Skip to main content

OTel Myth Busting: Untapping the Hidden Value of Logs in Observability

Bill Peterson
Sumo Logic

As software systems become more intricate, observability becomes even more essential to monitoring and managing performance across digital environments. As we know it today, observability relies on three pillars — logs, metrics and traces — to gain valuable system insights, troubleshoot and ensure system reliability.

While all three have played an important role, due to disparate data sources and a longstanding myth that logs only have backward-looking purposes, logs' unique capabilities have remained untapped.

Logs offer exceptional benefits for real-time observability by consistently capturing system events without needing special instrumentation or code modifications. While application logs involve more complexity and fine tuning for specific needs, basic infrastructure logs can be automatically generated as part of system operations, providing a continuous stream of actionable data that are often underestimated as a valuable observability tool.

OpenTelemetry (OTel) has revolutionized the way we approach observability by standardizing the collection of this telemetry data, but is often characterized primarily by its tracing capabilities. This is partly due to its evolution from two open-source Google projects that were tracing oriented. Traces offer many benefits, like helping you identify bottlenecks and failures across services. However, the human element of managing this data, especially in cases of large volumes, can introduce additional overhead and present security risks.

Unlike traces, logs are automatically generated as a byproduct of normal system operations. In other words, logs are data exhaust — they exist regardless of an application's architecture or how well its code is built. They offer organizations a consistent source of information that requires no instrumentation or modification of code. By leveraging a log management system to process intricate log data and structure it effectively, you can fully unlock the telemetry capabilities that logs provide.

Here are five myths — and truths — to help elevate your OTel integration by harnessing the untapped power of logs.

1. Myth: OTel is best for traces and metrics - not logs

Myth Busted: Despite the common assumption that OTel was built for traces and thus primarily supports tracing, the logging capabilities within OTel are vast and constantly expanding. For example, syslog-ng, an open-source log management tool, now features opentelemetry() source and destination, which can handle logs, traces and metrics using OTLP/gRPC.

2. Myth: Logs are too complex for OTel

Myth Busted: Due to their structural simplicity, metrics and traces can be easier to work with than logs. However, new log ingest and log management capabilities solve this challenge. Services that offer comprehensive log management capabilities, including schema on demand and structured and unstructured logs, can enable organizations to seamlessly ingest their data without the need for extensive reconfiguration.

3. Myth: Logs are expensive and difficult to scale

Myth Busted: Yes, logs generate large amounts of data, but modern log management solutions have created a sustainable approach to reducing costs. Organizations should seek storage solutions built with big data in mind, especially those that don't tie pricing to data volume.

4. Myth: Logs are retroactive, not proactive

Myth Busted: Logs were traditionally viewed as an investigational resource to pinpoint what went wrong following an incident. However, their current applications are much more versatile. They offer real-time insights into observability workflows and integrate with OTel to provide proactive monitoring, faster troubleshooting and quicker root-cause analysis, enabling you to prevent incidents before they occur.

5. Myth: Traces alone are sufficient for observability

Myth Busted: While traces offer valuable insights into distributed system performance and progress, they require instrumentation and can overlook important operational data. Logs, on the other hand, capture critical insights across all system activities regardless of instrumentation, ensuring full visibility into your systems.

Logging initiatives have come a long way since their inception, especially thanks to unified log management systems. By embracing their capabilities in OTel workflows, you can achieve a more complete picture of your digital environment. Telemetry data can be turned into actionable insights across systems, creating a modern, comprehensive observability framework that grows with your organization. Just as with OTel, the same myth-busting approach can elevate your overall observability strategy, helping you harness its full potential. 

Bill Peterson is Senior Director Product Marketing for Observability and Partner Product Marketing at Sumo Logic

Hot Topics

The Latest

Today's modern systems are not what they once were. Organizations now rely on distributed systems, event-driven workflows, hybrid and multi-cloud environments and continuous delivery pipelines. While each adds flexibility, it also introduces new, often invisible failures. Development speed is no longer the primary bottleneck of innovation. Reliability is ...

Seeing is believing, or in this case, seeing is understanding, according to New Relic's 2025 Observability Forecast for Retail and eCommerce report. Retailers who want to provide exceptional customer experiences while improving IT operations efficiency are leaning on observability ... Here are five key takeaways from the report ...

Technology leaders across the federal landscape are facing, and will continue to face, an uphill battle when it comes to fortifying their digital environments against hostile and persistent threat actors. On one hand, they are being asked to push digital transformation ... On the other hand, they are facing the fiscal uncertainty of continuing resolutions (CR) and government shutdowns looming near and far. In the face of these challenges, CIOs, CTOs, and CISOs must figure out how to modernize legacy systems and infrastructure while doing more with less and still defending against external and internal threats ...

Reliability is no longer proven by uptime alone, according to the The SRE Report 2026 from LogicMonitor. In the AI era, it is experienced through speed, consistency, and user trust, and increasingly judged by business impact. As digital services grow more complex and AI systems move into production, traditional monitoring approaches are struggling to keep pace, increasing the need for AI-first observability that spans applications, infrastructure, and the Internet ...

If AI is the engine of a modern organization, then data engineering is the road system beneath it. You can build the most powerful engine in the world, but without paved roads, traffic signals, and bridges that can support its weight, it will stall. In many enterprises, the engine is ready. The roads are not ...

In the world of digital-first business, there is no tolerance for service outages. Businesses know that outages are the quickest way to lose money and customers. For smaller organizations, unplanned downtime could even force the business to close ... A new study from PagerDuty, The State of AI-First Operations, reveals that companies actively incorporating AI into operations now view operational resilience as a growth driver rather than a cost center. But how are they achieving it? ...

