Over the last four years, EMA has done research uniquely focused on how software asset management (SAM), IT asset management (ITAM) more broadly (including hardware), IT service management (ITSM), and transformative attempts to optimize IT as a business, have been evolving — both in the spring of 2014 and the summer of 2016. The overall perspectives from both research projects shows that, at least as a vision, many IT organizations are really seeking:
■ A more cohesive and unifying approach across asset and service management disciplines
■ Executive level attention to this trend, including growth of executive "ownership" of the process
■ An indication that business stakeholders/executives are increasingly looking over IT's shoulder — expecting their IT tablemates to demonstrate value vis-à-vis costs (What's commonly called "running IT as a business.")
■ Growing interest in making this work across IT silos (e.g. network, systems, apps) so that SW and HW investments, and OpEx overhead can be managed more effectively together
■ Growing interest in managing cloud resources as an integrated part of IT asset and business planning
■ Accelerating investments in areas such as analytics (ranging from SAM to broad-based financial optimization), advanced discovery and dependency mapping, and service catalogs to promote a more effective lifecycle approach to asset management
■ More than a hint that IoT and security concerns are beginning to take root as an integrated part of the bigger picture in asset, service and financial planning
■ And don't forget the growing impacts of agile/DevOps in making IT asset management an even more interesting experience
■ A clear data demarcation showing that those who declared themselves "extremely successful" embraced all of the above trends far more than those who saw themselves as only "marginally successful."
Vision vs. Reality
OK fine. This is the vision. It makes sense. And it has the glow of being forward-looking, progressive, and relevant both to IT and to digital transformation.
And yet, when we talk to many vendors, or examine many IT environments, we still see just the opposite. Strategic values sail over the heads of far too many buyers. Immediate, hands-on, "let's get this done" still seems to rule the day when it comes to adopting most solutions.
Maybe the trick is this. When you do visionary research, you may tend to get visionary respondents.
So this spring we're embarking on research that can connect the dots with the visions of the past, but which will also squarely force respondents to come clean about what they're actually doing now — and within the coming 12 months. And we'll also ask them how their priorities have changed over the last two years:
■ Have they really pursued superior levels of integration over the last two years?
■ Are they seeking new leadership? New skillsets? Better OpEx metrics?
■ Changing their process and best practice priorities?
■ Are they moving more to IoT (and if so where?)
■ What have they done about cloud lately?
■ Are they still stumbling over security issues and compliance?
■ What are they investing in — really? And who owns the process?
■ Or, by contrast, are they simply looking to outsource the problem?
We'll also be able to evaluate changes in surprising data from the past. For instance, average mid-tier enterprises showed about 11 different discovery and inventory tools primarily linked to asset management requirements, while with larger enterprises the average shifted upward toward 15.
Has that changed? If so, in which direction?
And even more interesting, the average respondent spent about 15 hours a week resolving discovery and inventory discrepancies — and the more successful respondents spent more (not less) time doing this!
Have these and other "curious facts" changed? If so in which direction? Or have they stayed the same?
And back to basics, we'll certainly be trending the ins-and-outs of core priorities in SAM, ITAM, ITSM and beyond. The thrill of audits. The demands of managing and assimilating data from multiple data sources (not just inventory and discovery). The challenges of (and willingness to) model asset investments to align with business services.
And there are going to be some areas where we may have more fun than others. "Bots" were barely in the vocabulary two years ago. Now they're starting to show up with increasing frequency in a variety of roles. Or are they? And when it comes to analytics — an area of in-depth concern for EMA — what's being applied and where? Are we truly getting machine learning into the act, or merely the wish for it to arrive sooner than later?
The bottom line is this. We want to find our visionaries, once again. But we also want to provide a few more acid tests to see what's real. Or at least what's imminent.
I should know more well before spring gets too old. And I'll let you know some of the highlights then.
Organizations face major infrastructure and security challenges in supporting multi-cloud and edge deployments, according to new global survey conducted by Propeller Insights for Volterra ...
Developers spend roughly 17.3 hours each week debugging, refactoring and modifying bad code — valuable time that could be spent writing more code, shipping better products and innovating. The bottom line? Nearly $300B (US) in lost developer productivity every year ...
While remote work policies have been gaining steam for the better part of the past decade across the enterprise space — driven in large part by more agile and scalable, cloud-delivered business solutions — recent events have pushed adoption into overdrive ...
Time-critical, unplanned work caused by IT disruptions continues to plague enterprises around the world, leading to lost revenue, significant employee morale problems and missed opportunities to innovate, according to the State of Unplanned Work Report 2020, conducted by Dimensional Research for PagerDuty ...
In today's iterative world, development teams care a lot more about how apps are running. There's a demand for fixing actionable items. Developers want to know exactly what's broken, what to fix right now, and what can wait. They want to know, "Do we build or fix?" This trade-off between building new features versus fixing bugs is one of the key factors behind the adoption of Application Stability management tools ...
With the rise of mobile apps and iterative development releases, Application Stability has answered the widespread need to monitor applications in a new way, shifting the focus from servers and networks to the customer experience. The emergence of Application Stability has caused some consternation for diehard APM fans. However, these two solutions embody very distinct monitoring focuses, which leads me to believe there's room for both tools, as well as different teams for both ...
The 2019 State of E-Commerce Infrastructure Report, from Webscale, analyzes findings from a comprehensive survey of more than 450 ecommerce professionals regarding how their online stores performed during the 2019 holiday season. Some key insights from the report include ...
Robinhood is a unicorn startup that has been disrupting the way by which many millennials have been investing and managing their money for the past few years. For Robinhood, the burden of proof was to show that they can provide an infrastructure that is as scalable, reliable and secure as that of major banks who have been developing their trading infrastructure for the last quarter-century. That promise fell flat last week, when the market volatility brought about a set of edge cases that brought Robinhood's trading app to its knees ...
Application backend monitoring is the key to acquiring visibility across the enterprise's application stack, from the application layer and underlying infrastructure to third-party API services, web servers and databases, be they on-premises, in a public or private cloud, or in a hybrid model. By tracking and reporting performance in real time, IT teams can ensure applications perform at peak efficiency — and guarantee a seamless customer experience. How can IT operations teams improve application backend monitoring? By embracing artificial intelligence for operations — AIOps ...
In 2020, DevOps teams will face heightened expectations for higher speed and frequency of code delivery, which means their IT environments will become even more modular, ephemeral and dynamic — and significantly more complicated to monitor. As a result, AIOps will further cement its position as the most effective technology that DevOps teams can use to see and control what's going on with their applications and their underlying infrastructure, so that they can prevent outages. Here I outline five key trends to watch related to how AIOps will impact DevOps in 2020 and beyond ...