Skip to main content

It's Time to Modernize Pre-Deployment Testing

Jeff Atkins
Spirent

Here's how it happens: You're deploying a new technology, thinking everything's going smoothly, when the alerts start coming in. Your rollout has hit a snag. Whole groups of users are complaining about poor performance on their devices. Some can't access applications at all. You've now blown your service-level agreement (SLA). You might have just introduced a new security vulnerability. In the worst case, your big expensive product launch has missed the mark altogether.

"How did this happen?" you're asking yourself. "Didn't we test everything before we deployed?"

Yes, you did. But you made a critical though common mistake: your tests assumed ideal network conditions. And as you just learned firsthand, the idealized environment in your testing models and the way things work in the real world are two very different things.

Hopefully, this hypothetical doesn't sound too familiar. But if you're relying on traditional testing workflows and you've managed to avoid these kinds of outcomes so far, count your blessings. Because you're taking a big risk with every new launch.

There's a better way to test new enterprise technologies so they get deployed on time, under budget, with the performance you expect. To do it though, you need to get better at predicting the future. That starts with painting a more accurate picture of the present.

Navigating Complexity

Modern IT organizations already deal with more devices, more connections, and complexity than ever before. But even if you get a handle on today's technology landscape, new innovations emerge all the time. Next-generation Ethernet technologies, 5G networks, SD-WAN, Wi-Fi 6, and others can all bring important benefits to your users — benefits your competitors may already be realizing, that you can't afford to ignore. Yet, each new deployment carries significant unpredictability and risk.

All of this means it's more critical than ever to thoroughly test and validate new technology before you deploy. But all the testing in the world can't help you if you're not testing the right things. And the fact is, next-generation enterprise technologies are evolving too quickly for legacy testing approaches to keep up.

In too many cases, enterprises still test new applications and infrastructure by connecting devices directly to datacenters or clouds, with little or no traffic on the network. That kind of testing can tell you how the technology works under ideal conditions, but how often can you expect ideal conditions in the real world?

How will the technology perform on a congested or impaired network?

What kinds of problems will have the biggest impact on user experience?

Too often, those questions get answered only after deployment, when users complain. At which point customer satisfaction has already taken a hit, you may have missed an SLA, and you're looking at a time-consuming, expensive repair process.

Even more concerning, security often gets less attention than performance in pre-deployment validation. Many enterprises still rely on basic tools and firmware checks, or even just assurances from vendors, that software is safe to deploy. Which means there's a good chance you'll only learn about a vulnerability after it's been exploited, and your systems are already compromised.

A Smarter Approach

Fortunately, it's possible to predict and avoid most of these issues. To do it though, we need to recognize that testing models that worked a decade ago won't cut it anymore. We need to reimagine pre-deployment testing for today's more complex, dynamic, and distributed world.

Whatever your updated testing methodology looks like, it should include the following core practices:

Performance validation: Your vendors aren't lying when they claim to hit certain benchmarks, but you can't assume you'll achieve comparable performance in your own environment—especially if you'll be operating under an SLA. You should be measuring everything from voice quality to packet jitter. By validating real-world performance across more granular metrics, you can better evaluate any new solutions you're considering. At the same time, you identify everything you'll need to understand the user experience and troubleshoot problems post-deployment.

Network emulation: If you're going to deploy with confidence, you want to get your test beds as close as possible to real-world conditions. That includes mimicking networks, devices, and users under heavy traffic loads.

Network impairment: Network faults and service degradations are an unavoidable (if hopefully infrequent) reality. So, wouldn't you prefer to know how a new technology will respond under those conditions ahead of time? By running controlled network impairment scenarios alongside emulation, you'll know exactly how problems will affect your users, so you can better prepare. Even more important, you can set realistic expectations with customers and achievable SLAs.

Security assessments: Don't bet your security on third-party assurances or basic firmware checks. Take the time to thoroughly test for vulnerabilities, simulate known attacks, and evaluate weaknesses in the end-to-end network.