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

OTel Myth Busting: Untapping the Hidden Value of Logs in Observability

Bill Peterson
Sumo Logic

As software systems become more intricate, observability becomes even more essential to monitoring and managing performance across digital environments. As we know it today, observability relies on three pillars — logs, metrics and traces — to gain valuable system insights, troubleshoot and ensure system reliability.

While all three have played an important role, due to disparate data sources and a longstanding myth that logs only have backward-looking purposes, logs' unique capabilities have remained untapped.

Logs offer exceptional benefits for real-time observability by consistently capturing system events without needing special instrumentation or code modifications. While application logs involve more complexity and fine tuning for specific needs, basic infrastructure logs can be automatically generated as part of system operations, providing a continuous stream of actionable data that are often underestimated as a valuable observability tool.

OpenTelemetry (OTel) has revolutionized the way we approach observability by standardizing the collection of this telemetry data, but is often characterized primarily by its tracing capabilities. This is partly due to its evolution from two open-source Google projects that were tracing oriented. Traces offer many benefits, like helping you identify bottlenecks and failures across services. However, the human element of managing this data, especially in cases of large volumes, can introduce additional overhead and present security risks.

Unlike traces, logs are automatically generated as a byproduct of normal system operations. In other words, logs are data exhaust — they exist regardless of an application's architecture or how well its code is built. They offer organizations a consistent source of information that requires no instrumentation or modification of code. By leveraging a log management system to process intricate log data and structure it effectively, you can fully unlock the telemetry capabilities that logs provide.

Here are five myths — and truths — to help elevate your OTel integration by harnessing the untapped power of logs.

1. Myth: OTel is best for traces and metrics - not logs

Myth Busted: Despite the common assumption that OTel was built for traces and thus primarily supports tracing, the logging capabilities within OTel are vast and constantly expanding. For example, syslog-ng, an open-source log management tool, now features opentelemetry() source and destination, which can handle logs, traces and metrics using OTLP/gRPC.

2. Myth: Logs are too complex for OTel

Myth Busted: Due to their structural simplicity, metrics and traces can be easier to work with than logs. However, new log ingest and log management capabilities solve this challenge. Services that offer comprehensive log management capabilities, including schema on demand and structured and unstructured logs, can enable organizations to seamlessly ingest their data without the need for extensive reconfiguration.

3. Myth: Logs are expensive and difficult to scale

Myth Busted: Yes, logs generate large amounts of data, but modern log management solutions have created a sustainable approach to reducing costs. Organizations should seek storage solutions built with big data in mind, especially those that don't tie pricing to data volume.

4. Myth: Logs are retroactive, not proactive

Myth Busted: Logs were traditionally viewed as an investigational resource to pinpoint what went wrong following an incident. However, their current applications are much more versatile. They offer real-time insights into observability workflows and integrate with OTel to provide proactive monitoring, faster troubleshooting and quicker root-cause analysis, enabling you to prevent incidents before they occur.

5. Myth: Traces alone are sufficient for observability

Myth Busted: While traces offer valuable insights into distributed system performance and progress, they require instrumentation and can overlook important operational data. Logs, on the other hand, capture critical insights across all system activities regardless of instrumentation, ensuring full visibility into your systems.

Logging initiatives have come a long way since their inception, especially thanks to unified log management systems. By embracing their capabilities in OTel workflows, you can achieve a more complete picture of your digital environment. Telemetry data can be turned into actionable insights across systems, creating a modern, comprehensive observability framework that grows with your organization. Just as with OTel, the same myth-busting approach can elevate your overall observability strategy, helping you harness its full potential. 

Bill Peterson is Senior Director Product Marketing for Observability and Partner Product Marketing at Sumo Logic

Hot Topics

The Latest

Today's modern systems are not what they once were. Organizations now rely on distributed systems, event-driven workflows, hybrid and multi-cloud environments and continuous delivery pipelines. While each adds flexibility, it also introduces new, often invisible failures. Development speed is no longer the primary bottleneck of innovation. Reliability is ...

Seeing is believing, or in this case, seeing is understanding, according to New Relic's 2025 Observability Forecast for Retail and eCommerce report. Retailers who want to provide exceptional customer experiences while improving IT operations efficiency are leaning on observability ... Here are five key takeaways from the report ...

Technology leaders across the federal landscape are facing, and will continue to face, an uphill battle when it comes to fortifying their digital environments against hostile and persistent threat actors. On one hand, they are being asked to push digital transformation ... On the other hand, they are facing the fiscal uncertainty of continuing resolutions (CR) and government shutdowns looming near and far. In the face of these challenges, CIOs, CTOs, and CISOs must figure out how to modernize legacy systems and infrastructure while doing more with less and still defending against external and internal threats ...

Reliability is no longer proven by uptime alone, according to the The SRE Report 2026 from LogicMonitor. In the AI era, it is experienced through speed, consistency, and user trust, and increasingly judged by business impact. As digital services grow more complex and AI systems move into production, traditional monitoring approaches are struggling to keep pace, increasing the need for AI-first observability that spans applications, infrastructure, and the Internet ...

If AI is the engine of a modern organization, then data engineering is the road system beneath it. You can build the most powerful engine in the world, but without paved roads, traffic signals, and bridges that can support its weight, it will stall. In many enterprises, the engine is ready. The roads are not ...

In the world of digital-first business, there is no tolerance for service outages. Businesses know that outages are the quickest way to lose money and customers. For smaller organizations, unplanned downtime could even force the business to close ... A new study from PagerDuty, The State of AI-First Operations, reveals that companies actively incorporating AI into operations now view operational resilience as a growth driver rather than a cost center. But how are they achieving it? ...

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...