Skip to main content

Observability Is Key to Minimizing Service Outages, but What's Next for the Technology

Michael Nappi
ScienceLogic

IT service outages are more than a minor inconvenience. They can cost businesses millions while simultaneously leading to customer dissatisfaction and reputational damage. Moreover, the constant pressure of dealing with fire drills and escalations day and night can take a heavy toll on ITOps teams, leading to increased stress, human error, and burnout.

Observability promises to solve these problems by enabling quick incident identification and understanding, leading to reduced mean-time-to-repair (MTTR). However, while many approaches to observability exist, not all are created equal. Many current observability best practices fail to deliver on the promise of comprehensive hybrid IT visibility, intelligent insights, and a reduction in manual interventions by ITOps teams.

In order to ensure organizations can secure the holistic view of the entire IT environment required to tap into these benefits, they first have to understand observability's role.

What is Observability?

Observability is a concept from operations theory that suggests the internal state of an IT system, including issues and problems, can be deduced from the data the system generates. Unlike infrastructure monitoring, which only tells IT teams whether a system is working or not, observability provides contextual data into why it's not working.

Observability is particularly important in today's modern hybrid IT environments that utilize microservices architectures that span potentially thousands of containers. The ever-increasing level of complexity in such systems means that whenever a problem arises, IT teams may spend several hours or even days attempting to identify the root cause. However, with the right observability tools, engineers can swiftly identify and resolve problems across the tech stack.

Observability tools operate systematically, monitoring user interactions and key service metrics such as load times, response times, latency, and errors. With this data, ITOps teams can pinpoint the location and timing of issues within the system. Engineers then work backward by analyzing traces and/or logs to determine potential triggers and details that could contribute to the problem, such as software updates or spikes in traffic.

Without the holistic visibility afforded by observability, maintenance and MTTR efforts would be significantly hindered, negatively impacting business operations and customer satisfaction. However, organizations looking to reap the benefits of global IT observability may first have to overcome a few challenges prior to implementation.

Barriers to Observability

Despite growing interest in implementing a culture of observability, modern hybrid IT estates still face significant obstacles to achieving effective observability strategies.

1. Manual Processes

For some organizations, observability can still be a highly manual and brute-force process. While certain tools streamline the collection, search, and visualization of data, they still rely on human analysis and understanding to identify the root cause of the issue. This approach can be time-consuming and error-prone, leading to longer resolution times and increased downtime.

2. Data Proliferation

The amount of data generated has increased significantly in recent years, making it harder to observe and analyze. According to IDC's 2017 forecast, worldwide data is expected to increase tenfold by 2025. Although observability tools can help ITOps teams collect and organize this vast amount of data, the main challenge is still the limitations of the human brain. Humans must still make sense of the overwhelming volume of traces and logs coming their way — before service is impacted.

3. Modern Software Delivery

Engineers must also deal with the speed of digitization and the constantly evolving IT landscape.

CI/CD delivery practices mean that software systems are never static. Even if IT teams comprehend what could go wrong today, that knowledge becomes obsolete as the software environment changes from one week to the next.

In the face of these challenges, a new approach to observability is needed. One that combines the power, intelligence, and automation of AI and ML into the observability strategy.

What is AI/ML-Powered Observability?

When organizations use AI and ML for observability, they can benefit from an intelligent and automated system that provides complete visibility of the hybrid IT environment and identifies and flags any issues with minimal to no human intervention.

That's nothing new, but most AI/ML approaches to observability stop there. Next-generation observability leveraging automated insights goes a step further.

This automation-powered observability is like an MRI for the IT estate. It doesn't just detect symptoms of problems but provides an in-depth analysis that accurately identifies the root cause of any issue, exponentially faster and with elevated accuracy. This includes identifying new or novel problems that have never been encountered before — all without human intervention. Think of it as "automated root cause analysis."

Finally, the system can take user-driven or automated action to resolve the problem.

Observability's End Goal: A Self-Healing, Self-Optimizing IT Estate

AI/ML-powered observability provides enriched insights that go beyond just "monitoring" or "observing" the IT estate. These insights allow for more advanced functionalities that work alongside humans to reduce IT complexity and manual effort and ultimately self-heal and self-optimize the environment.

By leveraging automated observability, organizations can confidently build and scale more complex IT infrastructure, integrate technologies with ease, and deliver elegant user and customer experiences — without risks or complications.

Michael Nappi is Chief Product Officer at ScienceLogic

Hot Topics

The Latest

Artificial intelligence (AI) is core to observability practices, with some 41% of respondents reporting AI adoption as a core driver of observability, according to the State of Observability for Financial Services and Insurance report from New Relic ...

Application performance monitoring (APM) is a game of catching up — building dashboards, setting thresholds, tuning alerts, and manually correlating metrics to root causes. In the early days, this straightforward model worked as applications were simpler, stacks more predictable, and telemetry was manageable. Today, the landscape has shifted, and more assertive tools are needed ...

