Skip to main content

IT Cultural Transformation and the Elimination of Technology Silos

An Exercise in Efficiency or a Dream Turned Nightmare?
Dennis Drogseth

Cultural transformation and eliminating IT silos may sound like an impossible dream — and indeed, perhaps “eliminating” is too strong a word. But the reality is that IT organizations must change toward a more responsive, business-aligned culture, as well as toward a more service-aware (versus siloed) way of working.

So how do you begin? A lot depends, of course, on who you are — whether you’re a service desk manager, a vice president of service management or operations, a C-level exec looking across all of IT, or one of those lucky “catalysts” invited to take a transformative role in a matrix capacity.

It will also depend on your unique environment — both the vertical and business model you support and the distinctive characteristics of your IT organization as a human and technological aggregate.

So, there’s no generic answer, just as there’s no generic IT organization and no generic IT professional (or at least I have yet to meet one).

However, drawing from years of consulting and research, I believe I can make a few high-level suggestions to give you some basis for going forward — to accelerate the dream and minimize the nightmare:

Stand in the middle of the storm

"Stand in the middle of the storm." This is a phrase that Enterprise Management Associates (EMA) consultants use to explain the often-overlooked fact that IT organizations have various options to promote cultural transformation and cross-silo ways of working and these options are all interdependent. And they are technology, process, and organization. We don’t single out “people” because people — meaning their very human and sometimes siloed attitudes — are part of all three vectors in this storm of change.

Many in the industry still fail to recognize the need not only to understand each “stormy vector” separately, but also to understand how these vectors become a continuum. Just consider how many IT organizations pay considerable sums to process consultants, systems integrators, and organizational consultants — each group largely oblivious to the other and each group with its own terminology for describing objects, processes, and objectives. Each group has its own perspective on the “right” way to do things. In many instances, efforts to coordinate across these groups lead to a costly merry-go-round — with circular movement as opposed to actual forward progress — often with millions of dollars changing hands.

While the industry still treats the corners of the triangle as three separate worlds with different specialists attached to each, they are, in fact, fundamentally interdependent. The more you can bring these forces closer to the center, the more smoothly, more efficiently, and more effectively they will operate together. Technology can impact process and vice versa — for example, by making certain actions “automated” or “routine” that weren’t before. Process and organization are, of course, closely intertwined, and need to be understood as such. Effective process definitions should take into account your actual political environment, while your organizational structure may well have to evolve to support more cross-domain service awareness if you’re going to succeed in the long run.

Define your objectives

Cultural Transformation? Ask yourself “to do WHAT exactly?” While it’s all well and good to promote “cultural transformation” and “cross-siloed ways of working” I, personally, have never seen an initiative along these lines succeed that wasn’t a little more specific in nature. In defining specific objectives, you might also what to be clear why you feel cultural transformation is important to you, to your organization, and to the business. Then you can more meaningfully associate tangible objectives and metrics to the endeavor.

For instance, many initiatives are associated with technology deployments, such as a more automated capability for managing endpoints, a CMDB/CMS, or a truly cross-domain approach to managing service performance (including operations and the service desk). Other initiatives are framed at a higher level, such as the move to agile and DevOps, cross-domain IT asset optimization, or the move to assimilate internal and external cloud resources into service delivery. Others may be driven initially from non-IT requirements to optimize end-user and customer experience or support new business initiatives dependent on IT services. All these examples (and they are just a subset) represent tangible beginning points for driving IT cultural transformation and cross-silo ways of working.

Consider your resources

Once the initial catalyst for cultural transformation is clear, it’s time to begin to create a more tangible sense of what your resources are for achieving it. These resources may well include a core team (often part-time) of stakeholders, other relevant stakeholders across domains, existing or new management tools, and well-defined executive leadership. Like it or not, top-down leadership is key — a factor that’s been borne out again and again in our research and consulting.

Another lesson I’ve learned from multiple consulting engagements is: seek out the “enthusiasts.” Ask yourself, “Who are the true ‘catalysts for change’ and positive transformation?” And then try to center your initial phase program as much as possible with them.

Promote dialog and communication

No efforts at creating a truly cross-domain, service-aware way of working have succeeded, that I’m aware of, without effective dialog and communication that includes listening and documenting stakeholder concerns, as well as promoting new ways of working. It is a top-down, bottoms-up communication paradigm that — and here’s the good news — will bring strong benefits and insights in and of itself.

