Skip to main content

Observability Is Key to Minimizing Service Outages, but What's Next for the Technology

Michael Nappi
ScienceLogic

IT service outages are more than a minor inconvenience. They can cost businesses millions while simultaneously leading to customer dissatisfaction and reputational damage. Moreover, the constant pressure of dealing with fire drills and escalations day and night can take a heavy toll on ITOps teams, leading to increased stress, human error, and burnout.

Observability promises to solve these problems by enabling quick incident identification and understanding, leading to reduced mean-time-to-repair (MTTR). However, while many approaches to observability exist, not all are created equal. Many current observability best practices fail to deliver on the promise of comprehensive hybrid IT visibility, intelligent insights, and a reduction in manual interventions by ITOps teams.

In order to ensure organizations can secure the holistic view of the entire IT environment required to tap into these benefits, they first have to understand observability's role.

What is Observability?

Observability is a concept from operations theory that suggests the internal state of an IT system, including issues and problems, can be deduced from the data the system generates. Unlike infrastructure monitoring, which only tells IT teams whether a system is working or not, observability provides contextual data into why it's not working.

Observability is particularly important in today's modern hybrid IT environments that utilize microservices architectures that span potentially thousands of containers. The ever-increasing level of complexity in such systems means that whenever a problem arises, IT teams may spend several hours or even days attempting to identify the root cause. However, with the right observability tools, engineers can swiftly identify and resolve problems across the tech stack.

Observability tools operate systematically, monitoring user interactions and key service metrics such as load times, response times, latency, and errors. With this data, ITOps teams can pinpoint the location and timing of issues within the system. Engineers then work backward by analyzing traces and/or logs to determine potential triggers and details that could contribute to the problem, such as software updates or spikes in traffic.

Without the holistic visibility afforded by observability, maintenance and MTTR efforts would be significantly hindered, negatively impacting business operations and customer satisfaction. However, organizations looking to reap the benefits of global IT observability may first have to overcome a few challenges prior to implementation.

Barriers to Observability

Despite growing interest in implementing a culture of observability, modern hybrid IT estates still face significant obstacles to achieving effective observability strategies.

1. Manual Processes

For some organizations, observability can still be a highly manual and brute-force process. While certain tools streamline the collection, search, and visualization of data, they still rely on human analysis and understanding to identify the root cause of the issue. This approach can be time-consuming and error-prone, leading to longer resolution times and increased downtime.

2. Data Proliferation

The amount of data generated has increased significantly in recent years, making it harder to observe and analyze. According to IDC's 2017 forecast, worldwide data is expected to increase tenfold by 2025. Although observability tools can help ITOps teams collect and organize this vast amount of data, the main challenge is still the limitations of the human brain. Humans must still make sense of the overwhelming volume of traces and logs coming their way — before service is impacted.

3. Modern Software Delivery

Engineers must also deal with the speed of digitization and the constantly evolving IT landscape.

CI/CD delivery practices mean that software systems are never static. Even if IT teams comprehend what could go wrong today, that knowledge becomes obsolete as the software environment changes from one week to the next.

In the face of these challenges, a new approach to observability is needed. One that combines the power, intelligence, and automation of AI and ML into the observability strategy.

What is AI/ML-Powered Observability?

When organizations use AI and ML for observability, they can benefit from an intelligent and automated system that provides complete visibility of the hybrid IT environment and identifies and flags any issues with minimal to no human intervention.

That's nothing new, but most AI/ML approaches to observability stop there. Next-generation observability leveraging automated insights goes a step further.

This automation-powered observability is like an MRI for the IT estate. It doesn't just detect symptoms of problems but provides an in-depth analysis that accurately identifies the root cause of any issue, exponentially faster and with elevated accuracy. This includes identifying new or novel problems that have never been encountered before — all without human intervention. Think of it as "automated root cause analysis."

Finally, the system can take user-driven or automated action to resolve the problem.

Observability's End Goal: A Self-Healing, Self-Optimizing IT Estate

AI/ML-powered observability provides enriched insights that go beyond just "monitoring" or "observing" the IT estate. These insights allow for more advanced functionalities that work alongside humans to reduce IT complexity and manual effort and ultimately self-heal and self-optimize the environment.

By leveraging automated observability, organizations can confidently build and scale more complex IT infrastructure, integrate technologies with ease, and deliver elegant user and customer experiences — without risks or complications.

