Skip to main content

Organizations See AIOps in Their Future

Lori MacVittie

In the past decade, security has overshadowed other application related services. Gone are the various acceleration services — compression, bandwidth management, minification, etc. — that dominated the early days of the Internet, replaced by a reliance on modern application protocols designed to improve performance.

And yet optimizing the performance of applications remains a top challenge for most organizations, particularly when those applications are spread across a hybrid IT estate that includes core, public cloud, and edge.

Even if there were a magic performance wand, organizations would still need to know there was a problem and then do something about it — at Internet speed. Most organizations still lack the technical capability to observe application usage in real-time and even fewer can react quickly enough to do something about it.

We know this because we survey global organizations every year and specifically ask about measures that indicate digital maturity, including usage of telemetry (real-time operational data) and automation capabilities. We compile the results into a <span style="font-style: italic;">Digital Enterprise Maturity Index</span>.

This year, we found greater digital maturity across the six key technical capabilities, but automation maturity remains an elusive goal. Although we discovered that the most mature organizations are using telemetry to drive automation, less than one-third of organizations are considered digitally mature, or "digital doers." Those organizations are reaping benefits, with 53% reporting greater consistency, 71% enjoying cost savings, and 80% gaining greater operational efficiencies.  

But the bulk of organizations today still rely mostly on human-driven scripts to make configuration and policy changes that adjust delivery and security services. The gap between discovering a problem, determining the fix for it, and manually pushing a solution is problematic. Consumers have short attention spans and are more likely to walk away than wait for a resolution.

One of the uses of AIOps is to close that gap between discovering a problem and fixing it, whether that be related to performance, availability, or security. Prior to the introduction of generative AI, AI in the realm of application performance management was largely predictive if it was used at all. AIOps was largely ignored as though it were science fiction.

The accessibility of a system that can generate not just answers to homework questions but code, configurations, and queries has reignited excitement about AIOps. By leveraging the ability of predictive AI to ferret out anomalies and problems and marrying that with the capabilities of generative AI, a data-driven, closed loop automation capability emerges.

Our analysis found that the top two uses of telemetry by the most digitally mature organizations were exactly the uses needed for such a closed loop system: 75% use telemetry to drive automation and 66% rely on telemetry for root-cause analysis. In fact, the most mature organizations use telemetry in every way far more than the least digitally mature — "digital dawdlers" — who are least likely to employ telemetry for any use beyond alerting.

Our maturity model also measures the actual use of automation across application delivery and security, the most prevalent tools and technology used for application performance, availability, and security. We dive deeper here because the broad "use of telemetry to drive automation" does not specify what automation is being driven.

Overall, about 40% of respondents have automated app and API security functions and a mere 23% have automated app delivery. For those who have not automated, the reasons cited vary little based on maturity. For 51% of digital doers, budget gets in the way. "Digital dabblers" — organizations of intermediate maturity — are most likely to cite skillsets as holding up their automation journey.

What's exciting is that generative AI can address both these issues. The former by reducing the cost to implement and operate automation, and the latter by assisting in the generation and even invocation of appropriate APIs to make changes.

Respondents are aware of these capabilities. Respondents of all digital maturity levels overwhelmingly told us the most valuable use of generative AI for both application delivery and security was automation, foreshadowing the coming of AIOps to an IT environment near you.

What we learned this year from our research was that organizations are maturing at different rates across different technical capabilities. But they are maturing and when it comes to application performance and security management, they are maturing toward a future that leverages the power of telemetry and harnesses AI to overcome the challenges that keep them from becoming a digital business. 

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

Organizations See AIOps in Their Future

Lori MacVittie

In the past decade, security has overshadowed other application related services. Gone are the various acceleration services — compression, bandwidth management, minification, etc. — that dominated the early days of the Internet, replaced by a reliance on modern application protocols designed to improve performance.

And yet optimizing the performance of applications remains a top challenge for most organizations, particularly when those applications are spread across a hybrid IT estate that includes core, public cloud, and edge.

Even if there were a magic performance wand, organizations would still need to know there was a problem and then do something about it — at Internet speed. Most organizations still lack the technical capability to observe application usage in real-time and even fewer can react quickly enough to do something about it.

We know this because we survey global organizations every year and specifically ask about measures that indicate digital maturity, including usage of telemetry (real-time operational data) and automation capabilities. We compile the results into a <span style="font-style: italic;">Digital Enterprise Maturity Index</span>.

This year, we found greater digital maturity across the six key technical capabilities, but automation maturity remains an elusive goal. Although we discovered that the most mature organizations are using telemetry to drive automation, less than one-third of organizations are considered digitally mature, or "digital doers." Those organizations are reaping benefits, with 53% reporting greater consistency, 71% enjoying cost savings, and 80% gaining greater operational efficiencies.  

But the bulk of organizations today still rely mostly on human-driven scripts to make configuration and policy changes that adjust delivery and security services. The gap between discovering a problem, determining the fix for it, and manually pushing a solution is problematic. Consumers have short attention spans and are more likely to walk away than wait for a resolution.

One of the uses of AIOps is to close that gap between discovering a problem and fixing it, whether that be related to performance, availability, or security. Prior to the introduction of generative AI, AI in the realm of application performance management was largely predictive if it was used at all. AIOps was largely ignored as though it were science fiction.

The accessibility of a system that can generate not just answers to homework questions but code, configurations, and queries has reignited excitement about AIOps. By leveraging the ability of predictive AI to ferret out anomalies and problems and marrying that with the capabilities of generative AI, a data-driven, closed loop automation capability emerges.

Our analysis found that the top two uses of telemetry by the most digitally mature organizations were exactly the uses needed for such a closed loop system: 75% use telemetry to drive automation and 66% rely on telemetry for root-cause analysis. In fact, the most mature organizations use telemetry in every way far more than the least digitally mature — "digital dawdlers" — who are least likely to employ telemetry for any use beyond alerting.

Our maturity model also measures the actual use of automation across application delivery and security, the most prevalent tools and technology used for application performance, availability, and security. We dive deeper here because the broad "use of telemetry to drive automation" does not specify what automation is being driven.

Overall, about 40% of respondents have automated app and API security functions and a mere 23% have automated app delivery. For those who have not automated, the reasons cited vary little based on maturity. For 51% of digital doers, budget gets in the way. "Digital dabblers" — organizations of intermediate maturity — are most likely to cite skillsets as holding up their automation journey.

What's exciting is that generative AI can address both these issues. The former by reducing the cost to implement and operate automation, and the latter by assisting in the generation and even invocation of appropriate APIs to make changes.

Respondents are aware of these capabilities. Respondents of all digital maturity levels overwhelmingly told us the most valuable use of generative AI for both application delivery and security was automation, foreshadowing the coming of AIOps to an IT environment near you.

What we learned this year from our research was that organizations are maturing at different rates across different technical capabilities. But they are maturing and when it comes to application performance and security management, they are maturing toward a future that leverages the power of telemetry and harnesses AI to overcome the challenges that keep them from becoming a digital business. 

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.