Skip to main content

Is "Worker Experience" as Important as Customer Experience?

Pete Goldin
APMdigest

While executives say they understand the importance of Worker Experience and its impact on Customer Experience (and thereby customer loyalty and revenue), leadership struggles to fully connect the dots and implement programs to affect meaningful change, according to a study from Appirio, a Wipro company.

The study, entitled The Worker Shapes The Customers’ Experience, shows that 90 percent of business leaders believe engaged workers are better suited to provide superior customer service, but nearly the same percentage (87 percent) of businesses say they face hurdles when trying to improve Worker Experience in meaningful ways.

Surveyed leadership believes it is the responsibility of direct line managers to ensure workers have what they need to succeed. This belief leaves the burden of Worker Experience initiatives dependent on an individual manager’s control, prioritization, and education, which binds those changes to rollback when a new manager takes over.

“The past 15 or so years have seen a relentless focus on revolutionizing Customer Experience through digital transformation,” said Chris Barbin, CEO of Appirio. “Executives are just now beginning to understand how Worker Experience ultimately impacts the customer — and the company’s bottom line. This is no longer an issue that lives only in HR. Time and time again, we see that the top performing companies are the ones prioritizing the worker. That’s no coincidence.”

“Many businesses implement what they believe are Worker Experience-related initiatives in a ‘throw it on the wall and see what sticks’ way,” said Harry West, VP of Worker Experience at Appirio,”It’s often done in such an ad-hoc way that metrics and outcomes aren’t clearly identified. Executives know they should be doing something, but they don’t understand what or how. This is a common struggle.”

Businesses understand how haphazard the funding and project management of Worker Experience is — even if they aren’t sure how to remedy it. Only 26 percent of companies say they have a formal Worker Experience program; the rest fund these efforts ad-hoc, meaning Worker Experience is not a formal budgeting item in most companies.

Other key findings include:

■ Executives say they see the value of Worker Experience: 88 percent believe that Worker Experience directly affects the business’s bottom line, including revenue and overall ROI of business objectives.

■ Yet leadership lacks focus and prioritization: 70 percent of business leaders are focused on more than 8 solutions to improve Worker Experience, and 48 percent address Worker Experience in an ad-hoc way resulting in less substantial implementation.

■ Worker Experience is not rising to implementation priority: Only 26 percent of businesses have a formal, dedicated Worker Experience program, and 20 percent admit to doing nothing to address Worker Experience directly.

“Leadership often equates Worker Experience with employee training and onboarding programs,” continued West. “Those programs are undoubtedly important, but the data suggests that true success comes from robust programs that create engaged, productive and agile workers, who in turn create aware, satisfied, and amplified customers. It’s a self-perpetuating phenomenon driving profits and growth that we call the Virtuous Cycle.”

Methodology: The commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Appirio examines global Worker and Customer experiences across industries. The respondents included business leaders at the manager level and above, from the US, UK, Germany, France, Japan and Australia.

Pete Goldin is Editor and Publisher of APMdigest

The Latest

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

Is "Worker Experience" as Important as Customer Experience?

Pete Goldin
APMdigest

While executives say they understand the importance of Worker Experience and its impact on Customer Experience (and thereby customer loyalty and revenue), leadership struggles to fully connect the dots and implement programs to affect meaningful change, according to a study from Appirio, a Wipro company.

The study, entitled The Worker Shapes The Customers’ Experience, shows that 90 percent of business leaders believe engaged workers are better suited to provide superior customer service, but nearly the same percentage (87 percent) of businesses say they face hurdles when trying to improve Worker Experience in meaningful ways.

Surveyed leadership believes it is the responsibility of direct line managers to ensure workers have what they need to succeed. This belief leaves the burden of Worker Experience initiatives dependent on an individual manager’s control, prioritization, and education, which binds those changes to rollback when a new manager takes over.

“The past 15 or so years have seen a relentless focus on revolutionizing Customer Experience through digital transformation,” said Chris Barbin, CEO of Appirio. “Executives are just now beginning to understand how Worker Experience ultimately impacts the customer — and the company’s bottom line. This is no longer an issue that lives only in HR. Time and time again, we see that the top performing companies are the ones prioritizing the worker. That’s no coincidence.”

“Many businesses implement what they believe are Worker Experience-related initiatives in a ‘throw it on the wall and see what sticks’ way,” said Harry West, VP of Worker Experience at Appirio,”It’s often done in such an ad-hoc way that metrics and outcomes aren’t clearly identified. Executives know they should be doing something, but they don’t understand what or how. This is a common struggle.”

Businesses understand how haphazard the funding and project management of Worker Experience is — even if they aren’t sure how to remedy it. Only 26 percent of companies say they have a formal Worker Experience program; the rest fund these efforts ad-hoc, meaning Worker Experience is not a formal budgeting item in most companies.

Other key findings include:

■ Executives say they see the value of Worker Experience: 88 percent believe that Worker Experience directly affects the business’s bottom line, including revenue and overall ROI of business objectives.

■ Yet leadership lacks focus and prioritization: 70 percent of business leaders are focused on more than 8 solutions to improve Worker Experience, and 48 percent address Worker Experience in an ad-hoc way resulting in less substantial implementation.

■ Worker Experience is not rising to implementation priority: Only 26 percent of businesses have a formal, dedicated Worker Experience program, and 20 percent admit to doing nothing to address Worker Experience directly.

“Leadership often equates Worker Experience with employee training and onboarding programs,” continued West. “Those programs are undoubtedly important, but the data suggests that true success comes from robust programs that create engaged, productive and agile workers, who in turn create aware, satisfied, and amplified customers. It’s a self-perpetuating phenomenon driving profits and growth that we call the Virtuous Cycle.”

Methodology: The commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Appirio examines global Worker and Customer experiences across industries. The respondents included business leaders at the manager level and above, from the US, UK, Germany, France, Japan and Australia.

Pete Goldin is Editor and Publisher of APMdigest

The Latest

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...