Need A Change? Newer Isn't Necessarily Better
March 02, 2022

Rebecca Dilthey
Rocket Software

Share this

We all love new, shiny objects. When the washing machine dies, most of us don't run to an appliance store that sells used models or parts to repair your machine. You drop the money on a new one with all the bells and whistles.

Same goes for enterprise technology. When a legacy system starts to fail, our eyes tend to widen as we evaluate all the fancy toys on the market. Absolutely everything in hardware and software is about novelty — yesterday's innovation is tomorrow's doorstop.

While it doesn't appear as glamorous as the newest, most disruptive technology, often your old systems can be updated to deliver the performance your organization needs, saving your business the money and time associated with "rip and replace" projects.

During the pandemic, IT scaled back on higher risk new investments and looked at how they could invest in the systems they already had. In a post-COVID world, this trend hasn't changed, even as IT spending returns to pre-pandemic levels. Even though there is increased investment in projects to better service hybrid work environments as well as the hot new trends like hybrid cloud, organizations are realizing they can save valuable time and money by modernizing existing technology rather than throwing capital at the next big technology trend.

It's only natural that IT leaders would consider replacing systems they believe are outdated, especially if there is a perception that the systems cannot natively support a need of the business. In fact, that's often the first order of business for new CIOs when they walk into an IT organization. What often is overlooked, however, is the value of the solutions they have in place — the ones their teams are comfortable with and don't cost hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars in a rip and replace project. Often these systems are fully capable of meeting their needs and enabling innovation and experimentation, especially if they are kept up to date.

What was that about millions of dollars?

The numbers are not insignificant. When adopting a rip and replace strategy, there are so many costs that aren't realized when initial project scoping occurs. For example, Projects this size often need full time managers, often delegated to consulting firms. Then there is the opportunity cost of employees having to devote time and effort to the project instead of their day-to-day job. And what about the huge amount of risk inherent in a re-platforming project. There are companies that have made the huge investment to replatform, only to find out at the end of the project there are some applications that are so central to how the business operates, they are in essence the hub of all operations and therefore too risky to touch. Millions of dollars and years of effort essentially for nothing.

Fans of rip and replace often counter that change needs to be made for operational reasons — but the data doesn't support it. While the product lines of many large systems are several decades old, the hardware and operating systems are updated every year. For some reason, though, that gets lost when we think of these older systems.

If you drive a Ford Focus, you know it's evolved dramatically from Ford Model T — so why is there this perception that these machines are like their ancestors?

In fact, not only do these systems offer the lower total cost of ownership and the unique security and transaction management capabilities inherent in mainframe and midrange systems, today's developers and programmers can use their favorite open-source languages and tools, new technologies like AI and ML, and more.

Additionally, there are software tools that enable non-RPG and -COBOL developers to cost-effectively create an "innovation layer" that makes it easy and efficient to modernize and automate applications and workflows running on these systems.

Businesses are coming to the realization that it's more valuable to update their existing tech stack on the heritage system — and upgrade to the latest OS — rather than turning to a rip and replace approach. After all, at the end of the day, the two main factors that matter most to IT leaders are: does my infrastructure and the tools I deliver to the business support the business strategy and goals; and can I ensure that support of the business in a cost-effective way. If investing in systems instead of replatforming gives IT the best of both worlds, it would seem a quest for something brand new might not be the best option.

Rebecca Dilthey is a Product Marketing Director at Rocket Software
Share this

The Latest

September 30, 2022

For businesses with vast and distributed computing infrastructures, one of the main objectives of IT and network operations is to locate the cause of a service condition that is having an impact. The more human resources are put into the task of gathering, processing, and finally visual monitoring the massive volumes of event and log data that serve as the main source of symptomatic indications for emerging crises, the closer the service is to the company's source of revenue ...

September 29, 2022

Our digital economy is intolerant of downtime. But consumers haven't just come to expect always-on digital apps and services. They also expect continuous innovation, new functionality and lightening fast response times. Organizations have taken note, investing heavily in teams and tools that supposedly increase uptime and free resources for innovation. But leaders have not realized this "throw money at the problem" approach to monitoring is burning through resources without much improvement in availability outcomes ...

September 28, 2022

Although 83% of businesses are concerned about a recession in 2023, B2B tech marketers can look forward to growth — 51% of organizations plan to increase IT budgets in 2023 vs. a narrow 6% that plan to reduce their spend, according to the 2023 State of IT report from Spiceworks Ziff Davis ...

September 27, 2022

Users have high expectations around applications — quick loading times, look and feel visually advanced, with feature-rich content, video streaming, and multimedia capabilities — all of these devour network bandwidth. With millions of users accessing applications and mobile apps from multiple devices, most companies today generate seemingly unmanageable volumes of data and traffic on their networks ...

September 26, 2022

In Italy, it is customary to treat wine as part of the meal ... Too often, testing is treated with the same reverence as the post-meal task of loading the dishwasher, when it should be treated like an elegant wine pairing ...

September 23, 2022

In order to properly sort through all monitoring noise and identify true problems, their causes, and to prioritize them for response by the IT team, they have created and built a revolutionary new system using a meta-cognitive model ...

September 22, 2022

As we shift further into a digital-first world, where having a reliable online experience becomes more essential, Site Reliability Engineers remain in-demand among organizations of all sizes ... This diverse set of skills and values can be difficult to interview for. In this blog, we'll get you started with some example questions and processes to find your ideal SRE ...

September 21, 2022

US government agencies are bringing more of their employees back into the office and implementing hybrid work schedules, but federal workers are worried that their agencies' IT architectures aren't built to handle the "new normal." They fear that the reactive, manual methods used by the current systems in dealing with user, IT architecture and application problems will degrade the user experience and negatively affect productivity. In fact, according to a recent survey, many federal employees are concerned that they won't work as effectively back in the office as they did at home ...

September 20, 2022

Users today expect a seamless, uninterrupted experience when interacting with their web and mobile apps. Their expectations have continued to grow in tandem with their appetite for new features and consistent updates. Mobile apps have responded by increasing their release cadence by up to 40%, releasing a new full version of their app every 4-5 days, as determined in this year's SmartBear State of Software Quality | Application Stability Index report ...

September 19, 2022

In this second part of the blog series, we look at how adopting AIOps capabilities can drive business value for an organization ...