Skip to main content

Stop the Madness: Network Bandwidth Challenges Make IT Pros Go Into Overtime

Ennio Carboni

During the past several weeks we’ve had some fun debating what our experts viewed as 16 of the most damaging, costly and basically annoying issues network administrators deal with on a daily basis. We were inspired to put this together based on the infamous “bracket” that everyone is obsessed with this time of year for the NCAA Basketball Championships.

We started with a field of 16 as opposed to their 64, a sort of “Sour 16” if you will. Just like the real thing, I’m not sure anyone’s bracket was in great shape by the end of the debate and there were more than a few upsets along the way. To add some additional credibility to our exercise we also conducted a survey of more than 100 network administrators to see how they as an organization were approaching March Madness.

Click here to see the bracket

Let’s start with the survey as we make the point throughout our own network tournament that big time events can wreak havoc on a corporate network as employees will be tempted, if not committed, to streaming live across one of the several personal devices they are likely carrying to work with them each day. As it turns out, more than half (57 percent) of all respondents reported that employees were indeed streaming games live during business hours which adversely affected network performance.

March Madness has reached such a peak in viewership, made largely possible by the ease of streaming across personal devices, that more than 44 percent of all respondents actually had developed and implemented a plan to deal with high demands on network bandwidth during the tournament.

Additionally, almost 34 percent of all respondents monitored sites being visited, 31 percent set thresholds for bandwidth use, while 24 percent shared policy prior to the event. Nearly 16 percent went so far as to create a dedicated space for employees to watch the games to help manage bandwidth issues.

When asked what types of devices workers use to stream video to watch events like March Madness, company-provided computers (83 percent) ranked the highest, followed closely by smartphones (77 percent). Tablets (55 percent) and personally-owned laptops (46 percent) rounded out the rest of the pack. The findings indicate that the BYOD movement plays strongly into network performance problems caused by popular events.

The research we gathered through our survey really validated the arguments we were having amongst our own team as to which issue was the most damaging to an organization. The original 16 issues were broken down into four regions: Bandit, Grey, Reliability and Influx. Each of these represented common problem areas or themes that network admins deal with daily.

The Bandit region consisted of Bandwidth Hoarders, Understaffed IT, BYOD and Shadow IT.

The Grey was represented by Unexpected Issues, Slow Apps, Shortcuts/Quick Fixes and Lack of Visibility.

On the right side of the bracket we had the Reliability Region with Patchwork Solutions, Outages and Downtime, Shrinking IT Budget and Unresolved Problems.

Our final region, the Influx Region pitted the following four contenders against one another: Adoption of New Technology, Traffic Spikes, Fluctuating Numbers of Users and Point-in-Time Events.

While some of the choices may seem obvious at first, the more they were discussed and rationales were offered, the more difficult it became to advance one issue over another. All of the 16 have the potential to create widespread disruption to the network and a significant loss of productivity. Yet the bracket is never about easy choices, it’s about who can win in the end.

After all of the arguments were made and the votes were counted we eventually got it down to a final showdown between BYOD and Traffic Spikes. I personally found this interesting as you could argue that the first causes the latter. In somewhat of an upset (hello UConn!), Traffic Spikes emerged as our champion. This was largely based on the surprise factor and how quickly they can impede network progress and user productivity.

In one of the more interesting elements to our survey, it turns out that more than 62 percent of all IT professionals polled did not fill out a bracket or take part in NCAA March Madness pool. Given the potential issues this event can create for a network and by extension the network admin, I guess I can understand why.

In the end, this was a fun and interesting exercise to be a part of. What it also did was shine a light on the sheer number of issues that network admins deal with a on a daily basis and why planning for the worst is such a crucial part of maintaining the network.

There’s no need for IT pros to go into overtime. They should be able to easily gain visibility into who is using more than their share of bandwidth, and isolate issues before they spin out of control. Knowing the amount of bandwidth available to your network is like knowing how much gas you have in your car. Run out of either and you are going nowhere fast.

Click on the image below to see a larger version of the bracket

Image removed.

Ennio Carboni is Executive Vice President, Customer Solutions, Ipswitch.

Related Links:

www.ipswitch.com

Hot Topics

The Latest

In APMdigest's 2026 Observability Predictions Series, industry experts offer predictions on how Observability and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2025. Part 6 covers OpenTelemetry ...

