Skip to main content

Monitoring as Code: Worth The Hype?

Hannes Lenke
Checkly

Configuring application Monitoring as Code (MaC) is the next logical step in modern software development. Today, configuring monitoring is often an overly manual process. It's a bottleneck that DevOps teams are addressing to ship code faster with greater confidence.

Before we explore the relatively new MaC concept, we should step back and discuss the "as Code" movement in general. The most prominent current example is Infrastructure as Code (IaC), which became the gold standard for infrastructure provisioning in recent years. IaC lets developers write files that define how servers should be set up. Building on that concept, IaC tools apply those configurations automatically, often fully integrated into the CI/CD process.

Bringing key aspects of the software development workflow closer to the application code enables developers to automate and ultimately ship their services faster and more often, continuously. Hence ‘as code' has become popular in recent years. However, continuous delivery (CD) requires more than infrastructure automation. It also requires automation of other software delivery aspects. Without this additional automation, how would DevOps teams be able to ship code updates dozens of times a day or even more often?

Next to automation, one key aspect of CD is that cross-functional DevOps teams are now responsible for their services from one end to the other. The motto "You build it; you test it; you run it!" rings true for teams not only tasked to ship often but to simultaneously test and operate those deployed services. It's vital for modern DevOps teams to embrace automation for other functions in their pipeline, including crucial aspects like monitoring. In that context, health and performance monitoring need to be described as code too.

Let's look at some key reasons why monitoring as code is here to stay.

Monitoring shouldn't become the bottleneck for software delivery

Creating checks for larger APIs or websites are often repetitive manual tasks that require a lot of time. In addition, the demand on DevOps teams to make daily — or even hourly — changes to target applications translates into exploding workloads and testing requirements.
In contrast, defining something as code enables you to replicate the actions you would usually do manually — using a UI or CLI — and automate these.

Lack of transparency makes cross-team collaboration harder

Traditional monitoring processes require manual provisioning, meaning users need to create tickets to have new monitoring resources provisioned for them or request permission to apply the changes themselves. In turn, central IT teams are often required to work through different UIs and flows.

This makes it difficult to maintain consistency across an entire infrastructure while simultaneously avoiding duplication of effort across teams. It also complicated the task of auditing changes, making it difficult to review wrongly configured monitoring checks, thereby lengthening an important feedback loop.

Monitoring should be CI/CD integrated

Eventually, the speed of checks-provisioning does not match the pace at which the target applications are evolving. This results from a mismatch of approaches: the CI/CD workflow through which the websites and APIs are iterated upon on one side vs. the fully manual approach on the other.

Applying lessons learned from IaC, MaC brings check definitions closer to the application's source code by having them written as code.

This method allows check definitions to live in source control, boosting cross-team visibility. Additionally, code is text, which is useful for version control and generating an audit trail of all changes. This makes it easier to roll back changes in case of incidents.

With software taking over the provisioning of monitoring checks, hundreds or thousands of checks can be created or edited in a matter of seconds. This is a game-changer for development, operations, and DevOps teams, allowing them to reallocate time spent on manual configuration toward improving the coverage and robustness of their monitoring setup.

To summarize, MaC is revolutionizing the way monitoring is configured by providing:

1. Better scalability through faster, more efficient provisioning

2. Increased transparency and easier rollbacks via source control

3. Unification of previously fragmented processes in a CI/CD workflow

Hannes Lenke is CEO and Co-Founder of Checkly

Hot Topics

The Latest

Most organizations approach OpenTelemetry as a collection of individual tools they need to assemble from scratch. This view misses the bigger picture. OpenTelemetry is a complete telemetry framework with composable components that address specific problems at different stages of organizational maturity. You start with what you need today and adopt additional pieces as your observability practices evolve ...

One of the earliest lessons I learned from architecting throughput-heavy services is that simplicity wins repeatedly: fewer moving parts, loosely coupled execution (fewer synchronous calls), and precise timing metering. You want data and decisions to travel the shortest possible path. The goal is to build a system where every strategy and each line of code (contention is the key metric) complements the decision trees ...

As discussions around AI "autonomous coworkers" accelerate, many industry projections assume that agents will soon operate alongside human staff in making decisions, taking actions, and managing tasks with minimal oversight. But a growing number of critics (including some of the developers building these systems) argue that the industry still has a long way to go to be able to treat AI agents like fully trusted teammates ...

