Skip to main content

OTel Myth Busting: Untapping the Hidden Value of Logs in Observability

Bill Peterson
Sumo Logic

As software systems become more intricate, observability becomes even more essential to monitoring and managing performance across digital environments. As we know it today, observability relies on three pillars — logs, metrics and traces — to gain valuable system insights, troubleshoot and ensure system reliability.

While all three have played an important role, due to disparate data sources and a longstanding myth that logs only have backward-looking purposes, logs' unique capabilities have remained untapped.

Logs offer exceptional benefits for real-time observability by consistently capturing system events without needing special instrumentation or code modifications. While application logs involve more complexity and fine tuning for specific needs, basic infrastructure logs can be automatically generated as part of system operations, providing a continuous stream of actionable data that are often underestimated as a valuable observability tool.

OpenTelemetry (OTel) has revolutionized the way we approach observability by standardizing the collection of this telemetry data, but is often characterized primarily by its tracing capabilities. This is partly due to its evolution from two open-source Google projects that were tracing oriented. Traces offer many benefits, like helping you identify bottlenecks and failures across services. However, the human element of managing this data, especially in cases of large volumes, can introduce additional overhead and present security risks.

Unlike traces, logs are automatically generated as a byproduct of normal system operations. In other words, logs are data exhaust — they exist regardless of an application's architecture or how well its code is built. They offer organizations a consistent source of information that requires no instrumentation or modification of code. By leveraging a log management system to process intricate log data and structure it effectively, you can fully unlock the telemetry capabilities that logs provide.

Here are five myths — and truths — to help elevate your OTel integration by harnessing the untapped power of logs.

1. Myth: OTel is best for traces and metrics - not logs

Myth Busted: Despite the common assumption that OTel was built for traces and thus primarily supports tracing, the logging capabilities within OTel are vast and constantly expanding. For example, syslog-ng, an open-source log management tool, now features opentelemetry() source and destination, which can handle logs, traces and metrics using OTLP/gRPC.

2. Myth: Logs are too complex for OTel

Myth Busted: Due to their structural simplicity, metrics and traces can be easier to work with than logs. However, new log ingest and log management capabilities solve this challenge. Services that offer comprehensive log management capabilities, including schema on demand and structured and unstructured logs, can enable organizations to seamlessly ingest their data without the need for extensive reconfiguration.

3. Myth: Logs are expensive and difficult to scale

Myth Busted: Yes, logs generate large amounts of data, but modern log management solutions have created a sustainable approach to reducing costs. Organizations should seek storage solutions built with big data in mind, especially those that don't tie pricing to data volume.

4. Myth: Logs are retroactive, not proactive

Myth Busted: Logs were traditionally viewed as an investigational resource to pinpoint what went wrong following an incident. However, their current applications are much more versatile. They offer real-time insights into observability workflows and integrate with OTel to provide proactive monitoring, faster troubleshooting and quicker root-cause analysis, enabling you to prevent incidents before they occur.

5. Myth: Traces alone are sufficient for observability

Myth Busted: While traces offer valuable insights into distributed system performance and progress, they require instrumentation and can overlook important operational data. Logs, on the other hand, capture critical insights across all system activities regardless of instrumentation, ensuring full visibility into your systems.

Logging initiatives have come a long way since their inception, especially thanks to unified log management systems. By embracing their capabilities in OTel workflows, you can achieve a more complete picture of your digital environment. Telemetry data can be turned into actionable insights across systems, creating a modern, comprehensive observability framework that grows with your organization. Just as with OTel, the same myth-busting approach can elevate your overall observability strategy, helping you harness its full potential. 

Bill Peterson is Senior Director Product Marketing for Observability and Partner Product Marketing at Sumo Logic

Hot Topics

The Latest

Most organizations approach OpenTelemetry as a collection of individual tools they need to assemble from scratch. This view misses the bigger picture. OpenTelemetry is a complete telemetry framework with composable components that address specific problems at different stages of organizational maturity. You start with what you need today and adopt additional pieces as your observability practices evolve ...

One of the earliest lessons I learned from architecting throughput-heavy services is that simplicity wins repeatedly: fewer moving parts, loosely coupled execution (fewer synchronous calls), and precise timing metering. You want data and decisions to travel the shortest possible path. The goal is to build a system where every strategy and each line of code (contention is the key metric) complements the decision trees ...

As discussions around AI "autonomous coworkers" accelerate, many industry projections assume that agents will soon operate alongside human staff in making decisions, taking actions, and managing tasks with minimal oversight. But a growing number of critics (including some of the developers building these systems) argue that the industry still has a long way to go to be able to treat AI agents like fully trusted teammates ...