Testbed automation: To keep pace with rapidly changing networks and clouds, you should look to automate as much of the testing process as possible. The less you rely on slow, manual testing methodologies, the more quickly and cost-effectively you'll be able to simulate new scenarios as your environment evolves.

Proactive Testing Makes All the Difference

So, what happens when you put these principles into practice — when you modernize your testing to reflect a more realistic picture of your technology landscape?

First, you save time and money by identifying problems before deploying instead of after. It's a lot harder and more expensive to fix issues with a new technology when diverse users and systems already rely on it, and SLAs are already violated.

Second, you protect your users and your business by detecting and mitigating security vulnerabilities before malicious actors can exploit them. Finally, you improve your organization's ability to take advantage of new technology. By automating the testing process, you can continually bring in new testing practices and collect more valuable insights without slowing down innovation.

By overhauling your testing strategy based on realism and automation, you can put your organization in the best position to capitalize on new technologies when they emerge. You can reduce the risk of disruptive (and expensive) problems cropping up out of the blue. And, you can make ongoing innovation a core strength of your IT organization — and a key competitive advantage for your business.

Jeff Atkins is Director of Solutions Marketing at Spirent

Hot Topics

The Latest

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

The gap is widening between what teams spend on observability tools and the value they receive amid surging data volumes and budget pressures, according to The Breaking Point for Observability Leaders, a report from Imply ...

Seamless shopping is a basic demand of today's boundaryless consumer — one with little patience for friction, limited tolerance for disconnected experiences and minimal hesitation in switching brands. Customers expect intuitive, highly personalized experiences and the ability to move effortlessly across physical and digital channels within the same journey. Failure to deliver can cost dearly ...

If your best engineers spend their days sorting tickets and resetting access, you are wasting talent. New global data shows that employees in the IT sector rank among the least motivated across industries. They're under a lot of pressure from many angles. Pressure to upskill and uncertainty around what agentic AI means for job security is creating anxiety. Meanwhile, these roles often function like an on-call job and require many repetitive tasks ...

It's Time to Modernize Pre-Deployment Testing

Jeff Atkins
Spirent

Here's how it happens: You're deploying a new technology, thinking everything's going smoothly, when the alerts start coming in. Your rollout has hit a snag. Whole groups of users are complaining about poor performance on their devices. Some can't access applications at all. You've now blown your service-level agreement (SLA). You might have just introduced a new security vulnerability. In the worst case, your big expensive product launch has missed the mark altogether.

"How did this happen?" you're asking yourself. "Didn't we test everything before we deployed?"

Yes, you did. But you made a critical though common mistake: your tests assumed ideal network conditions. And as you just learned firsthand, the idealized environment in your testing models and the way things work in the real world are two very different things.

Hopefully, this hypothetical doesn't sound too familiar. But if you're relying on traditional testing workflows and you've managed to avoid these kinds of outcomes so far, count your blessings. Because you're taking a big risk with every new launch.

There's a better way to test new enterprise technologies so they get deployed on time, under budget, with the performance you expect. To do it though, you need to get better at predicting the future. That starts with painting a more accurate picture of the present.

Navigating Complexity

Modern IT organizations already deal with more devices, more connections, and complexity than ever before. But even if you get a handle on today's technology landscape, new innovations emerge all the time. Next-generation Ethernet technologies, 5G networks, SD-WAN, Wi-Fi 6, and others can all bring important benefits to your users — benefits your competitors may already be realizing, that you can't afford to ignore. Yet, each new deployment carries significant unpredictability and risk.

All of this means it's more critical than ever to thoroughly test and validate new technology before you deploy. But all the testing in the world can't help you if you're not testing the right things. And the fact is, next-generation enterprise technologies are evolving too quickly for legacy testing approaches to keep up.

In too many cases, enterprises still test new applications and infrastructure by connecting devices directly to datacenters or clouds, with little or no traffic on the network. That kind of testing can tell you how the technology works under ideal conditions, but how often can you expect ideal conditions in the real world?

