Skip to main content

In a Productivity Paradox, How Can Companies Prove the Value of Their Software Investments?

Uzi Dvir
WalkMe

Last year, labor productivity in the US dropped at the fastest rate in 75 years, with five consecutive quarters of year-over-year decline. In recorded data since 1948, that has never before happened. And, while productivity in the final quarter grew faster than expected, the long-term rate remains low. In fact, rates of productivity growth across G7 countries, including the US, in the last 50 years continue on a downward trajectory.

This slowing productivity surprisingly has occurred during a period of growth in technological innovation — that is, the era of digital transformation. On this paradox, McKinsey analysts observed: "Technology has lifted productivity for some sectors and firms, yet its benefits have not been fully captured nor broadly shared. In a recent survey, companies report that digital transformations fail five times more often than they succeed. … A colossal opportunity awaits if the country can collect the benefits of today's technologies (never mind what's to come) and ensure that its dividends are spread economy-wide. … To be ready to capture value from digitization today and the new technologies of tomorrow, firms will need to build their capabilities with the right investments in skilled talent, operating practices, and platforms."

There's a lot to unpack here, but, fundamentally, investments in digital transformation — often an amorphous budget category for enterprises — have not yielded their anticipated productivity and value. Blaming remote work on its face and worker churn doesn't dig deep enough and misses a day-to-day reality businesses and their workers experience. In the wake of the tsunami of money thrown at digital transformation, most businesses don't actually know what technology they've acquired, or the extent of it, and how it's being used, which is directly tied to how people do their jobs. Now, AI transformation represents the biggest change management challenge organizations will face in the next one to two years.

How can we possibly improve productivity in the AI era without knowing what software is under the hood at our businesses and how workers are using it — or not?

Moreover, with the average enterprise using approximately 1,900 business processes, how can we track software use across workflows? The rush to embrace AI software is further complicating these problems, as enterprises have little visibility or control over how these apps are being used.

To move forward, a more measurable digital discovery and integration must replace the behemoth of digital transformation. That means businesses must take a close look under their hoods and do three things to improve productivity and the value of their software investments.

Discover What's There and Dismantle Redundancy

Based on a survey of 1,700 senior business leaders and 2050 employees at organizations with 500 employees or more, across 16 industries, The State of Digital Adoption Report, 2024 found that enterprises vastly underestimate the number of apps running in their tech stack.

While executives at large enterprises believe they only use 21 applications, the actual number is more than 200. That's quite a figure to take in: they only know about 10% of the software that's running on their tech stack. And to complicate things further, 21% of these applications are AI, which executives oftentimes have little visibility or control over. These same large enterprises experience about $16 million in wasted digital transformation investments annually because employees don't use their software correctly.

The first step must be to find out what's there and what's redundant. What applications are duplicating the features and functionality of other applications? Knowing what's there also involves uncovering the use of shadow IT. Anyone with a credit card can purchase software, often well meaning and often on the company's dime through a line item on the budget that's vague and doesn't reveal the acquisition. Lack of visibility into what software is running and what shadow IT exists creates both compliance and cybersecurity issues.

Companies often hire a consultant to deal with this problem. That's an expensive and time consuming approach and they may not be gathering all of the intelligence needed for full visibility. For example, they might rely on basic login data, without understanding session length and other data. They may have a view, but no ability to act on it. They may have tunnel vision around cutting costs and licenses, without adequate context and insight around such cuts — and that's not strategic.

So, an effective solution, like a robust digital adoption platform (DAP), must easily and from a single vantage point provide complete visibility into what software exists in an organization and how it's tied to business processes.

Assess Access and Current Usage

Once a business has a real source of truth into knowing everything it has, the next step is to fully understand access and usage. For each application, can you assess whether it is being used? To what extent?

How is it being used?

How many seats are using it?

What are all of the details on license allocation?

Who are the people using it and what are their roles?

What roles are slated to use it, but not doing so? Why?

Can the seat be switched to someone else?

Who really needs the access to the software?

Who needs to be using it, when, and to what degree?