Enterprise AI has entered a transformational phase where, according to Digitate's recently released survey, Agentic AI and the Future of Enterprise IT, companies are moving beyond traditional automation toward Agentic AI systems designed to reason, adapt, and collaborate alongside human teams ...

The numbers back this urgency up. A recent Zapier survey shows that 92% of enterprises now treat AI as a top priority. Leaders want it, and teams are clamoring for it. But if you look closer at the operations of these companies, you see a different picture. The rollout is slow. The results are often delayed. There's a disconnect between what leaders want and what their technical infrastructure can handle ...

Kyndryl's 2025 Readiness Report revealed that 61% of global business and technology leaders report increasing pressure from boards and regulators to prove AI's ROI. As the technology evolves and expectations continue to rise, leaders are compelled to generate and prove impact before scaling further. This will lead to a decisive turning point in 2026 ...

Cloudflare's disruption illustrates how quickly a single provider's issue cascades into widespread exposure. Many organizations don't fully realize how tightly their systems are coupled to thirdparty services, or how quickly availability and security concerns align when those services falter ... You can't avoid these dependencies, but you can understand them ...

If you work with AI, you know this story. A model performs during testing, looks great in early reviews, works perfectly in production and then slowly loses relevance after operating for a while. Everything on the surface looks perfect — pipelines are running, predictions or recommendations are error-free, data quality checks show green; yet outcomes don't meet the ground reality. This pattern often repeats across enterprise AI programs. Take for example, a mid-sized retail banking and wealth-management firm with heavy investments in AI-powered risk analytics, fraud detection and personalized credit-decisioning systems. The model worked well for a while, but transactions increased, so did false positives by 18% ...

Basic uptime is no longer the gold standard. By 2026, network monitoring must do more than report status, it must explain performance in a hybrid-first world. Networks are no longer just static support systems; they are agile, distributed architectures that sit at the very heart of the customer experience and the business outcomes ... The following five trends represent the new standard for network health, providing a blueprint for teams to move from reactive troubleshooting to a proactive, integrated future ...

APMdigest's Predictions Series concludes with 2026 AI Predictions — industry experts offer predictions on how AI and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2026. Part 5, the final installment, covers AI's impacts on IT teams ...

OTel Myth Busting: Untapping the Hidden Value of Logs in Observability

Bill Peterson
Sumo Logic

As software systems become more intricate, observability becomes even more essential to monitoring and managing performance across digital environments. As we know it today, observability relies on three pillars — logs, metrics and traces — to gain valuable system insights, troubleshoot and ensure system reliability.

While all three have played an important role, due to disparate data sources and a longstanding myth that logs only have backward-looking purposes, logs' unique capabilities have remained untapped.

Logs offer exceptional benefits for real-time observability by consistently capturing system events without needing special instrumentation or code modifications. While application logs involve more complexity and fine tuning for specific needs, basic infrastructure logs can be automatically generated as part of system operations, providing a continuous stream of actionable data that are often underestimated as a valuable observability tool.

OpenTelemetry (OTel) has revolutionized the way we approach observability by standardizing the collection of this telemetry data, but is often characterized primarily by its tracing capabilities. This is partly due to its evolution from two open-source Google projects that were tracing oriented. Traces offer many benefits, like helping you identify bottlenecks and failures across services. However, the human element of managing this data, especially in cases of large volumes, can introduce additional overhead and present security risks.

Unlike traces, logs are automatically generated as a byproduct of normal system operations. In other words, logs are data exhaust — they exist regardless of an application's architecture or how well its code is built. They offer organizations a consistent source of information that requires no instrumentation or modification of code. By leveraging a log management system to process intricate log data and structure it effectively, you can fully unlock the telemetry capabilities that logs provide.

Here are five myths — and truths — to help elevate your OTel integration by harnessing the untapped power of logs.

1. Myth: OTel is best for traces and metrics - not logs

Myth Busted: Despite the common assumption that OTel was built for traces and thus primarily supports tracing, the logging capabilities within OTel are vast and constantly expanding. For example, syslog-ng, an open-source log management tool, now features opentelemetry() source and destination, which can handle logs, traces and metrics using OTLP/gRPC.

2. Myth: Logs are too complex for OTel

Myth Busted: Due to their structural simplicity, metrics and traces can be easier to work with than logs. However, new log ingest and log management capabilities solve this challenge. Services that offer comprehensive log management capabilities, including schema on demand and structured and unstructured logs, can enable organizations to seamlessly ingest their data without the need for extensive reconfiguration.

