Skip to main content

Managing Technical Debt to Support Successful Adoption of Emerging Technologies

Rebecca Dilthey
Rocket Software

Technical debt is a pressing issue for many organizations, stifling innovation and leading to costly inefficiencies. According to recent statistics, 7 out of 10 organizations report that technical debt significantly hampers their ability to innovate. Despite these challenges, 90% of IT leaders are planning to boost their spending on emerging technologies like AI in 2025, as highlighted by Forrester. As budget season approaches, it's important for IT leaders to address technical debt to ensure that their 2025 budgets are allocated effectively and support successful technology adoption.

Technical debt refers to the accumulation of shortcuts, outdated technologies, and suboptimal coding practices that build up over time. These "debts" arise from quick fixes that, while solving immediate problems, create long-term inefficiencies and maintenance challenges. This accumulated debt can severely hinder innovation by complicating system updates, increasing maintenance costs, and introducing vulnerabilities. It often results in slower development cycles and higher costs when implementing new technologies.

Beyond these operational challenges, technical debt impacts customer experience with poor performance, data quality issues, and potential breaches, ultimately harming reputation and driving customers away. It also undermines agility, leading to missed business opportunities and inefficient management of outdated technologies. Unsustainable cost structures and insufficient engineering skills further exacerbate these problems, increasing the risk of security issues and diminishing overall ROI from technology investments.

While technical debt is a common and sometimes unavoidable aspect of technology management, it is not insurmountable. Proactively recognizing and managing technical debt can mitigate its impact and facilitate a smoother transition to new technologies.

The High Cost of "Rip and Replace"

The "rip and replace" strategy, which involves removing outdated systems entirely and installing new ones, might seem like a straightforward solution to technical debt, but it carries several significant drawbacks. This approach often leads to considerable downtime, demands extensive resources for migration and training, and can disrupt ongoing business operations. The high costs associated with this method can strain budgets and delay the realization of benefits from new technologies.

Modernizing shouldn't require abandoning systems that have supported critical operations. For example, mainframes, which have been essential for decades in processing retail transactions and managing bank accounts, still play a crucial role. Instead of opting for a complete overhaul, modernizing in place involves updating and enhancing existing systems to better meet current needs. This approach aims to improve the functionality and efficiency of legacy systems without the need for a full replacement. By adopting this strategy, organizations can leverage their current infrastructure while gradually integrating newer technologies.

Modernization techniques streamline the maintenance and update processes for existing systems. For instance, refactoring code can make it more efficient, reducing the time and resources needed for ongoing maintenance. Containerization allows for faster deployment and scaling of applications, enabling organizations to respond more swiftly to changing needs.

Enhancing existing infrastructure rather than replacing it can help organizations avoid the high expenses associated with a full system overhaul, while also minimizing the risks associated with major system changes. Modernization in place often involves incremental updates, which can be more budget-friendly and less disruptive. This approach allows organizations to extend the life of their current investments while gradually integrating new technologies.

Embracing Emerging Technologies: Key Considerations

As organizations plan for 2025 and beyond, integrating emerging technologies such as AI, machine learning, and advanced analytics will be crucial for maintaining a competitive edge. To fully leverage these innovations, a solid foundation and effective management of technical debt are essential.

AI and machine learning have the potential to transform business operations and enhance customer insights significantly. However, realizing these benefits requires that existing systems are well-maintained and updated. Addressing technical debt and modernizing infrastructure will ensure that the foundation is robust enough to support these advanced tools.

Cloud technologies provide excellent opportunities for scalability and cost efficiency. To optimize these benefits, it is important to align cloud strategies with ongoing modernization efforts. Addressing technical debt and refining cloud usage will improve system performance and streamline operations. The Internet of Things (IoT) offers real-time data collection and automation benefits, but effective integration with legacy systems requires careful management of technical debt. Ensuring that older systems can interact seamlessly with IoT solutions will lead to better data utilization and increased operational efficiency.

To manage cloud costs and meet AI demands, establishing FinOps capabilities is vital. This approach provides visibility into specific expenditures, such as costs associated with AI calls or document processing, facilitating more accurate budgeting and helping to avoid unexpected costs.

Additionally, designing AI applications to minimize unnecessary computing resources, through techniques like caching and processing only essential data, can reduce costs. Evaluating the value of various AI use cases ensures that investment is focused on areas that offer the greatest benefit relative to their cost, maximizing overall return on investment.

Conclusion

As organizations look toward the future, balancing the maintenance and modernization of existing systems with the adoption of emerging technologies like AI, cloud computing, and IoT will be of the utmost importance. Addressing technical debt proactively allows CIOs and tech leaders to optimize resources, mitigate risks, and build a more agile infrastructure that fosters innovation. Through prioritizing modernization over complete system overhauls, organizations can make the most of their current investments, minimize disruptions, and stay on a steady growth path. Aligning these efforts with long-term business goals ensures that technology investments yield sustainable value.

In an era of economic uncertainty, strategic planning and continuous improvement are essential for managing technical debt, driving innovation, and achieving long-term success while remaining competitive.