In APMdigest's 2026 Observability Predictions Series, industry experts offer predictions on how Observability and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2025. Part 5 covers APM and infrastructure monitoring ...

AI continues to be the top story across the industry, but a big test is coming up as retailers make the final preparations before the holiday season starts. Will new AI powered features help load up Santa's sleigh this year? Or are early adopters in for unpleasant surprises in the form of unexpected high costs, poor performance, or even service outages? ...

In APMdigest's 2026 Observability Predictions Series, industry experts offer predictions on how Observability and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2025. Part 4 covers user experience, digital performance, website performance and ITSM ...

In APMdigest's 2026 Observability Predictions Series, industry experts offer predictions on how Observability and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2025. Part 3 covers more predictions about Observability ...

In APMdigest's 2026 Observability Predictions Series, industry experts offer predictions on how Observability and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2025. Part 2 covers predictions about Observability and AIOps ...

The Holiday Season means it is time for APMdigest's annual list of predictions, covering Observability and other IT performance topics. Industry experts — from analysts and consultants to the top vendors — offer thoughtful, insightful, and often controversial predictions on how Observability, AIOps, APM and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2026 ...

IT organizations are preparing for 2026 with increased expectations around modernization, cloud maturity, and data readiness. At the same time, many teams continue to operate with limited staffing and are trying to maintain complex environments with small internal groups. These conditions are creating a distinct set of priorities for the year ahead. The DataStrike 2026 Data Infrastructure Survey Report, based on responses from nearly 280 IT leaders across industries, points to five trends that are shaping data infrastructure planning for 2026 ...

Developers building AI applications are not just looking for fault patterns after deployment; they must detect issues quickly during development and have the ability to prevent issues after going live. Unfortunately, traditional observability tools can no longer meet the needs of AI-driven enterprise application development. AI-powered detection and auto-remediation tools designed to keep pace with rapid development are now emerging to proactively manage performance and prevent downtime ...

Every few years, the cybersecurity industry adopts a new buzzword. "Zero Trust" has endured longer than most — and for good reason. Its promise is simple: trust nothing by default, verify everything continuously. Yet many organizations still hesitate to implement Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA). The problem isn't that ZTNA doesn't work. It's that it's often misunderstood ...

Stop the Madness: Network Bandwidth Challenges Make IT Pros Go Into Overtime

Ennio Carboni

During the past several weeks we’ve had some fun debating what our experts viewed as 16 of the most damaging, costly and basically annoying issues network administrators deal with on a daily basis. We were inspired to put this together based on the infamous “bracket” that everyone is obsessed with this time of year for the NCAA Basketball Championships.

We started with a field of 16 as opposed to their 64, a sort of “Sour 16” if you will. Just like the real thing, I’m not sure anyone’s bracket was in great shape by the end of the debate and there were more than a few upsets along the way. To add some additional credibility to our exercise we also conducted a survey of more than 100 network administrators to see how they as an organization were approaching March Madness.

Click here to see the bracket

Let’s start with the survey as we make the point throughout our own network tournament that big time events can wreak havoc on a corporate network as employees will be tempted, if not committed, to streaming live across one of the several personal devices they are likely carrying to work with them each day. As it turns out, more than half (57 percent) of all respondents reported that employees were indeed streaming games live during business hours which adversely affected network performance.

March Madness has reached such a peak in viewership, made largely possible by the ease of streaming across personal devices, that more than 44 percent of all respondents actually had developed and implemented a plan to deal with high demands on network bandwidth during the tournament.

Additionally, almost 34 percent of all respondents monitored sites being visited, 31 percent set thresholds for bandwidth use, while 24 percent shared policy prior to the event. Nearly 16 percent went so far as to create a dedicated space for employees to watch the games to help manage bandwidth issues.

When asked what types of devices workers use to stream video to watch events like March Madness, company-provided computers (83 percent) ranked the highest, followed closely by smartphones (77 percent). Tablets (55 percent) and personally-owned laptops (46 percent) rounded out the rest of the pack. The findings indicate that the BYOD movement plays strongly into network performance problems caused by popular events.

The research we gathered through our survey really validated the arguments we were having amongst our own team as to which issue was the most damaging to an organization. The original 16 issues were broken down into four regions: Bandit, Grey, Reliability and Influx. Each of these represented common problem areas or themes that network admins deal with daily.

The Bandit region consisted of Bandwidth Hoarders, Understaffed IT, BYOD and Shadow IT.