Every week, enterprise employees spend close to seven hours compensating for poor technology experiences, including access and use issues. These include spending extra time on tasks because they don't know how to use software, they are waiting for support to respond to queries, or they need to ask colleagues or the internet for help. To maximize software ROI, enterprises need to update their change management programs to ensure employees get the support and more intuitive software experience they need in the flow of work.

When access and usage gaps exist, there must be an immediate and easy way to understand and address those — and to end the frustrated underutilization of software vital to business processes.

Optimize Usage and the Full Power of Software

Successful digital adoption that creates value also means employees are able to use the right technology for their role to its full extent and that they're happy doing so. They should have a seamless, enjoyable experience that makes their job easier — and frees them to think creatively, interact with customers and colleagues, and offer the full range of their talents to the business.

This means that assessing and ensuring use isn't enough. That use must be correct and optimized. The question becomes: are employees using all the functionality that can aid their work in the best way possible?

What are their impediments to optimized use and to leveraging the full power of the resources?

Having that level of granular insight into user experience and impediments is crucial.

Employees may use half of the features of their software, or not even that, because of a routine they've settled into that "works well enough." They might be effective to some degree, but they could be more effective and productive if they were able to optimize use without suffering through a tremendous training lift. If you have a Lamborghini at your disposal, but can only drive it in second gear, the power, speed, and potential that's lost can be breathtaking.

An AI-powered DAP goes beyond application analytics to behavioral analytics. It enables understanding of software usage in the context of the workflows that span multiple applications. It measures where users are starting, stopping, and where the friction points are, task by task. It makes more of a business's data actionable with tools that easily deliver personalized help to people in the time and place they need it most. By tracking software adoption progress over time in a clear and measurable way, businesses can chart efficiency KPIs by application workflow and by business process.

More productive and sustainable business growth must emerge as a fundamental feature of the new phase of AI-driven digital transformation we're in — and wasted software investment must become a thing of the past. To better navigate technology change at your business, know what's there, who's using it, and how it is being used for maximum impact.

Uzi Dvir is Global Chief Information Officer at WalkMe

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

In a Productivity Paradox, How Can Companies Prove the Value of Their Software Investments?

Uzi Dvir
WalkMe

Last year, labor productivity in the US dropped at the fastest rate in 75 years, with five consecutive quarters of year-over-year decline. In recorded data since 1948, that has never before happened. And, while productivity in the final quarter grew faster than expected, the long-term rate remains low. In fact, rates of productivity growth across G7 countries, including the US, in the last 50 years continue on a downward trajectory.

This slowing productivity surprisingly has occurred during a period of growth in technological innovation — that is, the era of digital transformation. On this paradox, McKinsey analysts observed: "Technology has lifted productivity for some sectors and firms, yet its benefits have not been fully captured nor broadly shared. In a recent survey, companies report that digital transformations fail five times more often than they succeed. … A colossal opportunity awaits if the country can collect the benefits of today's technologies (never mind what's to come) and ensure that its dividends are spread economy-wide. … To be ready to capture value from digitization today and the new technologies of tomorrow, firms will need to build their capabilities with the right investments in skilled talent, operating practices, and platforms."

There's a lot to unpack here, but, fundamentally, investments in digital transformation — often an amorphous budget category for enterprises — have not yielded their anticipated productivity and value. Blaming remote work on its face and worker churn doesn't dig deep enough and misses a day-to-day reality businesses and their workers experience. In the wake of the tsunami of money thrown at digital transformation, most businesses don't actually know what technology they've acquired, or the extent of it, and how it's being used, which is directly tied to how people do their jobs. Now, AI transformation represents the biggest change management challenge organizations will face in the next one to two years.

How can we possibly improve productivity in the AI era without knowing what software is under the hood at our businesses and how workers are using it — or not?

Moreover, with the average enterprise using approximately 1,900 business processes, how can we track software use across workflows? The rush to embrace AI software is further complicating these problems, as enterprises have little visibility or control over how these apps are being used.

To move forward, a more measurable digital discovery and integration must replace the behemoth of digital transformation. That means businesses must take a close look under their hoods and do three things to improve productivity and the value of their software investments.

