Planning for the Long-Tail Cloud

Jevon MacDonald
Manifold

Do you get excited when you discover a new service from one of the top three public clouds or a new public cloud provider? I do. But every time you feel excited about new cloud offerings, you should also feel a twinge of fear. Because in the tech world, each time we introduce something new we also add a new point of failure for our application and potentially a service we are stuck with. This is why thinking about the long-tail cloud for your organization is important.

What is the Long-Tail Cloud?

You can't predict the future, nor should you try to. What you should do is realize that change in the tech space is constant, and creating a framework for change is critical. Organizations that architect themselves into a corner today, no matter how cutting-edge-tech, are destined to become a dinosaur in a few years. The reason for this is that they did not build their delivery chain and infrastructure in a way that allows them to easily adopt new technologies as they evolve, but rather in a painful waterfall fashion every six years or so.

The long-tail cloud takes into account the long-term cloud strategy of your organization. It's a mindset that embraces change, avoids lock-in, and stewards on-going evolution of their environment.

Creating a Framework for Change

There are several things required in order to create a framework of change. Some tactical and some strategic.

1. Embrace change: Your Ops and Dev teams need to embrace the idea that there is a good chance the way they are currently working and the infrastructure they are using will likely change dramatically in the next six months to a year. Just compare how quickly docker containers went to Kubernetes, and now Kubernetes to serverless. In order to compete, development teams should be able to leverage new technologies when it makes sense.

2. Know what you have, and what you don't: Having visibility into the services you are using — and that you are not using — is very important. This helps you quickly identify gaps and overlap. Visibility ideally also means you see what you are missing, and can compare your services with others. Visibility can come in the form of actual UI/UX where you can eyeball services that you have, and identify new ones. But it should also have built-in interfaces for your developers to do the same in their standard dev environments like CLI. And finally, it should help you get an understanding of your costing.

3. Right tool for the job: This is a biggy. Because your application runs 90% on AWS, Google, or Azure exclusively, does not mean that if the right purpose-built cloud service comes along you should avoid it just because it's not running on your public cloud of choice. Conversely, organizations also make the mistake of picking less than ideal public cloud services just because they're available in their public cloud of choice, versus focusing on what is best for their users.

4. Specialization is key to giving your users the functionality they want: As we move beyond the generalist cloud services, in many modern applications their highly specialized functionality will require highly specialized cloud services. Specialized IoT, Machine-learning, BigData, etc. services, and APIs will become more commonplace. Organizations need to easily adopt these tools for their application to stay ahead.

The Risk of Cloud Exclusivity

There are some risks that come with being architected for a single public cloud.

1. It impacts your application architecture and features. Many dev teams find they are tailoring functionality to fit their public cloud when it should actually be the other way around. The cloud provider should be able to support anything you throw at it.

2. Your cloud provider could make drastic shifts in their strategies, which could be inconsistent or even contrary to your organization's. They also hold the keys to your pocketbook, and without options, they can modify pricing with little recourse for you.

3. Your security and stability exposure is equivalent and never better than the single cloud you run on. With only a single cloud, your application availability is only as good as theirs, and you are powerless to any exploits they face, or outages. We have learned that whole public cloud regions can go down.

These three reasons are why multi-cloud has become such a popular term, and why organizations are really considering it. But, they also need to think about the mechanism for supporting it.

Engineering Change

There is a sense of security that comes with committing to a single public cloud. It makes it easy to adopt new technologies IF the public cloud provider has them, and it avoids some internal communication because the broader cloud offering has already been approved.

But this also comes at a cost. It can force application teams to architect their applications in a way that is not optimal for its users. It can also force a lock-in that prevents organizations from embracing change should it make sense, or they need to.

Organizations can engineer change by changing their mindset, deciding not to be cloud exclusive, and considering tooling that gives them the visibility and ability to adopt cloud services that are the right fit for their application and organization.

Jevon MacDonald is Co-Founder and CEO of Manifold

Related Links

Hot Topics

The Latest

Closing the Gap in Modern Tech and the Tools Meant to Monitor Them

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Podcast - Episode 23: NetOps Labor Shortage

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Why FinOps Rewrote Its Mission and What It Signals for Technology Management

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Clearing the Path to AI: Why Vendor Consolidation Matters Now

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Cold Data, Hot Problem: Why AI Is Rewriting Enterprise Storage Strategy

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

Observability at a Crossroads: AI, Economics, Complexity and the Enduring Power of Open Source

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

Explainability Is the New Battleground in AI-Powered Observability

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

Empowering the Human Side of the Autonomous IT Age

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI Scale Is Outpacing Infrastructure - and IT Leaders Are Running Out of Time

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

No Escalations ≠ No Work: Why Visibility in DevOps Matters More Now That AI Is Accelerating Everything

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

Planning for the Long-Tail Cloud

Jevon MacDonald
Manifold

Do you get excited when you discover a new service from one of the top three public clouds or a new public cloud provider? I do. But every time you feel excited about new cloud offerings, you should also feel a twinge of fear. Because in the tech world, each time we introduce something new we also add a new point of failure for our application and potentially a service we are stuck with. This is why thinking about the long-tail cloud for your organization is important.