The Grey was represented by Unexpected Issues, Slow Apps, Shortcuts/Quick Fixes and Lack of Visibility.

On the right side of the bracket we had the Reliability Region with Patchwork Solutions, Outages and Downtime, Shrinking IT Budget and Unresolved Problems.

Our final region, the Influx Region pitted the following four contenders against one another: Adoption of New Technology, Traffic Spikes, Fluctuating Numbers of Users and Point-in-Time Events.

While some of the choices may seem obvious at first, the more they were discussed and rationales were offered, the more difficult it became to advance one issue over another. All of the 16 have the potential to create widespread disruption to the network and a significant loss of productivity. Yet the bracket is never about easy choices, it’s about who can win in the end.

After all of the arguments were made and the votes were counted we eventually got it down to a final showdown between BYOD and Traffic Spikes. I personally found this interesting as you could argue that the first causes the latter. In somewhat of an upset (hello UConn!), Traffic Spikes emerged as our champion. This was largely based on the surprise factor and how quickly they can impede network progress and user productivity.

In one of the more interesting elements to our survey, it turns out that more than 62 percent of all IT professionals polled did not fill out a bracket or take part in NCAA March Madness pool. Given the potential issues this event can create for a network and by extension the network admin, I guess I can understand why.

In the end, this was a fun and interesting exercise to be a part of. What it also did was shine a light on the sheer number of issues that network admins deal with a on a daily basis and why planning for the worst is such a crucial part of maintaining the network.

There’s no need for IT pros to go into overtime. They should be able to easily gain visibility into who is using more than their share of bandwidth, and isolate issues before they spin out of control. Knowing the amount of bandwidth available to your network is like knowing how much gas you have in your car. Run out of either and you are going nowhere fast.

Click on the image below to see a larger version of the bracket

Image removed.

Ennio Carboni is Executive Vice President, Customer Solutions, Ipswitch.

Related Links:

www.ipswitch.com

Hot Topics

The Latest

In APMdigest's 2026 Observability Predictions Series, industry experts offer predictions on how Observability and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2025. Part 6 covers OpenTelemetry ...

In APMdigest's 2026 Observability Predictions Series, industry experts offer predictions on how Observability and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2025. Part 5 covers APM and infrastructure monitoring ...

AI continues to be the top story across the industry, but a big test is coming up as retailers make the final preparations before the holiday season starts. Will new AI powered features help load up Santa's sleigh this year? Or are early adopters in for unpleasant surprises in the form of unexpected high costs, poor performance, or even service outages? ...

In APMdigest's 2026 Observability Predictions Series, industry experts offer predictions on how Observability and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2025. Part 4 covers user experience, digital performance, website performance and ITSM ...

In APMdigest's 2026 Observability Predictions Series, industry experts offer predictions on how Observability and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2025. Part 3 covers more predictions about Observability ...

In APMdigest's 2026 Observability Predictions Series, industry experts offer predictions on how Observability and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2025. Part 2 covers predictions about Observability and AIOps ...

The Holiday Season means it is time for APMdigest's annual list of predictions, covering Observability and other IT performance topics. Industry experts — from analysts and consultants to the top vendors — offer thoughtful, insightful, and often controversial predictions on how Observability, AIOps, APM and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2026 ...

IT organizations are preparing for 2026 with increased expectations around modernization, cloud maturity, and data readiness. At the same time, many teams continue to operate with limited staffing and are trying to maintain complex environments with small internal groups. These conditions are creating a distinct set of priorities for the year ahead. The DataStrike 2026 Data Infrastructure Survey Report, based on responses from nearly 280 IT leaders across industries, points to five trends that are shaping data infrastructure planning for 2026 ...

Developers building AI applications are not just looking for fault patterns after deployment; they must detect issues quickly during development and have the ability to prevent issues after going live. Unfortunately, traditional observability tools can no longer meet the needs of AI-driven enterprise application development. AI-powered detection and auto-remediation tools designed to keep pace with rapid development are now emerging to proactively manage performance and prevent downtime ...

Every few years, the cybersecurity industry adopts a new buzzword. "Zero Trust" has endured longer than most — and for good reason. Its promise is simple: trust nothing by default, verify everything continuously. Yet many organizations still hesitate to implement Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA). The problem isn't that ZTNA doesn't work. It's that it's often misunderstood ...