Cloud adoption has accelerated, but backup strategies haven't always kept pace. Many organizations continue to rely on backup strategies that were either lifted directly from on-prem environments or use cloud-native tools in limited, DR-focused ways ... Eon uncovered a handful of critical gaps regarding how organizations approach cloud backup. To capture these prevailing winds, we gathered insights from 150+ IT and cloud leaders at the recent Google Cloud Next conference, which we've compiled into the 2025 State of Cloud Data Backup ...

Private clouds are no longer playing catch-up, and public clouds are no longer the default as organizations recalibrate their cloud strategies, according to the Private Cloud Outlook 2025 report from Broadcom. More than half (53%) of survey respondents say private cloud is their top priority for deploying new workloads over the next three years, while 69% are considering workload repatriation from public to private cloud, with one-third having already done so ...

As organizations chase productivity gains from generative AI, teams are overwhelmingly focused on improving delivery speed (45%) over enhancing software quality (13%), according to the Quality Transformation Report from Tricentis ...

Back in March of this year ... MongoDB's stock price took a serious tumble ... In my opinion, it reflects a deeper structural issue in enterprise software economics altogether — vendor lock-in ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 15, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses Do-It-Yourself Network Automation ... 

Zero-day vulnerabilities — security flaws that are exploited before developers even know they exist — pose one of the greatest risks to modern organizations. Recently, such vulnerabilities have been discovered in well-known VPN systems like Ivanti and Fortinet, highlighting just how outdated these legacy technologies have become in defending against fast-evolving cyber threats ... To protect digital assets and remote workers in today's environment, companies need more than patchwork solutions. They need architecture that is secure by design ...

Traditional observability requires users to leap across different platforms or tools for metrics, logs, or traces and related issues manually, which is very time-consuming, so as to reasonably ascertain the root cause. Observability 2.0 fixes this by unifying all telemetry data, logs, metrics, and traces into a single, context-rich pipeline that flows into one smart platform. But this is far from just having a bunch of additional data; this data is actionable, predictive, and tied to revenue realization ...

64% of enterprise networking teams use internally developed software or scripts for network automation, but 61% of those teams spend six or more hours per week debugging and maintaining them, according to From Scripts to Platforms: Why Homegrown Tools Dominate Network Automation and How Vendors Can Help, my latest EMA report ...

Observability Is Key to Minimizing Service Outages, but What's Next for the Technology

Michael Nappi
ScienceLogic

IT service outages are more than a minor inconvenience. They can cost businesses millions while simultaneously leading to customer dissatisfaction and reputational damage. Moreover, the constant pressure of dealing with fire drills and escalations day and night can take a heavy toll on ITOps teams, leading to increased stress, human error, and burnout.

Observability promises to solve these problems by enabling quick incident identification and understanding, leading to reduced mean-time-to-repair (MTTR). However, while many approaches to observability exist, not all are created equal. Many current observability best practices fail to deliver on the promise of comprehensive hybrid IT visibility, intelligent insights, and a reduction in manual interventions by ITOps teams.

In order to ensure organizations can secure the holistic view of the entire IT environment required to tap into these benefits, they first have to understand observability's role.

What is Observability?

Observability is a concept from operations theory that suggests the internal state of an IT system, including issues and problems, can be deduced from the data the system generates. Unlike infrastructure monitoring, which only tells IT teams whether a system is working or not, observability provides contextual data into why it's not working.

Observability is particularly important in today's modern hybrid IT environments that utilize microservices architectures that span potentially thousands of containers. The ever-increasing level of complexity in such systems means that whenever a problem arises, IT teams may spend several hours or even days attempting to identify the root cause. However, with the right observability tools, engineers can swiftly identify and resolve problems across the tech stack.

Observability tools operate systematically, monitoring user interactions and key service metrics such as load times, response times, latency, and errors. With this data, ITOps teams can pinpoint the location and timing of issues within the system. Engineers then work backward by analyzing traces and/or logs to determine potential triggers and details that could contribute to the problem, such as software updates or spikes in traffic.

Without the holistic visibility afforded by observability, maintenance and MTTR efforts would be significantly hindered, negatively impacting business operations and customer satisfaction. However, organizations looking to reap the benefits of global IT observability may first have to overcome a few challenges prior to implementation.

Barriers to Observability

Despite growing interest in implementing a culture of observability, modern hybrid IT estates still face significant obstacles to achieving effective observability strategies.

1. Manual Processes

For some organizations, observability can still be a highly manual and brute-force process. While certain tools streamline the collection, search, and visualization of data, they still rely on human analysis and understanding to identify the root cause of the issue. This approach can be time-consuming and error-prone, leading to longer resolution times and increased downtime.

