Skip to main content

It's Not Downtime We Should be Worried About - It's Uptime

Ivar Sagemo

Here's an eight-letter word, twice as bad as any four-letter word, that no business leader wants to hear: downtime. Today's businesses are far more dependent on IT services than ever, and that's true whether you're talking about internal IT services (like ERP) used to drive strategic operations, or external IT services used to satisfy client and customer demand.

Among the more daunting long-term potential consequences of downtime to the organization are these:

• Lost revenues because business couldn't be transacted. A recent Ponemon study tells us the average cost of downtime for US-based organizations is a stunning $5600/minute.

• Diminished brand strength, because the company is seen as unreliable. The same study suggests the average length of downtime was 90 minutes, leading to roughly $500K of costs per incident.

• Evaporating market share, because unhappy customers go to competitors.

Quite a mess in short. And it's a mess that's rapidly getting bigger. Aberdeen Group found that between 2010 and 2012, the cost per hour of downtime climbed an average of 65%!

Now, all of this is obvious in my own area of application performance monitoring (APM), and while downtime is a problem, there is a bigger issue, more subtle lurking just beneath the surface. When we believe everything is running smoothly but don't know something is wrong, that’s when the most damage happens.

For instance, suppose a BizTalk-based service is up and running in a holistic sense, but operating in a subtly inconsistent manner — difficult to detect — that leads to lost transactions from time to time. By this I mean occasionally lost e-mails, lost database entries, lost purchase orders, etc. Time spent by customers resending email and clients waiting or employees spending time looking for an invoice that has not come through – all of these cause more loss in productivity and reputation over a longer period of time.

According to Pricewaterhouse Coopers, the average organization, spends $120 searching for a lost document and wastes 25 hours recreating each lost document.* But what we don't know is how much productivity is lost through not knowing when a problem exists, searching for a file that is not lost at all. Waiting on document resends, searching for "missing" invoices or customer relationships that need to be repaired due to an apparent miscommunication because information is not flowing smoothly in a system all impact company efficiency and costs.

Application performance, and service uptime, can be affected by myriad factors — some as subtle as a gradual shortage of key computational resources. That's why it's important to find a way to granularly monitor your system. To have control and visibility over the problems that are happening so you can decide which ones to tackle is key.

Over time, I think we're going to see that kind of granular insight play a larger and larger role in APM as a field. But in the meantime, it's important to have a clear view of the information that flows throughout your organization so you can see any problem lurking out of sight.

Ivar Sagemo is CEO of AIMS Innovation.

Related Links:

www.aimsinnovation.com

* DocuSense Blog: How Much are Lost Documents Costing You?

Hot Topics

The Latest

Every digital customer interaction, every cloud deployment, and every AI model depends on the same foundation: the ability to see, understand, and act on data in real time ... Recent data from Splunk confirms that 74% of the business leaders believe observability is essential to monitoring critical business processes, and 66% feel it's key to understanding user journeys. Because while the unknown is inevitable, observability makes it manageable. Let's explore why ...

Organizations that perform regular audits and assessments of AI system performance and compliance are over three times more likely to achieve high GenAI value than organizations that do not, according to a survey by Gartner ...

Kubernetes has become the backbone of cloud infrastructure, but it's also one of its biggest cost drivers. Recent research shows that 98% of senior IT leaders say Kubernetes now drives cloud spend, yet 91% still can't optimize it effectively. After years of adoption, most organizations have moved past discovery. They know container sprawl, idle resources and reactive scaling inflate costs. What they don't know is how to fix it ...

Artificial intelligence is no longer a future investment. It's already embedded in how we work — whether through copilots in productivity apps, real-time transcription tools in meetings, or machine learning models fueling analytics and personalization. But while enterprise adoption accelerates, there's one critical area many leaders have yet to examine: Can your network actually support AI at the speed your users expect? ...

The more technology businesses invest in, the more potential attack surfaces they have that can be exploited. Without the right continuity plans in place, the disruptions caused by these attacks can bring operations to a standstill and cause irreparable damage to an organization. It's essential to take the time now to ensure your business has the right tools, processes, and recovery initiatives in place to weather any type of IT disaster that comes up. Here are some effective strategies you can follow to achieve this ...

In today's fast-paced AI landscape, CIOs, IT leaders, and engineers are constantly challenged to manage increasingly complex and interconnected systems. The sheer scale and velocity of data generated by modern infrastructure can be overwhelming, making it difficult to maintain uptime, prevent outages, and create a seamless customer experience. This complexity is magnified by the industry's shift towards agentic AI ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 19, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA explains the cause of the AWS outage in October ... 

The explosion of generative AI and machine learning capabilities has fundamentally changed the conversation around cloud migration. It's no longer just about modernization or cost savings — it's about being able to compete in a market where AI is rapidly becoming table stakes. Companies that can't quickly spin up AI workloads, feed models with data at scale, or experiment with new capabilities are falling behind faster than ever before. But here's what I'm seeing: many organizations want to capitalize on AI, but they're stuck ...

On September 16, the world celebrated the 10th annual IT Pro Day, giving companies a chance to laud the professionals who serve as the backbone to almost every successful business across the globe. Despite the growing importance of their roles, many IT pros still work in the background and often go underappreciated ...

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping observability, and observability is becoming essential for AI. This is a two-way relationship that is increasingly relevant as enterprises scale generative AI ... This dual role makes AI and observability inseparable. In this blog, I cover more details of each side ...

