% of AI POCs that progress to the pilot stage successfully reach scaled production. The remaining 90% fail because the enterprise environment around them was never ready to absorb them, not the AI models ...

Reliability Is the New Bottleneck of Innovation

Today's modern systems are not what they once were. Organizations now rely on distributed systems, event-driven workflows, hybrid and multi-cloud environments and continuous delivery pipelines. While each adds flexibility, it also introduces new, often invisible failures. Development speed is no longer the primary bottleneck of innovation. Reliability is ...

5 Takeaways from the Observability Forecast for Retail and eCommerce

Seeing is believing, or in this case, seeing is understanding, according to New Relic's 2025 Observability Forecast for Retail and eCommerce report. Retailers who want to provide exceptional customer experiences while improving IT operations efficiency are leaning on observability ... Here are five key takeaways from the report ...