The pandemic effectively "shocked" enterprises into pushing the gas on tech initiatives that, on the one hand, support a more flexible, decentralized workforce, but that were by-and-large already on the roadmap, regardless of whether businesses had been planning to support widespread work-from-home or not.
Retiring legacy, hardware-based applications and workflows that committed workers to sharing an office for more flexible and scalable cloud tools, for instance, was already in progress (though relatively slowly) at many businesses well before the pandemic made cloud migration a top priority. Showing business leaders that accelerated "digital transformations" like these could even be pulled off (let alone successfully) was just one business myth that was dispelled as part of the pandemic.
The second myth (at least among wary enterprise decision makers) was that IT teams couldn't successfully deploy network infrastructures that were fit to support widespread WFH. Not only has this been dispelled (again, many of the required changes to enable WFH go hand-in-hand with long-simmering digital overhauls), but many newly-remote teams are actually performing better in their new environment.
However, just because enterprise IT have proven in many cases that they can support an almost fully remote workforce doesn't mean that this will be the enterprise standard going forward.
A study conducted by workplace chat app Blind found that among the biggest Silicon Valley tech companies, for instance, pandemic-induced WFH is leading to workers feeling 68 percent more burnt out than they did last year. While the feeling is subjective, the increase can't be ignored. That said, workers in other industries like healthcare are seeing tangible benefits in conducting work at a distance.
So while WFH will never be a fit for every worker, now that both IT and knowledge workers have debunked the misconceptions of their most skeptical enterprise leaders, it'll be hard to convince everyone to "go back" to the old way once restrictions are finally lifted.
All of this goes to show that as much as we've learned about the positives of WFH in this global "experiment" in decentralization, it's too soon to fully say goodbye to the office as we knew it before the pandemic. Instead, companies will need to adapt to support a more fluid, "anywhere operations" model for work that will allow employees to enjoy similar experiences with the job wherever they log on.
For network operations teams going forward, the biggest challenge will be keeping up with the accelerated pace of change now that they've proven to skeptical business leaders their efficiency (and efficacy) in successfully transforming the network. This will require teams to put a greater emphasis on leveraging comprehensive visibility into end-user performance wherever users are located now that the footprint for potential errors has expanded with workers at home.
Supporting this "new normal" calls for enterprise IT teams to synchronize visibility across their rapidly evolving network footprint to ensure they can monitor and manage the digital experiences of users leveraging any app, from any location, at any point in time. With users logging onto the network from all over the map and adopting new technologies to stay in sync with their times, enterprise IT teams have to seek out visibility into network environments that they don't inherently have clear insights into or control over to ensure successful deployment.
The Latest
The 2024 State of the Data Center Report from CoreSite shows that although C-suite confidence in the economy remains high, a VUCA (volatile, uncertain, complex, ambiguous) environment has many business leaders proceeding with caution when it comes to their IT and data ecosystems, with an emphasis on cost control and predictability, flexibility and risk management ...
In June, New Relic published the State of Observability for Energy and Utilities Report to share insights, analysis, and data on the impact of full-stack observability software in energy and utilities organizations' service capabilities. Here are eight key takeaways from the report ...
The rapid rise of generative AI (GenAI) has caught everyone's attention, leaving many to wonder if the technology's impact will live up to the immense hype. A recent survey by Alteryx provides valuable insights into the current state of GenAI adoption, revealing a shift from inflated expectations to tangible value realization across enterprises ... Here are five key takeaways that underscore GenAI's progression from hype to real-world impact ...
As software development grows more intricate, the challenge for observability engineers tasked with ensuring optimal system performance becomes more daunting. Current methodologies are struggling to keep pace, with the annual Observability Pulse surveys indicating a rise in Mean Time to Remediation (MTTR). According to this survey, only a small fraction of organizations, around 10%, achieve full observability today. Generative AI, however, promises to significantly move the needle ...
While nearly all data leaders surveyed are building generative AI applications, most don't believe their data estate is actually prepared to support them, according to the State of Reliable AI report from Monte Carlo Data ...
Enterprises are putting a lot of effort into improving the digital employee experience (DEX), which has become essential to both improving organizational performance and attracting and retaining talented workers. But to date, most efforts to deliver outstanding DEX have focused on people working with laptops, PCs, or thin clients. Employees on the frontlines, using mobile devices to handle logistics ... have been largely overlooked ...
The average customer-facing incident takes nearly three hours to resolve (175 minutes) while the estimated cost of downtime is $4,537 per minute, meaning each incident can cost nearly $794,000, according to new research from PagerDuty ...
In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 8, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses AutoCon with the conference founders Scott Robohn and Chris Grundemann ...
Numerous vendors and service providers have recently embraced the NaaS concept, yet there is still no industry consensus on its definition or the types of networks it involves. Furthermore, providers have varied in how they define the NaaS service delivery model. I conducted research for a new report, Network as a Service: Understanding the Cloud Consumption Model in Networking, to refine the concept of NaaS and reduce buyer confusion over what it is and how it can offer value ...
