Businesses Are Double-Invested in Monitoring – and Leaders Don't See It
September 29, 2022

Phil Tee

Share this

Our digital economy is intolerant of downtime. But consumers haven't just come to expect always-on digital apps and services. They also expect continuous innovation, new functionality and lightening fast response times.

Organizations have taken note, investing heavily in teams and tools that supposedly increase uptime and free resources for innovation. But leaders have not realized this "throw money at the problem" approach to monitoring is burning through resources without much improvement in availability outcomes.

The Moogsoft State of Availability Report — which helps engineering teams and leaders uncover insights about availability KPIs, teams and tools — found that businesses are double-investing in monitoring. Organizations spend too much money on too many tools, and teams spend the majority of their days monitoring their monitoring tools.

This over-investment in incident management goes largely unnoticed by management. So does the fact that monitoring cycles siphon resources from the future-driven work that delights customers and keeps engineers engaged.

We identify a few common causes of the spend for less approach here:

1. Sprawling single-domain monitoring tools

In a noble attempt to keep digital apps and services available to end users at all times, business leaders buy tools that monitor their increasingly large and complex IT infrastructures. In theory, these tools should speed fixes to performance-affecting issues by continuously scanning systems and notifying engineers about anomalies.

The problem is: Teams have far too many tools. On average, engineers manage 16 monitoring tools. And that number can creep up to 40 as SLAs increase. Sprawling tools like this are unwieldy and license, management and maintenance overheads are expensive. But the over-investment in monitoring doesn't stop there.

2. Days spend in monitoring cycles

IT monitoring tools should bear the brunt of monitoring itself. In principle, these tools relieve engineers from spending too much time on a fairly tedious task and enable them to deliver what customers want: bigger and better technology.

Unfortunately, teams spend by far the most time monitoring over any other task. Why? Engineers spin their wheels managing single-domain tools that are not integrated cross stack. and produce huge volumes of largely useless data. Teams facing a critical outage or incident waste valuable time investigating data from disparate tools and connecting the dots themselves.

3. Leadership-team misalignment

Business leaders do not see just how much time their teams spend on monitoring, and likely believe they're making sound monitoring investments. Leaders believe their teams spend about the same amount of their time on monitoring as they do on other daily (and often future-driven) responsibilities like automation, cloud transformation and development.

4. Stalling innovation and experimentation

With engineering teams stuck in monitoring cycles, something has to give. And unfortunately, that thing is innovation and experimentation — the very activities that delight customers and engage engineering teams. In other words, not only do organizations over-invest in monitoring, they do so to the detriment of customer experience improvements.

The solution: steps to tech stability

If you are part of an engineering team or team leader, chances are you're facing modern-day monitoring problems. Consider these best practices for breaking wasteful monitoring cycles and building your tech stability:

1. Baseline your tools. Audit your existing tools, understand their utilization and what they cost. Then, you can determine which of these assets advance availability goals and which just create more noise.

2. Consolidate your tools. Hold on to only those monitoring tools that provide value. Otherwise, try to shrink your monitoring tools' footprint to decrease total cost of ownership (TCO) and reduce noise.

3. Implement an artificial intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) solution. Make your next monitoring investment one that makes engineer's jobs less toilsome, not more. AIOps connects cloud and on-prem monitoring tools, giving engineers a central system of engagement for all monitoring activities. The platform alerts engineers to data anomalies and their root cause and automates the entire incident lifecycle.

4. Pay down your technical debt. With time back on your side, tackle the most relevant tech debt and increase system stability. Free even more time by automating away toil and continue to increase availability with chaos engineering.

5. Invest in the future. With time and money saved, refocus your investments on company-differentiating initiatives.

Monitoring tools are essential to uptime. But monitoring cannot be the only thing teams do — especially when it hinders innovation and experimentation. Leaders must make more informed investments to monitor more effectively. Only then can organizations move from maintaining the customer experience to innovating the customer experience.

Phil Tee is CEO of Moogsoft
Share this

The Latest

February 29, 2024

Despite the growth in popularity of artificial intelligence (AI) and ML across a number of industries, there is still a huge amount of unrealized potential, with many businesses playing catch-up and still planning how ML solutions can best facilitate processes. Further progression could be limited without investment in specialized technical teams to drive development and integration ...

February 28, 2024

With over 200 streaming services to choose from, including multiple platforms featuring similar types of entertainment, users have little incentive to remain loyal to any given platform if it exhibits performance issues. Big names in streaming like Hulu, Amazon Prime and HBO Max invest thousands of hours into engineering observability and closed-loop monitoring to combat infrastructure and application issues, but smaller platforms struggle to remain competitive without access to the same resources ...

February 27, 2024

Generative AI has recently experienced unprecedented dramatic growth, making it one of the most exciting transformations the tech industry has seen in some time. However, this growth also poses a challenge for tech leaders who will be expected to deliver on the promise of new technology. In 2024, delivering tangible outcomes that meet the potential of AI, and setting up incubator projects for the future will be key tasks ...

February 26, 2024

SAP is a tool for automating business processes. Managing SAP solutions, especially with the shift to the cloud-based S/4HANA platform, can be intricate. To explore the concerns of SAP users during operational transformations and automation, a survey was conducted in mid-2023 by Digitate and Americas' SAP Users' Group ...

February 22, 2024

Some companies are just starting to dip their toes into developing AI capabilities, while (few) others can claim they have built a truly AI-first product. Regardless of where a company is on the AI journey, leaders must understand what it means to build every aspect of their product with AI in mind ...

February 21, 2024

Generative AI will usher in advantages within various industries. However, the technology is still nascent, and according to the recent Dynatrace survey there are many challenges and risks that organizations need to overcome to use this technology effectively ...

February 20, 2024

In today's digital era, monitoring and observability are indispensable in software and application development. Their efficacy lies in empowering developers to swiftly identify and address issues, enhance performance, and deliver flawless user experiences. Achieving these objectives requires meticulous planning, strategic implementation, and consistent ongoing maintenance. In this blog, we're sharing our five best practices to fortify your approach to application performance monitoring (APM) and observability ...

February 16, 2024

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 3, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at Enterprise Management Associates (EMA) discusses network security with Chris Steffen, VP of Research Covering Information Security, Risk, and Compliance Management at EMA ...

February 15, 2024

In a time where we're constantly bombarded with new buzzwords and technological advancements, it can be challenging for businesses to determine what is real, what is useful, and what they truly need. Over the years, we've witnessed the rise and fall of various tech trends, such as the promises (and fears) of AI becoming sentient and replacing humans to the declaration that data is the new oil. At the end of the day, one fundamental question remains: How can companies navigate through the tech buzz and make informed decisions for their future? ...

February 14, 2024

We increasingly see companies using their observability data to support security use cases. It's not entirely surprising given the challenges that organizations have with legacy SIEMs. We wanted to dig into this evolving intersection of security and observability, so we surveyed 500 security professionals — 40% of whom were either CISOs or CSOs — for our inaugural State of Security Observability report ...