It's Not Downtime We Should be Worried About - It's Uptime

Ivar Sagemo

Here's an eight-letter word, twice as bad as any four-letter word, that no business leader wants to hear: downtime. Today's businesses are far more dependent on IT services than ever, and that's true whether you're talking about internal IT services (like ERP) used to drive strategic operations, or external IT services used to satisfy client and customer demand.

Among the more daunting long-term potential consequences of downtime to the organization are these:

• Lost revenues because business couldn't be transacted. A recent Ponemon study tells us the average cost of downtime for US-based organizations is a stunning $5600/minute.

• Diminished brand strength, because the company is seen as unreliable. The same study suggests the average length of downtime was 90 minutes, leading to roughly $500K of costs per incident.

• Evaporating market share, because unhappy customers go to competitors.

Quite a mess in short. And it's a mess that's rapidly getting bigger. Aberdeen Group found that between 2010 and 2012, the cost per hour of downtime climbed an average of 65%!

Now, all of this is obvious in my own area of application performance monitoring (APM), and while downtime is a problem, there is a bigger issue, more subtle lurking just beneath the surface. When we believe everything is running smoothly but don't know something is wrong, that’s when the most damage happens.

For instance, suppose a BizTalk-based service is up and running in a holistic sense, but operating in a subtly inconsistent manner — difficult to detect — that leads to lost transactions from time to time. By this I mean occasionally lost e-mails, lost database entries, lost purchase orders, etc. Time spent by customers resending email and clients waiting or employees spending time looking for an invoice that has not come through – all of these cause more loss in productivity and reputation over a longer period of time.

According to Pricewaterhouse Coopers, the average organization, spends $120 searching for a lost document and wastes 25 hours recreating each lost document.* But what we don't know is how much productivity is lost through not knowing when a problem exists, searching for a file that is not lost at all. Waiting on document resends, searching for "missing" invoices or customer relationships that need to be repaired due to an apparent miscommunication because information is not flowing smoothly in a system all impact company efficiency and costs.

Application performance, and service uptime, can be affected by myriad factors — some as subtle as a gradual shortage of key computational resources. That's why it's important to find a way to granularly monitor your system. To have control and visibility over the problems that are happening so you can decide which ones to tackle is key.

Over time, I think we're going to see that kind of granular insight play a larger and larger role in APM as a field. But in the meantime, it's important to have a clear view of the information that flows throughout your organization so you can see any problem lurking out of sight.

Ivar Sagemo is CEO of AIMS Innovation.

Related Links:

www.aimsinnovation.com

* DocuSense Blog: How Much are Lost Documents Costing You?

Hot Topics

The Latest

Every digital customer interaction, every cloud deployment, and every AI model depends on the same foundation: the ability to see, understand, and act on data in real time ... Recent data from Splunk confirms that 74% of the business leaders believe observability is essential to monitoring critical business processes, and 66% feel it's key to understanding user journeys. Because while the unknown is inevitable, observability makes it manageable. Let's explore why ...

Organizations that perform regular audits and assessments of AI system performance and compliance are over three times more likely to achieve high GenAI value than organizations that do not, according to a survey by Gartner ...

Kubernetes has become the backbone of cloud infrastructure, but it's also one of its biggest cost drivers. Recent research shows that 98% of senior IT leaders say Kubernetes now drives cloud spend, yet 91% still can't optimize it effectively. After years of adoption, most organizations have moved past discovery. They know container sprawl, idle resources and reactive scaling inflate costs. What they don't know is how to fix it ...

Artificial intelligence is no longer a future investment. It's already embedded in how we work — whether through copilots in productivity apps, real-time transcription tools in meetings, or machine learning models fueling analytics and personalization. But while enterprise adoption accelerates, there's one critical area many leaders have yet to examine: Can your network actually support AI at the speed your users expect? ...

The more technology businesses invest in, the more potential attack surfaces they have that can be exploited. Without the right continuity plans in place, the disruptions caused by these attacks can bring operations to a standstill and cause irreparable damage to an organization. It's essential to take the time now to ensure your business has the right tools, processes, and recovery initiatives in place to weather any type of IT disaster that comes up. Here are some effective strategies you can follow to achieve this ...

In today's fast-paced AI landscape, CIOs, IT leaders, and engineers are constantly challenged to manage increasingly complex and interconnected systems. The sheer scale and velocity of data generated by modern infrastructure can be overwhelming, making it difficult to maintain uptime, prevent outages, and create a seamless customer experience. This complexity is magnified by the industry's shift towards agentic AI ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 19, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA explains the cause of the AWS outage in October ... 

The explosion of generative AI and machine learning capabilities has fundamentally changed the conversation around cloud migration. It's no longer just about modernization or cost savings — it's about being able to compete in a market where AI is rapidly becoming table stakes. Companies that can't quickly spin up AI workloads, feed models with data at scale, or experiment with new capabilities are falling behind faster than ever before. But here's what I'm seeing: many organizations want to capitalize on AI, but they're stuck ...

On September 16, the world celebrated the 10th annual IT Pro Day, giving companies a chance to laud the professionals who serve as the backbone to almost every successful business across the globe. Despite the growing importance of their roles, many IT pros still work in the background and often go underappreciated ...

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping observability, and observability is becoming essential for AI. This is a two-way relationship that is increasingly relevant as enterprises scale generative AI ... This dual role makes AI and observability inseparable. In this blog, I cover more details of each side ...