Enterprise AI has entered a transformational phase where, according to Digitate's recently released survey, Agentic AI and the Future of Enterprise IT, companies are moving beyond traditional automation toward Agentic AI systems designed to reason, adapt, and collaborate alongside human teams ...

The numbers back this urgency up. A recent Zapier survey shows that 92% of enterprises now treat AI as a top priority. Leaders want it, and teams are clamoring for it. But if you look closer at the operations of these companies, you see a different picture. The rollout is slow. The results are often delayed. There's a disconnect between what leaders want and what their technical infrastructure can handle ...

Kyndryl's 2025 Readiness Report revealed that 61% of global business and technology leaders report increasing pressure from boards and regulators to prove AI's ROI. As the technology evolves and expectations continue to rise, leaders are compelled to generate and prove impact before scaling further. This will lead to a decisive turning point in 2026 ...

Cloudflare's disruption illustrates how quickly a single provider's issue cascades into widespread exposure. Many organizations don't fully realize how tightly their systems are coupled to thirdparty services, or how quickly availability and security concerns align when those services falter ... You can't avoid these dependencies, but you can understand them ...

If you work with AI, you know this story. A model performs during testing, looks great in early reviews, works perfectly in production and then slowly loses relevance after operating for a while. Everything on the surface looks perfect — pipelines are running, predictions or recommendations are error-free, data quality checks show green; yet outcomes don't meet the ground reality. This pattern often repeats across enterprise AI programs. Take for example, a mid-sized retail banking and wealth-management firm with heavy investments in AI-powered risk analytics, fraud detection and personalized credit-decisioning systems. The model worked well for a while, but transactions increased, so did false positives by 18% ...

Basic uptime is no longer the gold standard. By 2026, network monitoring must do more than report status, it must explain performance in a hybrid-first world. Networks are no longer just static support systems; they are agile, distributed architectures that sit at the very heart of the customer experience and the business outcomes ... The following five trends represent the new standard for network health, providing a blueprint for teams to move from reactive troubleshooting to a proactive, integrated future ...

APMdigest's Predictions Series concludes with 2026 AI Predictions — industry experts offer predictions on how AI and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2026. Part 5, the final installment, covers AI's impacts on IT teams ...

Monitoring as Code: Worth The Hype?

Hannes Lenke
Checkly

Configuring application Monitoring as Code (MaC) is the next logical step in modern software development. Today, configuring monitoring is often an overly manual process. It's a bottleneck that DevOps teams are addressing to ship code faster with greater confidence.

Before we explore the relatively new MaC concept, we should step back and discuss the "as Code" movement in general. The most prominent current example is Infrastructure as Code (IaC), which became the gold standard for infrastructure provisioning in recent years. IaC lets developers write files that define how servers should be set up. Building on that concept, IaC tools apply those configurations automatically, often fully integrated into the CI/CD process.

Bringing key aspects of the software development workflow closer to the application code enables developers to automate and ultimately ship their services faster and more often, continuously. Hence ‘as code' has become popular in recent years. However, continuous delivery (CD) requires more than infrastructure automation. It also requires automation of other software delivery aspects. Without this additional automation, how would DevOps teams be able to ship code updates dozens of times a day or even more often?

Next to automation, one key aspect of CD is that cross-functional DevOps teams are now responsible for their services from one end to the other. The motto "You build it; you test it; you run it!" rings true for teams not only tasked to ship often but to simultaneously test and operate those deployed services. It's vital for modern DevOps teams to embrace automation for other functions in their pipeline, including crucial aspects like monitoring. In that context, health and performance monitoring need to be described as code too.

Let's look at some key reasons why monitoring as code is here to stay.

Monitoring shouldn't become the bottleneck for software delivery

Creating checks for larger APIs or websites are often repetitive manual tasks that require a lot of time. In addition, the demand on DevOps teams to make daily — or even hourly — changes to target applications translates into exploding workloads and testing requirements.
In contrast, defining something as code enables you to replicate the actions you would usually do manually — using a UI or CLI — and automate these.

Lack of transparency makes cross-team collaboration harder

Traditional monitoring processes require manual provisioning, meaning users need to create tickets to have new monitoring resources provisioned for them or request permission to apply the changes themselves. In turn, central IT teams are often required to work through different UIs and flows.

This makes it difficult to maintain consistency across an entire infrastructure while simultaneously avoiding duplication of effort across teams. It also complicated the task of auditing changes, making it difficult to review wrongly configured monitoring checks, thereby lengthening an important feedback loop.