How will the technology perform on a congested or impaired network?

What kinds of problems will have the biggest impact on user experience?

Too often, those questions get answered only after deployment, when users complain. At which point customer satisfaction has already taken a hit, you may have missed an SLA, and you're looking at a time-consuming, expensive repair process.

Even more concerning, security often gets less attention than performance in pre-deployment validation. Many enterprises still rely on basic tools and firmware checks, or even just assurances from vendors, that software is safe to deploy. Which means there's a good chance you'll only learn about a vulnerability after it's been exploited, and your systems are already compromised.

A Smarter Approach

Fortunately, it's possible to predict and avoid most of these issues. To do it though, we need to recognize that testing models that worked a decade ago won't cut it anymore. We need to reimagine pre-deployment testing for today's more complex, dynamic, and distributed world.

Whatever your updated testing methodology looks like, it should include the following core practices:

Performance validation: Your vendors aren't lying when they claim to hit certain benchmarks, but you can't assume you'll achieve comparable performance in your own environment—especially if you'll be operating under an SLA. You should be measuring everything from voice quality to packet jitter. By validating real-world performance across more granular metrics, you can better evaluate any new solutions you're considering. At the same time, you identify everything you'll need to understand the user experience and troubleshoot problems post-deployment.

Network emulation: If you're going to deploy with confidence, you want to get your test beds as close as possible to real-world conditions. That includes mimicking networks, devices, and users under heavy traffic loads.

Network impairment: Network faults and service degradations are an unavoidable (if hopefully infrequent) reality. So, wouldn't you prefer to know how a new technology will respond under those conditions ahead of time? By running controlled network impairment scenarios alongside emulation, you'll know exactly how problems will affect your users, so you can better prepare. Even more important, you can set realistic expectations with customers and achievable SLAs.

Security assessments: Don't bet your security on third-party assurances or basic firmware checks. Take the time to thoroughly test for vulnerabilities, simulate known attacks, and evaluate weaknesses in the end-to-end network.

Testbed automation: To keep pace with rapidly changing networks and clouds, you should look to automate as much of the testing process as possible. The less you rely on slow, manual testing methodologies, the more quickly and cost-effectively you'll be able to simulate new scenarios as your environment evolves.

Proactive Testing Makes All the Difference

So, what happens when you put these principles into practice — when you modernize your testing to reflect a more realistic picture of your technology landscape?

First, you save time and money by identifying problems before deploying instead of after. It's a lot harder and more expensive to fix issues with a new technology when diverse users and systems already rely on it, and SLAs are already violated.

Second, you protect your users and your business by detecting and mitigating security vulnerabilities before malicious actors can exploit them. Finally, you improve your organization's ability to take advantage of new technology. By automating the testing process, you can continually bring in new testing practices and collect more valuable insights without slowing down innovation.

By overhauling your testing strategy based on realism and automation, you can put your organization in the best position to capitalize on new technologies when they emerge. You can reduce the risk of disruptive (and expensive) problems cropping up out of the blue. And, you can make ongoing innovation a core strength of your IT organization — and a key competitive advantage for your business.

Jeff Atkins is Director of Solutions Marketing at Spirent

Hot Topics

The Latest

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

The gap is widening between what teams spend on observability tools and the value they receive amid surging data volumes and budget pressures, according to The Breaking Point for Observability Leaders, a report from Imply ...

Seamless shopping is a basic demand of today's boundaryless consumer — one with little patience for friction, limited tolerance for disconnected experiences and minimal hesitation in switching brands. Customers expect intuitive, highly personalized experiences and the ability to move effortlessly across physical and digital channels within the same journey. Failure to deliver can cost dearly ...

If your best engineers spend their days sorting tickets and resetting access, you are wasting talent. New global data shows that employees in the IT sector rank among the least motivated across industries. They're under a lot of pressure from many angles. Pressure to upskill and uncertainty around what agentic AI means for job security is creating anxiety. Meanwhile, these roles often function like an on-call job and require many repetitive tasks ...