Once you start to create meaningful plans for moving into a true cross-domain way of working, ideally with measurable metrics including timeline objectives and business-impacting benefits, you may be surprised at how positive the benefits soon become. Benefits can range from vast improvements in efficiency as your organization finally begins to work together as a whole to increased business value and improved credibility with your service consumers.

But needless to say, cultural change in IT that resolves cross-silo issues isn’t a quick fix. It must evolve from multiple points of awareness and discussion as you, your IT organization, and the business it supports continue to change, adapt, and grow.

Hot Topics

The Latest

The enterprises that will define the next decade are not the ones that deployed the most technology. They are the ones who understood what their technology was actually doing. That distinction is not a philosophical point. It is the central operational challenge facing every organization that has spent the last five years modernizing at speed ...

AI is becoming the operating system of the enterprise. It acts as an invisible coordination layer that understands intent, connects systems, and executes work across complex SaaS environments. Previously, employees had to click through multiple systems — CRM, ERP, support tools, collaboration platforms — to complete a single task. Now, instead of navigating each application manually, they can simply state what they need to accomplish ...

In 2026, the cost of downtime or an outage is no longer just a technical inconvenience; it's a $600 billion wake up call for global businesses. As our digital ecosystems become  more interconnected, each touchpoint introduces new risks and multiplies the consequences when things go wrong. And the data is clear: aggregate downtime costs  for Global 2,000 companies have surged 50% since 2024, reaching a staggering $600 billion ...

Deloitte found that 74% of enterprises expect to deploy agentic AI solutions in the next 24 months. However, the rush to deployment is outpacing foundational work, though. Only 21% of enterprises have fully formed agent governance models in place. The result? AI agents deployed without guidance or governance begin to function as fragmented islands of complexity ...

Cloud spending is no longer viewed as a passthrough IT expense, but as a strategic financial lever that directly impacts innovation capacity, profitability and enterprise resilience, according to the CFO Cloud Cost Optimization Report from Azul ...

As AI moves from generating responses to performing actions, the need for trust increases exponentially. And as organizations enlist AI agents for increasingly sophisticated business processes, trust is going to be the single most important theme for spurring adoption. What can organizations do to build trustworthy AI agents? ...

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

IT Cultural Transformation and the Elimination of Technology Silos

An Exercise in Efficiency or a Dream Turned Nightmare?
Dennis Drogseth

Cultural transformation and eliminating IT silos may sound like an impossible dream — and indeed, perhaps “eliminating” is too strong a word. But the reality is that IT organizations must change toward a more responsive, business-aligned culture, as well as toward a more service-aware (versus siloed) way of working.

So how do you begin? A lot depends, of course, on who you are — whether you’re a service desk manager, a vice president of service management or operations, a C-level exec looking across all of IT, or one of those lucky “catalysts” invited to take a transformative role in a matrix capacity.

It will also depend on your unique environment — both the vertical and business model you support and the distinctive characteristics of your IT organization as a human and technological aggregate.

So, there’s no generic answer, just as there’s no generic IT organization and no generic IT professional (or at least I have yet to meet one).

However, drawing from years of consulting and research, I believe I can make a few high-level suggestions to give you some basis for going forward — to accelerate the dream and minimize the nightmare:

Stand in the middle of the storm

"Stand in the middle of the storm." This is a phrase that Enterprise Management Associates (EMA) consultants use to explain the often-overlooked fact that IT organizations have various options to promote cultural transformation and cross-silo ways of working and these options are all interdependent. And they are technology, process, and organization. We don’t single out “people” because people — meaning their very human and sometimes siloed attitudes — are part of all three vectors in this storm of change.

Many in the industry still fail to recognize the need not only to understand each “stormy vector” separately, but also to understand how these vectors become a continuum. Just consider how many IT organizations pay considerable sums to process consultants, systems integrators, and organizational consultants — each group largely oblivious to the other and each group with its own terminology for describing objects, processes, and objectives. Each group has its own perspective on the “right” way to do things. In many instances, efforts to coordinate across these groups lead to a costly merry-go-round — with circular movement as opposed to actual forward progress — often with millions of dollars changing hands.

While the industry still treats the corners of the triangle as three separate worlds with different specialists attached to each, they are, in fact, fundamentally interdependent. The more you can bring these forces closer to the center, the more smoothly, more efficiently, and more effectively they will operate together. Technology can impact process and vice versa — for example, by making certain actions “automated” or “routine” that weren’t before. Process and organization are, of course, closely intertwined, and need to be understood as such. Effective process definitions should take into account your actual political environment, while your organizational structure may well have to evolve to support more cross-domain service awareness if you’re going to succeed in the long run.