Discover What's There and Dismantle Redundancy

Based on a survey of 1,700 senior business leaders and 2050 employees at organizations with 500 employees or more, across 16 industries, The State of Digital Adoption Report, 2024 found that enterprises vastly underestimate the number of apps running in their tech stack.

While executives at large enterprises believe they only use 21 applications, the actual number is more than 200. That's quite a figure to take in: they only know about 10% of the software that's running on their tech stack. And to complicate things further, 21% of these applications are AI, which executives oftentimes have little visibility or control over. These same large enterprises experience about $16 million in wasted digital transformation investments annually because employees don't use their software correctly.

The first step must be to find out what's there and what's redundant. What applications are duplicating the features and functionality of other applications? Knowing what's there also involves uncovering the use of shadow IT. Anyone with a credit card can purchase software, often well meaning and often on the company's dime through a line item on the budget that's vague and doesn't reveal the acquisition. Lack of visibility into what software is running and what shadow IT exists creates both compliance and cybersecurity issues.

Companies often hire a consultant to deal with this problem. That's an expensive and time consuming approach and they may not be gathering all of the intelligence needed for full visibility. For example, they might rely on basic login data, without understanding session length and other data. They may have a view, but no ability to act on it. They may have tunnel vision around cutting costs and licenses, without adequate context and insight around such cuts — and that's not strategic.

So, an effective solution, like a robust digital adoption platform (DAP), must easily and from a single vantage point provide complete visibility into what software exists in an organization and how it's tied to business processes.

Assess Access and Current Usage

Once a business has a real source of truth into knowing everything it has, the next step is to fully understand access and usage. For each application, can you assess whether it is being used? To what extent?

How is it being used?

How many seats are using it?

What are all of the details on license allocation?

Who are the people using it and what are their roles?

What roles are slated to use it, but not doing so? Why?

Can the seat be switched to someone else?

Who really needs the access to the software?

Who needs to be using it, when, and to what degree?

Every week, enterprise employees spend close to seven hours compensating for poor technology experiences, including access and use issues. These include spending extra time on tasks because they don't know how to use software, they are waiting for support to respond to queries, or they need to ask colleagues or the internet for help. To maximize software ROI, enterprises need to update their change management programs to ensure employees get the support and more intuitive software experience they need in the flow of work.

When access and usage gaps exist, there must be an immediate and easy way to understand and address those — and to end the frustrated underutilization of software vital to business processes.

Optimize Usage and the Full Power of Software

Successful digital adoption that creates value also means employees are able to use the right technology for their role to its full extent and that they're happy doing so. They should have a seamless, enjoyable experience that makes their job easier — and frees them to think creatively, interact with customers and colleagues, and offer the full range of their talents to the business.

This means that assessing and ensuring use isn't enough. That use must be correct and optimized. The question becomes: are employees using all the functionality that can aid their work in the best way possible?

What are their impediments to optimized use and to leveraging the full power of the resources?

Having that level of granular insight into user experience and impediments is crucial.

Employees may use half of the features of their software, or not even that, because of a routine they've settled into that "works well enough." They might be effective to some degree, but they could be more effective and productive if they were able to optimize use without suffering through a tremendous training lift. If you have a Lamborghini at your disposal, but can only drive it in second gear, the power, speed, and potential that's lost can be breathtaking.

An AI-powered DAP goes beyond application analytics to behavioral analytics. It enables understanding of software usage in the context of the workflows that span multiple applications. It measures where users are starting, stopping, and where the friction points are, task by task. It makes more of a business's data actionable with tools that easily deliver personalized help to people in the time and place they need it most. By tracking software adoption progress over time in a clear and measurable way, businesses can chart efficiency KPIs by application workflow and by business process.

More productive and sustainable business growth must emerge as a fundamental feature of the new phase of AI-driven digital transformation we're in — and wasted software investment must become a thing of the past. To better navigate technology change at your business, know what's there, who's using it, and how it is being used for maximum impact.

Uzi Dvir is Global Chief Information Officer at WalkMe

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...