Rebecca Dilthey is a Product Marketing Director at Rocket Software

The Latest

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

Managing Technical Debt to Support Successful Adoption of Emerging Technologies

Rebecca Dilthey
Rocket Software

Technical debt is a pressing issue for many organizations, stifling innovation and leading to costly inefficiencies. According to recent statistics, 7 out of 10 organizations report that technical debt significantly hampers their ability to innovate. Despite these challenges, 90% of IT leaders are planning to boost their spending on emerging technologies like AI in 2025, as highlighted by Forrester. As budget season approaches, it's important for IT leaders to address technical debt to ensure that their 2025 budgets are allocated effectively and support successful technology adoption.

Technical debt refers to the accumulation of shortcuts, outdated technologies, and suboptimal coding practices that build up over time. These "debts" arise from quick fixes that, while solving immediate problems, create long-term inefficiencies and maintenance challenges. This accumulated debt can severely hinder innovation by complicating system updates, increasing maintenance costs, and introducing vulnerabilities. It often results in slower development cycles and higher costs when implementing new technologies.

Beyond these operational challenges, technical debt impacts customer experience with poor performance, data quality issues, and potential breaches, ultimately harming reputation and driving customers away. It also undermines agility, leading to missed business opportunities and inefficient management of outdated technologies. Unsustainable cost structures and insufficient engineering skills further exacerbate these problems, increasing the risk of security issues and diminishing overall ROI from technology investments.

While technical debt is a common and sometimes unavoidable aspect of technology management, it is not insurmountable. Proactively recognizing and managing technical debt can mitigate its impact and facilitate a smoother transition to new technologies.

The High Cost of "Rip and Replace"

The "rip and replace" strategy, which involves removing outdated systems entirely and installing new ones, might seem like a straightforward solution to technical debt, but it carries several significant drawbacks. This approach often leads to considerable downtime, demands extensive resources for migration and training, and can disrupt ongoing business operations. The high costs associated with this method can strain budgets and delay the realization of benefits from new technologies.

Modernizing shouldn't require abandoning systems that have supported critical operations. For example, mainframes, which have been essential for decades in processing retail transactions and managing bank accounts, still play a crucial role. Instead of opting for a complete overhaul, modernizing in place involves updating and enhancing existing systems to better meet current needs. This approach aims to improve the functionality and efficiency of legacy systems without the need for a full replacement. By adopting this strategy, organizations can leverage their current infrastructure while gradually integrating newer technologies.

Modernization techniques streamline the maintenance and update processes for existing systems. For instance, refactoring code can make it more efficient, reducing the time and resources needed for ongoing maintenance. Containerization allows for faster deployment and scaling of applications, enabling organizations to respond more swiftly to changing needs.

Enhancing existing infrastructure rather than replacing it can help organizations avoid the high expenses associated with a full system overhaul, while also minimizing the risks associated with major system changes. Modernization in place often involves incremental updates, which can be more budget-friendly and less disruptive. This approach allows organizations to extend the life of their current investments while gradually integrating new technologies.

Embracing Emerging Technologies: Key Considerations

As organizations plan for 2025 and beyond, integrating emerging technologies such as AI, machine learning, and advanced analytics will be crucial for maintaining a competitive edge. To fully leverage these innovations, a solid foundation and effective management of technical debt are essential.

AI and machine learning have the potential to transform business operations and enhance customer insights significantly. However, realizing these benefits requires that existing systems are well-maintained and updated. Addressing technical debt and modernizing infrastructure will ensure that the foundation is robust enough to support these advanced tools.

Cloud technologies provide excellent opportunities for scalability and cost efficiency. To optimize these benefits, it is important to align cloud strategies with ongoing modernization efforts. Addressing technical debt and refining cloud usage will improve system performance and streamline operations. The Internet of Things (IoT) offers real-time data collection and automation benefits, but effective integration with legacy systems requires careful management of technical debt. Ensuring that older systems can interact seamlessly with IoT solutions will lead to better data utilization and increased operational efficiency.

To manage cloud costs and meet AI demands, establishing FinOps capabilities is vital. This approach provides visibility into specific expenditures, such as costs associated with AI calls or document processing, facilitating more accurate budgeting and helping to avoid unexpected costs.

Additionally, designing AI applications to minimize unnecessary computing resources, through techniques like caching and processing only essential data, can reduce costs. Evaluating the value of various AI use cases ensures that investment is focused on areas that offer the greatest benefit relative to their cost, maximizing overall return on investment.

Conclusion

As organizations look toward the future, balancing the maintenance and modernization of existing systems with the adoption of emerging technologies like AI, cloud computing, and IoT will be of the utmost importance. Addressing technical debt proactively allows CIOs and tech leaders to optimize resources, mitigate risks, and build a more agile infrastructure that fosters innovation. Through prioritizing modernization over complete system overhauls, organizations can make the most of their current investments, minimize disruptions, and stay on a steady growth path. Aligning these efforts with long-term business goals ensures that technology investments yield sustainable value.

In an era of economic uncertainty, strategic planning and continuous improvement are essential for managing technical debt, driving innovation, and achieving long-term success while remaining competitive.

Rebecca Dilthey is a Product Marketing Director at Rocket Software

The Latest

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...