Define your objectives

Cultural Transformation? Ask yourself “to do WHAT exactly?” While it’s all well and good to promote “cultural transformation” and “cross-siloed ways of working” I, personally, have never seen an initiative along these lines succeed that wasn’t a little more specific in nature. In defining specific objectives, you might also what to be clear why you feel cultural transformation is important to you, to your organization, and to the business. Then you can more meaningfully associate tangible objectives and metrics to the endeavor.

For instance, many initiatives are associated with technology deployments, such as a more automated capability for managing endpoints, a CMDB/CMS, or a truly cross-domain approach to managing service performance (including operations and the service desk). Other initiatives are framed at a higher level, such as the move to agile and DevOps, cross-domain IT asset optimization, or the move to assimilate internal and external cloud resources into service delivery. Others may be driven initially from non-IT requirements to optimize end-user and customer experience or support new business initiatives dependent on IT services. All these examples (and they are just a subset) represent tangible beginning points for driving IT cultural transformation and cross-silo ways of working.

Consider your resources

Once the initial catalyst for cultural transformation is clear, it’s time to begin to create a more tangible sense of what your resources are for achieving it. These resources may well include a core team (often part-time) of stakeholders, other relevant stakeholders across domains, existing or new management tools, and well-defined executive leadership. Like it or not, top-down leadership is key — a factor that’s been borne out again and again in our research and consulting.

Another lesson I’ve learned from multiple consulting engagements is: seek out the “enthusiasts.” Ask yourself, “Who are the true ‘catalysts for change’ and positive transformation?” And then try to center your initial phase program as much as possible with them.

Promote dialog and communication

No efforts at creating a truly cross-domain, service-aware way of working have succeeded, that I’m aware of, without effective dialog and communication that includes listening and documenting stakeholder concerns, as well as promoting new ways of working. It is a top-down, bottoms-up communication paradigm that — and here’s the good news — will bring strong benefits and insights in and of itself.

Once you start to create meaningful plans for moving into a true cross-domain way of working, ideally with measurable metrics including timeline objectives and business-impacting benefits, you may be surprised at how positive the benefits soon become. Benefits can range from vast improvements in efficiency as your organization finally begins to work together as a whole to increased business value and improved credibility with your service consumers.

But needless to say, cultural change in IT that resolves cross-silo issues isn’t a quick fix. It must evolve from multiple points of awareness and discussion as you, your IT organization, and the business it supports continue to change, adapt, and grow.

Hot Topics

The Latest

The enterprises that will define the next decade are not the ones that deployed the most technology. They are the ones who understood what their technology was actually doing. That distinction is not a philosophical point. It is the central operational challenge facing every organization that has spent the last five years modernizing at speed ...

AI is becoming the operating system of the enterprise. It acts as an invisible coordination layer that understands intent, connects systems, and executes work across complex SaaS environments. Previously, employees had to click through multiple systems — CRM, ERP, support tools, collaboration platforms — to complete a single task. Now, instead of navigating each application manually, they can simply state what they need to accomplish ...

In 2026, the cost of downtime or an outage is no longer just a technical inconvenience; it's a $600 billion wake up call for global businesses. As our digital ecosystems become  more interconnected, each touchpoint introduces new risks and multiplies the consequences when things go wrong. And the data is clear: aggregate downtime costs  for Global 2,000 companies have surged 50% since 2024, reaching a staggering $600 billion ...

Deloitte found that 74% of enterprises expect to deploy agentic AI solutions in the next 24 months. However, the rush to deployment is outpacing foundational work, though. Only 21% of enterprises have fully formed agent governance models in place. The result? AI agents deployed without guidance or governance begin to function as fragmented islands of complexity ...

Cloud spending is no longer viewed as a passthrough IT expense, but as a strategic financial lever that directly impacts innovation capacity, profitability and enterprise resilience, according to the CFO Cloud Cost Optimization Report from Azul ...

As AI moves from generating responses to performing actions, the need for trust increases exponentially. And as organizations enlist AI agents for increasingly sophisticated business processes, trust is going to be the single most important theme for spurring adoption. What can organizations do to build trustworthy AI agents? ...

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...