3. Myth: Logs are expensive and difficult to scale

Myth Busted: Yes, logs generate large amounts of data, but modern log management solutions have created a sustainable approach to reducing costs. Organizations should seek storage solutions built with big data in mind, especially those that don't tie pricing to data volume.

4. Myth: Logs are retroactive, not proactive

Myth Busted: Logs were traditionally viewed as an investigational resource to pinpoint what went wrong following an incident. However, their current applications are much more versatile. They offer real-time insights into observability workflows and integrate with OTel to provide proactive monitoring, faster troubleshooting and quicker root-cause analysis, enabling you to prevent incidents before they occur.

5. Myth: Traces alone are sufficient for observability

Myth Busted: While traces offer valuable insights into distributed system performance and progress, they require instrumentation and can overlook important operational data. Logs, on the other hand, capture critical insights across all system activities regardless of instrumentation, ensuring full visibility into your systems.

Logging initiatives have come a long way since their inception, especially thanks to unified log management systems. By embracing their capabilities in OTel workflows, you can achieve a more complete picture of your digital environment. Telemetry data can be turned into actionable insights across systems, creating a modern, comprehensive observability framework that grows with your organization. Just as with OTel, the same myth-busting approach can elevate your overall observability strategy, helping you harness its full potential. 

Bill Peterson is Senior Director Product Marketing for Observability and Partner Product Marketing at Sumo Logic

Hot Topics

The Latest

Most organizations approach OpenTelemetry as a collection of individual tools they need to assemble from scratch. This view misses the bigger picture. OpenTelemetry is a complete telemetry framework with composable components that address specific problems at different stages of organizational maturity. You start with what you need today and adopt additional pieces as your observability practices evolve ...

One of the earliest lessons I learned from architecting throughput-heavy services is that simplicity wins repeatedly: fewer moving parts, loosely coupled execution (fewer synchronous calls), and precise timing metering. You want data and decisions to travel the shortest possible path. The goal is to build a system where every strategy and each line of code (contention is the key metric) complements the decision trees ...

As discussions around AI "autonomous coworkers" accelerate, many industry projections assume that agents will soon operate alongside human staff in making decisions, taking actions, and managing tasks with minimal oversight. But a growing number of critics (including some of the developers building these systems) argue that the industry still has a long way to go to be able to treat AI agents like fully trusted teammates ...

Enterprise AI has entered a transformational phase where, according to Digitate's recently released survey, Agentic AI and the Future of Enterprise IT, companies are moving beyond traditional automation toward Agentic AI systems designed to reason, adapt, and collaborate alongside human teams ...

The numbers back this urgency up. A recent Zapier survey shows that 92% of enterprises now treat AI as a top priority. Leaders want it, and teams are clamoring for it. But if you look closer at the operations of these companies, you see a different picture. The rollout is slow. The results are often delayed. There's a disconnect between what leaders want and what their technical infrastructure can handle ...

Kyndryl's 2025 Readiness Report revealed that 61% of global business and technology leaders report increasing pressure from boards and regulators to prove AI's ROI. As the technology evolves and expectations continue to rise, leaders are compelled to generate and prove impact before scaling further. This will lead to a decisive turning point in 2026 ...

Cloudflare's disruption illustrates how quickly a single provider's issue cascades into widespread exposure. Many organizations don't fully realize how tightly their systems are coupled to thirdparty services, or how quickly availability and security concerns align when those services falter ... You can't avoid these dependencies, but you can understand them ...

If you work with AI, you know this story. A model performs during testing, looks great in early reviews, works perfectly in production and then slowly loses relevance after operating for a while. Everything on the surface looks perfect — pipelines are running, predictions or recommendations are error-free, data quality checks show green; yet outcomes don't meet the ground reality. This pattern often repeats across enterprise AI programs. Take for example, a mid-sized retail banking and wealth-management firm with heavy investments in AI-powered risk analytics, fraud detection and personalized credit-decisioning systems. The model worked well for a while, but transactions increased, so did false positives by 18% ...

Basic uptime is no longer the gold standard. By 2026, network monitoring must do more than report status, it must explain performance in a hybrid-first world. Networks are no longer just static support systems; they are agile, distributed architectures that sit at the very heart of the customer experience and the business outcomes ... The following five trends represent the new standard for network health, providing a blueprint for teams to move from reactive troubleshooting to a proactive, integrated future ...

APMdigest's Predictions Series concludes with 2026 AI Predictions — industry experts offer predictions on how AI and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2026. Part 5, the final installment, covers AI's impacts on IT teams ...