Here's an eight-letter word, twice as bad as any four-letter word, that no business leader wants to hear: downtime. Today's businesses are far more dependent on IT services than ever, and that's true whether you're talking about internal IT services (like ERP) used to drive strategic operations, or external IT services used to satisfy client and customer demand.
Among the more daunting long-term potential consequences of downtime to the organization are these:
• Lost revenues because business couldn't be transacted. A recent Ponemon study tells us the average cost of downtime for US-based organizations is a stunning $5600/minute.
• Diminished brand strength, because the company is seen as unreliable. The same study suggests the average length of downtime was 90 minutes, leading to roughly $500K of costs per incident.
• Evaporating market share, because unhappy customers go to competitors.
Quite a mess in short. And it's a mess that's rapidly getting bigger. Aberdeen Group found that between 2010 and 2012, the cost per hour of downtime climbed an average of 65%!
Now, all of this is obvious in my own area of application performance monitoring (APM), and while downtime is a problem, there is a bigger issue, more subtle lurking just beneath the surface. When we believe everything is running smoothly but don't know something is wrong, that’s when the most damage happens.
For instance, suppose a BizTalk-based service is up and running in a holistic sense, but operating in a subtly inconsistent manner — difficult to detect — that leads to lost transactions from time to time. By this I mean occasionally lost e-mails, lost database entries, lost purchase orders, etc. Time spent by customers resending email and clients waiting or employees spending time looking for an invoice that has not come through – all of these cause more loss in productivity and reputation over a longer period of time.
According to Pricewaterhouse Coopers, the average organization, spends $120 searching for a lost document and wastes 25 hours recreating each lost document.* But what we don't know is how much productivity is lost through not knowing when a problem exists, searching for a file that is not lost at all. Waiting on document resends, searching for "missing" invoices or customer relationships that need to be repaired due to an apparent miscommunication because information is not flowing smoothly in a system all impact company efficiency and costs.
Application performance, and service uptime, can be affected by myriad factors — some as subtle as a gradual shortage of key computational resources. That's why it's important to find a way to granularly monitor your system. To have control and visibility over the problems that are happening so you can decide which ones to tackle is key.
Over time, I think we're going to see that kind of granular insight play a larger and larger role in APM as a field. But in the meantime, it's important to have a clear view of the information that flows throughout your organization so you can see any problem lurking out of sight.
Ivar Sagemo is CEO of AIMS Innovation.
Related Links:
* DocuSense Blog: How Much are Lost Documents Costing You?
The Latest
Over the last 20 years Digital Employee Experience has become a necessity for companies committed to digital transformation and improving IT experiences. In fact, by 2025, more than 50% of IT organizations will use digital employee experience to prioritize and measure digital initiative success ...
While most companies are now deploying cloud-based technologies, the 2024 Secure Cloud Networking Field Report from Aviatrix found that there is a silent struggle to maximize value from those investments. Many of the challenges organizations have faced over the past several years have evolved, but continue today ...
In our latest research, Cisco's The App Attention Index 2023: Beware the Application Generation, 62% of consumers report their expectations for digital experiences are far higher than they were two years ago, and 64% state they are less forgiving of poor digital services than they were just 12 months ago ...
In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 5, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the network source of truth ...
A vast majority (89%) of organizations have rapidly expanded their technology in the past few years and three quarters (76%) say it's brought with it increased "chaos" that they have to manage, according to Situation Report 2024: Managing Technology Chaos from Software AG ...
In 2024 the number one challenge facing IT teams is a lack of skilled workers, and many are turning to automation as an answer, according to IT Trends: 2024 Industry Report ...
Organizations are continuing to embrace multicloud environments and cloud-native architectures to enable rapid transformation and deliver secure innovation. However, despite the speed, scale, and agility enabled by these modern cloud ecosystems, organizations are struggling to manage the explosion of data they create, according to The state of observability 2024: Overcoming complexity through AI-driven analytics and automation strategies, a report from Dynatrace ...
Organizations recognize the value of observability, but only 10% of them are actually practicing full observability of their applications and infrastructure. This is among the key findings from the recently completed Logz.io 2024 Observability Pulse Survey and Report ...
Businesses must adopt a comprehensive Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) strategy, says Enterprise Management Associates (EMA), a leading IT analyst research firm. This strategy is crucial to bridge the significant observability gap within today's complex IT infrastructures. The recommendation is particularly timely, given that 99% of enterprises are expanding their use of the Internet as a primary connectivity conduit while facing challenges due to the inefficiency of multiple, disjointed monitoring tools, according to Modern Enterprises Must Boost Observability with Internet Performance Monitoring, a new report from EMA and Catchpoint ...
Choosing the right approach is critical with cloud monitoring in hybrid environments. Otherwise, you may drive up costs with features you don’t need and risk diminishing the visibility of your on-premises IT ...