2. Data Proliferation

The amount of data generated has increased significantly in recent years, making it harder to observe and analyze. According to IDC's 2017 forecast, worldwide data is expected to increase tenfold by 2025. Although observability tools can help ITOps teams collect and organize this vast amount of data, the main challenge is still the limitations of the human brain. Humans must still make sense of the overwhelming volume of traces and logs coming their way — before service is impacted.

3. Modern Software Delivery

Engineers must also deal with the speed of digitization and the constantly evolving IT landscape.

CI/CD delivery practices mean that software systems are never static. Even if IT teams comprehend what could go wrong today, that knowledge becomes obsolete as the software environment changes from one week to the next.

In the face of these challenges, a new approach to observability is needed. One that combines the power, intelligence, and automation of AI and ML into the observability strategy.

What is AI/ML-Powered Observability?

When organizations use AI and ML for observability, they can benefit from an intelligent and automated system that provides complete visibility of the hybrid IT environment and identifies and flags any issues with minimal to no human intervention.

That's nothing new, but most AI/ML approaches to observability stop there. Next-generation observability leveraging automated insights goes a step further.

This automation-powered observability is like an MRI for the IT estate. It doesn't just detect symptoms of problems but provides an in-depth analysis that accurately identifies the root cause of any issue, exponentially faster and with elevated accuracy. This includes identifying new or novel problems that have never been encountered before — all without human intervention. Think of it as "automated root cause analysis."

Finally, the system can take user-driven or automated action to resolve the problem.

Observability's End Goal: A Self-Healing, Self-Optimizing IT Estate

AI/ML-powered observability provides enriched insights that go beyond just "monitoring" or "observing" the IT estate. These insights allow for more advanced functionalities that work alongside humans to reduce IT complexity and manual effort and ultimately self-heal and self-optimize the environment.

By leveraging automated observability, organizations can confidently build and scale more complex IT infrastructure, integrate technologies with ease, and deliver elegant user and customer experiences — without risks or complications.

Michael Nappi is Chief Product Officer at ScienceLogic

Hot Topics

The Latest

Artificial intelligence (AI) is core to observability practices, with some 41% of respondents reporting AI adoption as a core driver of observability, according to the State of Observability for Financial Services and Insurance report from New Relic ...

Application performance monitoring (APM) is a game of catching up — building dashboards, setting thresholds, tuning alerts, and manually correlating metrics to root causes. In the early days, this straightforward model worked as applications were simpler, stacks more predictable, and telemetry was manageable. Today, the landscape has shifted, and more assertive tools are needed ...

Cloud adoption has accelerated, but backup strategies haven't always kept pace. Many organizations continue to rely on backup strategies that were either lifted directly from on-prem environments or use cloud-native tools in limited, DR-focused ways ... Eon uncovered a handful of critical gaps regarding how organizations approach cloud backup. To capture these prevailing winds, we gathered insights from 150+ IT and cloud leaders at the recent Google Cloud Next conference, which we've compiled into the 2025 State of Cloud Data Backup ...

Private clouds are no longer playing catch-up, and public clouds are no longer the default as organizations recalibrate their cloud strategies, according to the Private Cloud Outlook 2025 report from Broadcom. More than half (53%) of survey respondents say private cloud is their top priority for deploying new workloads over the next three years, while 69% are considering workload repatriation from public to private cloud, with one-third having already done so ...

As organizations chase productivity gains from generative AI, teams are overwhelmingly focused on improving delivery speed (45%) over enhancing software quality (13%), according to the Quality Transformation Report from Tricentis ...

Back in March of this year ... MongoDB's stock price took a serious tumble ... In my opinion, it reflects a deeper structural issue in enterprise software economics altogether — vendor lock-in ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 15, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses Do-It-Yourself Network Automation ... 

Zero-day vulnerabilities — security flaws that are exploited before developers even know they exist — pose one of the greatest risks to modern organizations. Recently, such vulnerabilities have been discovered in well-known VPN systems like Ivanti and Fortinet, highlighting just how outdated these legacy technologies have become in defending against fast-evolving cyber threats ... To protect digital assets and remote workers in today's environment, companies need more than patchwork solutions. They need architecture that is secure by design ...

Traditional observability requires users to leap across different platforms or tools for metrics, logs, or traces and related issues manually, which is very time-consuming, so as to reasonably ascertain the root cause. Observability 2.0 fixes this by unifying all telemetry data, logs, metrics, and traces into a single, context-rich pipeline that flows into one smart platform. But this is far from just having a bunch of additional data; this data is actionable, predictive, and tied to revenue realization ...

64% of enterprise networking teams use internally developed software or scripts for network automation, but 61% of those teams spend six or more hours per week debugging and maintaining them, according to From Scripts to Platforms: Why Homegrown Tools Dominate Network Automation and How Vendors Can Help, my latest EMA report ...