As the world's technology rapidly evolved and threats skyrocketed in the cloud, the need for security and compliance teams to come together to protect organizations and their customers has never been more important. Unfortunately, this hasn't happened yet.
In partnership with Enterprise Management Associates (EMA), we polled 204 technology and business leaders in North America from more than ten industry verticals to investigate this theme. The research found that most organizations recognize the importance of managing both compliance and security functions in-house. Nearly 83% of respondents said that a corporate employee was responsible for information security and 88% said that IT audit and compliance functions are also handled internally.
Yet, while most organizations run internal compliance and security teams, their status is not weighted equally. Compliance imperatives typically drive security priorities. However, organizations' combined security and compliance postures will be better served when both teams work together, and budgets and investments should reflect that equal importance.
Key takeaways from the research include:
Security and compliance ownership and budgets are splintered
Security and compliance ownership and budgets are splintered. They often operate with different teams, budgets and investment levels, but they need to work together to better protect the organization's posture instead.
■ 47% said that IT owns the security budget, while 11% noted that compliance is the security budget owner.
■ In the future, 86% of those surveyed plan to make a significant investment in compliance solutions and data privacy, while just over half (52%) will make a significant investment in a security management suite.
Compliance challenges amplified by rapidly growing IT environments
Compliance challenges are amplified by rapidly growing and global IT environments with different regulatory climates.
■ 39% of respondents said having multiple IT environments with different requirements is their primary compliance challenge.
■ 40% of organizations have postponed security projects to address regulatory compliance concerns.
■ 68% believe their regulatory compliance programs are a competitive differentiator.
■ 75% said that they are using existing tools or evaluating new tools to address data privacy.
compliance needs driving cybersecurity priorities
Organizations' compliance needs are driving cybersecurity priorities, causing teams to alter security strategies to align with requirements.
■ 67% said that data privacy regulations like GDPR, CCPA or changing data controls were their biggest compliance challenges.
■ 38% said that data security and privacy was the greatest security challenge in their organization
■ 25% stated that information security projects are dependent on compliance projects
■ 76% said that compliance has completely or significantly shifted their security strategy
Compliance and security teams must work together
Compliance and security teams must work together to best manage a mature and robust program, while maintaining numerous attestations and controls globally.
■ 89% indicated that the priorities of the security and compliance teams were aligned.
■ 85% stated that the security tools used adequately address compliance considerations.
■ 59% indicated that data privacy regulations have impacted their approach to security.
Integrated Security and Compliance Solutions
This survey also signaled the growing demand for integrated security and compliance solutions that increase visibility while mitigating emerging threats and privacy regulations. When organizations prioritize DevSecOps, they can better maintain compliance, especially as they are expected to comply with multiple standards, including PCI, HIPAA, PII, SOC and GDPR, in highly regulated industries.
It is undeniable that all organizations will benefit from incorporating a security-centric culture and fostering better collaboration between security and compliance teams. Organizations must adopt solutions that provide real-time monitoring for continuous compliance and help maintain system security.
A long-running study of DevOps practices ... suggests that any historical gains in MTTR reduction have now plateaued. For years now, the time it takes to restore services has stayed about the same: less than a day for high performers but up to a week for middle-tier teams and up to a month for laggards. The fact that progress is flat despite big investments in people, tools and automation is a cause for concern ...
Companies implementing observability benefit from increased operational efficiency, faster innovation, and better business outcomes overall, according to 2023 IT Trends Report: Lessons From Observability Leaders, a report from SolarWinds ...
Customer loyalty is changing as retailers get increasingly competitive. More than 75% of consumers say they would end business with a company after a single bad customer experience. This means that just one price discrepancy, inventory mishap or checkout issue in a physical or digital store, could have customers running out to the next store that can provide them with better service. Retailers must be able to predict business outages in advance, and act proactively before an incident occurs, impacting customer experience ...
Earlier this year, New Relic conducted a study on observability ... The 2023 Observability Forecast reveals observability's impact on the lives of technical professionals and businesses' bottom lines. Here are 10 key takeaways from the forecast ...
Only 33% of executives are "very confident" in their ability to operate in a public cloud environment, according to the 2023 State of CloudOps report from NetApp. This represents an increase from 2022 when only 21% reported feeling very confident ...
A large majority of organizations employ more than one cloud automation solution, and this practice creates significant challenges that are resulting in delays and added costs for businesses, according to Why companies lose efficiency and compliance with cloud automation solutions from Broadcom ...