What is the Long-Tail Cloud?

You can't predict the future, nor should you try to. What you should do is realize that change in the tech space is constant, and creating a framework for change is critical. Organizations that architect themselves into a corner today, no matter how cutting-edge-tech, are destined to become a dinosaur in a few years. The reason for this is that they did not build their delivery chain and infrastructure in a way that allows them to easily adopt new technologies as they evolve, but rather in a painful waterfall fashion every six years or so.

The long-tail cloud takes into account the long-term cloud strategy of your organization. It's a mindset that embraces change, avoids lock-in, and stewards on-going evolution of their environment.

Creating a Framework for Change

There are several things required in order to create a framework of change. Some tactical and some strategic.

1. Embrace change: Your Ops and Dev teams need to embrace the idea that there is a good chance the way they are currently working and the infrastructure they are using will likely change dramatically in the next six months to a year. Just compare how quickly docker containers went to Kubernetes, and now Kubernetes to serverless. In order to compete, development teams should be able to leverage new technologies when it makes sense.

2. Know what you have, and what you don't: Having visibility into the services you are using — and that you are not using — is very important. This helps you quickly identify gaps and overlap. Visibility ideally also means you see what you are missing, and can compare your services with others. Visibility can come in the form of actual UI/UX where you can eyeball services that you have, and identify new ones. But it should also have built-in interfaces for your developers to do the same in their standard dev environments like CLI. And finally, it should help you get an understanding of your costing.

3. Right tool for the job: This is a biggy. Because your application runs 90% on AWS, Google, or Azure exclusively, does not mean that if the right purpose-built cloud service comes along you should avoid it just because it's not running on your public cloud of choice. Conversely, organizations also make the mistake of picking less than ideal public cloud services just because they're available in their public cloud of choice, versus focusing on what is best for their users.

4. Specialization is key to giving your users the functionality they want: As we move beyond the generalist cloud services, in many modern applications their highly specialized functionality will require highly specialized cloud services. Specialized IoT, Machine-learning, BigData, etc. services, and APIs will become more commonplace. Organizations need to easily adopt these tools for their application to stay ahead.

The Risk of Cloud Exclusivity

There are some risks that come with being architected for a single public cloud.

1. It impacts your application architecture and features. Many dev teams find they are tailoring functionality to fit their public cloud when it should actually be the other way around. The cloud provider should be able to support anything you throw at it.

2. Your cloud provider could make drastic shifts in their strategies, which could be inconsistent or even contrary to your organization's. They also hold the keys to your pocketbook, and without options, they can modify pricing with little recourse for you.

3. Your security and stability exposure is equivalent and never better than the single cloud you run on. With only a single cloud, your application availability is only as good as theirs, and you are powerless to any exploits they face, or outages. We have learned that whole public cloud regions can go down.

These three reasons are why multi-cloud has become such a popular term, and why organizations are really considering it. But, they also need to think about the mechanism for supporting it.

Engineering Change

There is a sense of security that comes with committing to a single public cloud. It makes it easy to adopt new technologies IF the public cloud provider has them, and it avoids some internal communication because the broader cloud offering has already been approved.

But this also comes at a cost. It can force application teams to architect their applications in a way that is not optimal for its users. It can also force a lock-in that prevents organizations from embracing change should it make sense, or they need to.

Organizations can engineer change by changing their mindset, deciding not to be cloud exclusive, and considering tooling that gives them the visibility and ability to adopt cloud services that are the right fit for their application and organization.

Jevon MacDonald is Co-Founder and CEO of Manifold

Related Links

Hot Topics

The Latest

Closing the Gap in Modern Tech and the Tools Meant to Monitor Them

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Podcast - Episode 23: NetOps Labor Shortage

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Why FinOps Rewrote Its Mission and What It Signals for Technology Management

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Clearing the Path to AI: Why Vendor Consolidation Matters Now

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Cold Data, Hot Problem: Why AI Is Rewriting Enterprise Storage Strategy

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

Observability at a Crossroads: AI, Economics, Complexity and the Enduring Power of Open Source

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

Explainability Is the New Battleground in AI-Powered Observability

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

Empowering the Human Side of the Autonomous IT Age

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI Scale Is Outpacing Infrastructure - and IT Leaders Are Running Out of Time

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

No Escalations ≠ No Work: Why Visibility in DevOps Matters More Now That AI Is Accelerating Everything

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...