Skip to main content

IT Monitoring Paradox: Let's Step Outside the Bubble!

David Hayward

The world is full of paradoxes. To solve them, you have to look at the facts in a different, even nonconventional way. You have to step outside your bubble.

One of the earliest paradoxes is from the ancient Greek thinker Heraclitus. It goes like this: "You cannot step into the same river twice." As Roy Sorenson says in A Brief History of the Paradox, "[Heraclitus] means that you cannot step twice into the same water of a river. There is one river, but many distinct bodies of water flow through it. Heraclitus urges a balance between experience and reason."

Paradoxes are fun to solve, but real-life they can be serious. IT Operations faces paradoxes too, and one in particular day in and day out. Recently, an IT Manager in a FORTUNE 1000 company — let's call him "Joe" — told me that he was called into the distribution center VP's office. The center was at a standstill. Joe showed him that the IT systems supporting the center were meeting all their Service Level Agreements: servers, applications, databases, storage, routers, switches — the whole lot. And the VP's response? "So what. I can’t ship anything."

That's when the light bulb went off in Joe's head. All the IT technologies that underlie the distribution center were running fine, but not the center itself. IT Operations needed another way to look at things, so he could understand the IT environment's status in terms of its impact on the business, not just in terms of how this or that technology silo was behaving.

Like Heraclitus and the river, Joe needed to strike a balance between experience and reason. Joe had plenty of experience — reams of performance monitoring data and proof of SLA compliance for each technology domain — but no way to reason, or monitor, the distribution center business process itself.

Joe started thinking of ITIL — the framework for orienting IT with services, not technologies, in mind. The trouble is, IT operates in a bubble. In fact, lots of bubbles: silo’d teams, silo’d tools, each separately monitoring servers, applications, storage, databases, routers, switches, etc.. No one was monitoring the big picture outside the bubbles. IT Operations Level 1 (the “first line of defense”) was looking at a sea of monitoring screens, events and alerts about technology devices and circuits, and had little or no understanding about how those events and alerts impacted specific business processes.

So even when IT was meeting SLA objectives in each silo, little degradations (i.e., incidents) across silos were adding up and impacting different services (i.e., processes and user experience) in different ways. This was undetectable because there wasn't any way to way to associate all those incidents with specific business services: no operational view and real-time IT operational analytics of business processes across silos.

This is typical. As an analyst from a leading IT research firm recently told me: "The Industry has been trying to solve this problem for decades. It sounds old, but we keep coming back to the same paradox over and over again."

Joe and others like him have embarked on a mission to transform IT Operations from a purely technology monitoring team to a business service reliability monitoring team. They are transforming operations because either they’ll crack the paradox of managing services that they deliver to their business, or the business will outsource operations to someone who can.

Transformation doesn't happen overnight. As the ITIL mantra teaches us, it takes "people, processes and technology" to get IT properly focused on the business and its services. To start, you need to step outside your bubble.

David Hayward is Senior Principal Manager, Solutions Marketing at CA Technologies.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

IT Monitoring Paradox: Let's Step Outside the Bubble!

David Hayward

The world is full of paradoxes. To solve them, you have to look at the facts in a different, even nonconventional way. You have to step outside your bubble.

One of the earliest paradoxes is from the ancient Greek thinker Heraclitus. It goes like this: "You cannot step into the same river twice." As Roy Sorenson says in A Brief History of the Paradox, "[Heraclitus] means that you cannot step twice into the same water of a river. There is one river, but many distinct bodies of water flow through it. Heraclitus urges a balance between experience and reason."

Paradoxes are fun to solve, but real-life they can be serious. IT Operations faces paradoxes too, and one in particular day in and day out. Recently, an IT Manager in a FORTUNE 1000 company — let's call him "Joe" — told me that he was called into the distribution center VP's office. The center was at a standstill. Joe showed him that the IT systems supporting the center were meeting all their Service Level Agreements: servers, applications, databases, storage, routers, switches — the whole lot. And the VP's response? "So what. I can’t ship anything."

That's when the light bulb went off in Joe's head. All the IT technologies that underlie the distribution center were running fine, but not the center itself. IT Operations needed another way to look at things, so he could understand the IT environment's status in terms of its impact on the business, not just in terms of how this or that technology silo was behaving.

Like Heraclitus and the river, Joe needed to strike a balance between experience and reason. Joe had plenty of experience — reams of performance monitoring data and proof of SLA compliance for each technology domain — but no way to reason, or monitor, the distribution center business process itself.

Joe started thinking of ITIL — the framework for orienting IT with services, not technologies, in mind. The trouble is, IT operates in a bubble. In fact, lots of bubbles: silo’d teams, silo’d tools, each separately monitoring servers, applications, storage, databases, routers, switches, etc.. No one was monitoring the big picture outside the bubbles. IT Operations Level 1 (the “first line of defense”) was looking at a sea of monitoring screens, events and alerts about technology devices and circuits, and had little or no understanding about how those events and alerts impacted specific business processes.

So even when IT was meeting SLA objectives in each silo, little degradations (i.e., incidents) across silos were adding up and impacting different services (i.e., processes and user experience) in different ways. This was undetectable because there wasn't any way to way to associate all those incidents with specific business services: no operational view and real-time IT operational analytics of business processes across silos.

This is typical. As an analyst from a leading IT research firm recently told me: "The Industry has been trying to solve this problem for decades. It sounds old, but we keep coming back to the same paradox over and over again."

Joe and others like him have embarked on a mission to transform IT Operations from a purely technology monitoring team to a business service reliability monitoring team. They are transforming operations because either they’ll crack the paradox of managing services that they deliver to their business, or the business will outsource operations to someone who can.

Transformation doesn't happen overnight. As the ITIL mantra teaches us, it takes "people, processes and technology" to get IT properly focused on the business and its services. To start, you need to step outside your bubble.

David Hayward is Senior Principal Manager, Solutions Marketing at CA Technologies.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...