Monitoring should be CI/CD integrated

Eventually, the speed of checks-provisioning does not match the pace at which the target applications are evolving. This results from a mismatch of approaches: the CI/CD workflow through which the websites and APIs are iterated upon on one side vs. the fully manual approach on the other.

Applying lessons learned from IaC, MaC brings check definitions closer to the application's source code by having them written as code.

This method allows check definitions to live in source control, boosting cross-team visibility. Additionally, code is text, which is useful for version control and generating an audit trail of all changes. This makes it easier to roll back changes in case of incidents.

With software taking over the provisioning of monitoring checks, hundreds or thousands of checks can be created or edited in a matter of seconds. This is a game-changer for development, operations, and DevOps teams, allowing them to reallocate time spent on manual configuration toward improving the coverage and robustness of their monitoring setup.

To summarize, MaC is revolutionizing the way monitoring is configured by providing:

1. Better scalability through faster, more efficient provisioning

2. Increased transparency and easier rollbacks via source control

3. Unification of previously fragmented processes in a CI/CD workflow

Hannes Lenke is CEO and Co-Founder of Checkly

Hot Topics

The Latest

Most organizations approach OpenTelemetry as a collection of individual tools they need to assemble from scratch. This view misses the bigger picture. OpenTelemetry is a complete telemetry framework with composable components that address specific problems at different stages of organizational maturity. You start with what you need today and adopt additional pieces as your observability practices evolve ...

One of the earliest lessons I learned from architecting throughput-heavy services is that simplicity wins repeatedly: fewer moving parts, loosely coupled execution (fewer synchronous calls), and precise timing metering. You want data and decisions to travel the shortest possible path. The goal is to build a system where every strategy and each line of code (contention is the key metric) complements the decision trees ...

As discussions around AI "autonomous coworkers" accelerate, many industry projections assume that agents will soon operate alongside human staff in making decisions, taking actions, and managing tasks with minimal oversight. But a growing number of critics (including some of the developers building these systems) argue that the industry still has a long way to go to be able to treat AI agents like fully trusted teammates ...

Enterprise AI has entered a transformational phase where, according to Digitate's recently released survey, Agentic AI and the Future of Enterprise IT, companies are moving beyond traditional automation toward Agentic AI systems designed to reason, adapt, and collaborate alongside human teams ...

The numbers back this urgency up. A recent Zapier survey shows that 92% of enterprises now treat AI as a top priority. Leaders want it, and teams are clamoring for it. But if you look closer at the operations of these companies, you see a different picture. The rollout is slow. The results are often delayed. There's a disconnect between what leaders want and what their technical infrastructure can handle ...

Kyndryl's 2025 Readiness Report revealed that 61% of global business and technology leaders report increasing pressure from boards and regulators to prove AI's ROI. As the technology evolves and expectations continue to rise, leaders are compelled to generate and prove impact before scaling further. This will lead to a decisive turning point in 2026 ...

Cloudflare's disruption illustrates how quickly a single provider's issue cascades into widespread exposure. Many organizations don't fully realize how tightly their systems are coupled to thirdparty services, or how quickly availability and security concerns align when those services falter ... You can't avoid these dependencies, but you can understand them ...

If you work with AI, you know this story. A model performs during testing, looks great in early reviews, works perfectly in production and then slowly loses relevance after operating for a while. Everything on the surface looks perfect — pipelines are running, predictions or recommendations are error-free, data quality checks show green; yet outcomes don't meet the ground reality. This pattern often repeats across enterprise AI programs. Take for example, a mid-sized retail banking and wealth-management firm with heavy investments in AI-powered risk analytics, fraud detection and personalized credit-decisioning systems. The model worked well for a while, but transactions increased, so did false positives by 18% ...

Basic uptime is no longer the gold standard. By 2026, network monitoring must do more than report status, it must explain performance in a hybrid-first world. Networks are no longer just static support systems; they are agile, distributed architectures that sit at the very heart of the customer experience and the business outcomes ... The following five trends represent the new standard for network health, providing a blueprint for teams to move from reactive troubleshooting to a proactive, integrated future ...

APMdigest's Predictions Series concludes with 2026 AI Predictions — industry experts offer predictions on how AI and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2026. Part 5, the final installment, covers AI's impacts on IT teams ...