Michael Nappi is Chief Product Officer at ScienceLogic

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

Observability Is Key to Minimizing Service Outages, but What's Next for the Technology

Michael Nappi
ScienceLogic

IT service outages are more than a minor inconvenience. They can cost businesses millions while simultaneously leading to customer dissatisfaction and reputational damage. Moreover, the constant pressure of dealing with fire drills and escalations day and night can take a heavy toll on ITOps teams, leading to increased stress, human error, and burnout.

Observability promises to solve these problems by enabling quick incident identification and understanding, leading to reduced mean-time-to-repair (MTTR). However, while many approaches to observability exist, not all are created equal. Many current observability best practices fail to deliver on the promise of comprehensive hybrid IT visibility, intelligent insights, and a reduction in manual interventions by ITOps teams.

In order to ensure organizations can secure the holistic view of the entire IT environment required to tap into these benefits, they first have to understand observability's role.

What is Observability?

Observability is a concept from operations theory that suggests the internal state of an IT system, including issues and problems, can be deduced from the data the system generates. Unlike infrastructure monitoring, which only tells IT teams whether a system is working or not, observability provides contextual data into why it's not working.

Observability is particularly important in today's modern hybrid IT environments that utilize microservices architectures that span potentially thousands of containers. The ever-increasing level of complexity in such systems means that whenever a problem arises, IT teams may spend several hours or even days attempting to identify the root cause. However, with the right observability tools, engineers can swiftly identify and resolve problems across the tech stack.

Observability tools operate systematically, monitoring user interactions and key service metrics such as load times, response times, latency, and errors. With this data, ITOps teams can pinpoint the location and timing of issues within the system. Engineers then work backward by analyzing traces and/or logs to determine potential triggers and details that could contribute to the problem, such as software updates or spikes in traffic.

Without the holistic visibility afforded by observability, maintenance and MTTR efforts would be significantly hindered, negatively impacting business operations and customer satisfaction. However, organizations looking to reap the benefits of global IT observability may first have to overcome a few challenges prior to implementation.

Barriers to Observability

Despite growing interest in implementing a culture of observability, modern hybrid IT estates still face significant obstacles to achieving effective observability strategies.

1. Manual Processes

For some organizations, observability can still be a highly manual and brute-force process. While certain tools streamline the collection, search, and visualization of data, they still rely on human analysis and understanding to identify the root cause of the issue. This approach can be time-consuming and error-prone, leading to longer resolution times and increased downtime.

2. Data Proliferation

The amount of data generated has increased significantly in recent years, making it harder to observe and analyze. According to IDC's 2017 forecast, worldwide data is expected to increase tenfold by 2025. Although observability tools can help ITOps teams collect and organize this vast amount of data, the main challenge is still the limitations of the human brain. Humans must still make sense of the overwhelming volume of traces and logs coming their way — before service is impacted.

3. Modern Software Delivery

Engineers must also deal with the speed of digitization and the constantly evolving IT landscape.

CI/CD delivery practices mean that software systems are never static. Even if IT teams comprehend what could go wrong today, that knowledge becomes obsolete as the software environment changes from one week to the next.

In the face of these challenges, a new approach to observability is needed. One that combines the power, intelligence, and automation of AI and ML into the observability strategy.

What is AI/ML-Powered Observability?

When organizations use AI and ML for observability, they can benefit from an intelligent and automated system that provides complete visibility of the hybrid IT environment and identifies and flags any issues with minimal to no human intervention.

That's nothing new, but most AI/ML approaches to observability stop there. Next-generation observability leveraging automated insights goes a step further.

This automation-powered observability is like an MRI for the IT estate. It doesn't just detect symptoms of problems but provides an in-depth analysis that accurately identifies the root cause of any issue, exponentially faster and with elevated accuracy. This includes identifying new or novel problems that have never been encountered before — all without human intervention. Think of it as "automated root cause analysis."

Finally, the system can take user-driven or automated action to resolve the problem.

Observability's End Goal: A Self-Healing, Self-Optimizing IT Estate

AI/ML-powered observability provides enriched insights that go beyond just "monitoring" or "observing" the IT estate. These insights allow for more advanced functionalities that work alongside humans to reduce IT complexity and manual effort and ultimately self-heal and self-optimize the environment.

By leveraging automated observability, organizations can confidently build and scale more complex IT infrastructure, integrate technologies with ease, and deliver elegant user and customer experiences — without risks or complications.

Michael Nappi is Chief Product Officer at ScienceLogic

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.